Evolutionary linguistics

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volumn 37, Issue , 2008, Pages 219-234

  Croft, William ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative method; Phylogeny; Replicator; Selection

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; MODELING; PHYLOGENY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SELECTION; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 55349109689     PISSN: 00846570     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085156     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Atkinson QD, Gray RD. 2005. Curious parallels and curious connection: phylogenetic thinking in biology and historical linguistics. Syst. Biol. 54:513-26
2. Atkinson QD, Gray RD. 2006. How old is the Indo-European family? Illumination or more moths to the flame? See Forster & Renfrew 2006, pp. 91-109
3. Atkinson QD, Nicholls GK, Welch D, Gray RD. 2005. From words to dates: water into wine, mathemagic or phylogenetic inference? Trans. Philol. Soc. 103:193-219
4. Bastin Y, Coupez A, Mann M. 1999. Continuity and divergence in the Bantu languages: perspectives from a lexicostatistic study. Ann. Sci. Hum. 162:315-17
5. Baxter GJ, Blythe RA, Croft W, McKane AJ. 2006. Utterance selection model of linguistic change. Phys. Rev. E 73.046118
6. Baxter GJ, Blythe RA, Croft W, McKane AJ. 2008. Modeling language change: an evaluation of Trudgill's theory of the emergence of New Zealand English. Lang. Var. Change. In press
7. Baxter WH. 1995. "A stronger affinity...than could have been produced by accident": a probabilistic comparison of Old Chinese and Tibeto-Burman. In The Ancestry of the Chinese Language, J. Chin. Ling. Monogr. Ser. 8, ed. WSY Wang, pp, 1-39. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
8. Baxter WH, Manaster Ramer A. 1996. Review of Donald A. Ringe, Jr., On Calculating the Factor of Chance in Language Comparison. Diachronica 13:371-84
9. Baxter WH, Manaster Ramer A. 2000. Beyond lumping and splitting: probabilistic issues in historical linguistics. See Renfrew et al. 2000, pp. 167-88
10. Ben Hamed M. 2005. Neighbour-nets portray the Chinese dialect continuum and the linguistic legacy of China's demic history. Proc. R. Soc. London B 272:1015-22
11. Ben Hamed M, Wang F. 2006. Stuck in the forest: trees, networks and Chinese dialects. Diachronica 23:29-60
12. Bergsland K, Vogt H. 1962. On the validity of glottochronology. Curr. Anthropol. 3:115-53
13. Blackmore S. 1999. The Meme Machine. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
14. Blevins J. 2004. Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press
15. Blust R. 2000. Why lexicostatistics doesn't work: the "universal constant" hypothesis and the Austronesian languages. See Renfrew et al. 2000, pp. 311-31
16. Blythe RA, McKane AJ. 2007. Stochastic models of evolution in genetics, ecology and linguistics. J. Stat. Mech. 07-P07018
17. Boyd R, Richerson PJ. 1985. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press
18. Bryant D. 2006. Radiation and network breaking in Polynesian linguistics. See Forster & Renfrew 2006, pp. 111-18
19. Bryant D, Filimon F, Gray RD. 2005. Untangling our past: languages, trees, splits and networks. See Mace et al. 2005, pp. 67-83
20. Bybee JL. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
21. Cann RL, Stoneking M, Wilson AC. 1987. Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution. Nature 329:111-12
22. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Feldman MW. 1981. Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
23. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Piazza A, Menozzi P, Mountain J. 1988. Reconstruction of human evolution: bringing together genetic, archaeological, and linguistic data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:6002-6
24. Covington MA. 1996. An algorithm to align words for historical comparison. Comp. Ling. 22:481-96
25. Covington MA. 1998. Alignment of multiple languages for historical comparison. Proc. COLING-ACL'98: Annu. Meet Assoc. Comput. Ling., 36th, Montreal, Canada, and Int. Conf. Comput. Ling., 17th, Montreal, Canada, pp. 275-80. Morristown: Assoc. Comput. Ling.
26. Croft W. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman
27. Croft W. 2002. The Darwinization of linguistics. Selection 3:75-91
28. Croft W. 2003. Mixed languages and acts of identity: an evolutionary approach. In The Mixed Language Debate, ed. Y Matras, P Bakker, pp. 41-72. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
29. Croft W. 2006. The relevance of an evolutionary model to historical linguistics. In Competing Models of Linguistic Change: Evolution and Beyond, ed. O Nedergård Thomsen, pp. 91-132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
30. Croft W. 2008. The origins of grammaticalization in the verbalization of experience. Linguistics. In press
31. Dawkins R. 1982. The Extended Phenotype. Oxford, UK: Freeman
32. Dawkins R. 1989. The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. 2nd ed.
33. Donohue M, Wichmann S. 2007. Typology and the linguistic macrohistory of Island Melanesia. Ocean. Linguist. 46:348-87
34. Dunn M, Foley RA, Levinson SC, Reesink G, Terrill A. 2007. Statistical reasoning in the evaluation of typological diversity in Island Melanesia. Ocean. Linguist. 46:388-403
35. Dunn M, Terrill A, Reesink G, Foley RA, Levinson SC. 2005. Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction of ancient language history. Science 309:2072-75
36. Durham WH. 1991. Coevolution: Genes, Culture and Human Diversity. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
37. Durie M, Ross M, eds. 1996. The Comparative Method Reviewed: Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
38. Dyen I, Kruskal JB, Black P. 1992. An Indoeuropean classification: a lexicostatistical experiment. Trans. Am. Philos. Soc. 82:1-132
39. Forster P, Renfrew C, eds. 2006. Phylogenetic Methods and the Prehistory of Languages. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Inst. Archaeol. Res.
40. Gray RD. 2005. Pushing the time barrier in the quest for language roots. Science 309:2007-8
41. Gray RD, Atkinson QD. 2003. Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426:435-39
42. Gray RD, Jordan FM. 2000. Language trees support the express-train sequence of Austronesian expansion. Nature 405:1052-55
43. Greenberg JH. 1957. Language, diffusion and migration. In Essays in Linguistics, pp. 66-74. Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press
44. Greenberg JH. 1992. Preliminaries to a systematic comparison between biological and linguistic evolution. In The Evolution of Human Ldnguages, ed. JA Hawkins, M Gell-Mann, pp. 139-58. Redwood City, CA: Addison Wesley
45. Greenberg JH. 1993. Observations concerning Ringe's Calculating the Factor of Chance in Language Comparison. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 137:79-90
46. Greenberg JH. 2001. The methods and purposes of linguistic generic classification. Lang. Linguist. 2:111-36
47. Greenberg JH. 2005. Genetic Linguistics. Theory and Method, ed. W Croft. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
48. Greenberg JH, Ruhlen M. 1992. Linguistic origins of Native Americans. Sci. Am. 267(5):94-99
49. Greenhill SJ, Gray RD. 2005. Testing population dispersal hypotheses: Pacific settlement, phylogenetic trees and Austronesian languages. See Mace et al. 2005, pp. 31-52
50. Hinnebusch TJ. 1999. Contact and lexicostatics in comparative Bantu studies. In Bantu Historical Linguistics: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, ed. J-M Hombert, LM Hyman, pp. 173-205. Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
51. Holden CJ. 2002. Bantu language trees reflect the spread of farming across sub-Saharan Africa: a maximum-parsimony analysis. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 269:793-99
52. Holden CJ, Gray RD. 2006. Rapid radiation, borrowing and dialect continua in the Bantu languages. See Forster & Renfrew 2006, pp. 19-31
53. Holden CJ, Mace R. 2003. Spread of cattle led to the loss of matrilineal descent in Africa: a coevolutionary analysis. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 270:2425-33
54. Holden CJ, Mace R. 2005. "The cow is the enemy of matriliny": using phylogenetic methods to investigate cultural evolution in Africa. See Mace et al. 2005, pp. 217-34
55. Holden CJ, Meade A, Pagel M. 2005. Comparison of maximum parsimony and Bayesian Bantu language trees. See Mace et al. 2005, pp. 53-65
56. Hull DL. 1988. Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science. Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press
57. Hull DL. 2001. Science and Selection: Essays on Biological Evolution and the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
58. Joos M, 1964. Glottochronology with retention rate homogeneity. Proc. Int. Congr. Linguist., 9th, Cambridge, Mass., ed. HG Lunt, p. 237. The Hague: Mouton
59. Justeson JS, Stephens LD. 1980. Change cognation: a probabilistic model and decision procedure for historical inference. Pap. Int. Conf. Hist. Linguist., 4th, Stanford, Calif., ed. EC Traugott, R LaBrum, S Shepherd, pp. 37-46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
60. Kessler B. 1995. Computational dialectology in Irish Gaelic. Proc. EACL-95: Conf. Eur. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguist., 6th, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 60-67. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman
61. Kessler B. 2001. The Significance of Word Lists. Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
62. Kondrak G. 2002. Algorithms for language reconstruction. PhD thesis, Univ. Tor. http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~kondrak
63. Kondrak G. 2003. Phonetic alignment and similarity. Comput. Hum. 37:273-91
64. Kruskal JB, Dyen I, Black P. 1973. Some results from the vocabulary method of reconstructing language trees. In Lexicostatistics in Genetic Linguistics, ed. I Dyen, pp. 30-55. The Hague: Mouton
65. Lass R. 1990. How to do things with junk: exaptation in language change. J. Linguist. 26:79-102
66. Lass R. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
67. Lightfoot DW. 2006. How Languages Emerge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
68. Mace R, Holden CJ, Shennan S, eds. 2005. The Evolution of Cultural Diversity: A Phylogenetic Approach. London: UCL Press
69. Manaster Ramer A, Hitchcock C. 1996. Glass houses: Greenberg, Ringe, and the mathematics of comparative linguistics. Anthropol. Linguist. 38:601-19
70. McMahon AMS, Heggarty P, McMahon R, Slaska N. 2005. Swadesh sublists and the benefits of borrowing: an Andean case study. Trans. Philol. Soc. 103:147-70
71. McMahon AMS, McMahon R. 2003. Finding families: quantitative methods in language classification. Trans. Philol. Soc. 101:7-55
72. McMahon AMS, McMahon R. 2006. Language Classification by Numbers. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
73. Milroy L. 1987. Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 2nd ed.
74. Minett JW, Wang WS-Y. 2003. On detecting borrowing: distance-based and character-based approaches. Diachronica 20:289-330
75. Mufwene S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
76. Mufwene S. 2005. Créole, Écologie Sociale, Évolution Linguistique. Paris: L'Harmattan
77. Nakhleh L, Ringe DJ Jr, Warnow T. 2005. Perfect phylogenetic networks: a new methodology for reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages. Language 81:382-420
78. Nerbonne J, Heeringa W. 1997. Measuring dialect distance phonetically. Proc. SIGPHON-97: Meet. ACL Spec. Interest Group Comput. Phonol., 3rd, Madrid, Spain. http://www.cogsci.ed.ac.uk/sigphon
79. Nettle D. 1999. Linguistic Diversity. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
80. Nicholls GK, Gray RD. 2006. Quantifying uncertainty in a stochastic model of vocabulary evolution. See Forster & Renfrew 2006, pp. 161-71
81. Nichols J. 1996. The comparative method as heuristic. See Durie & Ross 1996, pp. 39-89
82. Oakes MP. 2000. Computer estimation of vocabulary in protolanguage from word lists in four daughter languages. J. Quant. Linguist. 7:233-43
83. Ohala JJ. 2003. Phonetics and historical phonology. In Handbook of Historical Linguistics, ed. B Joseph, R Janda, pp. 669-86. Oxford, UK: Blackwell
84. Oswalt RL. 1970. The detection of remote linguistic relationships. Comp. Stud. Hum. Verbal Behav. 3:117-29
85. Oswalt RL. 1991. A method for assessing distant linguistic relationships. In Sprung from Some Common Source: Investigations into the Prehistory of Languages, ed. SM Lamb, ED Mitchell, pp. 389-404. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
86. Pagel M. 2000. Maximum-likelihood models for glottochronology and for reconstructing linguistic phylogenies. See Renfrew et al. 2000, pp. 189-207
87. Pagel M, Atkinson QD, Meade A. 2007. Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history. Nature 449:717-20
88. Pagel M, Meade A. 2005. Bayesian estimation of correlated evolution across cultures: a case study of marriage systems and wealth transfer at marriage. See Mace et al. 2005, pp. 235-56
89. Pagel M, Meade A. 2006. Estimating rates of lexical replacement on phylogenetic trees of languages. See Forster & Renfrew 2006, pp. 173-82
90. Pierrehumbert JB. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Frequency and Emergence in Grammar, ed. JL Bybee, P Hopper, pp. 137-57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
91. Renfrew C, McMahon AMS, Trask RL, eds. 2000. Time Depth in Historical Linguistics. Cambridge, UK: McDonald Inst. Archaeol. Res.
92. Rexová K, Bastin Y, Frynta D. 2006. Cladistic analysis of Bantu languages: a new tree based on combined lexical and grammatical data. Naturwissenschaften 93:189-94
93. Rexová K, Frynta D, Zrzavy J. 2003. Cladistic analysis of languages: Indo-European classification based on lexicostatistical data. Cladistics 19:120-27
94. Richerson PJ, Boyd R. 2005. Not By Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press
95. Ringe DA Jr, Warnow T, Taylor A. 2002. Indo-European and computational cladistics. Trans. Philol. Soc. 100:59-129
96. Ringe DA Jr. 1992. On Calculating the Factor of Chance in Language Comparison. Trans. Am. Philos. Soc. Vol. 82, Part 1. Philadelphia: Am. Philos. Soc.
97. Ringe DA Jr. 1993. A reply to Professor Greenberg. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 137:91-109
98. Ritt N. 2004. Selfish Sounds and Linguistic Evolution: A Darwinian Approach to Language Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
99. Ross M, Durie M. 1996. Introduction. See Durie & Ross 1996, pp. 3-38
100. Vigilant L, Stoneking M, Harpending H, Hawkes R, Wilson AC. 1991. African populations and the evolution of human mitochondrial DNA. Science 253:1503-7
101. Wang WS-Y, Minett JW. 2005. Vertical and horizontal transmission in language evolution. Trans. Philol. Soc. 103:121-46
102. Warnow T, Evans SN, Ringe DA Jr, Nakhleh L. 2006. A stochastic model of language evolution that incorporates homoplasy and borrowing. See Forster & Renfrew 2006, pp. 75-87
103. Wedel A. 2006. Exemplar models, evolution and language change. Linguist. Rev. 23:247-74