The Effect of Target-Selection Strategy on Phonological Learning

Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 610-623

  Rvachew, Susan ^a   Nowak, Michele ^b  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b ALBERTA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Phonological disorders; Phonological treatment; Target selection strategy; Treatment efficacy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; LEARNING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHONETICS; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SPEECH DISORDER; SPEECH THERAPY;

ARTICULATION DISORDERS; CHILD LANGUAGE; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MALE; PHONETICS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPEECH THERAPY; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 0035378618     PISSN: 10924388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/050)     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bernhardt, B., & Gilbert, J. (1992). Applying linguistic theory to speech-language pathology: The case for nonlinear phonology. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 6, 123-145.
2. Creaghead, N. A., Newman, P. W., & Secord, S. A. (1989). Assessment and remediation of articulatory and phonological disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
3. Day, A. (1989). Carl goes shopping. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.
4. Diedrich, W. M., & Bangert, J. (1980). Articulation learning. Houston, TX: College-Hill Press.
5. Dinnsen, D. A., Chin, S. B., Elbert, M., & Powell, T. W. (1990). Some constraints on functionally disordered phonologies: Phonetic inventories and phonotactics. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 28-37.
6. Elbert, M., Powell, T. W., & Swartzlander, P. (1991). Toward a technology of generalization: How many exemplars are sufficient? Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 81-87.
7. Gierut, J. A. (1989). Maximal opposition approach to phonological treatment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 9-19.
8. Gierut, J. A. (1990). Differential learning of phonological oppositions. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 540-549.
9. Gierut, J. A., Elbert, M., & Dinnsen, D. A. (1987). A functional analysis of phonological knowledge and generalization learning in misarticulating children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 462-479.
10. Gierut, J. A., Morrisette, M. L., Hughes, M. T., & Rowland, S. (1996). Phonological treatment efficacy and developmental norms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27, 215-230.
11. Goldman, R., & Fristoe, M. (1986). Test of Articulation. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
12. Hodson, B. W., & Paden, E. P. (1983). Targeting intelligible speech: A phonological approach to remediation. Boston: College-Hill Press.
13. Lof, G. L. (1996). Factors associated with speech-sound stimulability. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29, 255-278.
14. McKercher, M., McFarlane, L., & Schneider, P. (1995). Phonological treatment dismissal: Optimal criteria. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 19, 115-123.
15. McReynolds, L. V., & Kearns, K. (1983). Single-subject experimental designs in communicative disorders. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
16. Miccio, A. W., & Elbert, M. (1996). Enhancing stimulability: A treatment program. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29, 335-352.
17. Miccio, A. W., Elbert, M., & Forrest, K. (1999). The relationship between stimulability and phonological acquisition in children with normally developing and disordered phonologies. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 347-363.
18. Monahan, D. (1986). Remediation of common phonological processes: Four case studies. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 17, 199-206.
19. Powell, T. W., Elbert, M., & Dinnsen, D. A. (1991). Stimulability as a factor in the phonological generalization of misarticulating preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 1318-1328.
20. Powell, T. W., & Miccio, A. W. (1996). Stimulability: A useful clinical tool. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29, 237-253.
21. Rvachew, S. (1994). Speech perception training can facilitate sound production learning. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 347-357.
22. Rvachew, S., Rafaat, S., & Martin, M. (1999). Stimulability, speech perception skills, and the treatment of phonological disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 8, 33-43.
23. Shuster, L. I., Ruscello, D. M., & Toth, A. R. (1995). The use of visual feedback to elicit correct /r/. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(2), 37-44.
24. Shriberg, L. D., & Kwiatkowski, J. (1982). Phonological disorders III: A procedure for assessing severity of involvement. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 256-270.
25. Smit, A. B., Hand, L., Freilinger, J. J., Bernthal, J. E., & Bird, A. (1990). The Iowa articulation norms project and its Nebraska replication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 779-798.
26. Tyler, A. A., Edwards, M. L., & Saxman, J. H. (1990). Acoustic validation of phonological knowledge and its relationship to treatment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 251-261.
27. Tyler, A. A., & Figurski, G. R. (1994). Phonetic inventory changes after treating distinctions along an implicational hierarchy. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 8, 91-107.