Dynamics of Metacognitive Judgments: Pre- and Postretrieval Mechanisms

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 339-346

  Vernon, David ^a   Usher, Marius ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APTITUDE; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; RECOGNITION; TIME; TIME PERCEPTION;

APTITUDE; COGNITION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); TIME FACTORS; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 0041909823     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.339     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barnes, A. E., Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., Mazzoni, G., & Narens, L. (1999). An integrative system of metamemory components involved in retrieval. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII - Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 287-313). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Botvinick, M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
3. Bowers, K. S., Regehr, G., Balthazard, C., & Parker, K. (1990). Intuition in the context of discovery. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 72-110.
4. Kamas, E. N., Reder, L. M., & Ayers, M. S. (1996). Partial matching in the Moses illusion: Response bias not sensitivity. Memory & Cognition, 24, 687-699.
5. Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609-639.
6. Koriat, A. (1995). Dissociation knowing and the feeling of knowing: Further evidence for the accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 311-333.
7. Koriat, A. (1996). Memory's knowledge of its own knowledge: The accessibility account of the feeling of knowing. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 115-135). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1994). Memory in naturalistic and laboratory contexts: Distinguishing the accuracy-oriented and quantity-oriented approaches to memory assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 297-315.
9. Koriat, A., & Levy-Sadot, R. (2001). The combined contributions of the cue familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feeling of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 34-53.
10. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
11. Maki, R. H. (1999). The roles of competition, target accessibility, and cue familiarity in metamemory for word pairs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1011-1023.
12. Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.
13. Metcalfe, J. (1986a). Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 288-294.
14. Metcalfe, J. (1986b). Premonitions of insight predict impending error. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 623-634.
15. Metcalfe, J. (1993). Novelty monitoring, metacognition, and control in a composite holographic associative recall model: Implications for Korsakoff amnesia. Psychological Review, 100, 3-22.
16. Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., & Joaquim, S. G. (1993). The cue familiarity heuristic in metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 851-861.
17. Metcalfe, J., & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and noninsight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 15, 238-246.
18. Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102-116.
19. Nelson, T. O., Gerler, D., & Narens, L. (1984). Accuracy of feeling of knowing judgments for predicting perceptual identification and relearning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 282-300.
20. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 26, 125-141.
21. Reder, L. M. (1987). Strategy selection in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 90-138.
22. Reder, L. M., & Kusbit, G. W. (1991). Locus of the Moses illusion: Imperfect encoding, retrieval, or match? Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 385-406.
23. Reder, L. M., & Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 435-451.
24. Reder, L. M., & Schunn, C. D. (1996). Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory. In L. M. Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 45-77). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Rumelhart, D. E., Smolensky, P., McClelland, J. L., & Hinton, G. E. (1986). Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDF models. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart, & PDF research group, Parallel distributed processing (Vol. 2, pp. 7-58). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Schreiber, T. A. (1998). Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cued recall: Implications for the cue effectiveness and partial retrieval hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 26, 553-571.
27. Schreiber, T. A., & Nelson, D. L. (1998). The relation between feelings of knowing and the number of neighbouring concepts linked to the test cue. Memory & Cognition, 26, 869-883.
28. Schunn, C. D., Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Richards, D. R., & Stroffolino, P. J. (1997). To calculate or not to calculate: A source activation confusion model of problem familiarity's role in strategy selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1-27.
29. Schwartz, B. L., & Metcalfe, J. (1992). Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling of knowing judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1074-1083.
30. Shapiro, M. L., & Olton, D. S. (1994). Hippocampal function and interference. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems 1994 (pp. 87-117). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.