Complexity in language learning and treatment

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 3-5

  Thompson, Cynthia K ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Complexity; Generalization; Treatment

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247182037     PISSN: 10580360     EISSN: 15589110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/002)     Document Type: Short Survey

References (17)

1. Ebbles, S., & van der Lehy, H. (2002, September). Meta-syntactic therapy using visual coding: Teaching grammatical structures to children with severe, persistent SLI. Paper presented at the Treatment Efficacy Conference, London.
2. Eckman, F. R., Bell, L., & Nelson, D. (1988). On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics, 9, 1-20.
3. Elman, J. L. (1991). Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure. Machine Learning, 7, 195-224.
4. Gierut, J. A. (2007). Phonological complexity and language learnability. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 6-17.
5. Hinckley, J. J., & Carr, T. H. (2005). Comparing the outcomes of intensive and non-intensive context-based aphasia treatment. Aphasiology, 19, 965-974.
6. Kiran, S. (2007). Complexity in the treatment of naming deficits. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 18-29.
7. Kiran, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2003). The role of semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits: Training semantic categories in fluent aphasia by controlling exemplar typicality. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 608-622.
8. Kuhn, D. (1972). Mechanisms of change in the development of cognitive structures. Child Development, 43, 833-844.
9. Levy, H., & Friedmann, N. (in press). Treatment of syntactic movement in syntactic SLI: A case study. First Language.
10. Maas, E., Barlow, J., Robin, D., & Shapiro, L. P. (2002). Treatment of phonological errors in aphasia and apraxia of speech: Effects of phonological complexity. Aphasiology, 16, 609-622.
11. Plaut, D. C. (1996). Retraining after damage in connectionists networks: Toward a theory of rehabilitation. Brain and Language, 52, 25-82.
12. Rohde, D. L. T., & Plaut, D. C. (1999). Language acquisition in the absence of explicit negative evidence: How important is starting small? Cognition, 72, 67-109.
13. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1999). Motor control and learning: A behavioural emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
14. Thompson, C. K. (2006). Single subject controlled experiments in aphasia: The science and the state of the science. Journal of Communication Disorder, 39, 266-291.
15. Thompson, C. K., & Shapiro, L. P. (2007). Complexity in treatment of syntactic deficits. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16, 30-42.
16. Thompson, C. K., Shapiro, L. P., Kiran, S., & Sobecks, J. (2003). The role of syntactic complexity in treatment of sentence deficits in agrammatic aphasia: The complexity account of treatment efficacy (CATE). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 591-607.
17. Yao, K. (1989). Acquisition of mathematical skills in a learning hierarchy by high and low ability students when instruction is omitted on coordinate and subordinate skills. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.