The evaluation and influence of interaction in network supported collaborative concept mapping

Computers and Education

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 17-25

  Chiu, Chiung Hui ^a   Huang, Chun Chieh ^a   Chang, Wen Tsung ^a  

^a Natl Tainan Teach Coll   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Architectures for educational technology system; Co operative collaborative learning; Computer mediated communication; Distributed learning environments; Interactive learning environments

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003140923     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00025-1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Chen, S. F. (1997). Gainian Goutushi Xuexi Xitong [Computer system for concept mapping]. Unpublished master's thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
2. Chiu C.H., Chen H.P., Wei L.C., Hu H.W. Approaching effective network co-operative learning. Proceedings of International Conference on Mathematics/Science Education and Technology, San Antonio, TX, USA. 1999.
3. Chung, W. K., O'Neil, F., Herl, E. & Dennis, A. (1997). Use of networked collaborative concept mapping to measure team processes and team outcomes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
4. Fisher K.M. Semantic-networking: the new kid on the block. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 27:1990;1001-1018.
5. Fisher K.M., Faletti J., Patternson H., Thornton R., Lipson J., Spring C. Computer-based concept mapping. Journal of College Science Teaching. 19:1990;347-352.
6. Herl H., Baker E., Niemi D. Construct validation of approach to modeling cognitive structure of US history knowledge. Journal of Education Research. 89:1996;213-230.
7. Hertz-Lazarowitz R. An integrative model of the classroom: the enhancement of co-operation in learning. American Educational Research Association Conference, Boston, MA. 1990.
8. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1992). Six mirrors of the classroom: a pathway to co-operative learning. EI Paso, TX.
9. Horton P.B., McConney A.A., Gallo M., Woods A.L., Senn G.J., Hamelin D. An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education. 77:1993;95-111.
10. Huang, T. Z. (1995). Gainiantu Zai Guozhong Shengwu Jiaoxueshang De Chengxiao Yanjiu (II) [The effects of concept mapping on secondary biology teaching]. Taipei, Taiwan: National Science Council (NSC 84-25511-S-017-003).
11. Kozma R.B. The implications of cognitive psychology for computer-based learning tools. Educational Technology. 27:1987;20-25.
12. Kozma R.B., Van Roekel J. Learning tool. 1986;Arborworks, Ann Arbor, MI.
13. Lin, S. C. (1998). Shuxinghua gainian goutu de mohu zhenghe he pingli [Fuzzy integration and measurement of attributed concept maps]. Unpublished master's thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
14. Novak J.D. Concept maps and Vee diagrams: two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science. 19:1990;29-52.
15. Novak J.D., Gowin D.B. Learning how to learn. 1984;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London.
16. Okebukola P.A., Jegede O.J. Cognitive preference and learning model as determinates of meaningful learning through concept mapping. Science Education. 71:1989;232-241.
17. Reader W., Hammond N. Computer-based tools to support learning from hypertext: concept mapping tools and beyond. Computers and Education. 12:1994;99-106.
18. Roth W.M. Student views of collaborative concept mapping: an emancipatory research project. Science Education. 78:1994;1-34.
19. Roth W.M., Roychoudhury A. The social construction of scientific concepts or the concept map as conscription device and tool for social thinking in high school science. Science Education. 76:1992;531-557.
20. Roth W.M., Roychoudhury A. The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: a microanalysis of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 30:1993;503-534.
21. Roth W.M., Roychoudhury A. About knowing and learning physics: the perspectives of four students. International Journal of Science Education. 15:1993;27-44.
22. Roth W.M., Roychoudhury A. Using Vee and concept maps in collaborative settings: elementary education majors construct meaning in physical science courses. School Science and Mathematics. 93:1993;237-244.
23. Roth W.M., Roychoudhury A. Science discourse through collaborative concept mapping: new perspectives for the teacher. International Journal of Science Education. 16:1994;437-455.
24. Roychoudhury A., Roth W.M. Student involvement in learning: collaboration in science for pre-service elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 3:1992;47-52.
25. Webb N.M. Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research. 13:1989;21-39.
26. Webb N.M. Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in small groups. Hertz-Lazarowitz R., Miller N. Interaction co-operative groups. 1992;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
27. Webb N.M. Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in small groups. Hertz-Lazarowitz R., Miller N. Interaction co-operative groups. 1995;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.