Part and whole practice: Chunking and online control in the acquisition of a serial motor task

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 60-66

  Hansen, Steve ^a   Tremblay, Luc ^b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Motor control; Multiple component; Practice regime; Serial aiming

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; ONLINE SYSTEM; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; ONTARIO;

EID: 14844360693     PISSN: 02701367     EISSN: 21683824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2005.10599262     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Adam, J. J., Nieuwenstein, J. H., Huys, R., Paas, F. G. W. C., Kingma, H., Willems, P., & Werry, M. (2000). Control of rapid aimed hand movements: The one target advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 295–312.
2. Chamberlin, C. J., & Magill, R. A. (1989). Preparation and control of rapid, multisegmented responses in simple and choice environments. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 256–267.
3. Elliott, D., Binsted, G., & Heath, M. (1999). The control of goal directed aiming movements: Correcting errors in the trajectory. Human Movement Science, 18, 121–136.
4. Elliott, D., Chua, R., Pollock, B. J., & Lyons, J. (1995). Optimizing the use of vision in manual aiming: The role of practice. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48-A, 72-83.
5. Elliott, D., Helsen, W. F., & Chua, R. (2001). A century later: Woodworth’s (1899) two-component model of goal directed aiming. Psychological Bulletin, 3, 342–357.
6. Elliott, D., Ricker, K. L., & Lyons, J. (1998). The control of sequential goal-directed movement: Learning to use feedback or central planning? Motor Control, 2, 61–80.
7. Helsen, W. F., Tremblay, L., Van den Berg, M., & Elliott, D. (2004). The role of oculormotor information in the learning of sequential aiming movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 82–90.
8. Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements a “memory drum” theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 31, 448–458.
9. Khan, M. A., Elliott, D., Coull, J., Chua, R., & Lyons, J. (2002). Optimal control strategies under different feedback schedules: Kinematic evidence. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 45–57.
10. Khan, M. A., Lawrence, G., Fourkas, A., Franks, I. M., Elliott, D., & Pembroke, S. (2003). Online versus offline processing of visual feedback in the control of movement amplitude. ActaPsychologica, 113, 83–97.
11. Lavrysen, A., Helsen, W. F., Elliott, D., & Adam, J. J. (2002). The one target advantage: Advance preparation or online processing? Motor Control, 6, 230–245.
12. Lavrysen, A., Helsen, W. F., Tremblay, L., Elliott, D., Adam, J. J., Feys, P., & Buekers, M. J. (2003). The control of sequential movements: The influence of practice and manual asymmetries on the one-target advantage. Cortex, 39, 307–325.
13. Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R. G., Girouard, Y., & Dugas, C. (1987). On the type of information used to control and learn an aiming movement after moderate and extensive training. Human Movement Science, 6, 181–199.
14. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1999). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.