Elementary students' participation style in synchronous online communication and collaboration

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 571-586

  Chiu, C H ^a   Yang, H Y ^b   Liang, T H ^c   Chen, H P ^c  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b Ping Ding Elementary School   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

collaborative learning; computer mediated communication; distributed cognition; diversity; user modelling

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; DISTRIBUTED COGNITION; DIVERSITY; USER MODELLING;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMMUNICATION; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STUDENTS;

TEACHING;

EID: 77958546398     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: 13623001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01449291003686195     Document Type: Article

References (124)

1. Anderson, T., et al, 2001. Assessing teaching presence in computer conferencing transcripts. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 5 (2), 1-17.
2. Baker, M. and Lund, K., 1997. Promoting reflective interactions in a cscl environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13 (3), 175-192. (Pubitemid 127362333)
3. Bauer, C., Chin, K.L., and Chang, V., 2000. Web based learning: aspects of cultural differences. In: Proceedings of the 8th European conference on information systems (ECIS), 3-5 July 2000, Vienna, Austria.
4. Bote-Lorenzo, M.L., et al., 2008. Gridcole: a tailorable grid service based system that supports scripted collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 51 (1), 155-172.
5. Branon, R. and Essex, C., 2001. Synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in distance education. Tech-Trends, 45 (1), 36-36.
6. Brown, A.L. and Palincsar, A.S., 1989. Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In: L.B. Resnick, ed. Knowing, learning, and instruction: essays in honor of robert glaser. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 393-451.
7. Brush, T.A., 1998. Embedding cooperative learning into the design of integrated learning systems: rationale and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46 (3), 5-18.
8. Caspi, A., Chajut, E., and Saporta, K., 2008. Participation in class and in online discussions: gender differences. Computers & Education, 50 (3), 718-724.
9. Chiu, C.H., 2003. Exploring how primary school students function in computer supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 13 (3-4), 258-267.
10. Chiu, C.H., 2004. Evaluating system-based strategies for managing conflict in collaborative concept mapping. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20 (2), 124-132.
11. Chiu, C.H. and Hsiao, H.F., 2010. Group differences in computer supported collaborative learning: evidence from patterns of taiwanese students' online communication. Computers & Education, 54 (2), 427-435.
12. Chiu, C.H., Huang, C.C., and Chang, W.T., 2000. The evaluation and influence of interaction in network supported collaborative concept mapping. Computers & Education, 34 (1), 17-25.
13. Chou, C.C., 2001. Formative evaluation of synchronous cmc systems for a learner-centered online course. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12 (2), 173-192.
14. Claire, H., ed., 2004. Gender in education 3-19: a fresh approach. London: Association of Teachers and Lecturers.
15. Cress, U., et al, 2007. Improving quality and quantity of contributions: two models for promoting knowledge exchange with shared databases. Computers & Education, 49 (2), 423-440.
16. Curtis, D.D. and Lawson, M.J., 2001. Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5 (1), 21-34.
17. Delange, J., 1995. Gender and communication in social work education: a cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Social Work Education, 31 (1), 75-81.
18. Devi, N.R., 2001. Active and co-operative learning among B.E. Students. In: Proceedings of the 31st ASEE/IEEE frontiers in education conference, 10-13 October 2001, Reno, NV. Vol. 10. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, TIB-16-TIB-18.
19. Dillenbourg, P., 1999. What do you mean by collaborative learning? In: P. Dillenbourg, ed. Collaborative-learning: cognitive and computational approaches. Oxford: Elsevier, 1-19.
20. Dillenbourg, P. and Jermann, P., 2007. Designing integrative scripts. In: F. Fischer, et al., eds. Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning. NewYork: Springer, 275-301.
21. Dillenbourg, P. and Tchounikine, P., 2007. Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23 (1), 1-13.
22. Doise, W. and Mugny, G., 1984. The social development of the intellect. 1st ed. Oxford (Oxfordshire), New York: Pergamon Press.
23. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., and Archer, W., 1999. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2 (2-3), 87-105.
24. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., and Archer, W., 2001. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15 (1), 7-23.
25. Garland, K. and Noyes, J., 2004. The effects of mandatory and optional use on students' ratings of a computer-based learning package. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35 (3), 263-273.
26. Gaudioso, E. and Boticario, J.G., 2003. Collecting, analyzing and interpreting data for user model acquisition in open web-based adaptive collaborative environment. In: Knowledge-based intellignet information and engineering systems, Part 2, Proceedings. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin, 1314-1320.
27. Graddol, D. and Swann, J., 1989. Linguistic intervention. In: Gender voices. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell, 174-196.
28. Graham, C.R., 2003. A model of norm development for computer-mediated teamwork. Small Group Research, 34 (3), 322-352.
29. Gunawardena, C., Carabajal, K., and Lowe, C.A., 2001. Critical analysis of models and methods used to evaluate online learning networks [online]. In: Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 10-14 April 2001. Seattle, WA: American Educational Research Association. Available from: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal.contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno= ED456159 [Accessed 15 September 2009].
30. Gutwin, C. and Greenberg, S., 1999. The effects of workspace awareness support on the usability of real-time distributed groupware. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 6 (3), 243-281.
31. Guzdial, M. and Turns, J., 2000. Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9 (4), 437-469.
32. Hair, J.F., et al, 1998. Multivariate data analysis. 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
33. Harasim, L., 1987. Teaching and learning on-line: issues in computer-mediated graduate courses. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 16 (2), 117-135.
34. Harasim, L.M., 1989. On-line education: an new domain. In: R. Mason and A. Kaye, eds. Mindweave: communication, computers, and distance education. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 50-62.
35. Harasim, L.M., 1993. Collaborating in cyberspace: using computer conferences as a group learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 3 (2), 119-130.
36. Hatano, G. and Inagaki, K., 1993. Desituating cognition through the construction of conceptual knowledge. In: P. Light and G. Butterworth, eds. Context and cognition: ways of learning and knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 115-133.
37. Hawisher, G.E., 1992. Cross-disciplinary perspectives: computer-mediated communication (cmc), electronic writing classes, and research. SIGCUE Outlook, 21 (3), 45-52.
38. Hawkes, M., 2006. Linguistic discourse variables as indicators of reflective online interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 20 (4), 231-244.
39. Hawkes, M. and Romiszowski, A., 2001. Examining the reflective outcomes of asynchronous computer-mediated communication on inservice teacher development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (2), 285-308.
40. Heinze-Fry, J.A. and Novak, J.D., 1990. Concept mapping brings long-term movement toward meaningful learning. Science Education, 74 (4), 461-472.
41. Henri, F., 1992. Computer conferencing and content analysis. In: A.R. Kaye, ed. Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: the najaden papers. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 117-136.
42. Hirokawa, R.Y., 1990. The role of communication in group decision-making efficacy: a task-contingency perspective. Small Group Research, 21 (2), 190-204.
43. Hofstede, G., 1979. Value systems in forty countries: Interpretation, validation, and consequences for theory. In: L.H. Eckensberger, W.J. Lonner, and Y.H. Poortin-ga, eds. Cross-cultural contributions to psychology. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger, 389-407.
44. Hofstede, G., 1982. Dimensions of national cultures. In: R. Rath, H.S. Asthana, D. Sinha, and J.B.P. Sinha, eds. Diversity and unity in cross-cultural psychology. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger, 173-187.
45. Hofstede, G., 1984. Hofstede culture dimensions - an independent validation using rokeach value survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15 (4), 417-433.
46. Hofstede, G., 1986. Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10 (3), 301-320.
47. Holsti, O.R., 1969. Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
48. Holubec, E.J., Johnson, D.W., and Johnson, R.T., 1995. Cooperative learning in reading and language arts. In: M. Rabinowitz, P. Antonacci, and C.N. Hedley, eds. Thinking and literacy: the mind at work. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 229-240.
49. Horton, P.B., et al, 1993. An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education, 77 (1), 95-111.
50. Hrastinski, S., 2009. A theory of online learning as online participation. Computers & Education, 52 (1), 78-82.
51. Hrastinski, S. and Keller, C., 2007. Computer-mediated communication in education: a review of recent research. Educational Media International, 44, 61-77.
52. Hron, A. and Friedrich, H.F., 2003. A review of web based collaborative learning: factors beyond technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19 (1), 70-79.
53. Hron, A., et al, 2000. Implicit and explicit dialogue structuring in virtual learning groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70 (1), 53-64.
54. Janssen, J., et al, 2007. Visualization of participation: does it contribute to successful computer-supported collaborative learning? Computers & Education, 49 (4), 1037-1065. (Pubitemid 47284631)
55. Jaques, D., 2000. Communication in groups. In: Learning in groups: a handbook for improving group working. London: Kogan Page, 61-75.
56. Jeffrey, L.M., 2009. Learning orientations: diversity in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 19 (2), 195-208.
57. Jermann, P. and Schneider, D., 1997. Semi-structured interface in collaborative problem solving. In: Proceedings of first Swiss workshop on distributed and parallel systems, 2 May 1997, Lausanne, Switzerland.
58. Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T., 1987. Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
59. Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T., 1989. Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
60. Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T., 1999. Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 38 (2), 67-73.
61. Johnson, D.W., et al, 1990. Impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 130 (4), 507-516.
62. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., and Holubec, E.J., 1986. Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom. rev. ed. Edina, MN: Interaction.
63. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., and Smith, K.A., 1991. Cooperative learning: increasing college faculty instructional productivity. Ashe-eric higher education report no.4. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
64. Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T., 2004. Cooperation and the use of technology. In: D. Jonassen, ed. Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan Library Reference, 785-812.
65. Kerr, N.L. and Bruun, S.E., 1983. Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44 (1), 78-94.
66. Kiesler, S., et al, 1985. Affect in computer-meditated communication: An experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion. Human-Computer Interaction, 1 (1), 77-104.
67. Kim, I.H., et al, 2007. Discourse patterns during children's collaborative online discussions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16 (3), 333-370.
68. Knoll, K. and Jarvenpaa, S.L., 1998. Working together in global virtual teams. In: M. Igbaria and M. Tan, eds. The virtual workplace. Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing, 2-23.
69. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., and Jochems, W., 2003. Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19 (3), 335-353.
70. Lauzon, A.C., 1999. Situating cognition and crossing borders: resisting the hegemony of mediated education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30, 261-276.
71. Lazonder, A.W., Wilhelm, P., and Ootes, S.A.W., 2003. Using sentence openers to foster student interaction in computer-mediated learning environments. Computers & Education, 41 (3), 291-308.
72. Leinonen, P., Jarvela, S., and Lipponen, L., 2003. Individual students' interpretations of their contribution to the computer-mediated discussions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14 (1), 99-122.
73. Lipponen, L., 1999. The challenges for computer supported collaborative learning in elementary and secondary level: Finnish perspectives. In: Proceedings of the 1999 conference on computer support for collaborative learning, 12-15 December 1999; Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 368-375.
74. Lipponen, L., et al, 2002. Effective participation and discourse through a computer network: investigating elementary students' computer supported interaction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 27 (4), 355-384.
75. Maushak, N. and Ou, C., 2005. Effects of synchronous communication on graduate students? Online collaboration. In: Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference, 1-5 March 2005, Phoenix, AZ, Chesapeake, VA: AACE, 515-520.
76. McCreary, E., 1990. Three behavioral models for computer-mediated communication. In: L.M. Harasim, ed. On-line education: perspectives on a new environment. New York: Praeger, 117-130.
77. Mcsporran, M. and Young, S., 2001. Does gender matter in online learning? Alt-J, 9 (2), 3-15.
78. Mercer, N., 1996. The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6 (4), 359-377.
79. Michailidou, A. and Economides, A., 2007. Gender and diversity in collaborative virtual teams. In: K.L. Orvis and A.L.R. Lassiter, eds. Computer supported collaborative learning: Best practices and principles for instructors. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing, 199-224.
80. Michalsky, T., Zion, M., and Mevarech, Z.R., 2007. Developing students' metacognitive awareness in asynchronous learning networks in comparison to face-to-face discussion groups. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36 (4), 395-424.
81. Mortenson, S.T., 2002. Sex, communication values, and cultural values: individualism-collectivism as a mediator of sex differences in communication values in two cultures. Communication Reports, 15 (1), 57-70.
82. Motteram, G., 2001. The role of synchronous communication in fully distance education. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 17 (2), 131-149.
83. Mulryan, C.M., 1992. Student passivity during cooperative small groups in mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 85 (5), 261-273.
84. Murphy, N., 1996. Multicultural mathematics and science: effective k-12 practices for equity. Eric digest. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
85. Newman, D.R., Webb, B., and Cochrane, C., 1995. A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing and Technology, 3 (2), 56-77.
86. Novak, J.D. and Gowin, D.B., 1984. Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
87. Palmer, S., Holt, D., and Bray, S., 2008. Does the discussion help? The impact of a formally assessed online discussion on final student results. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (5), 847-858.
88. Panitz, T., 1997. Collaborative versus cooperative learning: a comparing the two definitions helps understand the nature of interactive learning [online]. Cooperative Learning and College Teaching, 8 (2). Available from: http://home.capecod.net/~tpanitz/tedsarticles/coopdefinition.htm [Accessed 24 June 2009].
89. Pena-Shaff, J., Martin, W., and Gay, G., 2001. An epistemological framework for analyzing student interactions in computer mediated communication environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12 (1), 41-68.
90. Pfister, H.-R. and Muhlpfordt, M., 2002. Supporting discourse in a synchronous learning environment: the learning protocol approach. In: Proceedings of conference on computer support for collaborative learning (CSCL 2002), 7-11 January 2002, Boulder, Colorado, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 581-589.
91. Pfister, H.R. and Oehl, M., 2009. The impact of goal focus, task type and group size on synchronous net-based collaborative learning discourses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25 (2), 161-176.
92. Pilkington, R., 2001. Analysing educational dialogue interaction: towards models that support learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 1-7.
93. Pilkington, R. and Kuminek, P., 2004. Using role-play activity with synchronous cmc to encourage critical reflection on peer debate. In: M. Monteith, ed. ICT for curriculum enhancement. Bristol: Intellect, 69-84.
94. Preece, J., 2000. Shaping communities: empathy, hostility, lurking, participation. In: Proceedings of CPSR DIAC2000, shaping the network society: the future of the public sphere in cyberspace, 20-23 May 2000, Seattle, Washington. Seattle, WA: CPSR (Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility), 25-34.
95. Prinsen, F., Volman, M.L.L., and Terwel, J., 2007. The influence of learner characteristics on degree and type of participation in a cscl environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38 (6), 1037-1055.
96. Roschelle, J. and Teasley, S.D., 1995. The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In: C. O'malley, ed. Computer-supported collaborative learning. Berlin: Springer, 69-97.
97. Ruiz-Primo, M.A., et al., 2004. Concept maps as an assessment tool: a framework for examining their cognitive validity. In: Proceedings of the American educational research association annual meeting (AERA2004), 12-16 April 2004, San Diego, CA.
98. Salomon, G. and Globerson, T., 1989. When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research, 13 (1), 89-99.
99. Schallert, D.L. and Reed, J.H., 2003. Intellectual, motivational, textual, and cultural considerations in teaching and learning with computer-mediated discussion. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36 (2), 103-118.
100. Serce, F.C. and Yildirim, S., 2006. A web-based synchronous collaborative review tool: a case study of an on-line graduate course. Educational Technology & Society, 9 (2), 166-177.
101. Shaw, M.E., Robbin, R., and Belser, J.R., 1981. Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
102. Simonoski, G. and Dell, P., 2006. Helping or hindering: students' use of collaborative technology in group projects [online]. In: Proceedings of 15th annual teaching learning forum, 1-2 February 2006. Perth: The University of Western Australia. Available from: http://otl.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2006/ refereed/simonoski.html [Accessed 9 December 2008].
103. Simpson, J., 2005. Conversational floors in synchronous text-based cmc discourse. Discourse Studies, 7 (3), 337-361. (Pubitemid 41794864)
104. Soller, A.L., 2001. Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 40-62.
105. Smith, B.L. and Macgregor, J.T., 1992. What is collaborative learning?. In: A. Goodsell, M. Maher, V. Tinto, B.L. Smith, and J. Macgregor, eds. Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education. University Park, Pennsylvania: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning and Assessment, 9-22.
106. Strømsø, H.I., Grøttum, P., and Lycke, K.H., 2007. Content and processes in problem-based learning: a comparison of computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23 (3), 271-282.
107. van der Meijden, H., Janssen, J., and Ligorio, M.B., 2002. Edgar degas: reconstructing his art in a three-dimensional virtual world. In: Proceedings of the 5th international society for cultural research and activity theory (ISCRAT), 18-22 June 2002, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
108. Veerman, A. and Veldhuis-Diermanse, E., 2001. Collaborative learning through computer-mediated communication in academic education. In: Proceedings of computer support for collaborative learning conference (CSCL), 22-24 March 2001, Maastricht University, Holland.
109. Veerman, A.L., Andriessen, J.E.B., and Kanselaar, G., 2000. Learning through synchronous electronic discussion. Computers & Education, 34 (3-4), 269-290.
110. Walker, S.A., 2004. Socratic strategies and devil's advocacy in synchronous cmc debate. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20 (3), 172-182.
111. Walker, S.A. and Pilkington, R.M., 2000. Networked communication and the collaborative development of written expression at key stage three. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on networked learning 2000: Innovative approaches to lifelong learning and higher education through the Internet, 17-19 April 2000. Lancaster, England: Dept. of Educational Studies, University of Sheffield, 354-360.
112. Wang, C.-M. and Reeves, T.C., 2007. Synchronous online learning experiences: the perspectives of international students from taiwan. Educational Media International, 44 (4), 339-356.
113. Wang, X.C., Hinn, D.M., and Kanfer, A.G., 2001. Potential of computer-supported collaborative learning for learners with different learning styles. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34 (1), 75-85.
114. Warschauer, M., 1995. Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13 (2-3), 7-26.
115. Watkins, D., et al, 1998. Cultural dimensions, gender, and the nature of self-concept: A fourteen-country study. International Journal of Psychology, 33 (1), 17-31. (Pubitemid 128182419)
116. Webb, N.M. and Palincsar, A.S., 1996. Group processes in the classroom. In: D.C. Berliner and R.C. Calfee, eds. Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan, 841-873.
117. Wojahn, P.G., 1994. Computer-mediated communication: the great equalizer between men and women? Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 41 (4), 747-752.
118. Wolfe, J., 2000. Gender, ethnicity, and classroom discourse: communication patterns of hispanic and white students in networked classrooms. Written Communication, 17 (4), 491-519.
119. Wu, A., 2003. Supporting electronic discourse: principles of design from a social constructivist perspective. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14 (2), 167-184.
120. Wu, C.-Y., et al, 2009. The effect of integrating web 2.0 technology in collaborative note-taking on elementary students' science learning. In: Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications, 22-26 June 2009, Honolulu, HI, USA. Chesapeake, VA: AACE, 3145-3153.
121. Yin, Y., et al, 2005. Comparison of two concept-mapping techniques: implications for scoring, interpretation, and use. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42 (2), 166-184.
122. Yueh, H.-P., et al, 2007. Exploring group interaction in synchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) in an international distance course. In: Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications, 25-29 June 2007, Vancouver, Canada. Chesapeake, VA: AACE, 747-753.
123. Zhu, E., 1996. Meaning negotiation, knowledge construction, and mentoring in a distance learning course. In: Proceedings of selected research and development presentations at the 1996 national convention of the association for educational communications and technology (AECT), 14-18 February 1996, Indianapolis, IN, Indianapolis, IN: ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
124. Zondervan, K., Verbrugge, R., and Taatgen, N.A., 2004. Modeling the ability to reason about oneself and others in educational contexts. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on cognitive modeling: 6th ICCM 2004 integrating models. 30 July-1 August 2004, Pittsburgh, PA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 418-419.