Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative?

Linguistics

Volumn 39, Issue 376, 2001, Pages 1041-1070

  Hay, Jennifer ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040663141     PISSN: 00243949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/ling.2001.041     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alegre, Maria; and Gordon, Peter (1999a). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language 40, 41-61.
2. _; and Gordon, Peter (1999b). Rule-based versus associative processes in derivational morphology. Brain and Language 68, 347-354.
3. Baayen, R. Harald (1992). Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1991, Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), 109-150. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
4. _(1993). On frequency, transparency and productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1992, Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), 181-208. Kluwer Academic.
5. _(1994). Productivity in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes 9(3), 447-469.
6. _; and Lieber, Rochelle (1997). Word frequency distributions and lexical semantics. Computers and the Humanities 30, 281-291.
7. _; Lieber, Rochelle; and Schreuder, Robert (1997). The morphological complexity of simplex nouns. Linguistics 35, 861-877.
8. _; Piepenbrock, Richard; and Gulikens, Leon (1995). The CELEX lexical database (release 2), cd-rom. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
9. _; and Schreuder, Robert (1999). War and peace: morphemes and full forms in a non-interactive activation parallel dual-route model. Brain and Language 68, 27-32.
10. _; and Schreuder, Robert (2000). Towards a psycholinguistic computational model for morphological parsing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 358, 1-3.
11. _; Schreuder, Robert; De Jong, Nivja; and Krott, Andrea (i.p.). Dutch inflection: the rules that prove the exception. In Storage and Computation in the Language Faculty, Sieb Nooteboom, Fred Weerman, and Frank Wijnen (eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
12. Balota, David A.; and Chumbley, James I. (1984). Are lexical decisions good measures of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10, 340-357.
13. Beauvillain, Cecile; and Segui, Juan (1992). Representation and processing of morphological information. In Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning, Ram Frost and Leonard Katz (eds.), chapter 19, 377-388. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
14. Bertram, Raymond; Laine, Matti; Baayen, R. Harald; Schreuder, Robert; and Hyöna, Jukka (2000). Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition 74, B13-B25.
15. _; Schreuder, Robert; and Baayen, R. Harald (2000). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: the role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26(2), 489-511.
16. Bradley, Diane (1979). Lexical representation of derivational relations. In Juncture, Mark Aronoff and Mary-Louise Kean (eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Burani, Cristina; and Caramazza, Alfonso (1987). Representation and processing of derived words. Language and Cognitive Processes 2, 217-227.
18. _; and Laudanna, Alessandro (1992). Units of representation for derived words in the lexicon. In Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning, Ram Frost and Leonard Katz (eds.), chapter 18, 361-376. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
19. Butterworth, Brian (1983). Lexical representation. In Language Production, vol. 2. Brian Butterworth (ed.), 257-294. London: Academic Press.
20. Bybee, Joan (1985). Morphology: A Study of the Relation Between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
21. _(1988). Morphology as lexical organization. Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, Michael Hammond and Michael Noonan (eds.), 119-142. San Diego: Academic Press.
22. _(1995a). Diachronic and typological properties of morphology and their implications for representation. In Morphological Aspects of Language Processing, Laurie Beth Feldman (ed.), 225-246. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. _(1995b). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(5), 425-455.
24. Caramazza, Alfonso; Laudanna, Alessandro; and Romani, Cristina (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition 28, 297-332.
25. Cleveland, William S. (1979). Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatter-plots. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 829-836.
26. Cole, P.; Beauvillan, C.; and Segui, J. (1989). On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: a differential frequency effect. Journal of Memory and Language 28, 1-13.
27. Connine, Cynthia M.; Titone, Debra; and Wang, Jian (1993). Auditory word recognition: extrinsic and intrinsic effects of word frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 19(1), 81-94.
28. De Jong, Nivja H.; Schreuder, Robert; and Baayen, R. Harald (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes 15, 329-365.
29. Feldman, Laurie Beth (1994). Beyond orthography and phonology: differences between inflections and derivations. Journal of Memory and Language 33, 442-470.
30. _; and Soltano, Emily G. (1999). Morphological priming: the role of prime duration, semantic transparency, and affix position. Brain and Language 68, 33-39.
31. Fowler, Carol A.; Napps, Shirley E.; and Feldman, Laurie Beth (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory and Cognition 13, 241-255.
32. Frauenfelder, Uli H.; and Schreuder, Robert (1992). Constraining psycholinguistic models of morphological processing and representation: the role of productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1991, Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), 165-185. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
33. Grosjean, Francois (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics 45, 189-195.
34. Harwood, F. W.; and Wright, Alison M. (1956). Statistical study of English word formation. Language 32(2), 260-273.
35. Hay, Jennifer (2000). Causes and consequences of word structure. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Northwestern University.
36. Johnson, Keith (1997a). The auditory/perceptual basis for speech segmentation. In Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics: Papers from the Linguistics Laboratory, vol. 50, Kim Ainsworth-Darnell and Mariapaola D'Imperio (eds.). Columbus: Ohio State University.
37. _(1997b). Speech perception without speaker normalization. In Talker Variability in Speech Processing, K. Johnson and J. Mullenix (eds.). San Diego: Academic Press.
38. Kempley, S.; and Morton, J. (1982). The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition. British Journal of Psychology 73, 441-454.
39. Losiewicz, Beth L. (1992). The effect of frequency on linguistic morphology. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
40. Marslen-Wilson, William; Ford, Michael; and Zhou, Xiaolin (1997). The combinatorial lexicon: priming derivational affixes. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. _; Hare, Mary; and Older, Lianne (1993). Inflectional morphology and phonological regularity in the English mental lexicon. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Princeton, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. _; Tyler, Lorraine K.; Waksler, Rachelle; and Older, Lianne (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review 101(1), 3-33.
43. _; and Zhou, Xiaolin (1999). Abstractness, allomorphy, and lexical architecture. Language and Cognitive Processes 14(4), 321-352.
44. _; Zhou, Xiaolin; and Ford, Michael (1997). Morphology, modality, and lexical architecture. In Yearbook of Morphology 1996, Geert Booij and Jaap van Marie (eds.), 117-134. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
45. McClelland, James L.; and Elman, Jeffrey L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18, 1-86.
46. Meunier, Fanny; and Segui, Juan (1999a). Frequency effects in auditory word recognition: the case of suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language 41, 327-344.
47. _; and Segui, Juan (1999b). Morphological priming effect: the role of surface frequency. Brain and Language 68, 54-60.
48. Modor, Carol Lynn (1992). Productivity and categorization in morphological classes. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, SUNY at Buffalo.
49. Napps, Shirley E. (1989). Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships? Memory and Cognition 17(6), 729-739.
50. Norris, Dennis; McQueen, James M.; and Cutler, Anne (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(3).
51. Pagliuca, William (1976). Pre-fixing. Unpublished manuscript, SUNY at Buffalo.
52. Raveh, Michal; and Rueckl, Jay G. (2000). Equivalent effects of inflected and derived primes: long-term morphological priming in fragment completion and lexical decision. Journal of Memory and Language 42, 103-119.
53. Schreuder, Robert; and Baayen, R. Harald (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In Morphological Aspects of Language Processing, Laurie Beth Feldman (ed.), 131-156. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. _; and Baayen, R. Harald (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language 37, 118-139.
55. _; Burani, Cristina; and Baayen, R. Harald (i.p.). Parsing and semantic opacity. In Morphology and the Mental Lexicon, Egbert Assink and Dominiek Sandra (eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
56. Sereno, Joan; and Jongman, Allard (1997). Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory and Cognition 25, 425-437.
57. Sonnenstuhl, Ingrid; Eisenbeiss, Sonja; and Clahsen, Harald (1999). Morphological priming in the German mental lexicon. Cognition 72, 203-236.
58. Stanners, R. F.; Neiser, J. J.; Hernon, W. P.; and Hall, R. (1979). Memory representations for morphologically related words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 399-412.
59. Stemberger, Joseph Paul; and MacWhinney, Brian (1986). Frequency and the storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory and Cognition 14, 17-26.
60. _; and MacWhinney, Brian (1988). Are inflected forms stored in the lexicon? In Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, Michael Hammond and Michael Noonan (eds.). San Diego: Academic Press.
61. Taft, Marcus (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition 7(4), 263-272.
62. _(1985). The decoding of words in lexical access: a review of the morphographic approach. In Reading Research: Advances in Theory and Practice, vol. 5, Derek Besner, T. Gary Waller, and G. Ernest Mackinnon (eds.). London: Academic Press.
63. _; and Forster, Kenneth (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14, 638-647.
64. Tsapkini, Kyrana; Kehayia, Eva; and Jarema, Gonia (1999). Does phonological change play a role in the recognition of derived forms across modalities? Brain and Language 68, 318-323.
65. Vannest, Jennifer; and Boland, Julie E. (1999). Lexical morphology and lexical access. Brain and Language 6, 324-332.
66. Wurm, Lee (1997). Auditory processing of prefixed English words is both continuous and decompositional. Journal of Memory and Language 37, 438-461.