Gender and diversity in collaborative virtual teams

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Best Practices and Principles for Instructors

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 199-224

  Michailidou, Anna ^a   Economides, Anastasios ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MACEDONIA   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958601675     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-753-9.ch010     Document Type: Chapter

References (74)

1. Abnett, C., Stanton, D., Neale, H., & O'Malley. (2001, March 22-24). The effect of multiple input devices on collaboration and gender issues. In Proceedings of European Perspectives on Computer-Supported Col laborative Learning (EuroCSCL) 2001, Maastricht, The Netherlands (pp. 29-36).
2. Adler, N. J. (1997). International dimensions of organizational behavior. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
3. Anderson, T. D., & Garrison, D. R. (1998). Learning in a networked world: New roles and responsibilities. In C. C. Gibson (Ed.), Distance learners in higher education (pp. 97-112). Madison, WI: Atwood.
4. Andrews, T., & Schwarz, G. (2002). Preparing students for the virtual organization: An evaluation of learning with virtual learning technologies. Educational Technology & Society, 5(3).
5. Ausburn, L. (2004). Gender and learning strategy differences in non-traditional adult students' design preferences in hybrid distance courses. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(2), 1-17.
6. Aviv, R. (2000). Educational performance of ALN via content analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2).
7. Barrett, E., & Lally, V. (1999). Gender differences in an online learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15, 48-60.
8. Baxter-Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Genderrelated patterns in student's intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
9. Blum, K. D. (1999). Gender differences in asynchronous learning in higher education: Learning styles, participation barriers and communication patterns. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 3(1), 46-66.
10. Bonner, F., Marbley, A., & Agnello, M. F. (2004). The diverse learner in the college classroom. E-Journal of Teaching and Learning in Diverse Settings, 1(2), 246-255.
11. Bostock, S. J., & Lizhi, W. (2005). Gender in student online discussions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(1), 73-85.
12. Brosnan, M. J., & Davison, M. J. (1994), February. Computerphobia: Is it a particularly female phenomenon? The Psychologist, pp. 74-78.
13. Chang, T., & Lim, J. (2002). Cross-cultural communication and social presence in asynchronous learning processes. e-Service Journal, 1(3).
14. Chen, C., Czerwinski, M., & Macredie, R. (2000). Individual differences in virtual environments. Introduction and overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(6), 499-507.
15. Chioncel, N. E., Van Der Veen, R. G. W., Nildemeersch, P., & Jarvis, P. (2003). The validity and reliability of focus groups as a research method in adult education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(5), 495-517.
16. Chow, W. C., Shields, M. D., & Wu, A. (1999). The importance of national culture in the design of and preference for management controls for multi-national operations. Accounting Organizations and Society, 24, 441-461.
17. Chung, K., & Adams, C. (1997). A study on the characteristics of group decision-making behaviour: Cultural difference perspective of Korea vs. US. Journal of Global Information Management, 5(3), 18-29.
18. nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
19. Easley, R. F., Devaraj, S., & Crant, J. M. (2003). Collaborative technology use to teamwork performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Information Systems, 19(4), 247-268.
20. Fai Wong, L., & Trinidad, S. G. (2004). Using Web-based distance learning to reduce cultural distance. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(1).
21. Ford, N. (2000). Cognitive styles and virtual environments. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 51(6), 543-557
22. Ford, N., & Miller, D. (1996). Gender differences in Internet perceptions and use. In Proceedings of the Elvira Conference (pp.87-100). London: ASLIB. Retrieved November 9, 2007, from http://www.shef.ac.uk/~is/home_old/gender.htm
23. Gaskell, T. (2000). The process of empirical research: A learning experience? Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 5(3), 349-360.
24. Gunn, C., & McSporran, M. (2003). Dominant or different? Gender issues in computer supported learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 14-30.
25. nd ed.). Harper and Ross.
26. st Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, TX.
27. nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).
28. Herring, S. C. (2000). Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications. The CPSR Newsletter, 18(1). Retrieved November 9, 2007, from http://www.cpsr.org/publications/newsletters/issues/2000/Winter2000/herring.htm
29. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.
30. Howard A., & Levine, A. (2004). Where are the poor students? A conversation about social class and college attendance. About Campus, 9(4), 1924.
31. Hughes, S. C., Wickersham, L., Ryan-Jones, D. L., & Smith, A. (2002). Overcoming social and psychological barriers to effective on-line collaboration. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1).
32. Johnson, S. D., & Aragon, S. A. (2003). An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. In S. A. Aragon (Ed.), Facilitating learning in online environments, new directions for adult and continuing education (pp. 10, 31-44). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Kember, D. (2000). Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students. Higher Education, 40, 99-121.
34. Kennedy, P. (2002). Learning cultures and learning styles: Myth-understandings about adult (Hong Kong) Chinese learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 21(5), 430-445.
35. Knight, D., Pearce, C. L., Smith, K. G., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., Smith, K. A., & Flood, P. (1999). Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 445-465.
36. La Russa, G., & Faggiano, E. (2004). Robo-eLC: Enhancing learning hypermedia with robotics. In Proceedings of ICALT, Joensuu, Finland (pp. 465-469).
37. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
38. Leevers, D. (2001). Collaboration and shared virtual environments-from metaphor to reality. In R. Earnshaw, R. Guedj, A. van Dam, & J. Vince (Eds.), Frontiers of human-centered computing, online communities and virtual environments (pp. 278-298). Springer.
39. Liang, A., & McQueen, R. J. (1999). Computer assisted adult interactive learning in a multi-cultural environment. Adult Learning, 11(1), 26-29.
40. th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
41. nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
42. Mayers, M., & Tan, F. (2002). Beyond models of national culture in information systems research. Journal of Global Information Management, 10(1), 24-32.
43. McLean, S., & Morrison, D. (2000). Sociodemographic characteristic of learners and participation in computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 15(2).
44. McSporran, M., & Young, S. (2001). Does gender matter in online learning? Association for Learning Technology Journal (Alt-J), 9(2), 3-15.
45. Mehlenbacher, B., Miller, C. R., Covington, D., & Larsen, J. S. (2000). Active and interactive learning online: A comparison of Web-based and conventional writing classes. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 43(2), 166-184.
46. Mehrotra, C. M. (2003). In defense of educational programs for older adults. Educational Gerontology, 29, 645-655.
47. nd ed.). Krieger Publishing Company.
48. Michailidou, A., & Economides, A. (2003). Elearn: Towards a collaborative educational virtual environment. Journal of Information Technology Education, 2, 131-152.
49. Mortenson, S. T. (2002). Sex, communication and cultural values: Individualism-collectivism as a mediator of sex differences in communication in two cultures. Communication Reports, 15(1).
50. Mudur, S. (2001). On the need for cultural representation in interactive systems. In R. Earnshaw, R. Guedj, A. van Dam, & J. Vince (Eds.), Frontiers of human-centered computing, online communities and virtual environments (pp. 299-310). Springer.
51. Muirhead, B. (2000). Enhancing social interaction in computer-mediated distance education. Educational Technology & Society, 3(4), 4-11.
52. Myers, M., & Tan, F. (2002). Beyond models of national culture in information systems research. Journal of Global Information Management, 10(1), 24-32.
53. Nijholt, A. (2005). Human and virtual agents interacting in the virtuality continuum. In Proceedings of ACTAS II: IX Symposio Internacional de Comunicacion Social, Centro de Linguistica Aplicade, Santiago de Cuba (pp. 551-558).
54. Obidah, J. (2000). Mediating boundaries of race, class and professorial authority as a critical multiculturalist. Teachers College Record, 102, 1035-1061.
55. Paulsen, M., & St. John, E. P. (2002). Social class and college costs: Examining between college choice and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(2), 189-236.
56. Paulus, P. B., Legett, K., Dzindolet, M. T., Coskun, H., & Putman, V. L. (2002). Social and cognitive influences in group brainstorming: Prediction of production gains and losses. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 299-325). London: Wiley.
57. Potter, R. E., & Bathazard, P. A. (2002). Understanding human interactions and performance in the virtual team. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), 4(1), 1-23.
58. Raybourn, E. M. (2001). Designing an emergent culture of negotiation in collaborative virtual communities: The DomeCityMOO simulation. In E. Churchill, D. Snowden, & A. Munro (Eds.), Collaborative virtual environments (pp. 247-264). Springer.
59. Raybourn, E. M., Kings, N. J., & Davies, J. (2003). Adding cultural signposts in adaptive community-based environments [Special issue on intelligent community-based systems]. Interacting With Computers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 15(1), 91-107. Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.
60. Rich, M. (1997). A learning community on the Internet: An exercise with masters students. In Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems, Indianapolis.
61. Richardson, J. A., & Turner, A. (2000). A large-scale "local" evaluation of students' learning experiences using virtual learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 3(4).
62. Rovai, A. A. P. (2002). A preliminary look at the structural differences of higher education classroom communities in traditional and ALN courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 41-56.
63. Selim, H. M. (2003). An empirical investigation of student acceptance of course Websites. Computers & Education, 40, 343-360.
64. Swigger, K., Alpaslan, F., Brazile, R., & Monticino, M. (2004). Effects of culture on computer-supported international collaborations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 60, 365-380.
65. th International Conference on Learning Styles (pp. 353-384).
66. rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-9).
67. Volet, S. (1999). Learning across cultures: Appropriateness of knowledge transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 625-643.
68. Walpole, M. (2004). Socioeconomic status and college: How SES affects outcomes. The Review of Higher Education, 27(1), 4573.
69. Watkins, D. A., Adair, J., Akande, A., Cheng, C., Fleming, J., Gerong, A., et al. (1998). Cultural dimensions, gender and the nature of self-concept: A fourteen-country study. International Journal of Psychology, 33(1).
70. Watson, W. E., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 590-602.
71. Wegerif, R. (1998). The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1), 34-49.
72. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
73. Young, S., Dewstow, R., & McSporran, M. (1999, July). Who wants to learn online? What types of students benefit from the new learning environment? In Proceedings of the NACCQ.
74. Yu, F. (2001). Competition within computer-assisted cooperative learning environments: Cognitive, affective, and social outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(2), 99-117.