Intellectual, motivational, textual, and cultural considerations in teaching and learning with computer-mediated discussion

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 103-118

  Schallert, Diane L ^a,a   Hailey Reed, Joylynn ^a   Amador, Nicole A ^a   Beth, Alicia D ^a   Benton, Ronald E ^a   Boardman, Alison G ^a   Coward, Panni ^a   Dodson, Melissa M ^a   Fleeman, Brigitte ^a   Fowler, Laua ^a   Kim, Minseong ^a   Lissi, Maria R ^a   Reed, Joylynn H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007887131     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2003.10782407     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Amador, N. A., Benton, R. E., Coward, F. L., Dodson, M. M., Fleeman, B. F., Gould, A., et al. (1999, December). Negotiating cultural boundaries: The discourse practices of a multicultural classroom engaged in oral and written (CMC) discussion. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, Orlando, Florida.
2. Bonk, C. J., & Cunningham, D. J. (1998). Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and socio-cultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In C. J. Bonk & K. S. King (Eds.), Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse (pp. 25-50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Bonk, C. J., & King, K. S. (Eds.) (1998). Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Coward, F. (2003). The challenge of “doing discussions” in graduate seminars: A qualitative study of international students from China, Korea, and Taiwan. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, 2002). Dissertation Abstracts International, 64 (1), 66A.
5. Dodson, M. M. (2000). Monologic and dialogic conversations: How preservice teachers socially construct knowledge through oral and computer-mediated classroom discourse. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 49, 137-152.
6. Dodson, M. M., Schallert, D. L., Benton, R. E., Lissi, M. R., Amador, N. A., & Reed, J. H. (1997, December). The life and death of a topic: The creation of knowledge islands and the construction of conversational bridges in oral and written classroom discussions. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, Scottsdale, AZ.
7. Faigley, L. (1992). Fragments of rationality. Pittsburgh, PA: The University of Pittsburgh.
8. Gee, J. P. (1996). Vygotsky and current debates in education: Some dilemmas as afterthoughts to Discourse, Learning, and Schooling. In E. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 269-282). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Hanks, W. F. (1991). Foreword. In J. Lave & E. Wenger (Eds.), Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (pp. 13-24). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Hicks, D. (1996). Introduction. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning, and schooling (pp. 1-25). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Levin, J. A., Kim, H., & Riel, M. M. (1990). Analyzing instructional interactions in electronic message networks. In L. M. Harasim (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. 185-213). New York: Praeger.
12. Liberman, K. (1994). Asian student perspectives on American university instruction. International Journal ofLntercultural Relations, 18, 173-192.
13. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 37, 69-78.
14. Nieto, S. (1999). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities. New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Ramanathan, V., & Atkinson, D. (1999). Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 45-75.
16. Reed, J. H., Boardman, A. G., Coward, F. L., Beth, A. D., Benton, R. E., Dodson, M. M., et al. (2001, December). Perceptions of psychological engagement when technology enters the classroom. Paper presented a: the meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, TX.
17. Resnick, L. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1-20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18. Schallert, D. L., Benton, R. E., Dodson, M. M. Amador, N. A., Lissi, M. R., Reed, J. H., et al. (1998, October). Individual cognition and social construction of discourse in CMC classroom discussions Paper presented at the 4th annual Conference on Conceptual Structures of Discourse and Language (CSDL), Atlanta, GA.
19. Schallert, D. L., Dodson, M. M., Benton, R. E., Reed, J. H., Amador, N. A., Lissi, M. R, et al. (1999, April). Conversations that lead to learning in a computer age: Tracking how individuals make sense of socially shared classroom conversations. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
20. Schallert, D. L., Fowler, L. A., & Reed, J. H. (1994, December). Differences in the social construction of disciplinary knowledge through oral and written classroom conversations. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Reading Conference, San Diego, CA.
21. Schallert, D. L., Lissi, M. R., Reed, J. H., Dodson, M. M., Benton, R. E., & Hopkins, L. F. (1996). How coherence is socially constructed in oral and written classroom discussions of reading assignments. In D. J. Leu, C. K. Kinzer & K. A. Hinchman (Eds.), Literacies for the 21st Century: Research and practice, 45th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. Chicago: The National Reading Conference.
22. Schallert, D. L., Reed, J. H., Beth, A. D., & Kim, M. (2003, April). Responsibility and responsivity in online learning communities. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
23. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 85-100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.