Pushing structural information into the yeast interactome by high-throughput protein docking experiments

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 2009, Pages

  Mosca, Roberto ^a,b   Pons, Carles ^b,c   Fernández Recio, Juan ^b   Aloy, Patrick ^a,b,d  

^a INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN BIOMEDICINE   (Spain)

^b BARCELONA SUPERCOMPUTING CENTER   (Spain)

^c National Institute for Bioinformatics INB   (Spain)

^d INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS; THROUGHPUT; YEAST;

HIGH-THROUGHPUT; HOMOLOGY MODELING; INTERACTOME; MACROMOLECULAR COMPLEXES; PROTEIN DOCKING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS; PROTEOMICS; STRUCTURAL INFORMATION; STRUCTURAL MODELING;

PROTEINS;

ANTHRANILATE SYNTHASE; DNA DIRECTED RNA POLYMERASE III; FUNGAL PROTEIN; SAM1 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEOMICS; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FACTUAL DATABASE; FUNGAL GENOME; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DATABASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

ANTHRANILATE SYNTHASE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DATABASES, PROTEIN; GENOME, FUNGAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 70049112107     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000490     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Uetz P, Giot L, Cagney G, Mansfield TA, Judson RS, et al. (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403: 623-627. (Pubitemid 30103994)
2. Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R, Yoshida M, Hattori M, et al. (2001) A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 4569-4574. (Pubitemid 32295017)
3. Giot L, Bader JS, Brouwer C, Chaudhuri A, Kuang B, et al. (2003) A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 302: 1727-1736. (Pubitemid 37505730)
4. Li S, Armstrong CM, Bertin N, Ge H, Milstein S, et al. (2004) A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science 303: 540-543. (Pubitemid 38120855)
5. Gavin AC, Aloy P, Grandi P, Krause R, Boesche M, et al. (2006) Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440: 631-636.
6. Krogan NJ, Cagney G, Yu H, Zhong G, Guo X, et al. (2006) Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440: 637-643.
7. Rual JF, Venkatesan K, Hao T, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Dricot A, et al. (2005) Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature 437: 1173-1178. (Pubitemid 41509356)
8. Stelzl U, Worm U, Lalowski M, Haenig C, Brembeck FH, et al. (2005) A human protein-protein interaction network: a resource for annotating the proteome. Cell 122: 957-968. (Pubitemid 41345212)
9. Hart GT, Ramani AK, Marcotte EM (2006) How complete are current yeast and human protein-interaction networks? Genome Biol 7: 120.
10. Stein A, Aloy P (2008) Contextual specificity in peptide-mediated protein interactions. PLoS ONE 3: e2524.
11. Pache RA, Aloy P (2008) Incorporating high-throughput proteomics experiments into structural biology pipelines: identification of the low-hanging fruits. Proteomics 8: 1959-1964.
12. Aloy P, Ceulemans H, Stark A, Russell RB (2003) The relationship between sequence and interaction divergence in proteins. J Mol Biol 332: 989-998. (Pubitemid 37108793)
13. Aloy P, Bottcher B, Ceulemans H, Leutwein C, Mellwig C, et al. (2004) Structure-based assembly of protein complexes in yeast. Science 303: 2026-2029. (Pubitemid 38393279)
14. Bonvin AM (2006) Flexible protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 16: 194-200.
15. Gray JJ (2006) High-resolution protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 16: 183-193.
16. Ritchie DW (2008) Recent progress and future directions in protein-protein docking. Curr Protein Pept Sci 9: 1-15.
17. Lensink MF, Mendez R, Wodak SJ (2007) Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd Edition. Proteins 69: 704-718. (Pubitemid 350214359)
18. Mendez R, Leplae R, De Maria L, Wodak SJ (2003) Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins 52: 51-67. (Pubitemid 36648851)
19. Mendez R, Leplae R, Lensink MF, Wodak SJ (2005) Assessment of CAPRI predictions in rounds 3-5 shows progress in docking procedures. Proteins 60: 150-169. (Pubitemid 40934881)
20. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJ (1997) Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 272: 106-120.
21. Chen R, Li L, Weng Z (2003) ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins 52: 80-87.
22. Chen R, Weng Z (2002) Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics. Proteins 47: 281-294. (Pubitemid 34438678)
23. Mintseris J, Pierce B, Wiehe K, Anderson R, Chen R, et al. (2007) Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction. Proteins 69: 511-520. (Pubitemid 47628683)
24. Ritchie DW, Kemp GJ (2000) Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations. Proteins 39: 178-194.
25. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, et al. (1992) Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89: 2195-2199.
26. Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R (2002) Soft protein-protein docking in internal coordinates. Protein Sci 11: 280-291. (Pubitemid 34075791)
27. Fernandez-Recio J, Abagyan R, Totrov M (2005) Improving CAPRI predictions: optimized desolvation for rigid-body docking. Proteins 60: 308-313. (Pubitemid 40934904)
28. Fernandez-Recio J, Totrov M, Abagyan R (2003) ICM-DISCO docking by global energy optimization with fully flexible side-chains. Proteins 52: 113-117. (Pubitemid 36648859)
29. Cheng TM, Blundell TL, Fernandez-Recio J (2007) pyDock: electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins 68: 503-515.
30. Grosdidier S, Pons C, Solernou A, Fernandez-Recio J (2007) Prediction and scoring of docking poses with pyDock. Proteins 69: 852-858. (Pubitemid 350210148)
31. Dominguez C, Boelens R, Bonvin AM (2003) HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J Am Chem Soc 125: 1731-1737. (Pubitemid 36232568)
32. Camacho CJ (2005) Modeling side-chains using molecular dynamics improve recognition of binding region in CAPRI targets. Proteins 60: 245-251.
33. Camacho CJ, Gatchell DW (2003) Successful discrimination of protein interactions. Proteins 52: 92-97.
34. Gray JJ, Moughon S, Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Kuhlman B, et al. (2003) Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 331: 281-299. (Pubitemid 36870793)
35. Zacharias M (2005) ATTRACT: protein-protein docking in CAPRI using a reduced protein model. Proteins 60: 252-256. (Pubitemid 40934895)
36. Vajda S, Camacho CJ (2004) Protein-protein docking: is the glass half-full or half-empty? Trends Biotechnol 22: 110-116.
37. Vajda S (2005) Classification of protein complexes based on docking difficulty. Proteins 60: 176-180. (Pubitemid 40934883)
38. Hwang H, Pierce B, Mintseris J, Janin J, Weng Z (2008) Protein-protein docking benchmark version 3.0. Proteins 73: 705-709. (Pubitemid 352788651)
39. Chen R, Weng Z (2003) A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein-protein docking. Proteins 51: 397-408. (Pubitemid 36528825)
40. Zhang C, Vasmatzis G, Cornette JL, DeLisi C (1997) Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. J Mol Biol 267: 707-726. (Pubitemid 27170692)
41. Mintseris J, Weng Z (2004) Optimizing protein representations with information theory. Genome Inform 15: 160-169.
42. Canutescu AA, Shelenkov AA, Dunbrack RL Jr (2003) A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci 12: 2001-2014.
43. Cherry JM, Adler C, Ball C, Chervitz SA, Dwight SS, et al. (1998) SGD: Saccharomyces Genome Database. Nucleic Acids Res 26: 73-79.
44. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 235-242.
45. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403-410. (Pubitemid 20364473)
46. Pieper U, Eswar N, Davis FP, Braberg H, Madhusudhan MS, et al. (2006) MODBASE: a database of annotated comparative protein structure models and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D291-295. (Pubitemid 38081642)
47. Finn RD, Tate J, Mistry J, Coggill PC, Sammut SJ, et al. (2008) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D281-288.
48. Hermjakob H, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Lewington C, Mudali S, Kerrien S, et al. (2004) IntAct: an open source molecular interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D452-455. (Pubitemid 38081697)
49. Chatr-aryamontri A, Ceol A, Palazzi LM, Nardelli G, Schneider MV, et al. (2007) MINT: the Molecular INTeraction database. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D572-574.
50. Mosca R, Brannetti B, Schneider TR (2008) Alignment of protein structures in the presence of domain motions. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 352.
51. Chothia C, Lesk AM (1986) The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. Embo J 5: 823-826.
52. Guldener U, Munsterkotter M, Oesterheld M, Pagel P, Ruepp A, et al. (2006) MPact: the MIPS protein interaction resource on yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D436-441.
53. Gavin AC, Bosche M, Krause R, Grandi P, Marzioch M, et al. (2002) Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 415: 141-147. (Pubitemid 34059510)
54. Ho Y, Gruhler A, Heilbut A, Bader GD, Moore L, et al. (2002) Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 415: 180-183. (Pubitemid 34059520)
55. Krogan NJ, Peng WT, Cagney G, Robinson MD, Haw R, et al. (2004) High-definition macromolecular composition of yeast RNA-processing complexes. Mol Cell 13: 225-239. (Pubitemid 38183269)
56. Kowalsman N, Eisenstein M (2007) Inherent limitations in protein-protein docking procedures. Bioinformatics 23: 421-426. (Pubitemid 46323122)
57. Eswar N, Eramian D, Webb B, Shen MY, Sali A (2008) Protein structure modeling with MODELLER. Methods Mol Biol 426: 145-159.
58. Aloy P, Russell RB (2004) Ten thousand interactions for the molecular biologist. Nat Biotechnol 22: 1317-1321. (Pubitemid 39336787)
59. Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R (2002) Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 47: 409-443. (Pubitemid 34614722)
60. Hazbun TR, Malmstrom L, Anderson S, Graczyk BJ, Fox B, et al. (2003) Assigning function to yeast proteins by integration of technologies. Mol Cell 12: 1353-1365. (Pubitemid 38037006)
61. Russell RB, Aloy P (2008) Targeting and tinkering with interaction networks. Nat Chem Biol 4: 666-673.
62. Yu H, Braun P, Yildirim MA, Lemmens I, Venkatesan K, et al. (2008) High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 322: 104-110.
63. Kiemer L, Costa S, Ueffing M, Cesareni G (2007) WI-PHI: a weighted yeast interactome enriched for direct physical interactions. Proteomics 7: 932-943. (Pubitemid 46506740)