Analytic and pragmatic factors in college students' metacognitive reading strategies

Reading Psychology

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 67-81

  Taraban, Roman ^a   Kerr, Marcel ^b   Rynearson, Kimberly ^b  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TARLETON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2642510938     PISSN: 02702711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02702710490435547     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, and R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. III (pp. 285-310). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. 1 (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.
3. Bazerman, C. (1985). Physicists reading physics. Written Communication, 2, 3-23.
4. Garson, G. D. (2003, March 3). Factor analysis. In PA 765 Statnotes: An online textbook. Retrieved from http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/ statnote.htm.
5. Kronenberger, W. G., & Thompson, R. J. (1990). Dimensions of family functioning in families with chronically ill children: A higher order factor analysis of the Family Environment Scale. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 19, 380-388.
6. Locke, E. A. (1975). A guide to effective study. New York: Springer.
7. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies inventory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 249-259.
8. Nist, S. L., & Holschuh, J. L. (2000). Comprehension strategies at the college level. In R. Flippo & D. Caverly (Eds.), Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 75-104). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Nist, S. L., & Simpson, M. L. (1996). Developing textbook fluency. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
10. Nist, S. L., & Simpson, M. L. (2000). College studying. In M. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. III (pp. 645-666). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ), Technical Report No. 91-B-004. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan.
12. Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
13. Pressley, M. (2000). What should reading instruction be the instruction of? In M. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. III (pp. 545-561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Pressley, M., Brown, R., El-Dinary, P. B., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). The comprehension instruction that students need: Instruction fostering constructively responsive reading. learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 10, 215-224.
16. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics, 4th ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
17. Taraban, R., Rynearson, K., & Kerr, M. (2000). College students' academic performance and self-reports of comprehension strategy use. Reading Psychology, 21, 283-308.
18. Thompson, B., & Daniel, L. G. (1996). Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 197-208.
19. Wade, S. E., Trathen, W., & Schraw, G. (1990). An analysis of spontaneous study strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 147-166.
20. Weinstein, C. E., & Hume, L. M. (1998). Study strategies for lifelong learning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Weinstein, C. E., & Meyer, D. (1991). Cognitive learning strategies and college teaching. New directions for teaching and learning, No. 45. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Weinstein, C. E., Schulte, A. C., & Palmer, D. R. (1987).Learning and study strategies inventory. Clearwater, FL: H & H Publishing.
23. Wyatt, D., Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P., Stein, S., Evans, P., & Brown, R. (1993). Comprehension strategies, worth and credibility monitoring, and evaluations: Cold and hot cognition when experts read professional articles that are important to them. Learning and Individual Differences, 5, 49-72.