Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 342-348

  Hay, Jennifer B ^a   Baayen, R Harald ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENCODING (SYMBOLS); MORPHOLOGY; PROBABILITY; PROBLEM SOLVING;

GRADIENT STRUCTURES; MORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURE; MORPHOLOGICAL THEORY; PROBABILISTIC STRUCTURE;

WORD PROCESSING;

LANGUAGE ABILITY; LINGUISTICS; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NEUROBIOLOGY; PHONETICS; PROBABILITY; REVIEW; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; WORD RECOGNITION;

HUMANS; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LINGUISTICS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 21344444397     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.002     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. S. Pinker, and A. Prince On language and connectionism Cognition 28 1988 73 193
2. S. Pinker Words and rules in the human brain Nature 387 1997 547 548
3. S. Pinker Words and Rules: The Ingredients of Language 1999 Weidenfeld & Nicolson
4. S. Pinker, and M. Ullman The past and future of the past tense Trends Cogn. Sci. 6 2002 456 463
5. S. Pinker, and M. Ullman Combination and structure, not gradedness, is the issue: Reply to McClelland and Patterson Trends Cogn. Sci. 6 2002 472 474
6. Rumelhart, D.E. and McClelland, J.L. (1986) On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In Parallel Distributed Processing. Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. (Vol. 2) Psychological and Biological Models (McClelland, J.L. and Rumelhart, D.E., eds), pp. 216-271, MIT Press
7. B. MacWhinney, and J. Leinbach Implementations are not conceptualizations: revising the verb learning model Cognition 40 1991 121 157
8. K. Plunkett, and P. Juola A connectionist model of English past tense and plural morphology Cogn. Sci. 23 1999 463 490
9. M.S. Seidenberg, and L.M. Gonnerman Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes Trends Cogn. Sci. 4 2000 353 361
10. M.F. Joanisse, and M.S. Seidenberg Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: a connectionist model Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96 1999 7592 7597
11. J.L. McClelland, and K. Patterson 'Words or Rules' cannot exploit the regularity in exceptions: Reply to Pinker and Ullman Trends Cogn. Sci. 6 2002 464 465
12. L.H. Wurm Auditory processing of prefixed English words is both continuous and decompositional J. Mem. Lang. 37 1997 438 461
13. J. Hay Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? Linguistics 39 2001 1041 1070
14. J. Hay Causes and Consequences of Word Structure 2003 Routledge
15. L.M. Gonnerman, and E.S. Anderson Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in morphologically complex words S. Bendjaballah Morphology 2000: Selected Papers from the 9th Morphology Meeting 2001 Benjamins 137 148
16. M.J. Pastizzo, and L.B. Feldman Discrepancies between orthographic and unrelated baselines in masked priming undermine a decompositional account of morphological facilitation J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 28 2002 244 249
17. D.C. Plaut, and L.M. Gonnerman Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Lang. Cogn. Process. 15 2000 445 485
18. J.G. Rueckl Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks J. Mem. Lang. 36 1997 382 405
19. R. Beard Lexeme-morpheme Base Morphology: A General Theory of Inflection and Word Formation 1995 State University of New York Press
20. M. Aronoff Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes 1994 MIT Press
21. S.R. Anderson A-morphous Morphology 1992 Cambridge University Press
22. M. Erelt Estonian Language 2003 Estonian Academy Publishers
23. J.P. Blevins Stems and paradigms Language 79 2003 737 767
24. R.S. Jackendoff Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon Language 51 1975 639 671
25. J. Sereno, and A. Jongman Processing of English inflectional morphology Mem. Cogn. 25 1997 425 437
26. R. Bertram Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language Cognition 74 2000 B13 B25
27. I. Sonnenstuhl, and A. Huth Processing and representation of German -n plurals: a dual mechanism approach Brain Lang. 81 2002 276 290
28. R.H. Baayen Dutch inflection: the rules that prove the exception S. Nooteboom Storage and Computation in the Language Faculty 2002 Kluwer 61 92
29. B. New The processing of singular and plural nouns in French and English J. Mem. Lang. 51 2004 568 585
30. T.K. Landauer How much do people remember? Some estimates of the quantity of learned information in long-term memory Cogn. Sci. 10 1986 477 493
31. A. Kostic Inflectional morphology and word meaning: orthogonal or co-implicative domains? R.H. Baayen R. Schreuder Morphological Structure in Language Processing 2003 Mouton de Gruyter 1 44
32. F.M. del Prado Martin Putting the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological processing Cognition 94 2004 1 18
33. Tabak, W. et al. Lexical statistics and lexical processing: semantic density, information complexity, sex, and irregularity in Dutch. In Linguistic Evidence - Empirical, Theoretical, and Computational Perspectives (Kepser, S. and Reis, M. eds), Mouton de Gruyter (in press)
34. F. Moscoso del Prado Martin Morphological family size in a morphologically rich language: The case of Finnish compared to Dutch and Hebrew J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 30 2004 1271 1278
35. M. Ernestus, and R.H. Baayen Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch Language 79 2003 5 38
36. M. Ernestus, and R.H. Baayen Analogical effects in regular past tense production in Dutch Linguistics 42 2004 873 903
37. C. Gagne, and E.J. Shoben The influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 23 1997 71 87
38. A. Krott Analogy in morphology: modeling the choice of linking morphemes in Dutch Linguistics 39 2001 51 93
39. A. Krott Sublexical units and supralexical combinatorics in the processing of interfixed Dutch compounds Lang. Cogn. Process. 19 2004 453 471
40. D. Sandra, and M. Fayol Spelling errors as another way into the mental lexicon R.H. Baayen R. Schreuder Morphological Structure in Language Processing 2003 Mouton de Gruyter 485 514
41. A.A. Reid, and W.D. Marslen-Wilson Lexical representation of morphologically complex words: Evidence from Polish R.H. Baayen R. Schreuder Morphological Structure in Language Processing 2003 Mouton de Gruyter 287 336
42. C. Burani, and A.M. Thornton The interplay of root, suffix and whole-word frequency in processing derived words R.H. Baayen R. Schreuder Morphological Structure in Language Processing 2003 Mouton de Gruyter 157 208
43. M. Taft Prefix stripping revisited J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 20 1981 289 297
44. M. Seidenberg Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy M. Coltheart Attention and Performance XII 1987 Erlbaum 245 264
45. A. Laudanna, and C. Burani Distributional properties of derivational affixes: Implications for processing L.F. Feldman Morphological Aspects of Language Processing 1995 Erlbaum 345 364
46. B.K. Bergen The psychological reality of phonaesthemes Language 80 2004 290 311
47. L.B. Feldman Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form? J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 26 2000 1431 1444
48. D. Navon Forest before trees: the precedence of global features in visual perception Cogn. Psychol. 9 1977 353 383
49. A.P. Salverda The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension Cognition 90 2003 51 89
50. R. Schreuder Parsing and semantic opacity E.M.H. Assink D. Sandra Reading Complex Words. Cross-Language Studies 2003 Kluwer 159 189
51. J.S. Bowers Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a 'hat' in 'that'? J. Mem. Lang. 52 2005 131 143
52. M. Taft Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing Lang. Cogn. Process. 9 1994 271 294
53. C. Longtin Morphological priming without morphological relationship Lang. Cogn. Process. 18 2003 313 334
54. M. Taft Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A. 57 2004 745 765
55. R.H. Baayen Probabilistic approaches to morphology R. Bod Probabilistic Linguistics 2003 MIT Press 229 287
56. L. Bauer Morphological Productivity 2001 Cambridge University Press
57. R.H. Baayen, and A. Renouf Chronicling The Times: productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper Language 72 1996 69 96
58. J.B. Hay, and R.H. Baayen Phonotactics, parsing and productivity Ital. J. Linguistics 1 2003 99 130
59. G.E. Booij Lexical phonology: a review C. Kreidler Phonology: Critical Concepts 2001 Routledge 203 235
60. N. Fabb English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions Natural Lang. Linguist. Theory 6 1988 527 539
61. I. Plag Selectional restrictions in English suffixation revisited: a reply to Fabb (1988) Linguistics 34 1996 769 798
62. H.J. Giegerich Lexical Strata in English: Morphological Causes, Phonological Effects 1999 Cambridge University Press
63. L. Benua Phonological Relationships Between Words 2000 Garland Publishing
64. J.B. Hay From speech perception to morphology: Affix-ordering revisited Language 78 2002 527 555
65. J.L. Bybee Morphology: A study of the Relation Between Meaning and Form 1985 Benjamins
66. J.B. Hay, and I. Plag What constrains possible suffix combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology Natural Lang. Linguist. Theory 22 2004 565 596
67. D. Steriade Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics-phonology boundary M. Broe J. Pierrehumbert Papers in Laboratory Phonology 5 2000 Cambridge University Press 313 335
68. Ernestus, M. and Baayen, R.H. (in press) The functionality of incomplete neutralization in Dutch: The case of past-tense formation. In Laboratory Phonology 8 (Goldstein, L.M. et al., eds), Mouton de Gruyter
69. J.B. Hay, and P. Warren Experiments on /r/-intrusion Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 14 2003 47 58
70. A. Albright, and B. Hayes Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study Cognition 90 2003 119 161
71. Baayen, R.H. and Moscoso del Prado M.F. Semantic density and past-tense formation in three Germanic languages. Language (in press)
72. R. Kemps Prosodic cues for morphological complexity in Dutch and English Lang. Cogn. Process. 20 2005 43 73
73. P. Boersma, and B. Hayes Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm Linguist. Inquiry 32 2001 45 86
74. R. Skousen Analogical Modeling 2002 Benjamins
75. Daelemans, W. et al. (2001) TiMBL: Tilburg Memory Based Learner Reference Guide. Version 4.2. Technical Report ILK 02-01, Computational Linguistics Tilburg University