Word-based morphology

Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 531-573

  Blevins, James P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750291784     PISSN: 00222267     EISSN: 14697742     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0022226706004191     Document Type: Review

References (83)

1. Ackerman, F. & Webelhuth, G. (1998). A theory of predicates. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
2. Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by itself: stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Aronson, H. I. (1990). Georgian: a reading grammar. Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers.
5. Baayen, R. H., Lieber, R. & Schreuder, R. (1997). The morphological complexity of simple nouns. Linguistics 35. 861-877.
6. Baayen, R. H. (2003). Probabilistic approaches to morphology. In Bod, Hay & Jannedy (eds.), 229-287.
7. Baayen, R. H., McQueen, J. M., Dijkstra, T. & Schreuder, R. (2003). Frequency effects in regular inflectional morphology: revisiting Dutch plurals. In Baayen & Schreuder (eds.), 355-390.
8. Baayen, R. H. & Schreuder, R. (eds.) (2003). Morphological structure in language processing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
9. Bartens, H.-H. (1989). Lehrbuch der saamischen (lappischen) Sprache. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
10. Blevins, J. P. (2005). Word-based declensions in Estonian. In Booij, G. & van Marle, J. (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2005. Dordrecht: Springer. 1-25.
11. Bochner, H. (1993). Simplicity in generative morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
12. Bod, R., Hay, J. & Jannedy, S. (2003). Probabilistic linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Booij, G. (2005). Compounding and derivation: evidence for Constructional Morphology. In Dressler, W. U., Kastovsky, P. & Rainer, F. (eds.), Morphology and its demarcations. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 109-132.
14. Brown, D. (1998). Stem indexing and morphonological selection in the Russian verb: A Network Morphology account. In Fabri, R., Ortmann, A. & Parodi, T. (eds.), Models of inflection. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 196-224.
15. Bybee, J. 1985. Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
16. Carstairs, A. (1983). Paradigm economy. Journal of Linguistics 19. 115-125.
17. Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1991). Inflection classes: two questions with one answer. In Plank, F. (ed.), Paradigms: the economy of inflection. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 213-253.
18. Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1994). Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language 70. 737-788.
19. Chomsky, N. (1956). Three models for the description of language. Institute of Radio Engineers Transactions on Information Theory II-2. 113-124.
20. Chomsky, N. (1975). The logical structure of linguistic theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
21. Corbett, G. (1983). Hierarchies, targets and controllers: agreement patterns in Slavic. London: Croom Helm.
22. Cover, T. M. & Joy, A. T. (1991). Elements of information theory. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
23. de Jong, N. H. (2002). Morphological families in the mental lexicon. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nijmegen.
24. Ehala, M. (2003). Estonian quantity: implications for moraic theory. In Nelson, D. & Manninen, S. (eds.), Generative approaches to Finnic and Saami linguistics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 51-79.
25. Erelt, M. (ed.) (2003). Estonian language. Tallinn: Estonian Academy Publishers.
26. Erelt, M., Kasik, R., Metslang, H., Rajandi, H., Ross, K., Saari, H., Tael, K. & Vare, S. (1995). Eesti keele grammatika: morfoloogia. Tallinn: Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia Eesti Keele Instituut.
27. Erelt, M., Erelt, T. & Ross, K. (2000). Eesti keele käsiraamat. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.
28. Goldberg, A. (1995). A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
29. Grünthal, R. (2003). Finnic adpositions and cases in change. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne.
30. Gurevich, O. (2006). Constructional morphology: the Georgian version. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
31. Halle, M. & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The view from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 111-176.
32. Harris, A. C. (1981). Georgian syntax: a study in Relational Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Harris, A. C. (1985). Diachronic syntax: the Kartvelian case. New York: Academic Press.
34. Hay, J. (2001). Lexical frequency in morphology: is everything relative? Linguistics 39. 1041-1070.
35. Hewitt, B. G. (1995). Georgian: a structural reference grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
36. Hewitt, B. G. (1996). Georgian: a learner's grammar. London: Routledge.
37. Hockett, C. F. (1947). Problems of morphemic analysis. Language 23. 321-343. [Reprinted in Joos (1957), 229-242.]
38. Hockett, C. F. (1954). Two models of grammatical description. Word 10. 210-231. [Reprinted in Joos (1957), 386-399.]
39. Hockett, C. F. (1958). A course in modern linguistics. New York: MacMillan.
40. Hockett, C. F. (1967). The Yawelmani basic verb. Language 43. 208-222.
41. Johnson, K. (2005a). Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: the emergence of social identity and phonology. In UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report 2005. 95-128. [To appear, Journal of Phonetics.]
42. Johnson, K. (2005b). Decisions and mechanisms in exemplar-based phonology. In UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report 2005. 289-311.
43. [To appear in Sole, M. J., Beddor, P. & Ohala M. (eds.), Experimental approaches to phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]
44. Joos, M. (ed.) (1957). Readings in linguistics I. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45. Kirby, J. (2005). Implicational structure in Czech nominal morphology. MA dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
46. Kirby, J. (forthcoming). Minimal redundancy in word-based morphology. In Ackerman, F., Blevins, J. P. & Stump, G. T. (eds.), Patterns in paradigms. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
47. Kostić, A., Marković, T. & Baucal, A. (2003). Inflectional morphology and word meaning: orthogonal or co-implicative cognitive domains. In Baayen & Schreuder (eds.), 1-43.
48. Krott, A., Schreuder, R. & Baayen, R. H. (2001). Analogy in morphology: modeling the choice of linking morphemes in Dutch. Linguistics 39.1. 51-93.
49. Krott, A., Schreuder, R. & Baayen, R. H. (2002). Analogical hierarchy: exemplar-based modeling of linkers in Dutch noun-noun compounds. In Skousen, R., Londsdale, D. & Parkinson, D. B. (eds.), Analogical modeling: an exemplar-based approach to language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 181-206.
50. Krott, A., Schreuder, R., Baayen, R. H. & Dressler, W. U. (in press). Analogical effects on linking elements in German. Language and Cognitive Processes.
51. Kuryłowicz, J. (1949). La nature des procès dits 'analogiques'. Acta Linguistica. 121-138.
52. [Reprinted in Hamp, E., Householder, F. W. & Austerlitz, R. (eds.) (1966), Readings in linguistics II. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 158-174.]
53. Kuryłowicz, J. (1964). The inflectional categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
54. Laakso, J. (2001). The Finnic languages. In Dahl, Ö & Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (eds.), Circum-Baltic languages, vol. I: Past and present. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 179-212.
55. Lehiste, I. (1997). Search for phonetic correlates in Estonian prosody. In Lehiste, I. & Ross, J. (eds.), Estonian prosody: papers from a symposium Tallinn: Institute of Estonian Language. 11-33.
56. Lieber, R. (1992). Deconstructing morphology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
57. Manning, C. D. & Schütze, H. (1999). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Matthews, P. H. (1972). Inflectional morphology: a theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Matthews, P. H. (1991). Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Morpurgo Davies, A. (1998). Nineteenth-century linguistics. London: Longman.
61. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2003). Paradigmatic structures in morphological processing: computational and cross-linguistic studies. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Nijmegen.
62. Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Kostić, A. & Baayen, R. H. (2004). Putting the bits together: an information-theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition 94. 1-18.
63. Paul, H. (1880). Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte (8th edn., 1968). Tübingen: Max Niemayer Verlag.
64. Pertsova, K. (2004). Distribution of genitive plural allomorphs in the Russian lexicon and in the internal grammar of native speakers. MA thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.
65. Prince, A. (1980). A metrical theory for Estonian quantity. Linguistic Inquiry 11. 511-562.
66. Robins, R. H. (1959). In defence of WP. Transactions of the Philological Society. 116-144.
67. Saagpakk, P. F. (2000). Estonian-English dictionary. Tallinn: Koolibri.
68. Saussure, F. de. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
69. Schreuder, R. & Baayen, R. H. (1997). How complex simplex words can be. Journal of Memory and Language 37. 118-139.
70. Skousen, R. (1989). Analogical modeling of language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
71. Skousen, R. (1992). Analogy and structure. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
72. Steele, S. (1995). Towards a theory of morphological information. Language 71. 260-309.
73. Stump, G. T. (1993). On rules of referral. Language 69. 449-479.
74. Stump, G. T. (2001). Inflectional morphology: a theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition 7. 263-272.
76. Thyme, A. (1993). A connectionist approach to nominal inflection: paradigm patterning and analogy in Finnish. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, San Diego.
77. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
78. Tschenkéli, K. (1958). Einführung in die georgische Sprache. Zurich: Amirani Verlag.
79. Tschenkéli, K. (1960-1974). Georgisch-deutsches Wörterbuch. Zurich: Amirani Verlag.
80. Viitso, T.-R. (2003a). Structure of the Estonian language: phonology, morphology and word formation. In Erelt (ed.), 9-92.
81. Viitso, T.-R. (2003b). Rise and development of the Estonian language. In Erelt (ed.), 130-230.
82. Viks, Ü. (1992). Morphological dictionary of Estonian: introduction and grammar. Tallinn: Institute of Language and Literature.
83. Zwicky, A. M. (1985). How to describe inflection. In Niepokuj, M., Van Clay, M., Nikiforidou, V. & Feder, D. (eds.), Proceedings of BLS 11. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 372-386.