Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 277-298

  Maas, Edwin ^a   Robin, Donald A ^b,c   Hula, Shannon N Austermann ^d   Freedman, Skott E ^d   Wulf, Gabriele ^e   Ballard, Kirrie J ^f,g   Schmidt, Richard A ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^d SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Conditions of feedback; Conditions of practice; Motor learning; Motor speech disorders

Indexed keywords

EID: 50649085477     PISSN: 10580360     EISSN: 15589110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/025)     Document Type: Review

References (158)

1. Adams, S. G., & Page, A. D. (2000). Effects of selected practice and feedback variables on speech motor learning. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 215-220.
2. Adams, S. G., Page, A. D., & Jog, M. S. (2002). Summary feedback schedules and speech motor learning in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 215-220.
3. Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W. (2004). Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech. Brain and Language, 88, 148-159.
4. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2005). Evidence-based practice in communication disorders [Position statement]. Available from www.asha.org/policy.
5. Austermann Hula, S. N., Robin, D. A., Maas, E., Ballard, K. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (in press). Effects of feedback frequency and timing on acquisition and retention of speech skills in acquired apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
6. Baddeley, A. D., & Longman, D. J. A. (1978). The influence of length and frequency of training session on the rate of learning to type. Ergonomics, 21, 627-635.
7. Ballard, K. J. (2001). Response generalization in apraxia of speech treatments: Taking another look. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 3-20.
8. Ballard, K. J., Granier, J., & Robin, D. A. (2000). Understanding the nature of apraxia of speech: Theory, analysis, and treatment. Aphasiology, 14, 969-995.
9. Ballard, K. J., Maas, E., & Robin, D. A. (2007). Treating control of voicing in apraxia of speech with variable practice. Aphasiology, 21, 1195-1217.
10. Ballard, K. J., & Robin, D. A. (2007). Influence of continual biofeedback on jaw pursuit tracking in healthy adults and adults with apraxia plus aphasia. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39, 19-28.
11. Ballard, K. J., & Thompson, C. K. (1999). Treatment and generalization of complex sentence production in agrammatism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 690-707.
12. Basso, A. (2005). How intensive/prolonged should an intensive/ prolonged treatment be? Aphasiology, 19, 975-984.
13. Beilock, S. L., Bertenthal, B. I., McCoy, A. M., & Carr, T. H. (2004). Haste does not always make waste: Expertise, direction of attention, and speed versus accuracy in performing sensori-motor skills. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 313-319.
14. Brydges, R., Carnahan, H., Backstein, D., & Dubrowski, A. (2007). Application of motor learning principles to complex surgical tasks: Searching for the optimal practice schedule. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39, 40-48.
15. Cattell, J. M. (1947). Aufmerksamkeit und reaction [Attention and reaction]. In R. S. Woodworm (Ed. & Trans.), Psychological research (Vol. 1, pp. 252-255). Lancaster, PA: Science Press. (Original work published 1893).
16. Chamberlin, C. J., & Lee, T. D. (1993). Arranging practice conditions and designing instruction. In R. N. Singer, M. Murphey, & L. K. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook on research in sport psychology (pp. 213-241). New York: Macmillan.
17. Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2005). Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76, 42-48.
18. Cholin, J., Levelt, W. J. M., & Schiller, N. O. (2006). Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition, 99, 205-235.
19. Chumpelik, D. (1984). The PROMPT system of therapy: Theoretical framework and applications for developmental apraxia of speech. Seminars in Speech and Language, 5, 139-156.
20. Clark, H. M. (2003). Neuromuscular treatments for speech and swallowing: A tutorial. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 400-415.
21. Clark, H. M., & Robin, D. A. (1998). Generalised motor programme and parameterisation accuracy in apraxia of speech and conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 12, 699-713.
22. Darley, F. L., Aronson, A. E., & Brown, J. R. (1975), Motor speech disorders. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
23. Doyon, J., & Bcnali, H. (2005). Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Current Opinion in Neurohiology, 15, 161-167.
24. Dromey, C., & Adams, S. (2000). Loudness perception and hypophonia in Parkinson disease. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 255-259.
25. Duffy, J. (2005). Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Yearbook.
26. Dunham, P., & Mueller, R. (1993). Effect of fading knowledge of results on acquisition, retention, and transfer of a simple motor task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77(3, Pt. 2), 1187-1192.
27. Fox, C. M., Morrison, C. E., Ramig, L. O., & Sapir, S. (2002). Current perspectives on the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT) for individuals with idiopathic Parkinson disease. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 111-123.
28. Freedman, S. E., Maas, E., Caligiuri, M. P., Wulf, G., & Robin, D. A. (2007). Internal vs. external: Oral motor performance as a function of attentional focus. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 131-136.
29. Gierut, J. A. (2001). Complexity in phonological treatment: Clinical factors. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 32, 229-241.
30. Gierut, J. A. (2007). Phonological complexity and language learnability. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 6-17.
31. Giuffrida, C. G., Shea, J. B., & Fairbrother, J. T. (2002). Differential transfer benefits of increased practice for constant, blocked, and serial practice schedules. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 353-365.
32. Guadagnoli, M. A., & Kohl, R. M. (2001). Knowledge of results for motor learning: Relationship between error estimation and knowledge of results frequency. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 217-224.
33. Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 212-224.
34. Guenther, F. H. (2006). Cortical interactions underlying the production of speech sounds. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39, 350-365.
35. Guenther, F. H., Ghosh, S. S., & Tourville, J. A. (2006). Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain and Language, 96, 280-301.
36. Guenther, F. H., Hampson, M., & Johnson, D. (1998). A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements. Psychological Review, 105, 611-633.
37. Hanlon, R. E. (1996). Motor learning following unilateral stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77, 811-815.
38. Hansen, S., Tremblay, L., & Elliott, D. (2005). Part and whole practice: Chunking and online control in the acquisition of a serial motor task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 76, 60-66.
39. Hodges, N. J., & Franks, I. M. (2001). Learning a coordination skill: Interactive effects of instruction and feedback. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 132-142.
40. Janelle, C. M., Barba, D. A., Frehlich, S. G., Tennant, L. K., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1997). Maximizing performance effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 269-279.
41. Johansen-Berg, H., Dawes, H., Guy, C., Smith, S. M., Wade, D. T., & Matthews, P. M. (2002). Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy. Brain, 125, 2731-2742.
42. Keele, S. W. (1968). Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 387-403.
43. Keetch, K. M., Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., & Young, D. E. (2005). Especial skills: Their emergence with massive amounts of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 970-978.
44. Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Kelso, J. A. S., Saltzman, E. L., & Tuller, B. (1986). The dynamical perspective on speech production: Data and theory. Journal of Phonetics, 14, 29-59.
46. Kent, R. D. (1996). Hearing and believing: Some limits to the auditory-perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 7-23.
47. Kent, R., & Rosenbek, J. (1983). Acoustic patterns of apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26, 231-249.
48. Kiran, S. (2007). Complexity in the treatment of naming deficits. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 18-29.
49. Kiran, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2003). The role of semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits: Training semantic categories in fluent aphasia by controlling exemplar typicality. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 773-787.
50. Klapp, S. T. (1995). Motor response programming during simple and choice reaction time: The role of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1015-1027.
51. Knock, T., Ballard, K. J., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (2000). Influence of order of stimulus presentation on speech motor learning: A principled approach to treatment for apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 14, 653-668.
52. Krakauer, J. W. (2006). Motor learning: Its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Current Opinion in Neurology, 19, 84-90.
53. Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1998). Generalized motor program (GMP) learning: Effects of reduced frequency of knowledge of results and practice variability. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 51-59.
54. Lai, Q., Shea, C. H., Bruechert, L., & Little, M. (2002). Auditory model enhances relative-timing learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 299-307.
55. Lai, Q., Shea, C. H., Wulf, G., & Wright, D. L. (2000). Optimizing generalized motor program and parameter learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 10-24.
56. Landers, M., Wulf, G., Wallmann, H., & Guadagnoli, M. (2005). An external focus of attention attenuates balance impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease who have a fall history. Physiotherapy, 91, 152-158.
57. Lee, T. D., & Genovese, E. D. (1989). Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: Different effects for discrete and continuous tasks. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 59-65.
58. Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1983). The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 730-746.
59. Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1985). Can forgetting facilitate skill acquisition? In D. Goodman, R. B. Wilberg, & I. M. Franks (Eds.), Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory, and control (pp. 3-22). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
60. Lee, T. D., Magill, R. A., & Weeks, D. J. (1985). Influence of practice schedule on testing schema theory predictions in adults. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 283-299.
61. Lersten, K. C. (1968). Transfer of movement components in a motor learning task. Research Quarterly, 39, 575-581.
62. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-38.
63. Liotti, M., Ramig, L. O., Vogel, D., New, P., Cook, C. I., Ingham, R. J., et al. (2003). Hypophonia in Parkinson's disease: Neural correlates of voice treatment revealed by PET. Neurology, 60, 432-440.
64. Maas, E., Barlow, J., Robin, D., & Shapiro, L. (2002). Treatment of sound errors in aphasia and apraxia of speech: Effects of phonological complexity. Aphasiology, 16, 609-622.
65. Mané, A. M., Adams, J. A., & Donchin, E. (1989). Adaptive and part-whole training in the acquisition of a complex perceptual-motor skill. Acta Psychologica, 71, 179-196.
66. McNeil, M. R., Doyle, P. J., & Wambaugh, J. L. (2000). Apraxia of speech: A treatable disorder of motor planning and programming. In S. E. Nadeau, L. J. Gonzalez-Rothi, & B. Crosson (Eds.), Aphasia and language: Theory to practice (pp. 221-266). New York: Guilford Press.
67. McNeil, M. R., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (1997). Apraxia of speech: Definition, differentiation, and treatment. In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders (pp. 311-344). New York: Thieme.
68. Morrisette, M. L., & Gierut, J. A. (2003). Unified treatment recommendations: A response to Rvachew and Nowak (2001). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 382-385.
69. Newell, K. M., Carlton, M. J., & Antoniou, A. (1990). The interaction of criterion and feedback information in learning a drawing task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 536-552.
70. Newell, K. M., Carlton, M. J., Fisher, A. T., & Rutter, B. G. (1989). Whole-part training strategies for learning the response dynamics of microprocessor driven simulators. Acta Psychologica, 71, 197-216.
71. Nicholson, D. E., & Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Scheduling information feedback to enhance training effectiveness. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting (pp. 1400-1403). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
72. Nudo, R. J., Wise, B. M., SiFuentes, F., & Milliken, G. W. (1996). Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science, 272, 1791-1794.
73. Osu, R., Hirai, S., Yoshioka, T., & Kawato, M. (2004). Random presentation enables subjects to adapt to two opposing forces on the hand. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 111-112.
74. Park, J. H., & Shea, C. H. (2003). Effect of practice on effector independence. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35, 33-40.
75. Park, J. H., & Shea, C. H. (2005). Sequence learning: Response structure and effector transfer. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 387-419.
76. Park, J. H., Shea, C. H., & Wright, D. L. (2000). Reduced-frequency concurrent and terminal feedback: A test of the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 287-296.
77. Park, J. H., Wilde, H., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Part-whole practice of movement sequences. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 51-61.
78. Perkell, J. S., Guenther, F. H., Lane, H., Matthies, M. L., Perrier, P., Vick, J., et al. (2000). A theory of speech motor control and supporting data from speakers with normal hearing and with profound hearing loss. Journal of Phonetics, 28 , 233-372.
79. Pigott, R. E., & Shapiro, D. C. (1984). Motor schema: The structure of the variability session. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 55, 41-45.
80. Ramig, L. O., Countryman, S., Thompson, L. L., & Horii, Y. (1995). Comparison of two intensive speech treatments for Parkinson disease. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 1232-1251.
81. Ramig, L. O., Sapir, S., Countryman, S., Pawlas, A. A., O'Brien, C., Hoehn, M., & Thompson, L. L. (2001). Intensive voice treatment (LSVT®) for patients with Parkinson's disease: A 2 year follow-up. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 71, 493-498.
82. Ramig, L. O., Sapir, S., Fox, C., & Countryman, S. (2001). Changes in vocal loudness following intensive voice treatment (LSVT®) in individuals with Parkinson's disease: A comparison with untreated patients and normal age-matched controls. Movement Disorders, 16, 79-83.
83. Rhodes, B. J., Bullock, D., Verwey, W. B., Averbeck, B. B., & Page, M. P. A. (2004). Learning and production of movement sequences: Behavioral, neurophysiological, and modeling perspectives. Human Movement Science, 23, 699-746.
84. Rijntjes, M., & Weiller, C. (2002). Recovery of motor and language abilities after stroke: The contribution of functional imaging. Progress in Neurobiology, 66, 109-122.
85. Robertson, E. M., Pascual-Leone, A., & Miall, R. C. (2004). Current concepts in procedural consolidation. Nature Neuroscience Reviews, 5, 1-7.
86. Robey, R. R. (1998). A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 172-187.
87. Robin, D. A., Maas, E., Sandberg, Y., & Schmidt, R. A. (2007). Motor control and learning and childhood apraxia of speech. In P. K. Hall, L. S. Jordan, & D. A. Robin (Eds.), Developmental apraxia of speech: Theory and clinical practice (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
88. Rose, M., & Douglas, J. (2006). A comparison of verbal and gesture treatments for a word production deficit resulting from acquired apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 20, 1186-1209.
89. Rosenbek, J. C., Lemme, M. L., Ahern, M. B., Harris, E. H., & Wertz, R. T. (1973). A treatment for apraxia of speech in adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 38, 462-472.
90. Rvachew, S., & Nowak, M. (2001). The effect of target-selection strategy on phonological learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 610-623.
91. Rvachew, S., & Nowak, M. (2003). Clinical outcomes as a function of target selection strategy: A response to Morrisette and Gierut. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 386-389.
92. Sakai, K., Hikosaka, O., & Nakamura, K. (2004). Emergence of rhythm during motor learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 547-553.
93. Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355-386.
94. Schmidt, R. A. (1972). The case against learning and forgetting scores. Journal of Motor Behavior, 4, 79-88.
95. Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
96. Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In J. Requin & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience (pp. 59-75). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
97. Schmidt, R. A. (2003). Motor schema theory after 27 years: Reflections and implications for a new theory. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 366-375.
98. Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207-217.
99. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
100. Schmidt, R. A., & Wulf, G. (1997). Continuous concurrent feedback degrades skill learning: Implications for training and simulation. Human Factors, 39, 509-525.
101. Schneider, S. L., & Frens, R. A. (2005). Training four-syllable CV patterns in individuals with acquired apraxia of speech: Theoretical implications. Aphasiology, 19, 451-471.
102. Schulz, G. M., Dingwall, W. O., & Ludlow, C. L. (1999). Speech and oral motor learning in individuals with cerebellar atrophy. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 42. 1157-1175.
103. Schulz, G. M., Sulc, S., Leon, S., & Gilligan, G. (2000). Speech motor learning in Parkinson disease. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology. 8, 243-247.
104. Sekiya, H., Magill, R. A., Sidaway, B., & Anderson, D. I. (1994). The contextual interference effect for skill variations from the same and different generalized motor programs. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65, 330-338.
105. Shapiro, D. C., & Schmidt, R. A. (1982). The schema theory: Recent evidence and developmental implications. In J. A. S. Kelso & J. E. Clark (Eds.), The development of movement control and co-ordination (pp. 113-150). New York: Wiley.
106. Shea, C. H., & Kohl, R. M. (1991). Composition of practice: Influence on the retention of motor skills. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 187-195.
107. Shea, C. H., Kohl, R. M., & Indermill, C. (1990). Contextual interference: Contributions of practice. Acta Psychologica, 73, 145-157.
108. Shea, C. H., Lai, Q., Black, C., & Park, J. H. (2000). Spacing practice sessions across days benefits the learning of motor skills. Human Movement Science, 19, 737-760.
109. Shea, C. H., Lai, Q., Wright, D. L., Immink, M., & Black, C. (2001). Consistent and variable practice conditions: Effects on relative and absolute timing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 139-152.
110. Shea, C. H., & Wulf, G. (1999). Enhancing motor learning through external-focus instructions and feedback. Human Movement Science, 18, 553-571.
111. Shea, C. H., & Wulf, G. (2005). Schema theory: A critical appraisal and reevaluation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 85-101.
112. Shea, C. H., Wulf, G., Park, J. H., & Gaunt, B. (2001). Effects of an auditory model on the learning of relative and absolute timing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 127-138.
113. Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 5, 179-187.
114. Shriberg, L. D., Campbell, T. F., Karlsson, H. B., Brown, R. L., McSweeney, J. L., & Nadler, C. J. (2003). A diagnostic marker for childhood apraxia of speech: The lexical stress ratio. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 17, 549-574.
115. Spencer, K. A., & Rogers, M. A. (2005). Speech motor programming in hypokinetic and ataxic dysarthria. Brain and Language, 94, 347-366.
116. Spielman, J., Ramig, L. O., Mahler, L., Haipern, A., & Gavin, W. J. (2007). Effects of an extended version of the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment on voice and speech in Parkinson's disease. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 95-107.
117. Steinhauer, K., & Grayhack, J. P. (2000). The role of knowledge of results in performance and learning of a voice motor task. Journal of Voice, 14, 137-145.
118. Strand, E. A., & Debertine, P. (2000). The efficacy of integral stimulation intervention with developmental apraxia of speech. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 295-300.
119. Swinnen, S. P. (1996). Information feedback for motor skill learning: A review. In H. N. Zelaznik (Ed.), Advances in motor learning and control (pp. 37-66). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
120. Swinnen, S. P., Lee, T. D., Verschueren, S., Serrien, D. J., & Bogaerds, H. (1997). Interlimb coordination: Learning and transfer under different feedback conditions. Human Movement Science, 16, 749-785.
121. Swinnen, S., Schmidt, R. A., Nicholson, D. E., & Shapiro, D. C. (1990). Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 706-716.
122. Swinnen, S., Walter, C. B., Lee, T. D., & Serrien, D. J. (1993) Acquiring bimanual skills: Contrasting forms of information feedback for interlimb decoupling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1328-1344.
123. Thompson, C. K. (2007). Complexity in language learning and treatment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 3-5.
124. Thompson, C. K., Ballard, K. J., & Shapiro, L. P. (1998). The role of syntactic complexity in training wh-movement structures in agrammatic aphasia: Optimal order for promoting generalization. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 661-674.
125. Thompson, C. K., & Shapiro, L. P. (2007). Complexity in treatment of syntactic deficits. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 30-42.
126. Thompson, C. K., Shapiro, L. P., Kiran, S., & Sobecks, J. (2003). The role of syntactic complexity in treatment of sentence deficits in agrammatic aphasia: The complexity account of treatment efficacy (CATE). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 591-607.
127. Tjaden, K. (2000). Exploration of a treatment technique for prosodic disturbance following stroke. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 14, 619-641.
128. Vance, J., Wulf, G., McNevin, N., Töllner, T., & Mercer, J. (2004). EMG activity as a function of the performer's focus of attention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 450-459.
129. Vander Linden, D. W., Cauraugh, J. H., & Greene, T. A. (1993). The effect of frequency of kinetic feedback on learning an isometric force production task in nondisabled subjects. Physical Therapy, 73, 79-87.
130. Van Riper, C., & Irwin, J. (1958). Voice and articulation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
131. Van Rossum, J. H. A. (1990). Schmidt's schema theory: The empirical base of the variability of practice hypothesis. A critical analysis. Human Movement Science, 9, 387-435.
132. Van Vliet, P., & Wulf, G. (2006). Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: What is the evidence? Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 831-840.
133. Varley, R., Whiteside, S., Windsor, F., & Fisher, H. (2006). Moving up from the segment: A comment on Aichert and Ziegler's syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech, Brain and Language, 88, 148-159, 2004. Brain and Language, 96, 235-239.
134. Wambaugh, J. L., Doyle, P. J., West, J. E., & Kalinyak, M. M. (1995). Spectral analysis of sound errors in persons with apraxia of speech and aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 186-192.
135. Wambaugh, J. L., Duffy, J. R., McNeil, M. R., Robin, D. A., & Rogers, M. A. (2006). Treatment guidelines for acquired apraxia of speech: A synthesis and evaluation of the evidence. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 14(2), xv-xxxiii.
136. Wambaugh, J. L., Kalinyak-Fliszar, M. M., West, J. E., & Doyle, P. J. (1998). Effects of treatment for sound errors in apraxia of speech and aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 725-743.
137. Wambaugh, J. L., Martinez, A. L., McNeil, M. R., & Rogers, M. A. (1999). Sound production treatment for apraxia of speech: Overgeneralization and maintenance effects. Aphasiology, 13, 821-837.
138. Wambaugh, J. L., & Nessler, C. (2004). Modification of sound production treatment for apraxia of speech: Acquisition and generalization effects. Aphasiology, 18, 407-427.
139. Wambaugh, J. L., Nessler, C., Bennett, J., & Mauszycki, S. C. (2004). Variability in apraxia of speech: A perceptual and VOT analysis of stop consonants. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 221-227.
140. Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 677-691.
141. Wishart, L. R., & Lee, T. D. (1997). Effects of aging and reduced relative frequency of knowledge of results on learning a motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84(3, Pt. 1), 1107-1122.
142. Wright, D. L., Black, C. B., Immink, M. A., Brueckner, S., & Magnuson, C. (2004). Long-term motor programming improvements occur via concatenating movement sequences during random but not blocked practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 39-50.
143. Wright, D. L., & Shea, C. H. (2001). Manipulating generalized motor program difficulty during blocked and random practice does not affect parameter learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 32-38.
144. Wulf, G. (2007). Attention and motor skill learning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
145. Wulf, G., Höß, M., & Prinz, W. (1998). Instructions for motor learning: Differential effects of internal versus external focus of attention. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 169-179.
146. Wulf, G., Lauterbach, B., & Toole, T. (1999). Learning advantages of an external focus of attention in golf. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70, 120-126.
147. Wulf, G., & Lee, T. D. (1993). Contextual interference in movements of the same class: Differential effects on program and parameter learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 25, 254-263.
148. Wulf, G., Lee, T. D., & Schmidt, R. A. (1994). Reducing knowledge of results about relative versus absolute timing: Differential effects on learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 362-369.
149. Wulf, G., McConnel, N., Gärtner, M., & Schwarz, A. (2002). Enhancing the learning of sport skills through external-focus feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 171-182.
150. Wulf, G., & McNevin, N. (2003). Simply distracting learners is not enough: More evidence for the learning benefits of an external focus of attention. European Journal of Sport Science, 3(5), 1-13.
151. Wulf, G., McNevin, N., & Shea, C. H. (2001). The automacity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1143-1154.
152. Wulf, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Directing attention to movement effects enhances learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 648-660.
153. Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1989). The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 748-757.
154. Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1997). Variability of practice and implicit motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 987-1006.
155. Wulf, G., Schmidt, R. A., & Deubel, H. (1993). Reduced frequency feedback enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1134-1150.
156. Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple motor skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 185-211.
157. Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2004). Understanding the role of augmented feedback: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In A. M. Williams & N. J. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (pp. 121-144). London: Routledge.
158. Yorkston, K. M., Beukelman, D. R., Strand, E., & Bell, K. R. (1999). Clinical management of motor speech disorders in children and adults. Boston: Little Brown.