How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments?

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 24-33

  Kramarski, B ^a   Gutman, M ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

E learning; mathematics; supporting self regulated learning; transfer

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645112145     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: 13652729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00157.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Azevedo R. & Cromley J.G. (2004) Does training of self-regulated learning facilitate student's learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology 96, 523-535.
2. Butler D.L. & Cartier S.C. (2005) Multiple complementary methods for understanding self-regulated learning as situated in context. Accepted for presentation at the April 2005 Annual Meetings of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, QC.
3. Collins A. (1996) Design issues for learning environments. In International Perspectives on the Design of Technology-Supported Learning Environments (eds S. Vosniadou, E.D. Corte, R. Glaser & H. Mandle), pp. 347-362. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Inc.
4. Hadwin A. & Winne P. (2001) CoNoteS2: a software tool for promoting self-regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation 7, 313-334.
5. Jacobson M. & Archodidou A. (2000) The design of hypermedia tools for learning: fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. Journal of the Learning Sciences 9, 149-199.
6. Jonassen D. (1996) Computers As Mind Tools For Schools. Merril, Columbus, OH.
7. Kramarski B. & Mevarech Z.R. (2003) Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal 40, 281-310.
8. Kramarski B., Mevarech Z.R. & Liberman A. (2001) The effects of multilevel versus unilevel-metacognitive training on mathematical reasoning. Journal for Educational Research 94, 292-300.
9. Kramarski B., Mevarech Z.R. & Arami M. (2002) The effects of metacognitive training on solving mathematical authentic tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics 49, 225-250.
10. Kramarski B. & Mizrachi N. (in press) Online discussion and self-regulated learning: effects of four instructional methods on mathematical literacy. Journal of Educational Research.
11. Leinhardt G., Zaslavsky O. & Stein M.K. (1990) Functions, graphs, and graphing: tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research 60, 1-64.
12. Masui C. & De Corte E. (1999) Enhancing learning and problem solving skills: orienting and self-judging, two powerful and training learning tools. Learning and Instruction 9, 517-542.
13. Mevarech Z.R. & Kramarski B. (1997) IMPROVE: a multidimensional method for teaching mathematics in heterogeneous classrooms. American Educational Research Journal 34, 365-394.
14. Montague M. & Bos C.S. (1990) Cognitive and metacognitive characteristics of eighth-grade students' mathematical problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences 2, 371-388.
15. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000) Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. NCTM, Reston, VA.
16. Quintana C., Reiser B.J., Davis E.A., Krajcik J., Fretz E., Duncan R.G., Kyza E., Edelson D. & Soloway E. (2004) A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 13, 337-386.
17. Palincsar A. & Brown A. (1984) Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1, 117-175.
18. Pintrich P.R. & De Groot E.V. (1990) Motivational and selfregulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 82, 33-40.
19. Pressley M. (1986) The relevance of the good strategy user model to the teaching of mathematics. Educational Psychologist 21, 139-161.
20. PISA (2003) Literacy skills for the world of tomorrow. Further results from PISA 2000. Paris.
21. Puntambekar S. & Hubscher R. (2005) Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: what have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist 40, 1-12.
22. Rogoff B. (1999) Thinking and learning in a social context. In Everyday Cognition: Development in Social Context (ed. J. Lave), pp. 1-8. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
23. Schoenfeld A.H. (1992) Learning to think mathematically: problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In Handbook of Research On Mathematics Teaching and Learning (ed D.A. Grouws), pp. 165-197. MacMillan, New York.
24. Veenman M.V.J. (2005) The assessment of metacognitive skills: what can be learned from multi-method designs? In Lernstrategien und Metakognition: Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis (eds B. Moschner & C. Artelt), pp. 75-97, Waxmann, Berlin.
25. Zimmerman B.J. (1998) Academic studying and the development of personal skill: a self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist 33, 73-86.
26. Zimmerman B.J. & Martinez-Pons M. (1990) Student differences in self-regulated learning: related grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology 82, 51-59.
27. Zimmerman B. & Schunk D. (2001) Reflections on theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives, 2nd edition (eds B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk), pp. 289-307. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.