The role of Knowledge of Results in performance and learning of a voice motor task

Journal of Voice

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 137-145

  Steinhauer, Kimberly ^a   Grayhack, Judith Preston ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Knowledge of Results; Nasalance; Practice

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LEARNING; SCIENCE; SINGING; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOICE;

EID: 0034131258     PISSN: 08921997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0892-1997(00)80020-X     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB. Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bull. 1984;95:355-386.
2. Schmidt RA. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. 2nd ed. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics; 1988.
3. Burnett TA, Freedland MB, Larson CR, Hain TC. Voice FO responses to manipulations in pitch feedback. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998;103:3139-3152.
4. Ferrand CT. Effects of practice with and without knowledge of results on jitter and shimmer levels in normally speaking women. J Voice. 1995;9:419-423.
5. Bennet DM, Simmons RW. Effects of precision of knowledge of results on acquisition and retention of a simple motor skill. Percept Motor Skills. 1984;58:785-786.
6. Buekers MJ, Magill RA. The role of task experience and prior knowledge for detecting invalid augmented feedback while learning a motor skill. Q J Exp Psychol. 1995;48A: 84-97.
7. Feltz DL, Landers DM, Becker BJ. A revised meta-analysis of the mental practice literature on motor skill learning. In: Druckman D, Swet J, eds. Enhancing Human Performance: Issues, Theories, and Techniques. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1988:61-101.
8. Lee TD, Swinnen SP, Serrien DJ. Cognitive effort and motor learning. Quest. 1994;46:328-344.
9. Lee TD, White MA, Carnahan H. On the role of knowledge of results in motor learning: exploring the guidance hypothesis. J Motor Behav. 1990;22:191-208.
10. Wulf G, Horstmann G, Choi B. Does mental practice work like physical practice without information feedback? Res Q Exerc Sport. 1995;66:262-267.
11. Schmidt RA. A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychol Rev. 1975;82(4):225-260.
12. Winstein CJ, Schmidt RA. Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. J Exp Psychol. 1990;16:677-691.
13. Wulf G. The learning of generalized motor programs and motor schemata: Effects of KR relative frequency and contextual interference. J Hum Movement Stud. 1992;23: 53-76.
14. Wulf G, Schmidt RA. The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory. J Exp Psychol. 1989;15:748-757.
15. Kelso JA, Tuller B. A dynamical basis for action systems. In: Gazzaniga M, ed. Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1984:321-356.
16. Wallace SA. Dynamic pattern perspective of rhythmic movement: an introduction. In: Zelaznik HN, ed. Advances in Motor Learning and Control. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics; 1996:155-194.
17. Newell KM. Motor skill acquisition. Ann Rev Psychol. 1991;42:213-237.
18. Swinnen SP. Information feedback for motor skill learning: a review. In: Zelaznik HN, ed. Advances in Motor Learning and Control. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics; 1996:37-66.
19. Schoner G, Zanone PG, Kelso JAS. Learning as change of coordination dynamics: Theory and experiment. J Motor Behav. 1992;24:29-48.
20. Schmidt RA, Bjork RA. New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychol Sci. 1992;3(4):207-217.
21. Kuehn DP, Lemme ML, Baumgartner JM. Neural Bases of Speech, Hearing and Language. Boston, Mass: College-Hill Press; 1989.
22. Moon JB, Jones DL. Motor control of velopharyngeal structures during vowel production. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J. 1991;28:267-273.
23. Moon JB, Smith AE, Folkins JW, Lemke JG, Gartlan M. Coordination of velopharyngeal muscle activity during positioning of the soft palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J. 1994; 31:45-55.
24. Folkins JW. Issues in speech motor control and their relation to the speech of individuals with cleft palate. Cleft Palate J. 1985;22(2):106-122.
25. Austin SF. Movement of the velum during speech and singing in classically trained singers. J Voice. 1997;11(2):212-221.
26. Vennard W. Singing: The Mechanism and the Technic. New York, NY: Carl Fischer; 1967.
27. Verdolini-Marston K, Burke MK, Lessac A, Glaze L, Caldwell E. Preliminary study of two methods of treatment for laryngeal nodules. J Voice. 1995;9:74-85.
28. Schmidt RA. Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: evidence and interpretations. In: Requin J, Stelmach GE, eds. Tutorials in Motor Neuroscience. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991.
29. Lee TD, Maraj BKV. Effects of bandwidth goals and bandwidth knowledge of results on motor learning. Res Q Exer Sport. 1994;65(3):244-249.
30. Wulf G, Lee TD, Schmidt RA. Reducing knowledge of results about relative versus absolute timing: differential effects on learning. J Motor Behav. 1994;26:362-369.
31. House AS, Stevens KN. Analog studies of the nasalization of vowels. J Speech Hearing Disord. 1956;21:218-232.
32. Fant G. Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. The Hague: Mouton; 1960.