Effects of multilevel versus unilevel metacognitive training on mathematical reasoning

Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 94, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 292-300

  Kramarski, Bracha ^a   Mevarech, Zemira R ^a   Lieberman, Adiva ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Authentic tasks; Cooperative learning; Metacognitive training

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037796934     PISSN: 00220671     EISSN: 19400675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220670109598765     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Cai, J., Lane, S., & Jakabcsin, M. S. (1996). The role of open-ended tasks and holistic scoring rubrics: Assessing students' mathematical reasoning and communication. In P. C. Elliott & M. J. Kenney (Eds.), Communication in mathematics, K-12 and beyond (pp. 137-145). New York: Academic Press
2. Cecil, S. J., & Roazzi, A. (1994). The effects of context on cognition: Postcards from Brazil. In J. S. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.), Mind in context: Interactionist perspectives on human intelligence (pp. 74-100). England: Academic Press
3. Chi, M., de Leeuv, N., Chiu, M.-H., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting selfexplanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477
4. Cossey, R. (1997). Mathematical communication: Issues of access and equity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University
5. Hoek, D., van den Eden, P., & Terwel, J. (1999). The effects of integrated social and cognitive strategy instruction on the mathematics achievement in secondary education. Learning and Instruction, 9, 427-448
6. King, A. (1991). Effects of training in strategic questioning on children's problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 307-317
7. King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 338-368
8. Kramarski, B., & Mevarech, Z. R. (1997). Cognitive-metacognitive training within a problem-solving based Logo environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 425-445
9. Masui, C., & De Corte, E. (1999). Enhancing learning and problem solving skills: Orienting and self-judging, two powerful and training learning tools. Learning and Instruction, 9(6), 517-542
10. Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (1997). IMPROVE: A multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 365-395
11. Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (in press). The effects of metacognitive training versus worked-out examples on students' mathematical reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology
12. Montague, M., & Bos, C. S. (1990). Cognitive and metacognitive characteristics of eighth-grade students' mathematical problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 371-388
13. Perkins, D. N. (1992). Smart schools: From educating memories to educating minds. New York: Free Press
14. Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically-communication in mathematics classrooms. In M. Stubbs (Ed.), Language, education and society series. London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul
15. Pimm, D. (1996). Diverse communication. In P. C. Elliott & M. J. Kenney (Eds.), Communication in mathematics, K-12 and beyond (pp. 11-20). New York: Academic Press
16. Pressley, M. (1986). The relevance of the good strategy user model to the teaching of mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 21, 139-161
17. Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Guterman, E. (1989). The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognition from a reading partner. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 620-627
18. Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43-69
19. Webb, N. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-40
20. Wittrock, M. C. (1986). Students' thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan