Clinical outcomes as a function of target selection strategy: A response to Morrisette and Gierut [2]

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 386-389

  Rvachew, Susan ^a   Nowak, Michele ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b ALBERTA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Phonological disorders; Phonological intervention; Target selection strategy; Treatment efficacy

Indexed keywords

CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CONVERSATION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LEARNING; LETTER; PHONEME; PHONETICS; SPEECH THERAPY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 0037390676     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/031)     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Creaghead, N. A., Newman, P. W., & Secord, W. A. (1989). Assessment and remediation of articulatory and phonological disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
2. Gierut, J. A., Elbert, M., & Dinnsen, D. A. (1987). A functional analysis of phonological knowledge and generalization learning in misarticulating children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 462-479.
3. Gierut, J. A., Morrisette, M. L., Hughes, M. T., & Rowland, S. (1996). Phonological treatment efficacy and developmental norms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 215-230.
4. Morrisette, M. L., & Gierut, J. A. (2003). Unified treatment recommendations: A response to Rvachew and Nowak (2001). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 382-385.
5. Rvachew, S., & Nowak, M. (2001). The effect of target-selection strategy on phonological learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 610-623.