Evaluating system-based strategies for managing conflict in collaborative concept mapping

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 124-132

  Chiu, C H ^a  

^a Department of Mathematics Education   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Concept mapping; Conflict control management; Empirical; Groupware; Primary

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042734386     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00072.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anderson-Inman L. & Horney M. (1996/1997) Computer-based concept mapping: enhancing literacy with tools for visual thinking. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 40, 302-306.
2. Avouris N., Margaritis M., Komis V., Saez A. & Melendez R. (2003) ModellingSpace: Interaction design and architecture of a collaborative modelling environment. In Proceedings of 6th Conference on Computer Based Learning in Science (CBLIS) (ed. C. Constantinou), University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus, pp. 993-1004.
3. Baker K. (2002) Heuristic evaluation of shared workspace groupware based on the mechanics of collaboration. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary, Canada. Retrieved 14 July 2003, from http://www.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/grouplab/papers/2002/02-KevinBaker.Thesis/abstract. html.
4. Berlage T. & Genau A. (1993) From undo to multi-user applications. In Proceedings of the Vienna Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (T. Grechenig & M.Tscheligi eds), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 213-224.
5. Brush T.A. (1998) Embedding cooperative learning into the design of integrated learning systems: rationale and guidelines. Educational Technology Research & Development. 46, 5-18.
6. Chiu C.H., Huang C.C. & Chang W.T. (2000) The evaluation and influence of interaction in network supported collaborative concept mapping. Computers and Education 34, 17-25.
7. Chung W.K., O'Neil F., Herl E. & Dennis A. (1997) Use of networked collaborative concept mapping to measure team processes and team outcomes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 412 225.)
8. Cross L.H. (1995) Grading students (ERIC/AE Digest Series EDO-TM-95-5). ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, Washington, DC. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 398 239.)
9. Dix A., Finlay J., Abowd G. & Beale R. (1998) Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
10. Edmondson K. (1995) Concept mapping for the development of medical curricular. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32, 777-793.
11. Fidas C., Komis V. & Avouris N.M. (2001) Design of collaboration-support tools for group problem solving. In Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, Proceedings of PC HCI 2001 (eds N.M. Avouris & N. Fakotakis), pp. 263-268. Typorama, Patras, Greece.
12. Fidas C., Komis V., Avouris N.M. & Dimitracopoulou A. (2002) Collaborative problem solving using an open modelling environment. In Proceedings of CSCL 2002 (ed. G. Stahl), pp. 654-656. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
13. Greenberg S. (1990) Sharing views and interactions with single-user applications. In Proceedings of the ACM COIS Conference on Office Information Systems (F.H. Lochovsky & R.B. Allen, eds), ACM, Boston, MA, pp. 227-237.
14. Greenberg S. & Marwood D. (1994) Real time groupware as a distributed system: concurrency control and its effect on the interface. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (J.B. Smith, F.D. Smith & T.W. Malone, eds), ACM, New York, pp. 207-217.
15. Heinze-Fry J.A. & Novak J.D. (1990) Concept mapping brings long-term movement toward meaningful learning. Science Education 74, 461-472.
16. Horton P.B., McConney A.A., Gallo M., Woods A.L., Senn G.J. & Hamelin D. (1993) An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education 77, 95-111.
17. Huang T.Z. (1995) Gainiantu Zai Guozhong Shengwu Jiaoxueshang De Chengxiao Yanjiu (II) (The effects of concept mapping on secondary biology teaching). National Science Council, Taipei, Taiwan (NSC 84-25511-S-017-003).
18. Inkpen K., McGrenere J., Booth K.S. & Klawe M. (1997) The effect of turn-taking protocols on children's learning in mouse-driven collaborative environments. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface '97, Kelowna, BC, (W.A. Davis & R. Bartels, eds), Molgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, pp. 138-145.
19. Jackson S. & Brashers D.E. (1994) Random Factors in ANOVA. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
20. Johnson D.W. & Johnson R.T. (1992) Positive interdependency: Key to effective cooperation. In Interaction in Cooperative Groups: The Theoretical Anatomy of Group Learning (eds R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller), pp. 174-199. Cambridge University Press, New York.
21. Johnson D.W., Johnson R.T. & Holubec E.J. (1993) Circles of Learning: Cooperation in the Classroom, 4th edn. Interaction Book, Edina, MN.
22. Komis V., Avouris N. & Fidas C. (2002) Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping: Study of synchronous peer interaction. Education and Information Technologies 7, 169-188.
23. Kumar V.S. (1996) Computer-supported collaborative learning: Issues for research. Retrieved 25 August 2003, from http://www.cs.usask.ca/grads/vsk719/ academic/890/project2/project2.html.
24. Lamm H. & Trommsdorff G. (1973) Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): a review. European Journal of Social Psychology 3, 361-388.
25. Lindman H.R. (1974) Analysis of Variance in Complex Experimental Designs. W. H. Freeman & Co, San Francisco, CA.
26. Morris M.E., Plant T.A. & Hughes P.T. (1992) CoOpLab: practical experiences with evaluating a multi-user system. In Proceedings of the HCI'92 Conference on People and Computers VII, York, UK (A.F. Monk, D. Diaper & M.D. Harrison, eds), Cambridge University, pp. 355-368.
27. Novak J.D. & Gowin D.B. (1984) Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, London.
28. O'Malley C. (1987) Understanding explanation. Paper presented at the third CeRCLe Workshop, Ullswater, UK.
29. Patterson J.F., Hill R.D., Rohall S.L. & Meeks W.S. (1990) Rendezvous: an architecture for synchronous multi-user applications. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work '90, Los Angeles, CA, (F. Halasz, ed.), ACM, New York, pp. 317-328.
30. Roth W.M. (1994) Student views of collaborative concept mapping: an emancipatory research project. Science Education 78, 1-34.
31. Roth W.M. & Roychoudhury A. (1993) Using Vee and concept maps in collaborative settings: Elementary education majors construct meaning in physical science courses. School Science and Mathematics 93, 237-244.
32. Schmid R.F. & Telaro G. (1990) Concept mapping as an instructional strategy for high school biology. Journal of Educational Research 84, 78-85.
33. Slavin R.E. (1991) Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educational Leadership 48, 71-82.
34. Toothaker L.E. (1992) Multiple Comparison Procedures. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
35. Williams C.G. (1998) Using concept maps to assess conceptual knowledge of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 29, 414-421.