Analogy in Grammar : Form and Acquisition

Analogy in Grammar : Form and Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-296

  Blevins, James P ^a   Blevins, Juliette ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY ANTHROPOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acquisition; Analogy; Grammar; Morphology; Paradigms; Probabilistic linguistics; Syntax; Typology

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349266051     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547548.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (385)

1. Ackerman, Farrell, Blevins, James P., and Malouf, Robert (2008). Inflectional morphology as a complex adaptive system. Paper presented at the First Workshop on Complex Systems and Language, University of Arizona.
2. Akhtar, Nameera (1999). Acquiring basic word order: Evidence for datadriven learning of syntactic structure. Journal of Child Language, 26: 339-56.
3. Albright, Adam (2002a). The Identification of Bases in Morphological Paradigms. Ph.D. thesis, UCLA.
4. Albright, Adam (2002b). Islands of reliability for regular morphology: Evidence from Italian. Language, 78: 684-709.
5. Albright, Adam (2008). Explaining universal tendencies and language particulars in analogical change. See Good (2008), 144-81.
6. Albright, Adam Andrade, Argelia Edith, and Hayes, Bruce (2001). Segmental environments of Spanish diphthongization. In UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, Number 7: Papers in Phonology 5, A. Albright and T. Cho (eds.). UCLA, Los Angeles, 117-51.
7. Albright, Adam and Hayes, Bruce (2002). Modeling English past tense intuitions with minimal generalization. In SIGPHON 6: Proceedings of the Sixth Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology, M. Maxwell (ed.). ACL, 58-69.
8. Albright, Adam and Hayes, Bruce (2003). Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition, 90: 119-61.
9. Albright, Adam and Hayes, Bruce (2006). Modeling productivity with the Gradual Learning Algorithm: The problem of accidentally exceptionless generalizations. In Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspectives, F. Gisbert, F. Caroline, V. Ralf, and S. Matthias (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 185-204.
10. Alegre, Maria and Gordon, Peter (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40: 41-61.
11. Alverson, Hoyt (1994). Semantics and Experience: Universal Metaphors of Time in English, Mandarin, Hindi and Sesotho. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12. Anderson, Judi Lynn, Martínez, Isaac H., and Pace, Wanda J. (1990). Comaltepec Chinantec tone. See Merrifield and Rensch (1990), 3-20.
13. Anderson, Stephen R. (1992). A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Anderson, Stephen R. (2004). Morphological universals and diachrony. In Yearbook of Morphology 2004, G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer, 1-17.
15. Anttila, Raimo (1977). Analogy. The Hague: Mouton.
16. Anttila, Raimo and Brewer, Warren A. (1977). Analogy: A Basic Bibliography. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
17. Aronoff, Mark (1994). Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Baayen, R. Harald (1992). Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1992, G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 181-208.
19. Baayen, R. Harald (2003). Probabilistic approaches to morphology. In Probabilistic Linguistics, R. Bod, J. Hay, and S. Jannedy (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 229-87.
20. Baayen, R. Harald (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Baayen, R. Harald Davidson, Doug J., and Bates, Douglas M. (2008a). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language.
22. Baayen, R. Harald Feldman, Laurie, and Schreuder, Robert (2006). Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 53: 496-512.
23. Baayen, R. Harald, Levelt, Willem M. J., Schreuder, Robert, and Ernestus, Mirjam (2008b). Paradigmatic structure in speech production. Chicago Linguistics Society, 43, to appear.
24. Baayen, R. Harald and Lieber, Rochelle (1991). Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics, 29: 801-43.
25. Baayen, R. Harald and Lieber, Rochelle and Schreuder, Robert (1997). The morphological complexity of simple nouns. Linguistics, 35: 861-77.
26. Baayen, R. Harald McQueen, James M., Dijkstra, Ton, and Schreuder, Robert (2003a). Dutch inflectional morphology in spoken- and written-word recognition. In Morphological Structure in Language Processing, R. H. Baayen and R. Schreuder (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
27. Baayen, R. Harald McQueen, James M., Dijkstra, Ton, and Schreuder, Robert (2003b). Frequency effects in regular inflectional morphology: Revisiting Dutch plurals. In Morphological Structure in Language Processing, R. H. Baayen and R. Schreuder (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 355-90.
28. Baayen, R. Harald and Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín (2005). Semantic density and past tense formation in three Germanic languages. Language, 81: 666-98.
29. Baayen, R. Harald Piepenbrock, Richard, and Gullikers, Léon (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
30. Baayen, R. Harald Wurm, Lee H., and Aycock, Joanna (2008c). Lexical dynamics for lowfrequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities. The Mental Lexicon, 2: 419-63.
31. Bailey, Todd M. and Hahn, Ulrike (2001). Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? Journal of Memory and Language, 44: 568-91.
32. Balota, David A., Yap, Melvin J., Cortese, Michael J., Hutchison, Keith I., Kessler, Brett, Loftis, Bjorn, Neely, James H., Nelson, Douglas L., Simpson, Greg, B., and Treiman, Rebecca (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39: 445-59.
33. Barnes, Jonathan and Kavitskaya, Darya (2002). Phonetic analogy and schwa deletion in French. In Proceedings of the 27th Berkeley Linguistic Society, 39-50.
34. Bartens, Hans-Hermann (1989). Lehrbuch der saamischen (lappischen) Sprache. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
35. Bates, Douglas M. (2005). Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News, 5: 27-30.
36. Bates, Douglas M. (2006). Linear mixed model implementation in lme4, Ms., Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
37. Bauer, Laurie (1998). When is a sequence of two nouns a compound in English? English Language & Linguistics, 2: 65-86.
38. Beard, Robert (1995). Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology: A General Theory of Inflection and Word Formation. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
39. Becker, Judith A. (1994). 'sneak-shoes', 'sworders' and 'nose-beards': A case study of lexical innovation. First Language, 14: 195-211.
40. Beckwith, Richard, Fellbaum, Christiane, Gross, Derek, and Miller, George A. (1991). WordNet: A lexical database organized on psycholinguistic principles. In Lexical Acquisition. Exploiting On-Line Resources to Build a Lexicon, U. Zernik (ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 211-32.
41. Bennett, Charles H. (1999). Quantum Information Theory. In Feynman and Computation: Exploring the Limits of Computers, Anthiny J. G. Hey (ed.). Reading, MA: Perseus Books.
42. Bergen, Benjamin K. (2004). The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language, 80: 290-311.
43. Berko, Jean (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word, 14: 150-77.
44. Berman, Ruth A. and Clark, Eve V. (1989). Learning to use compounds for contrast: data from Hebrew. First Language, 9: 247-70.
45. Bertram, Raymond, Schreuder, Robert, and Baayen, R. Harald (2000). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing. The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 26: 489-511.
46. Bien, Heidrun (2007). On the Production of Morphologically Complex Words with Special Attention to Effects of Frequency. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
47. Blevins, James P. (2003). Stems and paradigms. Language, 79: 737-67.
48. Blevins, James P. (2005). Word-based declensions in Estonian. In Yearbook of Morphology 2005, G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer, 1-25.
49. Blevins, James P. (2006a). English inflection and derivation. In Handbook of English Linguistics, B. Aarts and A. M. S. McMahon (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell, 507-36.
50. Blevins, James P. (2006b). Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics, 42: 531-73.
51. Blevins, James P. (2007). Conjugation classes in Estonian. Linguistica Uralica, 43: 250-67.
52. Blevins, James P. (2008). The post-transformational enterprise. Journal of Linguistics, 44: 723-42.
53. Blevins, Juliette (2004). Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Blevins, Juliette (2006a). New perspectives on English sound patterns: 'Natural' and 'unnatural' in Evolutionary Phonology. Journal of English Linguistics, 34: 6-25.
55. Blevins, Juliette (2006b). A theoretical synopsis of Evolutionary Phonology. Theoretical Linguistics, 32: 117-66.
56. Blevins, Juliette (2008). Structure-preserving sound change: A look at unstressed vowel syncope in Austronesian. In TBA, A. Adelaar and A. Pawley (eds.). (to appear) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
57. Blevins, Juliette and Garrett, Andrew (1998). 'The origins of consonant-vowel metathesis.' Language, 74: 508-56.
58. Bloomfield, Leonard (1895). On assimilation and adaptation in congeneric classes of words. American Journal of Philology, 16: 409-34.
59. Bloomfield, Leonard (1933). Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60. Bochner, Harry (1993). Simplicity in Generative Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
61. Bod, Rens, Hay, Jennifer, and Jannedy, Stefanie (eds.) (2003). Probabilistic Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Bohas, Georges, Guillaume, Jean-Patrick, and Kouloughli, Djamel Eddine (1990). The Arabic Linguistic Tradition. Arabic Thought and Culture. London: Routledge.
63. Bonami, Olivier and Boyé, Gilles (2007). Remarques sur les bases de la conjugaison. In Des sons et des sens, E. Delais-Roussarie and L. Labrune (eds.). Paris: Hermès Sciences, 77-90.
64. Braine, Martin D. S. (1966). Learning the positions of words relative to a marker element. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72: 532-40.
65. Braine, Martin D. S. (1987). What is learned in acquiring word classes - a step toward an acquisition theory. In Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, B. MacWhinney (ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 65-87.
66. Brent, Michael R. (1999). An efficient, probabilistically sound algorithm for segmentation and word discovery. Machine Learning, 34: 71-105.
67. Broe, Michael (1993). Specification Theory: The Treatment of Redundancy in Generative Phonology. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
68. Brooks, Patricia J., Braine, Martin D. S., Catalano, Lisa, Brody, Ruth E., and Sudhalter, Vicki (1993). Acquisition of gender-like noun subclasses in an artificial language: The contribution of phonological markers to learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 32: 76-95.
69. Buchholz, Eva (2004). Grammatik der finnischen Sprache. Bremen: Hempen Verlag.
70. Burnard, Lou (1995). Users Guide for the British National Corpus. British National Corpus Consortium, Oxford: Oxford University Computing Service.
71. Bybee, Joan L. (1985). Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
72. Bybee, Joan L. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10: 425-55.
73. Bybee, Joan L. (2001). Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
74. Bybee, Joan L. (2002). Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change, 14: 261-90.
75. Bybee, Joan L. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language, 82: 711-33.
76. Bybee, Joan L. and Moder, Carol L. (1983). Morphological classes as natural categories. Language, 59: 251-70.
77. Bybee, Joan L. and Pardo, Elly (1981). On lexical and morphological conditioning of alternations: A nonce-probe experiment with Spanish verbs. Linguistics, 19: 937-68.
78. Cameron-Faulkner, Thea and Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew (2000). Stem alternants as morphological signata: Evidence from blur avoidance in Polish nouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 18: 813-35.
79. Campbell, Lyle (1998). Historical Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
80. Campbell, Lyle and Poser, William J. (2008). Language Classification: History and Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81. Caramazza, Alfonso (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14: 177-208.
82. Carstairs, Andrew (1983). Paradigm economy. Journal of Linguistics, 19: 115-25.
83. Carstairs, Andrew (1987). Allomorphy in Inflection. London: Croom Helm.
84. Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew (1991). 'Inflection classes: Two questions with one answer'. In Paradigms: The Economy of Inflection, ed. F. Plank. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 213-53.
85. Casanto, Daniel and Boroditsky, Lera (2007). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 102: 118-28.
86. Chapman, Don and Royal Skousen (2005). Analogical modeling and morphological change: The case of the adjectival negative prefix in English. English Language and Linguistics 9(2): 1-25.
87. Chater, Nick, Tenenbaum, Joshua B., and Yuille, Alan (eds.). (2006). Special issue: Probabilistic models of cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10.7.
88. Chitoran, Ioana and Hualde, José I. (2007). On the origin and evolution of the contrast between diphthongs and hiatus sequences in Romance. Phonology, 24: 37-75.
89. Chomsky, Noam (1975). The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
90. Chomsky, Noam (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.
91. Chomsky, Noam and Halle, Morris (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
92. Chomsky, Noam and Lasnik, Howard (1977). Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry, 8: 425-504.
93. Clahsen, Harald, Aveledo, Fraibet, and Roca, Iggy (2002). The development of regular and irregular verb inflection in Spanish child language. Journal of Child Language, 29: 591-622.
94. Clahsen, Harald, Sonnenstuhl, Ingrid, Hadler, Meike, and Eisenbeiss, Sonja (2001). Morphological paradigms in language processing and language disorders. Transactions of the Philological Society, 99: 247-77.
95. Clark, Eve V. (1981). Lexical innovations: How children learn to create new words. In The Child's Construction of Language, W. Deutsch (ed.). London: Academic Press, 299-328.
96. Clark, Eve V. (1983). Meaning and concepts. In Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 3 Cognitive Development, P. Mussen, L. Flavell, and E. Markman (eds.). New York: Wiley, 787-840.
97. Clark, Eve V. and Berman, Ruth A. (1987). Types of linguistic knowledge: Interpreting and producing compound nouns. Journal of Child Language, 14: 547-67.
98. Clark, Eve V. Gelman, Susan A., and Lane, Nancy M. (1985). Compound nouns and category structure in young children. Child Development, 56: 84-94.
99. Costello, Fintan. J. and Keane, Mark T. (2001). Testing two theories of conceptual combination: Alignment versus diagnosticity in the comprehension and production of combined concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 27.1: 255-71.
100. Cover, Thomas M. and Thomas, Joy A. (1991). Elements of Information Theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
101. Crawley, Michael J. (2002). Statistical Computing. An Introduction to Data Analysis using S-plus. Chichester: Wiley.
102. Croft, William (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
103. Croft, William (2008). Evolutionary linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37: 219-34.
104. Dabrowska, Ewa and Lieven, Elena (2005). Towards a lexically specific grammar of children's question constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 16: 437-74.
105. Daelemans, Walter and van den Bosch, Antal (2005). Memory-based Language Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
106. Daelemans, Walter, Zavrel, Jakob, van der Sloot, Ko, and van den Bosch, Antal (2000). TiMBL: Tilburg memory based learner reference guide 3.0. Technical report, Computational Linguistics Tilburg University.
107. Daelemans, Walter, Zavrel, Jakob, van der Sloot, Ko, and van den Bosch, Antal (2005). TiMBL: Tilburg memory-based learner, version 5.1, reference guide. Technical report, ILK Technical Report Series 04-02.
108. Daugherty, Kim and Seidenberg, Mark (1994). Beyond rules and exceptions: A connectionist approach to inflectional morphology. In The Reality of Linguistic Rules, S. D. Lima, R. L. Corrigan, and G. K. Iverson (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 353-88.
109. Deacon, Terrence W. (1997). The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Human Brain. London: Penguin Press.
110. Deutscher, Guy (2001). On the mechanisms of morphological change. Folia Linguistica Historica, 22: 41-8.
111. Deutscher, Guy (2005). The Unfolding of Language: The Evolution of Mankind's Greatest Invention. London: Arrow.
112. Di Sciullo, Anne-Marie and Williams, Edwin (1987). On the Definition of Word. Cambridge: MIT Press.
113. Dinnsen, Daniel (1979). Maybe atomic phonology. In Current Issues in Phonological Theory, D. Dinnsen (ed.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 31-49.
114. Downing, Pamela A. (1977). On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language, 53. 4: 810-42.
115. Dressler, Wolfgang U., Libben, Gary, Stark, Jacqueline, Pons, Christiane, and Jarema, Gonia (2001). The processing of interfixed German compounds. In Yearbook of Morphology 1999, G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 185-220.
116. Eddington, David (2002). A comparison of two analogical models: Tilburg memory-based learner versus analogical modeling. In Analogical modeling: An Exemplar-based Approach to Language, R. Skousen, D. Lonsdale, and D. B. Parkinson (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 141-55.
117. Eisner, Frank and McQueen, James M. (2005). The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 67: 224-38.
118. Elzinga, Dirk (2006). English adjective comparison and analogy. Lingua, 116: 757-70.
119. Erelt, Mati, Kasik, Reet, Metslang, Helle, Rajandi, Henno, Ross, Kristiina, Henn, Saari, Kaja, Tael, and Silvi, Vare (1995). Eesti keele grammatika. Volume I: Morfoloogia. Tallin: Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia Eesti Keele Instituut.
120. Ernestus, Mirjam and Baayen, R. Harald (2003). Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language, 79: 5-38.
121. Ernestus, Mirjam and Baayen, R. Harald (2004). Analogical effects in regular past tense production in Dutch. Linguistics, 42: 873-903.
122. Estes, Zachary (2003). Attributive and relational processes in nominal combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 48: 304-19.
123. Fabb, Nigel (1998). Compounding. In The Handbook of Morphology, A. Spencer and A. M. Zwicky (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 66-83.
124. Filipović D{stroke}urd{stroke}ević, Dušica (2007). The Polysemy Effect in the Processing of Serbian Nouns. Ph.D. thesis, University of Belgrade, Serbia.
125. Finkel, Rafael and Stump, Gregory (2007). Principal parts and linguistic typology. Morphology, 17: 39-75.
126. Firth, J. R. (1930). Speech. London: Ernest Benn.
127. Friedman, Lynn and Wall, Melanie (2005). Graphical views of suppression and multicollinearity in multiple regression. The American Statistician, 59: 127-36.
128. Frigo, Lenore and McDonald, Janet L. (1998). Properties of phonological markers that affect the acquisition of gender-like subclasses. Journal of Memory and Language, 39: 218-45.
129. Frisch, Stefan A. (1996). Similarity and Frequency in Phonology. Ph.D. thesis, Northwestern University.
130. Frisch, Stefan A. Pierrehumbert, Janet B., and Broe, Michael B. (2004). Similarity avoidance and the OCP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22: 179-228.
131. Gagné, Christina L. (2001). Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 27: 236-54.
132. Gagné, Christina L. and Shoben, Edward J. (1997). Influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 23: 71-87.
133. Gagné, Christina L. and Shoben, Edward J. (2002). Priming relations in ambiguous noun-noun combinations. Memory and Cognition, 30: 637-46.
134. Gagné, Christina L. and Spalding, Thomas L. (2004). Effect of relation availability on the interpretation and access of familiar noun-noun compounds. Brain and Language, 90: 478-86.
135. Gagné, Christina L. and Spalding, Thomas L. (2006). Conceptual combinations: Implications for the mental lexicon. In The Representation and Processing of Compound Words, G. Libben and G. Jarema (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 145-68.
136. Gahl, Susanne and Yu, Alan C. L. (eds.). (2006). Special issue on exemplarbased models in linguistics. The Linguistic Review, 23.
137. Garrett, Andrew (2008). Paradigmatic uniformity and markedness. See Good (2008), 125-43.
138. Gentner, Dedre (1983). Structure mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7: 155-70.
139. Gentner, Dedre, Bowdle, Brian F., Wolff, Phillip, and Boronat, Consuelo (2001a). Metaphor is like analogy. See Gentner, Holyoak, and Kokinov (2001b), 199-253.
140. Gentner, Dedre, Holyoak, Keith J., and Kokinov, Boicho N. (eds) (2001b). The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
141. Gentner, Dedre, and Kurtz, Kenneth J. (2005). Relational categories. In Categorization Inside and Outside the Lab, W. K. Ahn, R. L. Goldstone, B. C. Love, A. B. Markman, and P. W. Wolff (eds.). Washington, DC: APA, 151-75.
142. Gentner, Dedre, and Markman, Arthur B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52: 45-56.
143. Gerken, LouAnn, Wilson, Rachel, and Lewis, W. (2005). 17-month-olds can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories. Journal of Child Language, 32: 249-68.
144. Gerken, LouAnn., Gómez, Rebecca L., and Nurmsoo, Erika (1999). The role of meaning and form in the formation of syntactic categories. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development. Albuquerque, NM.
145. Giegerich, Heinz J. (2004). Compound or phrase? English noun-plus-noun constructions and the stress criterion. English Language and Linguistics, 8: 1-24.
146. Gildea, Daniel and Jurafsky, Daniel (1996). Learning bias and phonologicalrule induction. Computational Linguistics, 22: 497-530.
147. Gleitman, Lila R. and Gleitman, Henry (1970). Phrase and Paraphrase: Some Innovative Uses of Language. New York: W. W. Norton.
148. Goldberg, Adele E. (2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
149. Goldberg, Adele E. and Jackendoff, Ray (2005). The end result(ative). Language, 81: 474-7.
150. Goldinger, Stephen D. (2000). The role of perceptual episodes in lexical processing. In Proceedings of SWAP, Workshop on Spoken Word Access Processes, A. Cutler, J. M. McQueen, and R. Zondervan (eds.). Nijmegen: Max Planck Insititute for Psycholinguistics, 155-8.
151. Goldsmith, John A. (2000). Linguistica: An automatic morphological analyzer. In Papers from the 36th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Main Session, A. Okrent and J. Boyle (eds.). Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society, 125-39.
152. Goldsmith, John A. (2001). The unsupervised learning of natural language morphology. Computational Linguistics, 27: 153-98.
153. Goldsmith, John A. (2005). Review of Nevins. Language, 81: 719-36.
154. Goldsmith, John A. (2006). An algorithm for the unsupervised learning of morphology. Natural Language Engineering, 12: 353-71.
155. Goldsmith, John A. (2007). Towards a new empiricism. In Recherches Linguistiques à Vincennes 36, J. Brandao de Carvalho (ed.), 9-36.
156. Goldsmith, John A. (2009). Segmentation and morphology. In The Handbook of Computational Linguistics, A. Clark, C. Fox, and S. Lappin (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell.
157. Goldsmith, John A. and Hu, Yu (2004). From signatures to finite state automata. Technical Report TR-2005-05, Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago.
158. Gómez, Rebecca L. and LaKusta, Laura (2004). A first step in form-based category abstraction by 12-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 7: 567-80.
159. Good, Jeff (ed.) (2008). Linguistic Universals and Language Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
160. Goswami, Usha (2001). Analogical reasoning in children. See Gentner, Holyoak, and Kokinov (2001), 437-70.
161. Goswami, Usha and Brown, Ann L. (1989). Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: Analogical reasoning and causal relations. Cognition, 35: 69-95.
162. Goswami, Usha and Brown, Ann L. (1990). Higher-order structure and relational reasoning: Contrasting analogical and thematic relations. Cognition, 36: 207-26.
163. Grimshaw, Jane (1981). Form, function, and the language acquisition device. In The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition, C. L. Baker and J. J. McCarthy (eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 165-82.
164. Guenther, Frank H., Nieto-Castanon, Alfonso, Ghosh Satrajit, S., and Tourville, Jason A. (2004). Representation of sound categories in auditory cortical maps. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47: 46-57.
165. Gurevich, Olga (2006). Construction Morphology: the Georgian Case. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
166. Hafer, Margaret A. and Weiss, Stephen F. (1974). Word segmentation by letter successor varieties. Information Storage and Retrieval, 10: 371-85.
167. Hahn, Ulricke and Chater, Nick (1998). Similarity and rules: Distinct? Exhaustive? Empirically distinguishable? Cognition, 65: 197-230.
168. Hahn, Ulricke and Chater, Nick and Richardson, Lucy B. (2003). Similarity as transformation. Cognition, 87: 1-32.
169. Halford, Graeme S. and Andrews, Glenda (2007). Domain general processes in higher cognition: Analogical reasoning, schema induction and capacity limitations. In Integrating the Mind: Domain General versus Domain Specific Processes in Higher Cognition, M. J. Roberts (ed.). New York: Psychology Press, 213-32.
170. Halle, Morris (1962). Phonology in generative grammar. Word, 18: 54-72.
171. Halle, Morris and Marantz, Alec (1993). Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20, K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 111-76.
172. Hamp, Eric, Householder, Fred W., and Austerlitz, Robert (eds.)(1966). Readings in Linguistics II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
173. Hare, Mary and Elman, Jeffrey L. (1995). Learning and morphological change. Cognition, 56: 61-98.
174. Harrington, Jonathan, Palethorpe, Sallyanne, and Watson, Catherine I. (2000). Does the Queen speak the Queen's English? Nature, 408: 927-8.
175. Harris, Alice C. and Campbell, Lyle (1995). Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, vol. 74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
176. Harris, Zellig S. (1942). Morpheme alternants in linguistic analysis. Language, 18: 169-180. Reprinted in Joos (1957), 109-15.
177. Harris, Zellig S. (1955). From phoneme to morpheme. Language, 31: 190-222.
178. Harris, Zellig S. (1967). Morpheme boundaries within words: Report on a computer test. In Papers in Structural and Transformational Linguistics (1970), 68-77. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
179. Hay, Jennifer (2001). Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? Linguistics, 39: 1041-70.
180. Hay, Jennifer B. and Baayen, R. Harald (2002). Parsing and productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 2001, Geert E. Booij and Jaapvan Marle (eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer, 203-35.
181. Hay, Jennifer B. and Baayen, R. Harald (2005). Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9: 342-8.
182. Hay, Jennifer B., Pierrehumbert, Janet B., and Beckman, Mary (2004). Speech perception, well-formedness and the statistics of the lexicon. In Phonetic Interpretation: Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI, J. Local, R. Ogden, and R. Temple (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 58-74.
183. Heine, Bernd (1993). Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
184. Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna, and Ohala, John J. (eds.). (1995). Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
185. Hock, Hans Henrich (1991). Principles of Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
186. Hock, Hans Henrich (2003). Analogical change. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, B. Josephs and R. Janda (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 441-80.
187. Hockett, Charles F. (1947). Problems of morphemic analysis. Language, 23: 321-43. Reprinted in Joos (1957), 229-42.
188. Hockett, Charles F. (1954). Two models of grammatical description. Word, 10: 210-31. Reprinted in Joos (1957), 386-99.
189. Hockett, Charles F. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203: 88-9.
190. Hockett, Charles F. (1966). Language, mathematics and linguistics. In T. Seberk (ed.) Current trends in linguistics, vol 3: Theoretical Foundations. The Hague: Mouton. 155-304.
191. Hockett, Charles F. (1968). The State of the Art. The Hague: Mouton.
192. Hockett, Charles F. (1987). Refurbishing our Foundations: Elementary Linguistics from an Advanced Point of View. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, vol. 56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
193. Holyoak, Keith J. and Thagard, Paul (1977). The analogical mind. American Psychologist, 52: 35-44.
194. Holyoak, Keith J. and Thagard, Paul (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science 13: 295-355.
195. Holyoak, Keith J. and Thagard, Paul (1997). The analogical mind. American Psychologist, 52(1): 35-44.
196. Hopper, Paul and Traugott, Elizabeth C. (2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
197. Hu, Yu, Matveeva, Irina, Goldsmith, John A., and Sprague, Colin (2005). Using morphology and syntax together in unsupervised learning. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Psychocomputational Models of Human Language Acquisition, Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Computational Linguistics, 20-7.
198. Huang, Hsu-Wen, Lee, Chia-Ying, Tsai, Jie-Li, Lee, Chia-Lin, Hung, Daisy L., and Tzeng, Ovid J.-L. (2006). Orthographic neighborhood effects in reading Chinese two-character words. Neuroreport, 17: 1061-5.
199. Hughes, Michael and Ackerman, Farrell (2002). Words and paradigms: Estonian nominal declension. In Papers from the 37th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, M. Andronis, C. Ball, H. Elston, and S. Neuvel (eds.).
200. Hunt, Gavin R. and Gray, Russell D. (2004). The crafting of hook tools by wild New Caledonian crows. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B. Biol. Sci., 271: S88-S90.
201. Itkonen, Esa (2005). Analogy as Structure and Process: Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
202. Jackendoff, Ray (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
203. Jakobi, Angelika (1990). A Fur Grammar. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
204. Johnson, C. Douglas (1972). Formal Aspects of Phonological Description. The Hague: Mouton.
205. Johnson, Keith (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In Talker Variability in Speech Processing, K. Johnson and J. W. Mullennix (eds.). San Diego: Academic Press, 145-65.
206. de Jong, Nivja H. (2002). Morphological Families in the Mental Lexicon. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nijmegen.
207. de Jong, Nivja H., Feldman, Laurie B., Schreuder, Robert, Pastizzo, Matthew J., and Baayen, R. Harald (2002). The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral morphological and central orthographic effects. Brain and Language, 81: 555-67.
208. de Jong, Nivja H., Schreuder, Robert, and Baayen, R. Harald (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15: 329-65.
209. Joos, Martin (ed.) (1957). Readings in Linguistics I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
210. Joseph, Brian and Janda, Richard (1988). The how and why of diachronic morphologization and demorphologization. In Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, M. Hammond and M. Noonan (eds.). San Diego: Academic Press, 193-210.
211. Kang, Yoonjung (2006). Neutralization and variations in Korean verbal paradigms. In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics XI. Hanshin Publishing Company, 183-96.
212. Kaplan, Ronald M. and Kay, Martin (1994). Regular models of phonological rule systems. Computational Linguististics, 20: 331-78.
213. Karlsson, Fred (1999). Finnish: An Essential Grammar. London: Routledge.
214. Katz, Jeffrey S. and Wright, Anthony A. (2006). Same/different abstractconcept learning by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Proceedings, 32: 80-6.
215. Kay, Paul and Fillmore, Charles J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction. Language, 75: 1-33.
216. Kay, Paul and Zimmer, Karl (1976). On the semantics of compounds and genitives in English. In Sixth California Linguistics Association Proceedings, San Diego, CA: Campile Press, 29-35.
217. Kazazis, Kostas (1969). Possible evidence for (near-)underlying forms in the speech of a child. Chicago Linguistics Society, 5: 382-6.
218. Kemler Nelson, Deborah, Jusczyk, Peter W., Mandel, Denise R., Myers, James, Turk, Alice E., and Gerken, LouAnn (1995). The headturn preference procedure for testing auditory perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 18: 111-16.
219. Kempe, Vera and Brooks, Patricia J. (2001). The role of diminutives in the acquisition of Russian gender: Can elements of child-directed speech aid in learning morphology? Language Learning, 51: 221-56.
220. Keuleers, Emmanuel (2008). Memory-based Learning of Inflectional Morphology. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
221. Keuleers, Emmanuel, Sandra, Dorniniek, Daelemans, Walter, Gillis, Steven, Durieux, Gert, and Martens, Evelyn (2007). Dutch plural inflection: The exception that proves the analogy. Cognitive Psychology, 54: 283-318.
222. Kibrik, Aleksandr E. (1998). Archi. In Handbook of Morphology, A. Spencer and A. M. Zwicky (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell, 455-76.
223. Kirby, Simon (2001). Spontaneous evolution of linguistic structure: An iterated learning model of the emergence of regularity and irregularity. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 5: 102-10.
224. Kirby, Simon (2007). The evolution of language. In Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, R. Dunbar and L. Barrett (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 669-81.
225. Kostić, Aleksandar (1991). Informational approach to processing inflected morphology: Standard data reconsidered. Psychological Research, 53: 62-70.
226. Kostić, Aleksandar (1995). Informational load constraints on processing inflected morphology. In Morphological Aspects of Language Processing, L. B. Feldman (eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 317-44.
227. Kostić, Aleksandar (2008). The effect of the amount of information on language processing. In submission.
228. Kostić, Aleksandar Marković, Tanja, and Baucal, Aleksandar (2003). Inflectional morphology and word meaning: Orthogonal or co-implicative domains? In Morphological Structure in Language Processing, R. H. Baayen and R. Schreuder (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1-44.
229. Kraska-Szlenk, Iwona (2007). Analogy: The Relation between Lexicon and Grammar. Munich: Lincom Europa.
230. Krott, Andrea, Gagné, Christina L., and Nicoladis, Elena (2009). How the parts relate to the whole: Frequency effects on childrens's interpretation of novel compounds. Journal of Child Language, 36: 85-112.
231. Krott, Andrea, Hagoort, Peter, and Baayen, R. Harald (2004). Sublexical units and supralexical combinatorics in the processing of interfixed Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19: 453-71.
232. Krott, Andrea, Krebbers, Loes, Schreuder, Robert, and Baayen, R. Harald (2002a). Semantic influence on linkers in Dutch noun-noun compounds. Folia Linguistica, 36: 7-22.
233. Krott, Andrea, and Nicoladis, Elena (2005). Large constituent families help children parse compounds. Journal of Child Language, 32: 139-58.
234. Krott, Andrea, Schreuder, Robert, and Baayen, R. Harald (2001). Analogy in morphology: Modeling the choice of linking morphemes in Dutch. Linguistics, 1: 51-93.
235. Krott, Andrea, Schreuder, Robert, and Baayen, R. Harald (2002b). Analogical hierarchy: Exemplar-based modeling of linkers in Dutch noun-noun compounds. In Analogical Modeling: An Examplar-Based Approach to Language, R. Skousen, D. Londsdale, and D. B. Parkinson (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 181-206.
236. Krott, Andrea, Schreuder, Robert, and Baayen, R. Harald (2002c). Linking elements in Dutch noun-noun compounds: Constituent families as analogical predictors for response latencies. Brain and Language, 81: 708-22.
237. Krott, Andrea, Schreuder, Robert, and Baayen, R. Harald and Dressler, Wolfgang U. (2007). Analogical effects on linking elements in German compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22: 25-57.
238. Kruskal, Joseph B. (1983). An overview of sequence comparison. In Time Warps, String Edits, and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison, D. Sankoff and J. B. Kruskal (eds.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1-44.
239. Kuehne, Sven E., Forbus, Kenneth D., Gentner, Dedre, and Quinn, Bryan (2000). SEQL: Category learning as progressive abstraction using structure mapping. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 770-5.
240. Kuhl, Patricia K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a perceptual magnet effect for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception and Psychophysics, 50: 93-107.
241. Kuhl, Patricia K. (1995). Mechanisms of developmental change in speech and language. In Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol. 2, K. Elenius and P. Branderud (eds.). Stockholm: Stockholm University, 132-9.
242. Kuperman, Victor, Bertram, Raymond, and Baayen, R. Harald (2008). Morphological dynamics in compound processing. In submission.
243. Kupryanova, Z. N. (1985). Nenetskij jazyk [Nenets Language]. Moscow: Nauk.
244. Kuryłowicz, Jerzy (1947). La nature des procès dits "analogiques". Acta Linguistica, 5: 121-38. Reprinted in Hamp, Householder, and Austerlitz (1966), 158-74. English translation with introduction by Margaret Winters (1995), The nature of the so-called analogical processes. Diachronica 12: 113-45.
245. Lahiri, Aditi (ed.) (2000). Analogy, Levelling, Markedness: Principles of Change in Phonology and Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
246. Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
247. Landauer, Thomas K. and Dumais, Susan T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104: 211-40.
248. Law, Vivien (2003). The History of Linguistics in Europe: From Plato to 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
249. Lees, Robert B. (1960). The Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
250. Levelt, Willem J. M., Roelofs, Ardi, and Meyer, Antje S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 1-37.
251. Levi, Judith N. (1978). The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. New York: Academic Press.
252. Levy, Roger (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106: 1126-77.
253. Libben, Gary, Jarema, Gonia, Dressler, Wolfgang, Stark, Jacqueline, and Pons, Christiane (2002). Triangulating the effects of interfixation in the processing of German compounds. Folia Linguistica, 36: 23-43.
254. Lieber, Rochelle (1992). Deconstructing Morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
255. Lieven, Elena, Behrens, Heike, Speares, Jennifer, and Tomasello, Michael (2003). Early syntactic creativity: a usage-based approach'. Journal of Child Language, 30: 333-70.
256. Locke, John (1690/1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. History of Economic Thought Books. McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, Canada: Hamilton.
257. Long, Christopher J. and Almor, Amit (2000). Irregularization: The interaction of item frequency and phonological interference in regular past tense production. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 310-15.
258. Lonsdale, Deryle (2002). Data files for analogical modeling. In Analogical Modeling: An Exemplar-Based Approach to Language, Royal Skousen, Deryle Lonsdale, and Dilworth B. Parkinson (eds.). 349-63. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
259. Luce, R. Duncan (1959). Individual Choice Behavior. New York: Wiley.
260. MacWhinney, Brain. (2000). The Childes Project: Tool for Analyzing Talk, Vol. 1: Transcription Format and Programs. Vol. 2: The Database. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
261. MacWhinney, Brian and Leinbach, Jared (1991). Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model. Cognition, 40: 121-57.
262. Magnus, Margaret (2000). What's in a Word? Evidence for Phonosemantics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Trondheim.
263. Mańczak, Witold (1958). Tendances générales des changements analogiques. Lingua, 7: 298-325, 387-420.
264. Mańczak, Witold (1980). Laws of analogy. In Historical Morphology J. Fisiak (ed.). The Hague: Mouton, 283-8.
265. Manning, Christopher D. and Schütze, Hinrich (1999). Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
266. Maratsos, Michael (1982). The child's construction of grammatical categories. In Language Acquisition: The State of the Art, E. Wanner and L. Gleitman (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
267. de Marcken, Carl (1996). Unsupervised Language Acquisition. Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge MA.
268. Marcus, Gary F., Brinkmann, Ursula, Clahsen, Harald, Wiese, Richard, and Pinker, Steven (1995). German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, 29: 189-256.
269. Mattens, W. H. M. (1984). De voorspelbaarheid van tussenklanken in nominale samenstellingen. De Nieuwe Taalgids, 7: 333-43.
270. Matthews, Peter H. (1972). Inflectional Morphology: A Theoretical Study Based on Aspects of Latin Verb Conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
271. Matthews, Peter H. (1974). Morphology. An Introduction to the Theory of Word Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
272. Matthews, Peter H. (1991). Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
273. Matthews, Peter H. (2007). Syntactic Relations: A Critical Survey. Vol. 114, Cambridge Studies in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
274. Mayr, Ernst (1997). The objects of selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94: 2091-4.
275. McClelland, James L. and Patterson, Karalyn (2002). Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6: 465-72.
276. Meillet, Antoine (1915). Étude comparative des langues indo-européennes. Paris: Hachette et Cie.
277. Mellenius, Ingmarie (1997). The Acquisition of Nominal Compounding in Swedish. Lund: Lund University Press.
278. Merlo, Lauren M. F., Pepper, John W., Reid, Brian J., and Maley, Carlo C. (2006). Cancer as an evolutionary and ecological process. Nature Reviews Cancer, 6: 924-35.
279. Merrifield, William R. and Rensch, Calvin R. (eds.) (1990). Syllables, Tone, and Verb Paradigms. Studies in Chinantec Languages, Vol. 4. Summer Institute of Linguistics and The University of Texas at Arlington, Dallas.
280. Mielke, Jeff (2004). The Emergence of Distinctive Features. Ph.D. thesis, Ohio State University.
281. Mielke, Jeff (2008). The Emergence of Distinctive Features. Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
282. Milin, Petar, Filipović D{stroke}urd{stroke}ević, Dušica, and Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín (2009). The simultaneous effects of inflectional paradigms and classes on lexical recognition: Evidence from Serbian. Journal of Memory and Language, 60: 50-64.
283. Miller, George A. (1990). Wordnet: An on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography, 3: 235-312.
284. Mintz, Tobin (2002). Category induction from distributional cues in an artifical language. Memory and Cognition, 30: 678-86.
285. Mintz, Tobin (2006). Frequent frames: Simple co-occurrence constructions and their links to linguistic structure. In Constructions in Acquisition, B. Kelly and E. V. Clark (eds.). Stanford: CSLI, 59-82.
286. Miozzo, Michele and Caramazza, Alfonso (2005). The representation of homophones: Evidence from the distractor-frequency effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31: 1360-71.
287. Morpurgo Davies, Anna (1978). Analogy, segmentation and the early Neogrammarians. Transactions of the Philological Society, 36-60.
288. Morris, Richard E.(2005). Attraction to the unmarked in Old Spanish leveling. In Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, D. Eddington (ed.). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 180-91.
289. Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín (2003). Paradigmatic Structures in Morphological Processing: Computational and Cross-Linguistic Studies. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nijmegen.
290. Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, Bertram, Raymond, Haikio, Tuomo, Schreuder, Robert, and Baayen, R. Harald (2004a). Morphological family size in a morphologically rich language: The case of Finnish compared to Dutch and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30: 1271-8.
291. Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, Kostić, Aleksandar, and Filipović D{stroke}urd{stroke}ević, Dušica (2008). The missing link between morphemic assemblies and behavioral responses: A Bayesian information-theoretical model of lexical processing. Manuscript submitted for publication.
292. Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, Kostić, Aleksandar, and Baayen, R. Harald (2004b). Putting the bits together: An information-theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition, 94: 1-18.
293. Murphy, Gregory L. (1990). Noun phrase interpretation and conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 29: 259-88.
294. Nakisa, Ramin Charles, Plunkett, Kim, and Hahn, Ulrike (2000). A crosslinguistic comparison of single and dual-route models of inflectional morphology. In Cognitive Models of Language Acquisition, P. Broeder and J. Murre (eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 201-22.
295. Neuvel, Sylvain and Fulop, Sean A. (2002). Unsupervised learning of morphology without morphemes. In Proceedings of the ACL-02 Workshop on Morphological and Phonological Learning, Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics, 31-40.
296. Neuvel, Sylvain and Singh, Rajendra (2001). Vive la différence! What morphology is about. Folia Linguistica, 35: 313-20.
297. New, Boris, Brysbaert, Marc, Segui, Juan, Ferrand, Ludovic, and Rastle, Kathleen (2004). The processing of singular and plural nouns in French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 51: 568-85.
298. Nickel, Klaus Peter (1990). Samisk grammatikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
299. Nicoladis, Elena (2003). What compound nouns mean to preschool children. Brain and Language, 84: 38-49.
300. Nicoladis, Elena and Krott, Andrea (2007). Family size and French-speaking children's segmentation of existing compounds. Language Learning, 57: 201-228.
301. Nosofsky, Robert M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identificationcategorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115: 39-57.
302. Nosofsky, Robert M. (1990). Relations between exemplar similarity and likelihood models of classification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 34: 393-418.
303. Oinas, Zsuzsanna (2008). Guide to Finnish Declension. Espoo: Finnlibri.
304. Pace, Wanda J. (1990). Comaltepec Chinantec verb inflection. See Merrifield and Rensch (1990), 21-62.
305. Parault, Susan J., Schwanenflugel, Paula J., and Haverback, Heather R. (2005). The development of interpretations for novel noun-noun conceptual combinations during the early school years. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91: 67-87.
306. Paul, Hermann (1920). Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Max Niemayer Verlag.
307. Penn, Derek C., Holyoak, Keith J., and Povinelli, Daniel J. (2008). Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31: 109-78.
308. Penny, Ralph (2002). A History of the Spanish Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
309. Pepperberg, Irene M. (1987). Acquisition of the same/different concept by an African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus): Learning with respect to categories of color, shape and material. Animal Learning and Behavior, 15: 423-32.
310. Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, J. Bybee and P. Hopper (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 137-58.
311. Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (2003). Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech, 46: 115-54.
312. Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (2006). The new toolkit. Journal of Phonetics, 34: 516-30.
313. Pihel, Kalju and Pikamäe, Arno (eds.) (1999). Soome-eesti sõnaraamat. Tallinn: Valgus.
314. Pinker, Steven (1982). A theory of the acquisition of lexical interpretive grammars. In The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, J. Bresnan (ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 655-726.
315. Pinker, Steven (1991). Rules of language. Science, 153: 530-35.
316. Pinker, Steven (1999). Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
317. Pinker, Steven and Ullman, Michael T. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6: 456-63.
318. Plag, Ingo (2006). The variability of compound stress in English: Structural, semantic, and analogical factors. Part 1. English Language & Linguistics, 10: 143-72.
319. Premack, David (1983). Animal cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 34: 351-62.
320. Rissanen, Jorma (1989). Stochastic Complexity in Statistical Inquiry. Riner Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publishing Company.
321. Roark, Brian and Sproat, Richard (2007). Computational Approaches to Morphology and Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
322. Robins, Robert H. (1959). In defense of WP. Transactions of the Philological Society, 116-44. Reprinted in Transactions of the Philological Society 99: 1-36.
323. Robinson, A. H. (1979). Observations on some deficiencies in the transformational model as applied to particular compound types in French. Cahiers de Lexicologie, 35: 107-15.
324. Ross, Sheldon M. (1988). A First Course in Probability. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
325. Rubach, Jerzy and Booij, Geert (1985). A grid theory of Polish stress. Lingua, 66: 281-319.
326. Rumelhart, David E. and McClelland, James L. (1987). Learning the past tenses of English verbs. In Mechanisms of Language Acquisition, B. MacWhinney (ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 194-248.
327. Ryder, Mary Ellen (1994). Ordered Chaos: An Investigation of the Interpretation of English Noun-Noun Compounds. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
328. Salminen, Tapani (1993). On identifying basic vowel distinctions in Tundra Nenets. Finno-Ugrische Forschungen, 51: 177-87.
329. Salminen, Tapani (1997). Tundra Nenets Inflection. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 227, Helsinki.
330. Salminen, Tapani (1998). A Morphological Dictionary of Tundra Nenets. Lexica Societatis Fenno-Ugricae 26, Helsinki.
331. Sankoff, Gillian and Blondeau, Hélène (2007). Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language, 83: 560-88.
332. Sapir, Edward (1921). Language. New York: Harcourt Brace.
333. Saussure, Ferdinand de (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
334. Schreuder, Robert and Baayen, R. Harald (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In Morphological Aspects of Language Processing, L. B. Feldman (ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 131-54.
335. Schreuder, Robert and Baayen, R. Harald (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37: 118-39.
336. Seiler, Hansjakob (1965). On paradigmatic and syntagmatic similarity. Lingua, 18: 35-97.
337. Shannon, Claude (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379-423, 623-56.
338. Sharkey, William S. (1982). The Theory of Natural Monopoly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
339. Skousen, Royal (1989). Analogical Modeling of Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
340. Skousen, Royal (1992). Analogy and Structure. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
341. Skousen, Royal (2002). Analogical modeling and quantum computing. In Analogical Modeling, Skousen, Royal, Deryle Lonsdale, and Dilworth B. Parkinson (eds.), 319-46.
342. Skousen, Royal (2003) Analogical Modeling: Exemplars, Rules, and Quantum Computing. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Pawel Nowak, Corey Yoquelet, and David Mortensen (eds.), 425-39 [also available at ].
343. Skousen, Royal (2005). Quantum Analogical Modeling: A General Quantum Computing Algorithm for Predicting Language Behavior. Preprint, posted under Quantum Physics on , quant-ph/0510146, October 18, 2005.
344. Skousen, Royal, Lonsdale, Deryle, and Parkinson, Dilworth B. (eds.) (2002). Analogical Modeling: An Exemplar-Based Approach to Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
345. Smith, Kirk H. (1966). Grammatical intrusions in the recall of structured letter pairs: Mediated transfer or position learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72: 580-8.
346. Sproat, Richard (2008). Experiments in morphological evolution. Keynote address. 3rd Workshop on Quantitative Investigations in Theoretical Linguistics, Helsinki.
347. Stampe, David (1980). How I Spent My Summer Vacation. New York: Garland Press.
348. Stemberger, Joseph P. and MacWhinney, Brian (1986). Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory and Cognition, 14: 17-26.
349. Steriade, Donca (2000). Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics-phonology boundary. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the Lexicon, M. B. Broe and J. B. Pierrehumbert (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 313-34.
350. Storms, Gert and Wisniewski, Edward J. (2005). Does the order of head noun and modifier explain response times in conceptual combination? Memory and Cognition, 33: 852-61.
351. Stump, Gregory T. (2001). Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
352. Sturtevant, Edgar H. (1947). An Introduction to Linguistic Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
353. Taylor, Alex H., Hunt, Gavin R., and Holzhaider, Jennifer C. Gray, Russell D. (2007). Spontaneous metatool use by New Caledonian crows. Current Biology, 17: 1504-7.
354. Taylor, Douglas R, Zeyl, Clifford, and Cooke, Erin (2002). Conflicting levels of selection in the accumulation of mitochondrial defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99: 3690-4.
355. Tenenbaum, Joshua B. and Griffiths, Thomas L. (2001). Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24: 629-40.
356. Tenpenny, P. L. (1995). Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2: 339-63.
357. Tereshchenko, Natal'ya Mitrofanovna (1965). Nenetsko-russkij slovar' [Nenets-Russian dictionary]. St. Petersburg: Sovetskaja Entsiklopedija.
358. Thymé, Anne E. (1993). A Connectionist Approach to Nominal Inflection: Paradigm Patterning and Analogy in Finnish. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, San Diego.
359. Thymé, Anne E. Ackerman, Farrell, and Elman, Jeffrey L. (1994). Finnish nominal inflections: Paradigmatic patterns and token analogy. In The Reality of Linguistic Rules, S. D. Lima, R. L. Corrigan, and G. K. Iverson (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 445-66.
360. Tomasello, Michael (2000). First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11: 61-82.
361. Tomasello, Michael (2003). Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
362. Traficante, Daniela and Burani, Cristina (2003). Visual processing of Italian verbs and adjectives: The role of inflectional family size. In Morphological Structure in Language Processing, R. H. Baayen and R. Schreuder (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 45-64.
363. Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Heine, Bernd (1991). Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. 19, Typological Studies in Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
364. Tsai, Jie-Li, Lee, Chia-Ying, Lin, Ying-Chun, Tzeng, Ovid J.-L., and Hung, Daisy L. (2006). Neighborhood size effects of Chinese words in lexical decision and reading. Language and Linguistics, 7. 3: 659-75.
365. Tschenkéli, Kita (1958). Einführung in die georgische Sprache. Zurich: Amirani Verlag.
366. Tversky, Amos (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84: 327-52.
367. Vance, Timothy J. (1980). The psychological status of a contraint on Japanese consonant alternation. Linguistics, 18: 145-67.
368. van den Toorn, M. C. (1982a). Tendenzen bij de beregeling van de verbindingsklank in nominale samenstellingen I. De Nieuwe Taalgids, 75: 24-33.
369. van den Toorn, M. C. (1982b). Tendenzen bij de beregeling van de verbindingsklank in nominale samenstellingen II. De Nieuwe Taalgids, 75: 153-60.
370. van Jaarsveld, Henk J., Coolen, Riet, and Schreuder, Robert (1994). The role of analogy in the interpretation of novel compounds. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23: 111-37.
371. Vennemann, Theo H. (1972). Phonetic analogy and conceptual analogy. In Schuchardt, the Neogrammarians, and the Transformational Theory of Phonological Change: Four Essays, T. Vennemann and T. H. Wilbur (eds.). Frankfurt: Athenaeum, 181-204.
372. Vennemann, Theo H. (1993). Language change as language improvement. In Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives, C. Jones (ed.). London: Longman, 319-44.
373. Viks, Ülle (1992). Väike vormi-sõnastik: Sissejuhatus & grammatika. Tallinn: Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut.
374. Wedel, Andrew (2004). Self-Organization and Categorical Behavior in Phonology. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz.
375. Wedel, Andrew (2006). Exemplar models, evolution and language change. The Linguistic Review, 23: 247-74.
376. Wedel, Andrew (2007). Feedback and regularity in the lexicon. Phonology, 24: 147-85.
377. Wheeler, Max W. (2005). The Phonology of Catalán. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
378. Whitney, William D. (1875). The Life and Growth of Language. London: H. S. King.
379. Wilson, Rachel (2002). Syntactic Category Learning in a Second Language. Ph.D. thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson.
380. Wisniewski, Edward J. (1996). Construal and similarity in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 35: 434-53.
381. Wurzel, Wolfgang U. (1970). Studien zur deutschen Lautstruktur. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
382. Wurzel, Wolfgang U. (1989). Natural Morphology and Naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
383. Yu, Alan C. L. (2007). Tonal phonetic analogy. Paper presented at ICPHS, Saarbrücken.
384. Zanone, P. G. and Kelso, J. A. S. (1997). The coordination dynamics of learning and transfer: Collective and component levels. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 23: 1454-80.
385. Zwicky, Arnold M. (1985). How to describe inflection. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, M. Niepokuj, M. Van Clay, V. Nikiforidou, and D. Feder (eds.). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 372-86.