The specificity of perceptual learning in speech processing

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 224-238

  Eisner, Frank ^a   Mcqueen, James M ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21244438021     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206487     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. BRADLOW, A. R., & BENT, T. (2003, August). Listener adaptation to foreign-accented speech. In Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 2881-2884). Barcelona.
2. CHURCH, B. A., & SCHACTER, D. L. (1994). Perceptual specificity of auditory priming: Implicit memory for voice intonation and fundamental frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 521-533.
3. CLARKE, C. M. (2002, September). Perceptual adjustment to foreign-accented English with short-term exposure. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 253-256). Denver.
4. CLARKE, C. M. (2003). Processing time effects of short-term exposure to foreign-accented English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Arizona, Tucson.
5. COHEN, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. DUPOUX, E., & GREEN, K. (1997). Perceptual adjustment to highly compressed speech: Effects of talker and rate changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 914-927.
7. EVANS, B. G., & IVERSON, P. (2004). Vowel normalization for accent: An investigation of best exemplar locations in northern and southern British English sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 352-361.
8. GANONG, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 6, 110-125.
9. GOLDINGER, S. D. (1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1166-1183.
10. GOLDINGER, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251-279.
11. GOLDINGER, S. D., PISONI, D. B., & LOGAN, J. S. (1991). On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 152-162.
12. GREEN, K. P., TOMIAK, G. R., & KUHL, P. K. (1997). The encoding of rate and talker information during phonetic perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 675-692.
13. GREENSPAN, S. L., NUSBAUM, H. C., & PISONI, D. B. (1988). Perceptual learning of synthetic speech produced by rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 421-433.
14. HERVAIS-ADELMAN, A., JOHNSRUDE, I. S., DAVIS, M. H., & BRENT, L. (2002, September). Adaptation to noise-vocoded speech in normal listeners: Perceptual learning depends on lexical feedback. Poster presented at the BSA Short Papers Meeting on Experimental Studies of Hearing and Deafness, University of Sheffield.
15. HIRAHARA, T., & KATO, H. (1992). The effect of F0 on vowel identification. In Y. Tohkura, E. Vatikiotis-Bateson, & Y. Sagisaka (Eds.), Speech perception, production, and linguistic structure (pp. 89-112). Tokyo: Ohmsha.
16. JOHNSON, K. (1990). The role of perceived speaker identity in F0 normalization of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 642-654.
17. JOHNSON, K. (1991). Differential effects of speaker and vowel variability on fricative perception. Language & Speech, 34, 265-279.
18. JOHNSON, K. (1997). Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 145-165). San Diego: Academic Press.
19. KLATT, D. H. (1979). Speech perception: A model of acoustic-phonetic analysis and lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 279-312.
20. KLATT, D. H. (1986). The problem of variability in speech recognition and in models of speech perception. In J. S. Perkell & D. Klatt (Eds.), Invariance and variability in speech processes (pp. 301-324). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. KLATT, D. H. (1989). Review of selected models of speech perception. In W. D. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 169-226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. KNÖSCHE, T. R., LATTNER, S., MAESS, B., SCHAUER, M., & FRIEDERICI, A. D. (2002). Early parallel processing of auditory word and voice information. NeuroImage, 17, 1493-1503.
23. KRUSCHKE, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.
24. LADEFOGED, P. (1989). A note on "information conveyed by vowels." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 2223-2224.
25. LADEFOGED, P., & BROADBENT, D. E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 98-104.
26. LATTNER, S. (2002). Neurophysiologische Untersuchungen zur auditorischen Verarbeitung von Stimminformation [Neurophysiological investigations into auditory processing of voice information] (Max Planck Series in Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 29). Leipzig: Max-Planck-Institut fur Neuropsychologische Forschung.
27. LIVELY, S. E., LOGAN, J. S., & PISONI, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: II. The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 94, 1242-1255.
28. MANN, V. A., & REPP, B. H. (1980). Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [f]-[s] distinction. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 213-228.
29. MANN V. [A.], & SOLI, S. D. (1991). Perceptual order and the effect of vocalic context on fricative perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 399-411.
30. MARTIN, C. S., MULLENNIX, J. W., PISONI, D. B., & SUMMERS, W. V. (1989). Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 676-684.
31. MAYE, J., ASLIN, R., & TANENHAUS, M. (2003, March). In search of the weckud wetch: Online adaptation to speaker accent. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing (pp. 153). Cambridge, MA.
32. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & ELMAN, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
33. MCQUEEN, J. M. (1991). The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: Stimulus quality in word-final ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 433-443.
34. MCQUEEN, J. M., CUTLER, A., & MORRIS, D. (2003, December). Perceptual learning in speech generalises over words. Paper presented at the 9th Wintercongres of the Nederlands Vereniging voor Psychonomie, Egmond aan Zee.
35. MEHLER, J., SEBASTIAN, N., ALTMANN, G., DUPOUX, E., CHRISTOPHE, A., & PALLIER, C. (1993). Understanding compressed sentences: The role of rhythm and meaning. In P. Tallal, A. M. Galaburda, R. R. Llinás, & C. von Euler (Eds.), Temporal information processing in the nervous system: Special reference to dyslexia and dysphasia (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 682, pp. 272-282). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
36. MULLENNIX, J. W., & PISONI, D. B. (1990). Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 379-390.
37. MULLENNIX, J. W., PISONI, D. B., & MARTIN, C. S. (1989). Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 365-378.
38. NEAREY, T. M. (1989). Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 2088-2113.
39. NORRIS, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
40. NORRIS, D., MCQUEEN, J. M., & CUTLER, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 204-238.
41. NUSBAUM, H. [C.], & MAGNUSON, J. (1997), Talker normalization: Phonetic constancy as a cognitive process. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 109-129). San Diego: Academic Press.
42. NUSBAUM, H. C., & MORIN, T. M. (1992). Paying attention to differences among talkers. In Y. Tohkura, E. Vatikiotis-Bateson, & Y. Sagisaka (Eds.), Speech perception, production, and linguistic structure (pp. 113-134). Tokyo: Ohmsha.
43. NYGAARD, L. C., & PISONI, D. B. (1998). Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 355-376.
44. NYGAARD, L. C., SOMMERS, M. S., & PISONI, D. B. (1994). Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Science, 5, 42-46.
45. PALMERI, T. J., GOLDINGER, S. D., & PISONI, D. B. (1993). Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 309-328.
46. PISONI, D. B. (1993). Long-term memory in speech perception: Some new findings on talker variability, speaking rate and perceptual learning. Speech Communication, 13, 109-125.
47. PISONI, D. B. (1997). Some thoughts on "normalization" in speech perception. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 9-30). San Diego: Academic Press.
48. REPP, B. H., & LIBERMAN, A. M. (1987). Phonetic category boundaries are flexible. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition (pp. 89-112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. SCOTT, D. R., & CUTLER, A. (1984). Segmental phonology and the perception of syntactic structure. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 450-466.
50. SMITS, R. (2001a). Evidence for hierarchical categorization of coarticulated phonemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1145-1162.
51. SMITS, R. (2001b). Hierarchical categorization of coarticulated phonemes: A theoretical analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1109-1139.
52. STEVENS, K. N. (2002). Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 1872-1891.