Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch

Language

Volumn 79, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 5-38

  Ernestus, Mirjam ^a,b   Baayen, R Harald ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2542491733     PISSN: 00978507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2003.0076     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. ALBRIGHT, ADAM, and BRUCE HAYES. 2001. Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Los Angeles: UCLA, MS.
2. ALLOPENNA, PAUL D.; JAMES S. MAGNUSON; and MICHAEL K. TANENHAUS. 1998. Tracking the timecourse of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language 38.419-39.
3. BAAYEN, R. HARALD; RICHARD PIEPENBROCK; and LEON GULIKERS. 1995. The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
4. BAUMANN, MONIKA. 1995. The production of syllables in connected speech. Nijmegen: Benda Drukkers.
5. BOERSMA, PAUL. 1996. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, MS.
6. BOERSMA, PAUL. 1998. Functional phonology. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
7. BOERSMA, PAUL, and BRUCE HAYES. 2001. Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32.45-86.
8. BOOIJ, GEERT. 1995. The phonology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. BOOIJ, GEERT. 1999. The syllable, views and facts. Morpheme structure constraints and the phonotactics of Dutch. Studies in generative grammar 45, ed. by Harry van der Hulst and Nancy A. Ritter, 53-68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
10. BREIMAN, LEO; JEROME H. FRIEDMAN; RICHARD A. OLSHEN; and CHARLES J. STONE. 1984. Classification and regression trees. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth International Group.
11. BYBEE, JOAN. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12. CLEVELAND, WILLIAM S. 1979. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74.829-36.
13. COLLINS, ALLAN M., and ELIZABETH F. LOFTUS. 1975. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review 82.407-28.
14. COLLINS, BEVERLY, and INGER MEES. 1981. The sounds of English and Dutch. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
15. DAELEMANS, WALTER; STEVEN GILLIS; and GERT DURIEUX. 1994. The acquisition of stress, a data-oriented approach. Computational Linguistics 20.421-51.
16. DAELEMANS, WALTER; JAKUB ZAVREL; KO VAN DER SLOOT; and ANTAL VAN DEN BOSCH. 2002. TiMBL: Tilburg memory based learner reference guide, version 4.2. Tilburg: Computational Linguistics Tilburg University.
17. DE JONG, NIVJA H.; ROBERT SCHREUDER; and R. HARALD BAAYEN. 2000. The morphological family size effect and morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes 15.329-65.
18. DERWING, BRUCE L. 1980. English pluralization: A testing ground for rule evaluation. Experimental linguistics, integration of theories and applications, ed. by Gary D. Prideaux, Bruce L. Derwing, and William J. Baker, 81-120. Ghent: E. Story-Scientia.
19. EDDINGTON, DAVID. 2000a. Analogy and the dual-route model of morphology. Lingua 110.281-98.
20. EDDINGTON, DAVID. 2000b. Spanish stress assignment within the analogical modeling of language. Language 76.92-109.
21. ERNESTUS, MIRJAM. 2000. Voice assimilation and segment reduction in casual Dutch: A corpus-based approach of the phonology-phonetics interface. Utrecht: LOT.
22. ERNESTUS, MIRJAM, and HARALD BAAYEN. 2001. Choosing between the Dutch past-tense suffixes -te and -de. Linguistics in the Netherlands 2001, ed. by Ton van der Wouden and Helen de Hoop, 81-93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
23. ERNESTUS, MIRJAM, and HARALD BAAYEN. 2002. The functionality of incomplete neutralization in Dutch: The case of past-tense formation. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen and Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, MS.
24. ERNESTUS, MIRJAM, and WILLEM MARINUS MAK. 2002. Analogical effects in the reading of Dutch verb forms. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen, MS.
25. GUSSENHOVEN, C., and R. H. BREMMER, JR. 1983. Voiced fricatives in Dutch: Sources and present-day usage. North-Western European Language Evolution 2.55-71.
26. GUSSENHOVEN, CARLOS, and HAIKE JACOBS. 1998. Understanding phonology. London: Arnold, Hodder Headline Group.
27. HOOPER, JOAN B. 1976. An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.
28. HYMAN, LARRY. 1970. The role of borrowing in the justification of phonological grammars. Studies in African Linguistics 1.1-48.
29. JACOBS, HAIKE, and CARLOS GUSSENHOVEN. 2000. Loan phonology: Perception, salience, the lexicon and OT. Optimality theory: Phonology, syntax, and acquisition, ed. by Joost Dekkers, Frank van der Leeuw, and Jeroen van de Weijer, 192-210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. JANDA, RICHARD D., and BRIAN D. JOSEPH. 1986. One rule or many? Sanskrit reduplication as fragmented affixation. Studies on Language Change (Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 34) 84-107.
31. JONGMAN, ALLARD; JOAN A. SERENO; MARIANNE RAAIJMAKERS; and ADITI LAHIRI. 1992. The phonological representation of [voice] in speech perception. Language and Speech 35.137-52.
32. JOSEPH, BRIAN D. 1997. How general are our generalizations? What speakers actually know and what they actually do. ESCOL '96. Proceedings of the thirteenth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, ed. by Anthony D. Green and Virginia Motopanyane, 148-60. Ithaca: Cascadilla Press.
33. KROTT, ANDREA; R. HARALD BAAYEN; and ROBERT SCHREUDER. 2001. Analogy in morphology: Modeling the choice of linking morphemes in Dutch. Linguistics 39.51-93.
34. LADEFOGED, PETER, and IAN MADDIESON. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell.
35. MANNING, CHRISTOPHER D. 2003. Probabilistic approaches to syntax. Probability theory in linguistics, ed. by Rens Bod, Jennifer Hay, and Stefanie Jannedy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, in press.
36. MCCARTHY, JOHN, and ALAN PRINCE. 1993a. Prosodic morphology 1: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Amherst, MA and New Brunswick, NJ: University of Massachusetts and Rutgers University, MS.
37. MCCARTHY, JOHN, and ALAN PRINCE. 1993b. Generalized alignment. Yearbook of Morphology 1993.79-153.
38. MCCARTHY, JOHN, and ALAN PRINCE. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. Papers in optimality theory, ed. by Jill L. Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey, and Suzanne Urbanczyk, 249-384. (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18.) Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
39. MOULTON, WILLIAM G. 1962. The vowels of Dutch: Phonetic and distributional classes. Lingua 11.294-312.
40. NAKISA, RAMIN; KIM PLUNKETT; and ULRIKE HAHN. 2000. A cross-linguistic comparison of single and dual-route models of inflectional morphology. Models of language acquisition: Inductive and deductive approaches, ed. by Peter Broeder and Jaap Murre, 201-21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. NELDER, J. A., and R. MEAD. 1965. A simplex method for function minimization. Computer Journal 7.308-13.
42. NOSOFSKY, ROBERT M. 1990. Relations between exemplar similarity and likelihood models of classification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 34.393-418.
43. OHALA, JOHN J. 1983. The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. The production of speech, ed. by Peter F. MacNeilage, 189-216. Berlin: Springer.
44. PISONI, DAVID B.; HOWARD C. NUSBAUM; PAUL A. LUCE; and LOUISA M. SLOWIACZEK. 1985. Speech perception, word recognition and the structure of the lexicon. Speech Communication 4.75-95.
45. PRINCE, ALAN, and PAUL SMOLENSKY. 1993. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Boulder, CO and New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University and University of Colorado at Boulder, MS.
46. RUHLEN, MERITT. 1975. A guide to the languages of the world. Stanford: Stanford University, MS.
47. SANKOFF, DAVID. 1987. Variable rules. Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society, vol. 1, ed. by Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, and Klaus J. Mattheier, 984-97. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
48. SCHREUDER, ROBERT, and R. HARALD BAAYEN. 1995. Modeling morphological processing. Morphological aspects of language processing, ed. by Laurie B. Feldman, 131-54. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49. SKOUSEN, ROYAL. 1989. Analogical modeling of language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
50. SKOUSEN, ROYAL. 1993. Analogy and structure. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
51. SKOUSEN, ROYAL. 2000. Analogical modeling and quantum computing. Los Alamos National Laboratory. Online: http://arXiv.org.
52. SLIS, I. H., and A. COHEN. 1969. On the complex regulating the voiced-voiceless distinction 2. Language and Speech 12.80-102,137-55.
53. SLIS, I. H., and M. VAN HEUGTEN. 1989. Voiced-voiceless distinction in Dutch fricatives. Linguistics in the Netherlands 1989, ed. by Hans Bennis and Ans van Kemenade, 123-32. Dordrecht: Foris.
54. VAN REENEN, PIETER, and EVERT WATTEL. 1992. De uitspraak van /s/ en /z/ voor klinker in het Nederlands: Zes eeuwen variatie. De Binnenbouw van het Nederlands: een bundel artikelen voor Piet Paardekoper, ed. by Hans Bennis and Jan W. de Vries, 291-306. Dordrecht: ICG Publications.
55. WARNER, NATASHA; ALLARD JONGMAN; JOAN SERENO; and RACHÈL KEMPS. 2001. Sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, MS.
56. WOODS, ARTHUR E.; PAUL FLETCHER; and ANTHONY HUGHES. 1986. Statistics in language studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. ZONNEVELD, WIM. 1983. Lexical and phonological properties of Dutch voicing assimilation. Sound structures: Studies for Antonie Cohen, ed. by Marcel van den Broecke, Vincent van Heuven, and Wim Zonneveld, 101-35. Dordrecht: Foris.