Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 161-167

  Doyon, Julien ^a   Benali, Habib ^a  

^a CENTRE DE RECHERCHE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; CEREBELLUM CORTEX; HUMAN; LEARNING; LOCOMOTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NEUROIMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STRIATE CORTEX; THEORETICAL MODEL; ADULT; ANIMAL; BRAIN CORTEX; CEREBELLUM; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; NERVE TRACT; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; ANIMALS; CEREBELLUM; CEREBRAL CORTEX; HUMANS; LEARNING; MOTOR SKILLS; NEURAL PATHWAYS; NEURONAL PLASTICITY;

EID: 20544469025     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.004     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Willingham DB: A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychol Rev 1998, 105:558-584.
2. Doyon J: Skill learning. In The cerebellum and cognition. Edited by Schmahmann JD. Academic Press; 1997:273-294.
3. Hikosaka O, Nakamura K, Sakai K, Nakahara H: Central mechanisms of motor skill learning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2002, 12:217-222.
4. Doyon J, Ungerleider LG: Functional anatomy of motor skill learning. In Neuropsychology of memory, edn 3rd edition. Edited by Squire LR, Schacter DL. The Guilford Press; 2002:225-238.
5. Doyon J, Penhune V, Ungerleider LG: Distinct contribution of the cortico-striatal and cortico-cerebellar systems to motor skill learning. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:252-262.
6. Aizenstein HJ, Stenger VA, Cochran J, Clark K, Johnson M, Nebes RD, Carter CS: Regional brain activation during concurrent implicit and explicit sequence learning. Cereb Cortex 2004, 14:199-208.
7. Schendan HE, Searl MM, Melrose RJ, Stern CE: An FMRI study of the role of the medial temporal lobe in implicit and explicit sequence learning. Neuron 2003, 37:1013-1025. Using fMRI at 3.0 Tesla, the authors present the most compelling evidence that both implicit and explicit learning of a sequence of movements requires the contribution of the hippocampus and its associated cortical medio-temporal limbic areas. Thus, this suggests that this type of learning requires not only the usual motor-related structures forming the cortico-striatal and cortico-cerebellar systems but the limbic system also. This finding also emphasizes the notion that these systems can interact together to create new memories, such as motor skilled behaviors.
8. Wu T, Kansaku K, Hallett M: How self-initiated memorized movements become automatic: a functional MRI study. J Neurophysiol 2004, 91:1690-1698.
9. Imamizu H, Kuroda T, Miyauchi S, Yoshioka T, Kawato M: Modular organization of internal models of tools in the human cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:5461-5466. Imamizu and co-workers have already reported that the lateral portion of the cerebellar cortex is crucial for maintaining the internal model necessary to improve on a motor adaptation task. In this subsequent study, the authors demonstrate that this phylogenetically older part of the cerebellum is modular in nature, and thus that it can store at least two different internal models useful to adapt to novel tools.
10. Floyer-Lea A, Matthews PM: Changing brain networks for visuomotor control with increased movement automaticity. J Neurophysiol 2004, 92:2405-2412. The authors demonstrate that practice of a visuomotor task requiring continuous adaptation using a sensor pressure device produces dynamic shifts of activation within both the striatum (from caudate to putamen) and the cerebellum (cortex to dentate). In accordance with the results of several other studies, their findings contradict the notion that learning is merely associated with a more proficient cerebral subsystem than the one first recruited at the beginning of the learning process. They are consistent, however, with those of Doyon et al. [23] and Shadmehr and co-workers [28], who have also reported a shift in motor representation from the cerebellar cortex to the deep cerebellar nuclei.
11. Seidler RD: Multiple motor learning experiences enhance motor adaptability. J Cogn Neurosci 2004, 16:65-73. This is an interesting behavioral study in healthy volunteers showing that the knowledge acquired through practice of motor adaptation tasks can transfer to other forms of adaptations. More importantly, however, the author also demonstrates that this newly acquired knowledge can result in significant increases of the subject's ability to learn sequential movements. Nonetheless, this ability to shift from one form of learning to another comes with a price, as movements learned under these conditions are less stable when faced with external perturbations.
12. Mentis MJ, Dhawan V, Nakamura T, Ghilardi MF, Feigin A, Edwards C, Ghez C, Eidelberg D: Enhancement of brain activation during trial-and-error sequence learning in early PD. Neurology 2003, 60:612-619. This study demonstrates using PET that patients with Parkinson's disease need to activate four times as much neural tissue than control subjects to achieve equal performance on a sequence learning task. Interestingly, however, the authors report that these plastic changes also occur bilaterally in the cerebellum, suggesting that physiological compensation can be seen in the cerebellar system when normal functioning of the nigro-striatal dopaminergic pathway is altered in Parkinson's disease.
13. Smith MA, Brandt J, Shadmehr R: Motor disorder in Huntington's disease begins as a dysfunction in error feedback control. Nature 2000, 403:544-549.
14. Smith MA, Shadmehr R: Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration. J Neurophysiol 2004. Epub ahead of print. This well-controlled study constitutes an elegant demonstration of the complementary role that the basal ganglia and cerebellum play in motor learning. The authors compare the performance of three groups of patients, one with Huntington's disease, one with a risk of developing Huntington's disease, and one with a circumscribed cerebellar degeneration, on a target-reaching task performed with a robot arm disturbed by a force field. The results demonstrate that the striatum contributes to our ability to correct our on-going movements on-line, whereas the cerebellum participates in our capacity to modify the internal model necessary to adapt to the task on subsequent trials through this feedback mechanism.
15. Shadmehr R, Holcomb HH: Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. Science 1997, 277:821-825.
16. Maquet P, Laureys S, Peigneux P, Fuchs S, Petiau C, Phillips C, Aerts J, Del Fiore G, Degueldre C, Meulemans T et al.: Experience-dependent changes in cerebral activation during human REM sleep. Nat Neurosci 2000, 3:831-836.
17. Peigneux P, Laureys S, Fuchs S, Destrebecqz A, Collette F, Delbeuck X, Phillips C, Aerts J, Del Fiore G, Degueldre C et al.: Learned material content and acquisition level modulate cerebral reactivation during posttraining rapid-eye-movements sleep. Neuroimage 2003, 20:125-134. This group of researchers showed for the first time using imaging that the implicit learning of a grammatical sequence of events reactivates cerebral regions during REM sleep that are similar to those activated during the acquisition process. In this second study, they demonstrate that the sleep-dependent reactivations are specific to the learning of the probabilistic rules required to improve performance on the artificial grammar task, and not to the mere exposition to other basic visuomotor paradigms.
18. Karni A, Meyer G, Jezzard P, Adams MM, Turner R, Ungerleider LG: Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature 1995, 377:155-158.
19. Walker MP, Brakefield T, Morgan A, Hobson JA, Stickgold R: Practice with sleep makes perfect: sleep-dependent motor skill learning. Neuron 2002, 35:205-211.
20. Fischer S, Hallschmid M, Eisner AL, Born J: Sleep forms memory for finger skills. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:11987-11991.
21. Donchin O, Sawaki L, Madupu G, Cohen LG, Shadmehr R: Mechanisms influencing acquisition and recall of motor memories. J Neurophysiol 2002, 88:2114-2123.
22. Haslinger B, Erhard P, Altenmuller E, Hennenlotter A, Schwaiger M, Grafin vE, Rummeny E, Conrad B, Ceballos-Baumann AO: Reduced recruitment of motor association areas during bimanual coordination in concert pianists. Hum Brain Mapp 2004, 22:206-215.
23. Doyon J, Song AW, Karni A, Lalonde F, Adams MM, Ungerleider LG: Experience-dependent changes in cerebellar contributions to motor sequence learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:1017-1022.
24. Grafton ST, Woods RP, Mike T: Functional imaging of procedural motor learning: relating cerebral blood flow with individual subject performance. Hum Brain Mapp 1994, 1:221-234.
25. Krebs HI, Brashers-Krug T, Rauch SL, Savage CR, Hogan N, Rubin RH, Fischman AJ, Alpert NM: Robot-aided functional imaging: application to a motor learning study. Hum Brain Mapp 1998, 6:59-72.
26. Shadmehr R, Holcomb HH: Inhibitory control of competing motor memories. Exp Brain Res 1999, 126:235-251.
27. Toni I, Rowe J, Stephan KE, Passingham RE: Changes of cortico-striatal effective connectivity during visuomotor learning. Cereb Cortex 2002, 12:1040-1047.
28. Nezafat R, Shadmehr R, Holcomb HH: Long-term adaptation to dynamics of reaching movements: a PET study. Exp Brain Res 2001, 140:66-76.
29. Bellec P, Marrelec G, Perlbarg V, Jbabdi S, Jolivet O, Pelegrini-Issac M, Doyon J, Benali H: Identification of a large-scale functional network in functional magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE ISBI Proc 2004. CDROM: 848-851.
30. Doyon J, Bellec P, Burnod Y, Posé C, Jolivet O, Pelegrini-Issac M, Ungerleider LG, Benali H: How the human brain learns new adapted movements. Neuroimage: Human Brain Mapping Meeting Proceedings, June 2004, Elsevier; 2004: S41.
31. MacDonald R, White NM: A triple dissociation of memory systems: Hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal striatum. Behav Neurosci 1993, 107:3-22.
32. Poldrack RA, Clark J, Pare-Blagoev EJ, Shohamy D, Creso MJ, Myers C, Gluck MA: Interactive memory systems in the human brain. Nature 2001, 414:546-550.
33. Jueptner M, Frith CD, Brooks DJ, Frackowiak RS, Passingham RE: Anatomy of motor learning. II. Subcortical structures and learning by trial and error. J Neurophysiol 1997, 77:1325-1337.
34. Parsons MW, Harrington DL, Rao SM: Distinct neural systems underlie learning visuomotor and spatial representations of motor skills. Hum Brain Mapp 2005, 24:229-247.