Peace by Design: Managing Intrastate Conflict through Decentralization

Peace by Design: Managing Intrastate Conflict through Decentralization

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-320

  Brancati, Dawn ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Civil war; Decentralization; Elections; Ethnic conflict; Federalism; Intrastate conflict; Regional parties; Secessionism; Separatism; Voting

Indexed keywords

EID: 67849105275     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549009.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (350)

1. Abadie, A. and Gardeazabal, J. (2003). The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque Country. American Economic Review 93 (1): 113-32.
2. Achen, C. H. (1986). The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3. Achen, C. H. (2000). Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of Other Independent Variables. Unpublished Manuscript.
4. Agarwal, U. C. (1997). National Dilemma: Regionalization of Politics and Power. In Coalition Government and Politics in India, edited by Subhash C. Kashyap, 27-40. New Delhi: Uppal Publishing House.
5. Agranoff, R. and Ramos Gallarín, J. A. (1998). La Evolución Hacia una Democracia Federal en España: Un Examen del Sistema de Relaciones Intergubernamentales. In El Estado de las Autonomías ¿Hacia un Nuevo Federalismo?, edited by Robert Agranoff and Rafael Bañón i Martínez, 55-103. Bilbao, España: Instituto Vasco de Administración Pública.
6. Aja Fernández, E. (1991). Los Parliamentos de las Comunidades Autónomas. In El Futuro de las Autonomías Territoriales: Comunidades Autónomas, Balance y Perspectivas, edited by Luis Martín Rebollo, 109-29. Santander, España: Universidad de Cantabria.
7. Alberti Rovira, E. (1991). La Colaboración entre el Estado y las Comunidades Autónomas. In El Futuro de las Autonomías Territoriales: Comunidades Autónomas, Balance y Perspectivas, edited by Luis Martín Rebollo, 201-26. Santander, España: Universidad de Cantabria.
8. Alcántara Sáez, M. and Martínez Rodríguez, A., eds. (1998). Las elecciones Autonómicas en España, 1980-97. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
9. Alesina, A. and Spolare, E. (1997). On the Number and Size of Nations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (4): 1027-56.
10. Armet, L. et al. (1988). Federalismo y Estado de las Autonomías. Barcelona: Planeta.
11. Arora, B. (2002). The Political Parties and the Party System: The Emergence of New Coalitions. In Parties and Party Politics in India, edited by Zoya Hasan, 504-32. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
12. Aznar Grasa, A. and López Laborda, J. (1994). Una Metodología para la Determinación de las Necesidades de Gasto de las Comunidades Autónomas. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
13. Bakke, K. M. and Wibbels, E. (2006). Diversity, Disparity and Civil Conflict in Federal States. World Politics 59 (October): 1-50.
14. Banerjee, K. (1984). Regional Political Parties in India. New Delhi, India: B.R. Publishing Corporation.
15. Bañón i Martínez, R. and Tamayo, M. (1998). Las Relaciones Intergubernamentales en España: El Nuevo Papel de la Administración Central en el Modelo de Relaciones Intergubernamentales. In El Estado de las Autonomías ¿Hacia un Nuevo Federalismo?, edited by Robert Agranoff and Rafael Bañón i Martínez, 105-59. Bilbao, España: Instituto Vasco de Administración Pública.
16. Bartels, L. M. (1991). Instrumental and "Quasi-Instrumental" Variables. American Journal of Political Science 35 (3): 777-800.
17. Bates, R. H. (1983). Modernization, Ethnic Competition and the Rationality of Politics in Contemporary Africa. In State versus Ethnic Claims: African Policy Dilemmas, edited by Donald S. Rothchild and Victor A. Olorunsola, 152-71. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
18. Beramendi, J. G. (1995). Identity, Ethnicity and State in Spain: 19th and 20th Centuries. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 5 (3/4): 79-100.
19. Beramendi, P. and Máiz, R. (2004). Spain: Unfulfilled Federalism (1978-1996). In Federalism and Territorial Cleavages, edited by Ugo M. Amoretti and Nancy Bermeo, 123-54. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
20. Bermeo, N. (2002). The Import of Institutions. Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 96-110.
21. Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., and Mullainathan, S. (2004). How Much Should We Trust Difference in Differences Estimates? Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (1): 249-75.
22. Bhargava, P. K. (1984). Transfers from the Center to the States in India. Asian Survey 24.6 (June): 665-87.
23. Bhatnagar, S. and Kumar, P., eds. (1988a). Regional Political Parties in India. New Delhi, India: Ess Ess Publications.
24. Bhatnagar, S. and Kumar, P., eds. (1988b). Preface. In Regional Political Parties in India, edited by Satyavan Bhatnagar and Pradeep Kumar, vii-xi. New Delhi, India: Ess Ess Publications.
25. Birnir, J. K. (2007). Divergence in Diversity? The Dissimilar Effects of Cleavages on Electoral Politics in New Democracies. American Journal of Political Science 51 (3): 602-19.
26. Biswas, G. (1992). Emergence of the United Minorities Front in Assam. In Regional Political Parties in North East India, edited by L. S. Gassah, 47-76. New Delhi, India: Omsons Publications.
27. Blumi, I. (2001). Kosovo: From the Brink - and Back Again. Current History 100 (649): 369-74.
28. Bolton, P. and Roland, G. (1997). The Breakup of Nations: A Political Economy Analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics CXII (November): 1057-90.
29. Bombwall, K. R. (1967). The Foundations of Indian Federalism. New York: Asia Publishing House.
30. Bookman, M. Z. (1991). The Political Economy of Discontinuous Development: Regional Disparities and Inter-regional Conflict. New York: Praeger.
31. Bound, J., Jaeger, D. A., and Baker, R. M. (1995). Problems with Instrumental Variable Estimation when Correlation between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable is Weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90 (430): 443-50.
32. Brady, H. E. and Collier, D., eds. (2004). Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Berkeley, CA: Rowman & Littlefield, Inc.
33. Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., and Golder, M. (2006). Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis 14 (1): 63-82.
34. Brancati, D. (2003). Design over Conflict: Managing Ethnic Conflict and Secessionism through Decentralization. PhD Thesis, Columbia University.
35. Brancati, D. (2005). Pawns Take Queen: The Destabilizing Effects of Regional Parties in Europe. Special Issue, Constitutional Political Economy 16 (2): 143-59.
36. Brancati, D. (2006). Decentralization: Fueling the Fire or Dampening the Flames of Ethnic Conflict and Secessionism. International Organization 60 (July): 651-85.
37. Brancati, D. (2007). Constituency-level Elections (CLE) dataset. New York: New York.
38. Brancati, D. (2008a). The Origins and Strengths of Regional Parties. British Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 135-59.
39. Brancati, D. (2008b). Winning Alone: The Fate of Independent Candidates Worldwide, Journal of Politics, 3 ( July): 648-662.
40. Braña, F. J. and Serna de los Mozos, V. M. (1997). La Descentralización de Competencias de Gasto Público: Teoría y Aplicación a España. Madrid: Editorial Civitas, SA
41. Brass, P. R. (1974). Language, Religion and Politics in North India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Brass, P. R. (1997). Theft of an Idol. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43. Brassloff, A. (1989). Spain: The State of the Autonomies. In Federalism and Nationalism, edited by Murray Forsyth, 24-50. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
44. Braumoeller, B. F. (2004). Hypothesis Testing and Multiplicative Interaction Terms. International Organization 58 (4): 807-20.
45. Brubaker, R. (1996). Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Brzinski, J. B. (1999). The Changing Forms of Federalism and Party Electoral Strategies: Belgium and the European Union. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 29 (1): 45-70.
47. Buchanan, J. M. and Faith, R. L. (1987). Secession and the Limits of Taxation: Toward a Theory of Internal Exit. The American Economic Review LXXVII: 1023-31.
48. Bunce, V. (1999). Subversive Institutions: The Design and the Destruction of Socialism and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Burgess, M. (1993). Federalism as Political Ideology: Interests, Benefits and Beneficiaries in Federalism and Federation. In Comparative Federalism and Federation: Competing Traditions and Future Directions, edited by Michael Burgess and Alain-G. Gagnon, 102-14. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
50. Buse, M. (1984). La Nueva Democracia Española: Sistema de Partidos y Orientación del Voto 1976-1983. Madrid: Unión Editorial, SA.
51. Byman, D. (1997). Divided They Stand: Lessons about Partition from Iraq and Lebanon. Security Studies 7 (1): 1-29.
52. Campbell, T. (1997). Innovations and Risk Taking: The Engine of Reform in Local Government in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Bank Discussion Papers, No. 357. Washington, DC: World Bank.
53. Candland, C. (1997). Congress Decline and Party Pluralism in India. Journal of International Affairs 51.1 (summer): 19-35.
54. Caramani, D. (2000). Elections in Western Europe since 1815: Election Results by Constituencies. London: Macmillan Reference.
55. Carey, J., and Shugart, M. S. (1995). Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas. Electoral Studies 14 (4): 417-39.
56. Cederman, Lars-Erik and Girardin, L. (2007). Beyond Fractionalization: Mapping Ethnicity onto Nationalist Insurgencies. American Political Science Review 101 (1): 173-85.
57. Center for International Development and Conflict Management (CIDCM). (2002). Minorities at Risk Project. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Press. Accessed December 1, 2007.
58. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS). (1996). Identidad Regional y Nacionalismo en el Estado de las Autonomías, CIS 2228. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
59. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS) (1998). Instituciones y Autonomías, CIS 2286. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
60. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS) (2001). Situación Social y Política del País Vasco, XIII, CIS 2407. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
61. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS) (2003). Instituciones y Autonomías, CIS 2455. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
62. Chandler, W. M. (1987). Federalism and Political Parties. In Federalism and the Role of the State, edited by Herman Bakvis and William M. Chandler, 149-70. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
63. Chandra, K. (2004). Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Headcounts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Chandra, K. (2005). Ethnic Parties and Democratic Stability. Perspectives on Politics 3 (2): 235-52.
65. Chhibber, P. K. (1995). Political Parties, Electoral Competition, Government Expenditures and Economic Reform in India. Journal of Development Studies 32.1 (October): 74-96.
66. Chhibber, P. K. (1999). Democracy Without Associations: Transformation of the Party System and Social Cleavages in India. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
67. Chhibber, P. K. and Kollman, K. (1998). Party Aggregation and the Number of Parties in India and the United States. American Political Science Review 92 (2): 329-42.
68. Chhibber, P. K. and Kollman, K. (2004). The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Great Britain, Canada, India and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69. Chhibber, P. and Petrocik, J. R. (1989). The Puzzle of Indian Politics: Social Cleavages and the Indian Party System. British Journal of Political Science 19.2 (April): 191-210.
70. Chong, D. and Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies. American Political Science Review 101 (4): 637-55.
71. Christiansen, T. (1998). Plaid Cymru: Dilemmas and Ambiguities of Welsh Regional Nationalism. In Regionalist Parties in Western Europe, edited by Lieven de Winter and Huri Türsan, 125-43. New York: Routledge.
72. Christin, T. and Hug, S. (2006). Federalism and the Geographic Location of Groups and Conflict. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
73. Chueca Rodríguez, R. L. and Montero, J. R., eds. (1995). Elecciones Autonómicas en Aragón. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos.
74. Collier, P. and Hoeffler, A. (2004). Greed and Grievance in Civil War. Oxford Economic Papers 56 (4): 563-96.
75. Cotarelo, R. G. (1992). Los Partidos Políticos. In Transición Política y Consolidación Democrática en España (1975-1986), edited by Ramón García Cotarelo, 299-325. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
76. Cox, G. W. (1997). Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World' Electoral System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Cox, R. H. and Frankland, E. G. (1995). The Federal State and the Breakup of Czechoslovakia: An Institutional Analysis. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 25 (1): 71-88.
78. De Burgos, J. (1983). España: por un Estado Federal. Barcelona: Editorial Argos Vergara, S.A.
79. Dědek, O. (1997). Ekonomické Aspekty Zániku Československa: Příklad Kulturního Rozchodu Národů. Praha, Česká Republika: Nakladatelství Fortuna.
80. De Esteban, J. and López Guerra, L. M. (1982). Los Partidos Políticos en la España Actual. Barcelona: Editorial Planeta.
81. Desposato, S. W. (2004). The Impact of Federalism on National Political Party Cohesion in Brazil. Legislative Studies Quarterly XXIX (2): 259-85.
82. De Winter, L. and Türsan, H., eds. (1998). Regionalist Parties in Western Europe. New York: Routledge.
83. Diamond, L. and Tsalik, S. (1999). Size of Democracy: The Case for Decentralization. In Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation, edited by Larry Diamond, 117-60. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
84. Dikshit, R. D. (1975). The Political Geography of Federalism: An Inquiry into the Origins and Stability. Delhi, India: Macmillan Company of India.
85. Dorff, R. H. (1994). Federalism in Eastern Europe: Part of the Solution or Part of Problem? Publius: The Journal of Federalism 24.2 (spring): 99-114.
86. Dua, B. D. (1985). Federalism or Patrimonialism: The Making and Unmaking of Chief Ministers in India. Asian Survey 25.8 (August): 793-804.
87. Duchacek, I. D. (1987). Comparative Federalism: The Territorial Dimension of Politics. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
88. Duchacek, I. D. (1988). Dyadic Federations and Confederations. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 18.2 (spring): 5-31.
89. Dutta, A. (1998). Growth and Development of a Regional Political Party: The Asom Gana Parishad. In Regional Political Parties in India, edited by Satyavan Bhatnagar and Pradeep Kumar, 29-49. New Delhi, India: Ess Ess Publications.
90. Dutta, N. (1992). Regional Political Parties of Assam. In Regional Political Parties in North East India, edited by L. S. Gassah, 11-7. New Delhi, India: Omsons Publications.
91. Duverger, M. (1969). Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Metheun.
92. Dvořáková,V. and Kunc, J. (1996). Zrod Českeho Straniského Systému. In Krystalizace Struktury Politických Stran v České Republice po Roce 1989, edited by Vladimíra Dvořáková and Aleš Gerloch, 55-63. Praha, Česká Republika: Česká Společnost pro Politické Vědy.
93. Eaton, K. (2004). Politics Beyond the Capital: The Design of Subnational Institutions in South America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
94. Elazar, D. J. (1987). Exploring Federalism. Tuscaloossa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
95. Elazar, D. J. (1994). Federal Systems of the World: A Handbook of Federal, Confederal, and Autonomy Arrangements. Harlow, UK: Longman Current Affairs.
96. Election Commission of India. (1991). Statistical Report on the General Elections, 1991 to the Tenth Lok Sabha. New Delhi, India: Election Commission of India.
97. Election Commission of India. (1996). Statistical Report on the General Elections, 1996 to the Eleventh Lok Sabha. New Delhi, India: Election Commission of India.
98. Election Commission of India. (1998). Statistical Report on the General Elections, 1998 to the Twelfth Lok Sabha. New Delhi, India: Election Commission of India.
99. Election Commission of India. (1999). Statistical Report on the General Elections, 1999 to the Thirteenth Lok Sabha. New Delhi, India: Election Commission of India.
100. Elkins, Z. and Sides, J. (2007). Can Institutions Build Unity in Multiethnic States? American Political Science Review 101 (4): 693-708.
101. Elster, J. (1995). Consenting Adults or the Sorcerer' Apprentice? Explaining the Breakup of the Czechoslovak Federation. East European Constitutional Review (winter): 36-41.
102. Erkizia, T., Garitano, M., Baigorri, E., Cereceda, J. L., Egido, J. A., and de la Cueva, J. (1988). Euskadi, la Renuncia del PSOE. Bilbao, España: Txalaparta Argitaletxea, S. L.
103. Escobar-Lemmon, M. (2003). Political Support for Decentralization: An Analysis of the Colombian and Venezuelan Legislatures. American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 683-97.
104. Falleti, T. G. (2005). A Sequential Theory of Decentralization: Latin American Cases in Comparative Perspective. American Political Science Review 99 (3): 327-46.
105. Fearon, J. D. (2003). Ethnic and Cultural Diversity by Country. Journal of Economic Growth 8 (2): 195-222.
106. Fearon, J. D. and Laitin, D. D. (1996). Explaining Interethnic Cooperation. American Political Science Review 90 (4): 715-35.
107. Fearon, J. D. and Laitin, D. D. (2003). Ethnicity, Insurgency and Civil War. American Political Science Review 97 (1): 75-90.
108. Fearon, J. D., Kasara, K., and Laitin, D. D. (2007). Ethnic Minority Rule and Civil War Onset. American Political Science Review 101 (1): 187-93.
109. Fearon, J. D. and van Houten, P. (2002). The Politicization of Cultural and Economic Difference: A Return to the Theory of Regional Autonomy Movements. Paper Presented at the Fifth Meeting of the Laboratory in Comparative Ethnic Processes (LiCEP), May 10-11, 2002.
110. Federal Statistical Office. (1991). Preliminary Results of the Population and Housing Census: Czech and Slovak Federal Republics, March 3, 1991. Prague, Czechoslovakia: Federal Statistical Office.
111. Filippov, M., Ordeshook, P. C., and Shvetsova, O. (2004). Designing Federalism: A Theory of Self-sustainable Federal Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
112. Fossas, E. (1999). Asimetría y Plurinacionalidad en el Estado Autonómico. In Asímetría Federal y Estado Plurinacional: El Debate Sobre la Acomodación de la Diversidad en Canada, Bèlica y España, edited by Enric Fossas and Ferrán Requejo, 275-301. Madrid: Editorial Trotta, S.A.
113. Foster, E. M. (1997). Instrumental Variables for Logistic Regression: An Illustration. Social Science Research 26 (4): 487-584.
114. Franklin, M. N. and Hirczy, W. P. (1998). Separated Powers, Divided Government and Turnout in U.S. Presidential Elections. American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 316-26.
115. Freedom House. (2007). Freedom in the World 1972-2007. Washington, DC: Freedom House.
116. Fusi Aizpurua, J. P. (2000). España: La Evolución de la Identidad Nacional. Madrid: Ediciones Temas de Hoy.
117. Gagnon Jr., V. P. (1994/1995). Ethnic Nationalism and International Conflict. International Security 19 (3): 130-66.
118. Ganguly, S. (1996). Explaining the Kashmir Insurgency: Political Mobilization and Institutional Decay. International Security 21.2 (autumn): 76-107.
119. García Ferrando, M. (1982). Regionalismo y Autonomias en España 1976-1979. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
120. García Ferrando, M. and López Aranguren, E. M. and Beltrán, M. (1994). La Conciencia Nacional y Regional en la España de las Autonomías. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
121. Garmendia Martínez, J. A., Parraluna, F., and Pérez-Agote, A. (1982). Abertzales y Vascos: Identificación Vasquista y Nacionalista en el País Vasco. Madrid: Akal Editor.
122. Gassah, L. S., ed. (1992). Regional Political Parties in North East India. New Delhi, India: Omsons Publications.
123. Gavela, D. (1980). "El Federalista Daniel Elazar, en el Congreso de Citep 'El Sistema Autonónomico Español Tiende al Separatismo. El País, 30 Noviembre 1980, 18.
124. Geddes, B. (1990). How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics. Political Analysis 2 (1): 131-50.
125. Gerring, J., Thacker, S. C., and Moreno, C. (2005). Centripetal Democratic Governance: A Theory and Global Inquiry. American Political Science Review 99:4 (November) 567-81.
126. Ghobarah, H. A., Huth, P., and Russett, B. (2003). Civil Wars Kill and Maim People - Long After the Shooting Stops. American Political Science Review 97 (2): 189-202.
127. Gibson, J. L. and Gouws, A. (2000). Social Identities and Political Intolerance: Linkages within the South African Mass Public. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 278-92.
128. Giuliano, E. (2000). Who Determines the Self in the Politics of Self-Determination? Identity and Preference Formation in Tatarstan' Mobilization. Comparative Politics 32 (3): 295-316.
129. Giuliano, E. (2006). Secessionism from the Bottom Up: Democratization, Nationalism and Local Accountability in the Russian Transition. World Politics 58 (2): 276-310.
130. Gleason, G. (1990). Federalism and Nationalism: The Struggle for Republican Rights in the USSR. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
131. Grau Creus, M. (2000). The Effects of Institutions and Political Parties upon Federalism: The Channeling and Integration of the Autonomous Communities within the Central-Level Policy Process in Spain (1983-1996). PhD Thesis. European University Institute, Florence.
132. Gregor, M. and Caha, L. (1993). Volby a Okresy. Sociologický Časopis XXIX (4): 493-515.
133. Grzymala-Busse, A. M. (2002). Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of the Communist Successor Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
134. Guerrero Salom, E. (2000). Crisis y Cambios en las Relaciones Parlamento-Gobierno 1993-1996. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos, SA.
135. Gunther, R., Sani, G. and Shabad, G. (1986). Spain After Franco: The Making of a Competitive Party System. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
136. Gurr, T. R. (2000). Peoples versus States: Minorities at Risk in the New Century. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
137. Habyarimana, J., Humphreys, M., Posner, D. N., and Weinstein, J. M. (2007). Why Does Ethnic Diversity Undermine Public Goods Provision. American Political Science Review 101 (4): 709-25.
138. Hale, H. E. (2004). Divided We Stand: Institutional Sources of Ethnofederal State Survival and Collapse. World Politics 56 (2): 165-93.
139. Hamann, K. (1999). Federalist Institutions, Voting Behavior and Party Systems in Spain. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 29 (1): 111-37.
140. Hamilton, A., Madison, J. and Jay, J. (1987). The Federalist Papers, edited by Isaac Kramnick. Harmondsworth: Penguin Classics.
141. Hampl, S. (1991). Informace. 18/4. Praha, Československo: Institut pro Výzkum Veřejného Mínění.
142. Hampl, S. (1992). Názory Čs. Veřejnosti na Státoprávní Uspořádání a na Referendum. 2/17. Praha, Československo: Institut pro Výzkum Veřejného Mínění.
143. Hardgrave Jr., R. L. (1994). India: The Dilemmas of Diversity. In Nationalism, Ethnic Conflict and Democracy, edited by Larry Diamond and Marc F. Plattner, 71-85. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
144. Hardin, R. (1997). One for All: The Logic of Group Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
145. Hart, H. C. (1988). Political Leadership in India: Dimensions and Limits. In India' Democracy: An Analysis of Changing State-Society Relations, edited by Atul Kohli, 18-61. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
146. Hartzell, C. and Hoddie, M. (2003). Institutionalizing Peace: Power Sharing and Post-Civil War Conflict Management. American Journal of Political Science 47 (2): 318-32.
147. Hasan, Z. (2002). Introduction: Conflict Pluralism and the Competitive Party System in India. In Parties and Party Politics in India, edited by Zoya Hasan, 1-36. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
148. Havel, M. (1991). Nové Zákony o Rozpočtových Pravidlech. Finance a Úvěr 41 (4): 143-51.
149. Hearl, D. J., Budge, I., and Pearson, B. (1996). Distinctiveness of Regional Voting: A Comparative Analysis across the European Community Countries (1979-93). Electoral Studies 15 (2): 167-82.
150. Heath, A. and Yadav, Y. (2002). The United Colours of Congress: Social Profile of Congress Voters, 1996-1998. In Parties and Party Politics in India, edited by Zoya Hasan, 107-49. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
151. Hechter, M. (1992). The Dynamics of Secession. Acta Sociologica 35 (4): 267-83.
152. Hechter, M. (2000). Containing Nationalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
153. Henderson, K. (1995). Czechoslovakia: The Failure of Consensus Politics and the Breakup of the Federation. Regional and Federal Studies 5 (2): 111-33.
154. Herbst, J. (2000). States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
155. Herrera, Y. M. (2005). Imagined Communities: The Sources of Russian Regionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
156. Hewitt, J. J., Wilkenfeld, J., and Gurr, T. R. (2008). Peace and Conflict 2008. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management (CIDCM).
157. Holzer, A. and Schwegler, B. (1998). The Südtiroler Volkspartei: A Hegemonic Ethnoregionalist Party. In Regionalist Parties in Western Europe, edited by Lieven de Winter and Huri Türsan, 158-73. New York: Routledge.
158. Honajzer, J. (1996). Občanské Fórum: Vznik, Vývoj a Rozpad. Praha, Česká Republika: Orbis.
159. Horowitz, D. L. (1985). Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
160. Horowitz, D. L. (1991). A Democratic South Africa? Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
161. Hug, S. (2003). Selection Bias in Comparative Research: The Case of Incomplete Data Sets. Political Analysis 11 (3): 255-74.
162. Hug, S. (2005). Federal Stability in Unequal Societies. Special Issue, Constitutional Political Economy 16 (3): 113-24.
163. Hug, S. (2007). Institutions and Conflict Resolution: Dealing with Endogeneity, University of Zurich, Unpublished Manuscript.
164. Innes, A. (1997). The Breakup of Czechoslovakia: The Impact of Party Development on the Separation of the State. East European Politics and Societies 11 (3): 393-435.
165. International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2001). Government Finance Statistics. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
166. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is Anyone Responsible: How Television Frames Issues? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
167. Iyengar, S. and Valentino, N. A. (2000). Who Says What? Source Credibility as a Mediator of Campaign Advertising. In Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice and the Bounds of Rationality, edited by Arthur Lupia, Matthew D. McCubbins and Samuel L. Popkin, 108-29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
168. Iyer, V. R. K. (1999). The Alarum Rings - The Constitution' Soul Must Be Saved. In Reconstructing the Republic, edited by Upendra Baxi, Alice Jacob, and Tarlok Singh, 49-68. New Delhi, India: Har-Anand Publications Pvt. Ltd.
169. Janda, K. (1980). Political Parties: A Cross-national Survey. New York: Free Press.
170. Jensen, N. M. and Young, D. J. (2008). Investment Risk: What Makes the Developing World Countries Seem Prone to Violence? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52 (4): 527-547.
171. Jozífková, B. (1990). Veřejné Mínění o Ekonomické Reformě. 21/5. Praha, Česká Republika: Institut pro Výzkum Veřejného Mínění.
172. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica 47: 263-91.
173. Kalyvas, S. N. (1996). The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
174. Kaufmann, C. (1996). Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars. International Security 20 (4): 136-75.
175. Keating, M. (1998). The New Regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial Restructing and Political Change. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
176. Keele, L. and Kelly, N. J. (2005). Dynamic Models for Dynamic Theories: The Ins and Outs of Lagged Dependent Variables. Political Analysis 14 (2): 186-205.
177. Khanna, H. R. (1999). Use and Misuse of Article 356. In Reconstructing the Republic, edited by Upendra Baxi, Alice Jacob, and Tarlok Singh, 154-60. Delhi, India: Har-Anand Publications Pvt. Ltd.
178. King, G., Keohane, R. O., and Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
179. Kohli, A. (1998). Enduring Another Election. Journal of Democracy 9 (3): 7-20.
180. Kopecký, P. (2000). From "Velvet Revolution" to "Velvet Split": Consociational Institutions and the Disintegration of Czechoslovakia. In Irreconcilable Differences?Explaining Czechoslovakia' Dissolution, edited and translated by Michael Kraus and Allison Stanger, 69-86. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
181. Kostelecký, T. (1994). Economic, Social and Historical Determinants of Voting Patterns: In the 1990 and 1992 Parliamentary Elections in the Czech Republic. Czech Sociological Review 2 (2): 209-28.
182. Kothari, R. (2002). The Congress 'System' in India. In Parties and Party Politics in India, edited by Zoya Hasan, 39-55. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
183. Krause, G. A. and Bowman, A. O'M. (2005). Adverse Selection, Political Parties, and Policy Delegation in the American Federal System. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 21 (2): 359-87.
184. Krejčí, O. (1994). Kniha o Volbách. Praha, Česká Republika: Victoria.
185. Krejčí, O. (2000). A Comment on Čarnogurský and Pithart. In Irreconcilable Differences? Explaining Czechoslovakia' Dissolution, edited and translated by Michael Kraus and Allison Stanger, 235-40. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
186. Kroupa, A. and Kostelecký, T. (1996). Party Organization and Structure at National and Local Level in the Czech Republic since 1989. In Party Structure and Organization in East-Central Europe, edited by Paul G. Lewis, 89-115. Cheltenham, UK Edward Elgar.
187. Kroupa, D. (1996). Daniel Kroupa: Svoboda a Řád (Sváteční Rozhovory). By Jan Šícha. Praha, Česká Republika: Éós.
188. Kučera, M. and Pavlík, Z. (1995). Czech and Slovak Demography. In The End of Czechoslovakia, edited by Jiří Musil, 15-39. New York: Central European University Press.
189. Kumar, G. G. (1986). Regional Political Parties and State Politics. New Delhi, India: Deep and Deep Publications.
190. Kumar, P. (1988). Akali Dal in Punjab. In Regional Political Parties in India, edited by Satyavan Bhatnagar and Pradeep Kumar, 107-29. New Delhi, India: Ess Ess Publications.
191. Kusý, M. (1995). Slovak Exceptionalism. In The End of Czechoslovakia, edited Jiří Musil, 139-58. New York: Central European University Press.
192. Kymlicka, W. (1998). Is Federalism a Viable Alternative to Secessionism? Theories of Secession, edited by Percy B. Lehning, 111-50. New York: Routledge Press.
193. L. A. (1994). Nacionalismus a Masmédia. Mezinárodní Politika 18 (8): 15.
194. Lagares Díez, N. (1999). Génesis y Desarollo del Partido Popular de Galicia. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos, S.A.
195. Laitin, D. D. (1985). Hegemony and Religious Conflict: British and Imperial Control and Political Cleavages in Yorubaland. In Bringing the State Back In, edited by Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol, 285-316. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
196. Leff, C. S. (1999). Democratization and Disintegration in Multinational States: The Breakup of the Communist Federations. World Politics 51 (2): 205-35.
197. Leff, C. S. (2000). Inevitability, Probability, Possibility: The Legacies of the Czech-Slovak Relationship, 1918-1989, and the Disintegration of the State. In Irreconcilable Differences? Explaining Czechoslovakia' Dissolution, edited and translated by Michael Kraus and Allison Stanger, 29-48. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
198. Levi, M. and Hechter, M. (1985). A Rational Choice Approach to the Rise and Decline of Ethnoregional Parties. In New Nationalisms of the Developed West: Toward Explanation, edited by Ronald Rogowski and Edward A. Tiryakian, 128-46. Winchester: Allen and Unwin.
199. Lieberman, E. S. (2005). Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. American Political Science Review 99 (3): 435-52.
200. Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
201. Lijphart, A. (1996). Puzzle of Indian Democracy: A Consociational Interpretation. American Political Science Review 90 (June): 258-68.
202. Lijphart, A., Rogowski, R., and Weaver, R. K. (1993). Separation of Powers and Cleavage Management. In Do Institutions Matter? Government Capabilities in the United States and Abroad, edited by R. Kent Weaver and Bert A. Rockman, 302-44. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
203. Linz, J. J., and Montero, J. R. (1999). The Party System of Spain: Old Cleavages and New Challenges. Madrid, Spain: Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Ciencias Sociales.
204. Linz, J. J. and Stepan, A. (1992). Political Identities and Electoral Sequences: Spain, the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia. Daedalus 121 (spring): 123-39.
205. Linz, Juan J. and Arturo Valenzuela. 1994. The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
206. Lipset, S. M. (1963). Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
207. Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. In Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-national Perspectives, edited by Seymour Martin Lipset and Stein Rokkan, 1-64. New York: Free Press.
208. Llera Ramo, F. J. (1984). El Sistema de Partidos Vascos: Distancia, Ideológica y Legitimación Política. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas 28: 171-201.
209. Llera Ramo, F. J. (1993). The Construction of the Basque Polarized Pluralism. Barcelona, Spain: Institut de Ciències Polítiques i Socials.
210. Llera Ramo, F. J. (1995). Basque Polarization: Between Autonomy and Independence. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 5 (3/4): 101-20.
211. Lundell, K. (2004). Determinants of Candidate Selection: The Degree of Centralization in Perspective. Party Politics 10 (1): 25-47.
212. Lustik, I. S., Miodownik, D., and Eidelson, R. J. (2004). Secessionism in Multicultural States: Does Sharing Power Prevent or Encourage It? American Political Science Review 98 (2): 209-229.
213. Macek, M. (2000). Fragments from the Dividing of Czechoslovakia. In Irreconcilable Differences? Explaining Czechoslovakia' Dissolution, edited and translated by Michael Kraus and Allison Stanger, 241-46. Lanham, MD Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
214. Malcolm, N. (1996). Bosnia: A Short History. New York: New York University Press.
215. Manor, J. (1998). Making Federalism Work. Journal of Democracy 9 (3): 21-35.
216. Marcet, J. and Argelaguet, J. (1998). Nationalist Parties in Catalonia: Convergència Democrática de Catalunya and Esquerra Republicana In Regionalist Parties in Western Europe, edited by Lieven de Winter and Huri Türsan, 70-86. New York: Routledge.
217. Martínez, R. (1995). Procesos Políticos y Electorales. In Elecciones Autonómicas en Aragón, edited by Ricardo Luis Chueca Rodríguez and José Ramón Montero, 109-34. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos.
218. McGraw, K. M. and Hubbard, C. (1996). Some of the People Some of the Time: Individual Differences in Acceptance of Political Accounts. In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, edited by Diana C. Mutz, Richard A. Brody, and Paul M. Sniderman, 145-70. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
219. Meadwell, H. (1993). Transition to Independence and Ethnic Nationalist Mobilization. In Politics and Rationality, edited by William James Booth, Patrick James and Hudson Meadwell, 191-216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
220. Meguid, B. M. (2002). Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Rising Party Success in Western Europe. PhD Dissertation. Harvard University.
221. Miguel, E., Satyanath, S., and Sargenti, E. (2004). Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: An Instrumental Variables Approach. Journal of Political Economy 112 (4): 725-53.
222. Ministerio del Interior. (2000). Procesos Electorales de ámbito Estatal, 1976-1999. Madrid: Ministerio del Interior.
223. Ministerio del Interior. (2001). Elecciones a Cortes Generales 2000: Aplicación de Consulta. Madrid: Ministerio del Interior.
224. Ministerio para las Administraciones Públicas (MAP). (1992). Los Acuerdos Autonómicos de 28 de febrero de 1992. Madrid: MAP.
225. Ministerio para las Administraciones Públicas (MAP). (1994). Informe Económico-Financiero de las Administraciones Territoriales en 1993. Madrid: Ministerio para las Adminstraciones Publicas.
226. Ministry of Finance (1998-2000) Indian Public Finance Statistics, 1998-2000. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Finance. Economic Division.
227. Ministry of Finance 2006-7. Indian Public Finance Statistics, 2006-7. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Finance, Economic Division, 12-3.
228. Ministerio de Hacienda. (1997-2008). Presupuestos Generales del Estado. Madrid: Ministerio de Hacienda.
229. Mišovič, J. (1990). Informace. 18/2. Praha, Československo: Institut pro Výzkum Veřejného Mínění.
230. Montero, J. R., Llera Ramo, F. J., Pallarés Posta, F. (1998). Los Partidos de ámbito No Estatal en España: Notas Actitudinales sobre Nacionalismos y Regionalismos. In El Estado de las Autonomías ¿Hacia un Nuevo Federalismo?, edited by Robert Agranoff and Rafael Bañón i Martínez, 205-44. Bilbao, España: Instituto Vasco de Administración Pública.
231. Montero, J. R., Pallarés Posta, F. and Õnate Rubalcaba, P. (1995). El Subsistema de Partidos. In Elecciones Autonómicas en Aragón. edited by Ricardo Luis Chueca Rodríguez and José Ramón Montero, 193-236. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos.
232. Moreno, L. (1997). Federalization and Ethnoterritorial Concurrence in Spain. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 27 (4): 65-84.
233. Mueller, J. (2000). The Banality of "Ethnic War." International Security 25 (1): 42-70.
234. Murdoch, J. C. and Sandler, T. (2002). Economic Growth, Civil Wars, and Spatial Spillovers. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (1): 91-110.
235. Musil, J. (1995). Czech and Slovak Society. In The End of Czechoslovakia, edited Jiří Musil, 77-96. New York: Central European University Press.
236. Narang, A. S. (1995). Ethnic Identities and Federalism. Shimla, India: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
237. Narula, R. S. (1999). Restructuring the Political System. In Reconstructing the Republic, edited by Upendra Baxi, Alice Jacob, and Tarlok Singh, 69-85. New Delhi, India: Har- Anand Publications Pvt. Ltd.
238. Nayar, V. K. S. (1986). Foreword. In Regional Political Parties and State Politics, edited by G. Gopa Kumar, 8-10. New Delhi, India: Deep and Deep Publications.
239. Newell, J. L. (1998). The Scottish Nationalist Party: Development and Change. In Regionalist Parties in Western Europe, edited by Lieven de Winter and Huri Türsan, 105-24. New York: Routledge.
240. Nordlinger, E. A. (1972). Conflict Regulation in Divided Societies. Cambridge, MA: Center for International Affairs, Harvard University.
241. Norris, P. (2008). Driving Democracy: Do Power-sharing Regimes Work? New York: Cambridge University Press.
242. Núñez, X-M. (1999). Autonomist Regionalism within the Spanish State of the Autonomous Communities: An Interpretation. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 5 (3/4): 121-41.
243. Občanské Fórum. (1990). První Návrah Nové Ústavy. Praha, Česká Republika: Občanské Fórum.
244. Obrman, J. and Mates, P. (1994). Subdividing the Czech Republic: The Controversy Continues. RFE/RL Research Report 3 (9): 27-32.
245. Office of the Registrar General. (2001). Census of India. New Delhi, India: Office of the Registrar General.
246. O'Leary, B. and McGarry, J. (1995). Regulating Nations and Ethnic Communities. In Nationalism and Rationality, edited by Albert Breton, Gianluigi Galeotti, Pierre Salmon, Ronald Wintrobe, 245-89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
247. Olson, D. (1993). The Dissolution of the State: Political Parties and the 1992 Election in Czechoslovakia. Communist and Post-communist Studies 26 (3): 301-14.
248. Olson, D. (1994). The New Parliaments of New Democracies: The Experience of the Federal Assembly of the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic. In The Emergence of East Central European Parliaments: The First Steps, edited by Attila ágh, 35-47. Budapest, Hungary: Hungarian Centre for Democracy Studies.
249. Olson, M. (1971). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory or Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
250. O'Neill, K. (2003). Decentralization as an Electoral Strategy. Comparative Political Studies 36 (9): 1068-91.
251. Ornstein, N. and Coursen, K. (1992). As the World Turns Democratic, Federalism Finds Favor. The American Enterprise (January/February): 20-4.
252. Padró-Solanet, A. and Colomer, J. M. (1992). Espacio Político-Ideológico y Temas de Campaña: El Ejemplo de las Elecciones Autonómicas de Cataluña de 1992. Revista de Estudios Políticos 78 (Octubre/Diciembre): 131-60.
253. Pai, S. (1998). The Indian Party System under Transformation: Lok Sabha Elections 1998. Asian Survey XXXVII (9): 836-52.
254. Pal, C. (1984). State Autonomy in Indian Federation: Emerging Trends. New Delhi, India: Deep and Deep Publications.
255. Panizza, U. (1999). On the Determinants of Fiscal Centralization: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Economics 74 (1): 97-139.
256. Patterson, S. C. and Mughan, A., eds. (1999). Senate: Bicameralism in the Contemporary World. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
257. Pehe, J. (1993). Czechoslovakia: Toward Dissolution. RFE/RL Research Report 2 (1): 84-8.
258. Penn, E. M. (2007a). Citizenship versus Ethnicity: The Role of Institutions in Shaping Identity Choice. Unpublished Manuscript, Harvard University.
259. Penn, E. M. (2007b). From Many, One: State Representation and the Construction of an American National Identity, Unpublished Manuscript, Harvard University.
260. Pérez Vilariño, J. (1987). Las Primeras Elecciones al Parlamento Gallego. In Comportamiento Electoral y Nacionalismo en Cataluña, Galicia y País Vasco, edited by José Pérez Vilariño, 57-90. Santiago de Compostela, España: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.
261. Pérez-Nievas, S. and Fraile, M. (2000). Is the Nationalist Vote Really Nationalist: Dual Voting in Catalonia (1980-1999). Estudio/Working Paper 2000/147. Madrid: Instituto Juan March de Estudios e Investigaciones.
262. Perulles Romero, J. M. (1991). La Financiación de las Comunidades Autónomas. In El Futuro de las Autonomías Territoriales: Comunidades Autónomas, Balance y Perspectivas, edited by Luis Martín Rebollo, 227-60. Santander, España: Universidad de Cantabria.
263. Pithart, P. (1995). The Division of Czechoslovakia: A Preliminary Balance Sheet for the End of a Respectable Country. Canadian Slavonic Papers/Revue Canadienne des Slavistes XXXVII (3/4): 321-36.
264. Popkin, S. L. (1994). The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
265. Posner, D. N. (2004). The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi. American Political Science Review 98 (4): 529-45.
266. Příhoda, P. (1995). Mutual Perceptions in Czech-Slovak Relationships. In The End of Czechoslovakia, edited by Jiří Musil, 128-38. New York: Central European University Press.
267. Průcha, V. (1995). Economic Development and Relations, 1918-1989. In The End of Czechoslovakia, edited by Jiří Musil, 40-77. New York: Central European University Press.
268. Rabushka, A. and Shepsle, K. A. (1972). Politics in Plural Societies: A Theory of Democratic Instability. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
269. Rao, M. G. (1998). India: Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in a Planned Economy: The Case of India. In Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries, edited by Richard M. Bird and François Vaillancourt, 78-114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
270. Řeháková, B. (1999). Social Stratification and Voting Behavior. In Ten Years of Rebuilding Capitalism: Czech Society after 1989, edited by Jiří Večerník and Petr Matějů, 228-50. Praha, Česká Republika: Academia.
271. Requejo, F. (1999). La Acomodación Federal de la Plurinacionalidad. Democracia Liberal y Federalismo Plural. In Asímetría Federal y Estado Plurinacional: El Debate Sobre la Acomodación de la Diversidad en Canadá, Bèlica y España, edited by Enric Fossas and Ferrán Requejo, 303-44. Madrid: Editorial Trotta, S.A.
272. Reventós, J. (1979). Las Razones del 'Sí' Socialista. El País, 16 de Octubre, 13.
273. Riker, W. H. (1964). Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
274. Rocca, F. X. (1999). Out of their League: How Did a Champion of Decentralized Government and Regional Pride End Up Betraying Both Causes? With Opportunism, Overreaching and Crude Charisma. The American Spectator (March): 34-9.
275. Rodden, J. (2004). Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: On Meaning and Measurement. Comparative Politics 36 (4): 481-500.
276. Roeder, P. G. (1991). Soviet Federalism and Ethnic Mobilization. World Politics 43 (2): 196-232.
277. Roeder, P. G. (2001). Ethno-Linguistic Fractionalization Indices, 1961 and 1985. Accessed December 3, 2007.
278. Rokkan, S. and Urwin, D. W., eds. (1982). The Politics of Territorial Identity: Studies in European Regionalism. London: Sage Publications.
279. Ross, M. L. (2004). How Do Natural Resources Influence Civil War? Evidence from Thirteen Cases. International Organization 58 (winter): 35-67.
280. Rothschild, J. (1974). East Central Europe Between the Two World Wars. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
281. Rousseau, D. L. and García-Retamero, R. (2007). Identity, Power, and Threat Perception: A Cross-National Experimental Study. Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 (5): 744-71.
282. Rychlík, J. (1995). National Consciousness and the Common State (A Historical- Ethnological Analysis). In The End of Czechoslovakia, edited by Jiří Musil, 97-105. New York: Central European University Press.
283. Saideman, S. M., Lanoue, D., Campenni, M., and Stanton, S. (2002). Democratization, Political Institutions, and Ethnic Conflict: A Pooled, Cross-Sectional Time Series Analysis from 1985-1998. Comparative Political Studies 35 (1): 103-29.
284. Sambanis, N. (2000). Partition as a Solution to Ethnic War: An Empirical Critique of the Theoretical Literature. World Politics 52 (July): 437-83.
285. Sambanis, N. (2001). Do Ethnic and Non-ethnic Civil Wars Have the Same Causes? A Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry (Part I). Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (3): 259-82.
286. Samuels, D. (2000). The Gubernatorial Coattails Effect: Federalism and Congressional Elections in Brazil. The Journal of Politics 62 (1): 240-53.
287. Sartori, G. (1997). Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. New York: New York University Press.
288. Sen, S. R. (1999). India' Political System: What Is to Be Done? In Reconstructing the Republic, edited by Upendra Baxi, Alice Jacob, and Tarlok Singh, 86-110. New Delhi, India: Har-Anand Publications Pvt. Ltd.
289. Sengupta, A. (1992). Regional Political Parties in Assam: An Observation on Asom Gana Parishad. In Regional Political Parties in North East India, edited by L. S. Gassah, 42-46. New Delhi, India: Omsons Publications.
290. Seshia, S. (1998). Divide and Rule in Indian Party Politics: The Rise of the Bharatiya Janata Party. Asian Survey 38 (11): 1036-50.
291. Shabad, G. (1986). Las elecciones de 1982 y las Autonomías. In Crisis y Cambio: Electores y Partidos en la España de los Años Ochentas, edited by Juan José Linz and José Ramón Montero, 525-85. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
292. Shugart, M. S., and Carey, J. M. (1992). Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
293. Singh, G. (2000). Ethnic Conflict in India: A Case Study of Punjab. New York: St. Martin' Press.
294. Singh, K. (1997). Our Democratic Polity: Minority and Coalition Governments. In Coalition Government and Politics in India, edited by Subhash C. Kashyap, 1-6. New Delhi, India: Uppal Publishing House.
295. Singh, S. D. (1998). The Fragmental Party System: A Study of the Viability of Indian Political Parties. Ranchi, India: Catholic Press.
296. Singh, V. B. and Bose, S. (1986). Elections in India: Data Handbook on Lok Sabha Elections. 2nd ed., vols.1-2. New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.
297. Slavíková, J. (1990). Kdy Začít s Hospodářskými Reformami? 21/4. Praha, Československo: Institut pro Výzkum Veřejného Mínění.
298. Slavíková, J. (1992). V České Republice Názory Kritické, ve Slovenské Republice Ještě Kritičtější.21/19. Praha, Československo: Institut pro Výzkum Veřejného Mínění.
299. Snyder, J. L. (2000). From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
300. Snyder, J. L. and Ballentine, K. (1996). Nationalism and the Marketplace of Ideas. International Security 21 (2): 5-40.
301. Snyder, J. L. and Mansfield, E. D. (1995). Democratization and the Danger of War. International Security 20 (1): 5-38.
302. Sridharan, E. (2002). The Fragmentation of the Indian Party System, 1952-1999: Seven Competing Explanations. In Parties and Party Politics in India, edited by Zoya Hasan, 475-503. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
303. Stanger, A. (2000). The Price of Velvet: Constitutional Politics and the Demise of the Czechoslovak Federation. In Irreconcilable Differences? Explaining Czechoslovakia' Dissolution, edited and translated by Michael Kraus and Allison Stanger, 137-62. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
304. Stein, E. (2000). Czecho/Slovakia: Ethnic Conflict, Constitutional Fissure and Negotiated Breakup. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
305. Stepan, A. C. (1999). Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the US Model. Journal of Democracy 10 (4): 19-34.
306. Stock, J. H. (2002). Instrumental Variables in Economics and Statistics. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 20, edited by Neil J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes, 7577-82. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
307. Suberu, R. T. (1994). The Travails of Federalism in Nigeria. In Nationalism, Ethnic Conflict and Democracy, edited by Larry Diamond and Marc F. Plattner, 56-70. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
308. Subirats i Humet, J. (1998). El Papel de las Comunidades Autónomas en el Sistema Español de Relaciones Intergubernamentales: Quince Años de Comunidades Autónomas en España. Luces y Sombras de una Realidad Aún en Discusión. In El Estado de las Autonomías ¿Hacia un Nuevo Federalismo, edited by Robert Agranoff and Rafael Bañón i Martínez, 161-80. Bilbao, España: Instituto Vasco de Administración Pública.
309. Suresh, K. (2000). Identity Articulation and Emerging Political Formation in India. In Coalition Politics and Power Sharing, edited by Akhtar Majeed, 36-68. New Delhi, India: Manak Publications Pvt. Ltd.
310. Svejnar, J. (2000). Explaining Czechoslovakia' Dissolution: Assessing Economic Performance Before and After the Breakup. In Irreconcilable Differences? Explaining Czechoslovakia' Dissolution, edited and translated by Michael Kraus and Allison Stanger, 183-99. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
311. Svitek, I. (1992). The 1992 State Budgets in Czechoslovakia. RFE/RL Research Report (February): 34-7.
312. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by William G. Austin and Stephen Worchel, 38-43. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
313. Tarchi, M. (1998). The Lega Nord. In Regionalist Parties in Western Europe, edited by Lieven de Winter and Huri Türsan, 143-58. New York: Routledge.
314. Thandavan, R. (1998). AIADMK in Tamil Nadu: Its Emergence and Unprecedented Growth. In Regional Political Parties in India, edited by Satyavan Bhatnagar and Pradeep Kumar, 131-65. New Delhi, India: Ess Ess Publications.
315. Tomek, I. and Forst, V. (1990). Czechoslovak Citizens' Attitudes Towards Federation (September/October 1990). Prague, Czech Republic: Public Opinion Research Institute.
316. Tornos Más, J. (1991). La Distribución de Competencias entre el Estado y las Comunidades Autónomas: Problemas de Articulación. In El Futuro de las Autonomías Territoriales: Comunidades Autónomas, Balance y Perspectivas, edited by Luis Martín Rebollo, 45-77. Santander, España: Universidad de Cantabria.
317. Treisman, D. (2002). Defining and Measuring Decentralization: A Global Perspective. Unpublished Manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.
318. Treisman, D. (2007). Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
319. Tremblay, R. C. (1996). Nation, Identity and the Intervening Role of the State: A Study of the Secessionist Movement in Kashmir. Pacific Affairs 69 (4): 471-97.
320. Trudeau, P. E. (1968). Federalism and the French Canadians. Toronto: Macmillan of Canada.
321. Truman, D. B. (1955). Federalism and the Party System. In Federalism: Mature and Emergent, edited by Arthur W. MacMahon, 115-36. Garden City, NY: Double Day and Company.
322. Tsebelis, G. (1990). Elite Interaction and Constitution Building in Consociational Societies. Journal of Theoretical Politics 2 (1): 5-29.
323. Tummala, K. K. (1992). India' Federalism Under Stress. Asian Survey 32 (6): 538-53.
324. Ugarte, B. A. and Pérez-Nievas, S. (1998). Moderate Nationalist Parties in the Basque Country: Partido Nacionalista Vasco and Eusko Alkartasuna. In Regionalist Parties in Western Europe, edited by Lieven de Winter and Huri Türsan, 87-104. New York: Routledge.
325. Unión de Pueblo Navarro (UPN). (2000). 20 Años al Servicio de Navarra del Siglo XX al Siglo XXI. Pamplona, España: Unión del Pueblo Navarro.
326. Vachudová, M. A. (1993). Divisions in the Czech Communist Party. RFE/RL Research Report 2 (37): 28-33.
327. Vadas, M. (2000). Notes on the Role of Television in Czechoslovakia' Dissolution. In Irreconcilable Differences? Explaining Czechoslovakia' Dissolution, edited and translated by Michael Kraus and Allison Stanger, 269-86. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
328. Valko, E., Zelenay, R., and Kovář, J. (1992). Interviews by Jakub Císař and Stanislav Benda. Rozvod po Československu: Úvahy o Rozpadu Státu. Praha, Česká Republika: Jakub Císař and Stanislav Benda.
329. Van Houten, P. J. (2008). Regionalist Challenges to European States: A Quantitative Assessment. Ethnopolitics 6 (4): 545-68.
330. Varshney, A. (1998). Why Democracy Survives. Journal of Democracy 9 (3): 36-50.
331. Varshney, A. (2001). Ethnic Conflict and Civil Society: India and Beyond. World Politics 53 (3): 362-98.
332. Vodička, K. (1996). Vývojové Fáze Stranického Systému v České Republice v Mezinárodním Kontextu. In Krystalizace Struktury Politických Stran v České Republice po Roce 1989, edited by Vladimíra Dvořáková and Aleš Gerloch, 77-83. Praha, Česká Republika: Česká Společnost pro Politické Vědy.
333. Walter, B. F. (2002). Committing to Peace: The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
334. Walter, B. F. (2006). Building Reputation: Why Governments Fights Some Separatists But Not Others. American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 313-30.
335. Weiner, M. (1967). Party Building in a New Nation: The India National Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
336. Widmalm, S. (1998). The Rise and Fall of Democracy in Jammu and Kashmir, 1975-1989. In Community Conflicts and the State in India, edited by Amrita Basu and Atul Kohli, 149-82. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
337. Wightman, G. (1995). The Development of the Party System and the Breakup of Czechoslovakia. In Party Formation in East-Central Europe: Post-communist Politics in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, and Bulgaria, edited by Gordon Wightman, 59-78. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
338. Wildavsky, A. B. (1967). Party Discipline under Federalism: Implications of the Australian Experience. In American Federalism in Perspective, edited by Aaron B. Wildavsky, 162-81. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
339. Wilkinson, S. I. (2004) Votes and Violence: Electoral Competition and Ethnic Riots in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
340. Wolchik, S. L. (1995). The Politics of Transition and the Breakup of Czechoslovakia. In The End of Czechoslovakia, edited by Jiří Musil, 225-44. New York: Central European University Press.
341. Wolchik, S. L. (2000). The Impact of Institutional Factors on the Breakup of the Czechoslovak Federation. In Irreconcilable Differences? Explaining Czechoslovakia' Dissolution, edited and translated by Michael Kraus and Allison Stanger, 87-106. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
342. Wood, E. J. (2006). Variation in Sexual Violence during War. Politics and Society 34 (3): 307-42.
343. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
344. World Bank. (2002). World Development Indicators Online. Washington, DC: World Bank.
345. World Bank. (2005). Fiscal Decentralization Indicators (WBFDI Country Database January 2005). Washington, DC: World Bank.
346. Young, C. (1994). The African Colonial State in Comparative Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
347. Zaidi, A. M. and Zaidi, S. C. (1980). The Encyclopedia of the Indian National Congress Volume Eleven: 1936-1938: An Unwanted Constitution. New Delhi, India: S. Chand and Company Limited.
348. Žák, V. (1995). The Velvet Divorce - Institutional Foundations. In the End of Czechoslovakia, edited by Jiří Musil, 245-68. New York: Central European University Press.
349. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
350. Ziblatt, D. (2004). Rethinking the Origins of Federalism: Puzzle, Theory and Evidence from Nineteenth-Century Europe. World Politics 57 (1): 70-98.