The Roles of Competition, Target Accessibility, and Cue Familiarity in Metamemory for Word Pairs

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 1011-1023

  Maki, Ruth H ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033464209     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.1011     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson, M. C., & Neely, J. H. (1996). Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory (pp. 237-313). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
2. Hart, J. T. (1965). Memory and the feeling of knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 208-216.
3. Keppel, G., Henschel, D. M., & Zavortink, B. (1969). Influence of nonspecific interference on response recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 246-255.
4. Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review, 100, 609-639.
5. Koriat, A. (1995). Dissociating knowing and the feeling of knowing: Further evidence for the accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 311-333.
6. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370.
7. Koriat, A., & Lieblich, I. (1977). What does a person in a "TOT" state know that a person in a "don't know" state doesn't know? Memory & Cognition, 2, 647-655.
8. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
9. Leibert, T. W., & Nelson, D. L. (1998). The roles of cue and target familiarity in making feeling of knowing judgments. American Journal of Psychology, 111, 63-75.
10. McGovern, J. B. (1964). Extinction of associations in four transfer conditions. Psychological Monographs, 78 (16, Whole No. 593).
11. Metcalfe, J. (1993). Novelty monitoring, metacognition, and control in a composite holographic associative recall model: Implications for Korsakoff amnesia. Psychological Review, 100, 3-22.
12. Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., & Joaquim, S. G. (1993). The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 851-861.
13. Miner, A. C., & Reder, L. M. (1994). A new look at feeling of knowing: Its metacognitive role in regulating question answering. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 47-70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. (1991). The University of South Florida word associations, rhyme, and word frequency norms. Unpublished manuscript.
15. Nelson, T. O., Gerler, D., & Narens, L. (1984). Accuracy of feeling-of-knowing judgments for predicting perceptual identification and relearning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 282-300.
16. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 26, pp. 125-173). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17. Postman, L., Stark, K., & Fraser, J. (1968). Temporal changes in interference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 672-694.
18. Reder, L. M. (1987). Selection strategies in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 90-138.
19. Reder, L. M., & Ritter, F. E. (1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 435-451.
20. Schreiber, T. A. (1998). Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cued recall: Implications for the cue effectiveness and partial-retrieval hypotheses. Memory & Cognition, 26, 553-571.
21. Schreiber, T. A., & Nelson, D. L. (1998). The relation between feelings of knowing and the number of neighboring concepts linked to the test cue. Memory & Cognition, 26, 869-883.