Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research

American Political Science Review

Volumn 99, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 435-452

  Lieberman, Evan S ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944588677     PISSN: 00030554     EISSN: 15375943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0003055405051762     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Achen, Christopher H. 1982. Interpreting and Using Regression. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2. Achen, Christopher H., and Duncan Snidal. 1989. "Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies." World Politics 41 (January): 144-69.
3. Adcock, Robert, and David Collier. 2001. "Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research." American Political Science Review 95 (3): 529-47.
4. Adserà, Alícia, and Carles Boix. 2002. "Trade, Democracy and the Size of the Public Sector: The Political Underpinnings of Openness." International Organization 56 (Spring): 229-62.
5. Bates, Robert H., Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, and Barry R. Weingast. 1998. Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6. Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 1995. "What to do (and not to do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data." American Political Science Review 89 (September): 634-47.
7. Bennett, Andrew. 2002. "Where the Model Frequently Meets the Road: Combining Statistical, Formal, and Case Study Methods." Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
8. Brady, Henry E., and David Collier, eds. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Berkeley, CA: Rowman & Littlefield and Berkeley Public Policy Press.
9. Campbell, Donald T., and Julian C. Stanley. 1966. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
10. Collier, David. 1991. "The Comparative Method: Two Decades of Change." In Comparative Political Dynamics. ed. D. A. Rustow and K. P. Erickson. New York: Harper Collins, 7-31.
11. Collier, David. 1999. "Building a Disciplined, Rigorous Center in Comparative Politics." APSA Comparative Politics Section Newsletter 10 (Summer): 1-2, 4.
12. Collier, David, and James Mahoney. 1996. "Insights and Pitfalls." World Politics 49 (October): 56-92.
13. Collier, David, Henry E. Brady, and Jason Seawright. 2004. "Source of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology." In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, ed. H. E. Brady and D. Collier. Berkeley, CA: Rowman & Littlefield and Berkeley Public Policy Press.
14. Coppedge, Michael. 1999. "Thickening Thin Concepts and Theories." Comparative Politics 31 (July): 465-77.
15. Coppedge, Michael. 2005. "Explaining Democratic Deterioration in Venezuela Through Nested Induction." In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America, ed. F. Hagopian & S. Mainwaring. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Fearon, James, and David Laitin. 2005. "Civil War Narratives." Theory and Research in Comparative Social Analysis Working Paper Series, 27. Department of Sociology, UCLA. http://repositories.cdlib.org/uclasoc/trcsa/27.
17. Fearon, James, and David Laitin. 2003. "Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War." American Political Science Review 97 (February): 75-90.
18. Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy, Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Geddes, Barbara. 1990. "How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics." Political Analysis (Spring): 131-50.
20. George, Alexander L. 1979. Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison. In Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory and Policy, ed. P. G. Lauren. New York: The Free Press.
21. George, Alexander L. and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Gerring, John. 2001. Social Science Methodology: A Criterial Framework. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Gerring, John. 2004. "What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good For?" American Political Science Review 98 (May): 341-54.
24. Gerring, John. 2005. "Causation: A Unified Framework for the Social Sciences." Journal of Theoretical Politics 17 (April): 163-98.
25. Huth, Paul K. 1996. Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict. Ann Arbor: Univeristy of Michigan Press.
26. Jackman, Robert W. 1985. "Cross-National Statistical Research and the Study of Comparative Politics." American Journal of Political Science 29 (February): 161-82.
27. Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28. King, Gary, Robert Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. Laitin, David. 2002. "Comparative Politics: The State of the Sub-discipline." In Political Science: The State of the Discipline. ed. I. Katznelson and H. V. Milner. New York; Washington, DC; Norton: American Political Science Association.
30. Lieberman, Evan. 2001a. "Causal Inference in Historical Institutional Analysis: A Specification of Periodization Strategies." Comparative Political Studies 34 (9): 1011-35.
31. Lieberman, Evan. 2001b. "Taxation Data as Indicators of State-Society Relations: Possibilities and Pitfalls in Cross-National Research." Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (January): 89-115.
32. Lieberman, Evan S. 2003. Race and Regionalism in the Politics of Taxation in Brazil and South Africa, Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Lijphart, Arend. 1971. "Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method." American Political Science Review 65 (September): 682-93.
34. Lustick, Ian S. 1996. "History, Historiography, and Political Science: Multiple Historical Records and the Problem of Selection Bias." American Political Science Review 90 (September): 605-18.
35. Lynch, Julia. 2002. "The Age of Welfare: Citizens, Clients, and Generations in the Development of the Welfare State." Ph.D. diss. University of California, Berkeley.
36. Mahoney, James, and Dietrich Rueschemeyer. 2003. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Martin, Lisa L. 1992. Coercive Cooperation: Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. McKeown, Timothy. 2004. "Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview." In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, ed. H. E. Brady and D. Collier. Berkeley, CA: Rowman & Littlefield and Berkeley Public Policy Press.
39. Munck, Gerardo L. 1998. "Canons of Research Design in Qualitative Research." Studies in Comparative International Development 33 (Fall): 18-45.
40. Przeworski, Adam, and Henry Teune. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
41. Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
42. Ragin, Charles C. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Reiter, Dan, and Allan C. Stam. 2002. Democracies at War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44. Rogowski, Ronald. 1995. "The Role of Theory and Anomaly in Social-Scientific Research." American Political Science Review 89 (June): 467-70.
45. Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. "Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics." The American Political Science Review 64 (December): 1033-53.
46. Swank, Duane. 2002. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States, Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Tarrow, Sidney. 1995. "Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide in Political Science." American Political Science Review 89 (June): 471-4.
48. Western, Bruce, and Simon Jackman. 1994. "Bayesian Inference for Comparative Research." American Political Science Review 88 (June): 412-23.
49. Zuckerman, Alan S. 1997. "Reformulating Explanatory Standards and Advancing Theory in Comparative Politics." In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, ed. M. I. Lichbach and A. S. Zuckerman. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.