Summary feedback schedules and speech motor learning in Parkinson's disease

Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 215-220

  Adams, Scott G ^a   Page, Allyson D ^a   Jog, Mandar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PARKINSON DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH DISORDER; SPEECH THERAPY; SUMMARY FEEDBACK; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING;

EID: 0036999498     PISSN: 10651438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Adams, S. G., & Page, A. D. (2000). Effects of selected practice and feedback variables on speech motor learning. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 215-220.
2. Bjork, R. A. (1988). Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical Aspects of Memory II (pp. 396-401). London: Wiley.
3. Fahn, S., Elton, R., & members of the UPDRS Development Committee (1987). Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. In S. Fahn, C. Marsden, D. Calne, & M. Goldstein (Eds.), Recent Developments in Parkinson's Disease, Volume 2 (pp. 153-163).
4. Hanlon, R. E. (1996). Motor learning following unilateral stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77, 811-815.
5. Knock, T., Ballard, K, Robin, D., & Schmidt, R. (1999). Influence of order of stimulus presentation on speech motor learning: A principled approach to treatment for apraxia of speech. National Center for Voice and Speech: Status and Progress Report 14, (pp. 163-171). Iowa City, Iowa: University of Iowa.
6. Marascuilo, L. A., & Serlin, R. C. (1988). Statistical methods for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 431-439). New York: W. H. Freeman.
7. Mudie, M. H., & Matyas, T. A. (1996). Upper extremity retraining following stroke: Effects of bilateral practice. Journal of Neurological Rehabilitation, 10, 167-184.
8. Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1996). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. In D. A. Robin, K. M. Yorkston, & D. R. Beukelman (Eds.), Disorders of Motor Speech: Assessment, Treatment, and Clinical Characterization (pp. 3-23). Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.
9. Schmidt, R. A., Lange, C. A., & Young, D. E. (1990). Optimizing summary knowledge of results for skill learning. Human Movement Science, 9, 325-348.
10. Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Swinnen, S., & Shapiro, D. C. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 352-359.
11. Thach, W. T. (1998). A role for the cerebellum in learning and movement coordination. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 70, 177-188.
12. Tse, D. W. (1998). Practice conditions and motor learning in individuals post-stroke: A pilot-study comparing random and block practice. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
13. Tulving, E., & Thompson, D. M. (1973). Retrieval processes in recognition memory: Effects of associative context. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 116-124.
14. Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 677-691.