Sublexical units and supralexical combinatorics in the processing of interfixed Dutch compounds

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 453-471

  Krott, Andrea ^a   Hagoort, Peter ^b   Baayen, R Harald ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; NETHERLANDS; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SEMANTICS; VISUAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 3042825596     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690960344000251     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anshen, F., & Aronoff, M. (1988). Producing morphologically complex words. Linguistics, 26, 641-655.
2. Baayen, R.H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 94-117.
3. Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
4. Bertram, R., Laine, M., Baayen, R.H., Schreuder, R., & Hyönä, J. (1999). Affixal homonymy triggers full-form storage even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language. Cognition, 74, B13-B25.
5. Bertram, R., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H. (2000). The balance of storage and computation in morphological processing: The role of word formation type, affixal homonymy, and productivity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 419-511.
6. Burani, C., Dovetto, M., Thornton, A.M., & Laudanna, A. (1997). Accessing and naming suffixed pseudo-words. In G.E. Booij & J. Van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1996 (pp. 55-73). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
7. De Jong, N.H., Feldman, L.B., Schreuder, R., Pastizzo, M., & Baayen, R.H. (2002). The processing and representation of Dutch and English compounds: Peripheral morphological, and central orthographic effects. Brain and Language, 81(1/2/3), 555-567.
8. De Jong, N.H., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 329-365.
9. Gagné, C. (2001). Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 236-254.
10. Gagné, C., & Shoben, E.J. (1997). The influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 71-87.
11. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 127-131.
12. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2003). On the role of derivational affixes in recognizing complex words: Evidence from masked priming. In R. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing (pp. 211-234). Berlin: Mouton.
13. Krott, A., Baayen, R.H., & Schreuder, R. (2001). Analogy in morphology: Modeling the choice of linking morphemes in Dutch. Linguistics, 39(1), 51-93.
14. Krott, A., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H. (2002a). Linking elements in Dutch noun-noun compounds: constituent families as predictors for response latencies. Brain and Language, 81(1-3). 708-722.
15. Krott, A., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H. (2002b). Analogical hierarchy: Exemplar-based modeling of linkers in Dutch noun-noun compounds. In R. Skousen, D. Londsdale, & D.B. Parkinson (Eds.), Analogical modeling: An exemplar-based approach to language (pp. 181-206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16. Levelt, W.J.M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
17. Longtin, C., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313-334.
18. Pinheiro, J.C., & Bates, D.M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS, Statistics and Computing. New York: Springer.
19. Schreuder, R., & Baayen, R.H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 118-139.
20. Schreuder, R., Neijt, A., Van der Weide, F., & Baayen, R.H. (1998). Regular plurals in Dutch compounds: linking graphemes or morphemes? Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 551-573.
21. Sereno, J., & Jongman, A. (1997). Processing of English inflectional morphology. Memory and Cognition, 25, 425-437.