Complexity in the treatment of naming deficits

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 18-29

  Kiran, Swathi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Aphasia; Semantic complexity; Treatment

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247210177     PISSN: 10580360     EISSN: 15589110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/004)     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Armstrong, S. L., Gleitman, L. R., & Gleitman, H. (1983). What some concepts might not be. Cognition, 13, 263-308.
2. Barr, R. A., & Caplan, L. J. (1987). Category representations and their implications for category structure. Memory & Cognition, 15, 397-418.
3. Barsalou, L. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition, 11, 211-227.
4. Barsalou, L. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 11, 629-649.
5. Barsalou, L., & Ross, D. R. (1985). Contrasting the representation of scripts and categories. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 646-665.
6. Boyle, M. (2004). Semantic feature analysis treatment for anomia in two fluent aphasia syndromes. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 236-249.
7. Boyle, M., & Coehlo, C. A. (1995). Application of semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(4), 94-98.
8. Butterworth, B. (1989). Lexical access in speech production. In W. Marslen Wilson (Ed.), Lexical representation and process (pp. 108-235). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Butterworth, B. (1992). Disorders of phonological encoding. Cognition, 42, 261-286.
10. Caramazza, A., Hillis, A., Rapp, B., & Romani, R. (1990). The multiple semantic hypothesis: Multiple confusions? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7, 161-189.
11. Casey, P. J. (1992). A re-examination of the roles of typicality and category dominance in verifying category membership. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 18, 823-834.
12. Coehlo, C., McHugh, R., & Boyle, M. (2000). Semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia: A replication. Aphasiology, 14, 133-142.
13. Davis, A., & Pring, T. (1991). Therapy for word finding deficits: more on the effects of semantic and phonological approaches to treatment with anomic patients. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 1, 135-145.
14. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 92, 283-321.
15. Devlin, J. T., Russell, R. P., Davis, M. H., Price, C. J., Moss, H. E., Fadili, J., & Tyler, L. K. (2002). Is there an anatomical basis for category specificity? Semantic memory studies in PET and fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 40, 54-75.
16. Drew, R. L., & Thompson, C. K. (1999). Model based semantic treatment for naming deficits in aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 972-990.
17. Forde, E. M., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Category specific recognition impairments: A review of important case studies and influential theories. Aphasiology, 13, 169-193.
18. Garrard, P., Lambon-Ralph, M. A., Hodges, J., & Patterson, K. (2001). Prototypicality, distinctiveness and intercorrelation: Analysis of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 125-174.
19. Gennari, S., & Poeppel, D. (2003). Processing correlates of lexical semantic complexity. Cognition, 89, B27-B41.
20. Gierut, J. A. (2007). Phonological complexity and language learnability. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 6-17.
21. Greenwald, M., Raymer, A. M., Richardson, M. E., & Rothi, L. G. (1995). Contrasting treatments for severe impairments of picture naming. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 5, 17-A9.
22. Grober, E., Perecman, E., Kellar, L., & Brown, J. (1980). Lexical knowledge in anterior and posterior aphasics. Brain and Language, 10, 318-330.
23. Grossman, M. (1980). The aphasics identification of a superordinate's referents with basic level and subordinate level terms. Cortex, 16, 459-469.
24. Grossman, M. (1981). A bird is a bird: Making references within and without superordinate categories. Brain and Language, 12, 313-331.
25. Hampton, J. A. (1979). Polymorphous concepts in semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 441-461.
26. Hampton, J. A. (1993). Prototype models of concept representation. In I. Van Mechelen, J. A. Hampton, R. S. Michlanski, & P. Theuns (Eds.), Categories and concepts: Theoretical views and inductive data analysis (pp. 67-95). London: Academic Press.
27. Hampton, J. A. (1995). Testing the prototype theory of concepts. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 686-708.
28. Hampton, J. A., & Gardiner, M. M. (1983). Measures of internal category structure: A correlational analysis of normative data. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 491-516.
29. Hart, J., Moo, L., Segal, J., Adkins, E., & Kraut, M. (2002). Neural substrates of semantics. In A. Hillis (Ed.), Handbook of adult language disorders (pp. 207-228). New York: Taylor & Francis.
30. Howard, D., Patterson, K., Franklin, S., Orchid-Lisle, V., & Morton, J. (1985). The facilitation of picture naming in aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 49-80.
31. Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (1988). Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 67-103.
32. Johnson, L. (2004). Typicality effects on naming accuracy in well-defined categories. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
33. Kertesz, A. (1982). The Western Aphasia Battery. Philadelphia: Grune & Stratton.
34. Kiran, S., & Allison, K. (2005). Effect of typicality on lexical processing of feature based and perceptually based categories. Manuscript submitted for publication.
35. Kiran, S., Ntourou, K., & Eubanks, M. (in press). Effects of typicality on category verification in inanimate categories in aphasia. Aphasiology.
36. Kiran, S., Ntourou, K., Eubank, M., & Shamapant, S. (2005). Typicality of inanimate category exemplars in aphasia: Further evidence for the semantic complexity effect. Brain and Language, 95, 178-180.
37. Kiran, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2003a). Effect of typicality on online category verification of animate category exemplars in aphasia. Brain and Language, 85, 441-450.
38. Kiran, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2003b). The role of semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits: training semantic categories in fluent aphasia by controlling examplar typicality. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 773-787.
39. Komatsu, L. K. (1992). Recent views of conceptual structure. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 500-526.
40. Lambon-Ralph, M. A., Patterson, K., & Hodges, J. R. (1997). The relationship between naming and semantic knowledge for different categories in dementia of Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1251-1261.
41. Larochelle, S., & Pineu, H. (1994). Determinants of response time in the semantic verification task. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 796-823.
42. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 22, 1-75.
44. Lowell, S., Beeson, P. M., & Holland, A. L. (1995). The efficacy of semantic cueing procedure on naming performance of adults with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(4), 109-114.
45. Maher, L. M., & Raymer, A. M. (2004). Management of anomia. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 11(1), 10-21.
46. Marshall, J. C., Pound, C., White-Thompson, M., & Pring, T. (1990). The use of picture matching tasks to assist in word retrieval in aphasic patients. Aphasiology, 4, 167-184.
47. Marshall, J., Robson, J., Pring, T., & Chiat, S. (1998). Why does monitoring fail in jargon aphasia: Comprehension, judgment and therapy evidence. Brain and Language, 63, 79-107.
48. McCloskey, M. E., & Glucksberg, S. (1978). Natural categories. Well defined or fuzzy sets? Memory & Cognition, 6, 462-472.
49. McRae, K., de Sa, V. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1997). On the nature and scope of featural representations in word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 126, 99-130.
50. Mervis, C. B., Catlin, J., & Rosch, E. (1976). Relationships among goodness of example, category norms, and word frequency. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 283-284.
51. Moore, C. J., & Price, C. J. (1999). A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category specific processing object differences. Brain, 122, 943-962.
52. Nickels, L. (2002). Therapy for naming disorders: Revisiting, revising and reviewing. Aphasiology, 16, 935-979.
53. Nickels, L., & Best, W. (1996). Therapy for naming disorders (Part I): Principles, puzzles and progresses. Aphasiology, 10, 21-47.
54. Plaut, D. C. (1996). Relearning after damage in connectionists networks: Toward a theory of rehabilitation. Brain and Language, 52, 25-82.
55. Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353-363.
56. Pring, T., Hamilton, A., Harwood, A., & McBride, L. (1993). Generalization of naming after picture/word matching tasks: Only items appearing in therapy benefit. Aphasiology, 7, 383-394.
57. Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., & Smith, E. E. (1973). Semantic distance and the verification of semantic distance. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 1-20.
58. Rosch, E. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 111-144). New York: Academic Press.
59. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representation of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192-233.
60. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-604.
61. Saffran, E., & Schwartz, M. (1994). Of cabbages and things: Semantic memory from a neuropsychological perspective - a tutorial review. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance 15: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 507-536). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62. Sartori, G., & Lombardi, L. (2004). Semantic relevance and semantic disorders. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 439-442.
63. Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model of semantic association. Psychological Review, 81, 214-241.
64. Storms, G., De Boek, P., & Ruts, W. (2000). Prototype and exemplar based information in natural language categories. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 51-73.
65. Thompson, C. K. (2001). Treatment of underlying forms. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention and strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (4th ed., pp. 605-626). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
66. Thompson, C. K., & Shapiro, L. P. (2007). Complexity in treatment of syntactic deficits. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 30-42.
67. Thompson, C. K., Shapiro, L. P., Kiran, S., & Sobecks, J. (2003). The role of syntactic complexity in treatment of sentence deficits in agrammatic aphasia: The complexity account of treatment efficacy (CATE). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 591-607.
68. Tyler, L. K., & Moss, H. E. (2001). Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 244-252.
69. Tyler, L. K., Moss, H. E., Durrant-Peatfield, M. R., & Levy, J. P. (2000). Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: A distributed account of category specific deficits. Brain and Language, 75, 195-231.
70. Uyeda, K. M., & Mandler, F. (1980). Prototypicality norms for 28 semantic categories. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 12, 587-595.