The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer-assessment system

Computers and Education

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 229-236

  Chen, Chao hsiu ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Evaluation of CAL systems; Improving classroom teaching; Teaching learning strategies

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES; CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EDUCATION COURSE; EVALUATION OF CAL SYSTEMS; FLEXIBLE ASSESSMENTS; IMPLEMENTATION MODELS; IMPROVING CLASSROOM TEACHING; INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGY; MOBILE TECHNOLOGY; PEER ASSESSMENT; SELF ASSESSMENT; TEACHING/LEARNING STRATEGY;

EDUCATION COMPUTING; OPTICAL PROJECTORS; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS; RESEARCH; SCHOOL BUILDINGS; STUDENTS; TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT;

TEACHING;

EID: 77949659462     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ashworth P., Bannister P., and Thorne P. Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education 22 2 (1997) 187-203
2. Ballantyne R., Hughes K., and Mylonas A. Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 5 (2002) 427-441
3. Bloxham S., and West A. Understanding the rules of the game: Marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students' conceptions of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 6 (2004) 721-733
4. Bransford J.B., Brown A.L., and Cocking R. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. expanded ed. (2000), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
5. Davies P. Computerized peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International 37 4 (2000) 346-355
6. Davis S. Observations in classrooms using a network of handheld devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19 (2003) 298-307
7. Draper S.W., and Brown M.I. Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20 (2004) 81-94
8. Falchikov N., and Goldfinch J. Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research 70 3 (2000) 287-322
9. Gibbs G. How assessment frames student learning. In: Bryan C., and Clegg K. (Eds). Innovative assessment in higher education (2006), Routledge, London 23-36
10. Lin S.S.J., Liu E.Z.F., and Yuan S.M. Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17 (2001) 420-432
11. Magin D.J. A novel technique for comparing the reliability of multiple peer assessments with that of single teacher assessments of group process work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26 2 (2001) 139-152
12. McLuckie J., and Topping K.J. Transferable skills for online peer learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (2004) 563-584
13. Miller P.J. The effect of scoring criteria specificity on peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28 4 (2003) 383-394
14. Nicol D., and Milligan C. Rethinking technology-supported assessment practices in relation to the seven principle of good feedback practice. In: Bryan C., and Clegg K. (Eds). Innovative assessment in higher education (2006), Routledge, London 64-77
15. Novak J.D., Mintzes J.J., and Wandersee J.H. Learning, teaching, and assessment: A human constructivist perspective. In: Mintzes J.J., Wandersee J.H., and Novak J.D. (Eds). Assessing science understanding: A human constructivist view (1999), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1-13
16. Orsmond P., Merry S., and Reiling K. The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25 1 (2000) 23-38
17. Penuel W.R., and Yarnall L. Designing handheld software to support classroom assessment: An analysis of conditions for teacher adoption. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment 3 5 (2005) 45
18. Penuel W.R., Lynn E., and Berger L. Classroom assessment with handheld computers. In: van't Hooft M., and Swan K. (Eds). Ubiquitous computing in education (2007), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 103-125
19. Perkins D.N., and Unger C. Teaching and learning for understanding. In: Reigeluth C.M. (Ed). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory Vol. 2 (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 91-114
20. Pownell D., and Bailey G.D. Are you ready for handhelds?. Learning and Leading with Technology 30 2 (2002) 50-55
21. Price M., and O'Donovan B. Improving performance through enhancing student understanding of criteria and feedback. In: Bryan C., and Clegg K. (Eds). Innovative assessment in higher education (2006), Routledge, London 100-109
22. Prins F.J., Sluijsmans D.M.A., Kirschner P.A., and Strijbos J.-W. Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: A case study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 4 (2005) 417-444
23. Purchase H.C. Learning about interface design through peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25 4 (2000) 341-352
24. Shepard L.A. The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning. In: Richardson V. (Ed). Handbook of research on teaching (2001), American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC 1066-1101
25. Shin N., Norris C., and Soloway E. Findings from early research on one-to-one handheld use in K-12 education. In: van't Hooft M., and Swan K. (Eds). Ubiquitous computing in education (2007), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 19-39
26. Smodal O., and Gregory J. Personal digital assistants in medical education and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19 (2003) 320-329
27. Sung Y.-T., Chang K.-E., Chiou S.-K., and Hou H.-T. The design and application of a web-based self and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education 45 (2005) 187-202
28. Sung Y.-T., Lin C.-S., Lee C.-L., and Chang K.-E. Evaluating proposals for experiments: An application of web-based self-assessment and peer-assessment. Teaching of Psychology 30 4 (2003) 331-334
29. Topping K. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research 68 3 (1998) 249-276
30. Topping K.J., Smith E.F., Swanson I., and Elliot A. Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25 2 (2000) 149-169
31. Tsai C.-C., Lin S.S.J., and Yuan S.-M. Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education 38 (2002) 241-252
32. Vahey, P., & Crawford, V. (2002). Palm education pioneers program: Final evaluation report [Electronic Version]. In SRI international. http://www.palmgrants.sri.com. Retrieved March 14, 2007.
33. Wang H.-Y., Liu T.-C., Chou C.-Y., Liang J.-K., Chan T.-W., and Yang J.-C. A framework of three learning activity levels for enhancing the usability and feasibility of wireless learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research 30 4 (2004) 331-351