Mathematical modeling of T-cell activation kinetic

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 105-128

  Bidot, C ^a   Gruy, F ^a   Haudin, C S ^a   El Hentati, F ^a   Guy, B ^a   Lambert, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF SAINT ETIENNE   (France)

Author keywords

Activation; Kinetics; Mathematical model; Ordinary differential equations; T cells

Indexed keywords

INTERLEUKIN 2;

ANTIGEN PRESENTATION; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CELL KINETICS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SIMULATION; T LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION;

ANIMALS; ANTIGEN PRESENTATION; ANTIGENS, CD; HUMANS; INTERLEUKIN-2; KINETICS; LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; MODELS, IMMUNOLOGICAL; RECEPTORS, ANTIGEN, T-CELL; RECEPTORS, INTERLEUKIN; T-LYMPHOCYTES;

EID: 39449125884     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2007.0125     Document Type: Article

References (111)

1. Acuto, O., and Michel, F. 2003. CD28-mediated co-stimulation: a quantitative support for TCR signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 939-951.
2. Alam, S.M., Davies, G.M., et al. 1999. Qualitative and quantitative differences in T cell receptor binding of agonist and antagonist ligands. Immunity 10, 227-237.
3. Anderson, M.W., and Gorski, J. 2005. Cooperativity during the formation of peptide/MHC class II complexes. Biochemistry 44, 5617-5624.
4. beta endows CD8 with efficient coreceptor function by coupling T cell receptor/CD3 to raft-associated CD8/p56(lck) complexes. J. Exp. Med. 194, 1485-1495.
5. - T lymphocytes. Antigenic and functional properties. J. Immunol. 150, 1147-1159.
6. Bachmann, M.F., Sebzda, E., et al. 1996. T cell responses are governed by avidity and co-stimulatory thresholds. Eur. J. Immunol. 26, 2017-2022.
7. Bettens, F., Kristensen, F., et al. 1984. Lymphokine regulation of human lymphocyte proliferation: formation of resting G0 cells by removal of interleukin 2 in cultures of proliferating T lymphocytes. Cell Immunol. 86, 337-346.
8. Bezouska, K., Nepovim, A., et al. 1995. CD69 antigen of human lymphocytes is a calcium-dependent carbohydrate-binding protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 208, 68-74.
9. (+) memory T cell activation requirements at the single clonotype level. J. Immunol. 169, 1207-1218.
10. Borisova, L.R., Andreev, S.G., et al. 1998. Kinetics of T cell proliferation: a mathematical model and data analysis. Membr. Cell Biol. 12, 111-119.
11. Borisova, L.R., Kuznetsov, V.A. 1997. A mathematical model of T lymphocyte proliferation controlled by interleukin-2 internalization. Membr. Cell Biol. 11, 259-267.
12. Boulougouris, G., McLeod, J.D., et al. 1999. IL-2-independent activation and proliferation in human T cells induced by CD28. J. Immunol. 163, 1809-1816.
13. Bromley, S.K., Iaboni, A., et al. 2001. The immunological synapse and CD28-CD80 interactions. Nat. Immunol. 2, 1159-1166.
14. Busch, D.H., and Pamer, E.G. 1998. MHC class I/peptide stability: implications for immunodominance, in vitro proliferation, and diversity of responding CTL. J. Immunol. 160, 4441-4448.
15. Cantrell, D., Bluestone, J., et al. 1998. Signalling through the TCR. Res. Immunol. 149, 866-867.
16. Carneiro, J., Coutinho, A., et al. 1996. A model of the immune network with B-T cell co-operation. I - Prototypical structures and dynamics. J. Theor. Biol. 182, 513-529.
17. Carreno, B.M., and Collins, M. 2002. The B7 family of ligands and its receptors: new pathways for costimulation and inhibition of immune responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 20, 29-53.
18. Carreno, L.J., Gonzalez, P.A., et al. 2006. Modulation of T cell function by TCR/pMHC binding kinetics. Immunobiology 211, 47-64.
19. Cemerski, S., and Shaw, A. 2006. Immune synapses in T-cell activation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 18, 298-304.
20. Chakraborty, A.K., Dustin, M.L., et al. 2003. In silico models for cellular and molecular immunology: successes, promises and challenges. Nat. Immunol. 4, 933-936.
21. Coombs, D., Kalergis, A.M., et al. 2002. Activated TCRs remain marked for internalization after dissociation from pMHC. Nat. Immunol. 3, 926-931.
22. Corr, M., Slanetz, A.E., et al. 1994. T cell receptor-MHC class I peptide interactions: affinity, kinetics, and specificity. Science 265, 946-949.
23. D'Ambrosio, D., Trotta, R., et al. 1993. Transcriptional regulation of interleukin-2 gene expression by CD69-generated signals. Eur. J. Immunol. 23, 2993-2997.
24. D'Oro, U., and Ashwell, J.D. 1999. Cutting edge: the CD45 tyrosine phosphatase is an inhibitor of Lck activity in thymocytes. J. Immunol. 162, 1879-1883.
25. Davis, S.J., Ikemizu, S., et al. 2003. The nature of molecular recognition by T cells. Nat. Immunol. 4, 217-224.
26. Davis, S.J., and van der Merwe, P.A. 2006. The kinetic-segregation model: TCR triggering and beyond. Nat. Immunol. 7, 803-809.
27. Demotz, S., Grey, H.M., et al. 1990. The minimal number of class II MHC-antigen complexes needed for T cell activation. Science 249, 1028-1030.
28. Denkberg, G., Cohen, C.J., et al. 2001. Critical role for CD8 in binding of MHC tetramers to TCR: CD8 antibodies block specific binding of human tumor-specific MHC-peptide tetramers to TCR. J. Immunol. 167, 270-276.
29. Dietrich, J., Menne, C., et al. 2002. Ligand-induced TCR down-regulation is not dependent on constitutive TCR cycling. J. Immunol. 168, 5434-5440.
30. Edmead, C.E., Lamb, J.R., et al. 1997. The T cell surface protein, CD28. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 29, 1053-1057.
31. Fallon, E.M., and Lauffenburger, D.A. 2000. Computational model for effects of ligand/receptor binding properties on interleukin-2 trafficking dynamics and T cell proliferation response. Biotechnol. Prog. 16, 905-916.
32. Faroudi, M., Zaru, R., et al. 2003. Cutting edge: T lymphocyte activation by repeated immunological synapse formation and intermittent signaling. J. Immunol. 171, 1128-1132.
33. Favier, B., Burroughs, N.J., et al. 2001. TCR dynamics on the surface of living T cells. Int. Immunol. 13, 1525-1532.
34. Feito, M.J., Ballester, S., et al. 1997. CD4 dependence of activation threshold and TCR signalling in mouse T lymphocytes. Scand. J. Immunol. 45, 166-174.
35. Fierro, N.A., Pedraza-Alva, G., et al. 2006. TCR-dependent cell response is modulated by the timing of CD43 engagement. J. Immunol. 176, 7346-7353.
36. Figge, M.T., and Meyer-Hermann, M. 2006. Geometrically repatterned immunological synapses uncover formation mechanisms. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2, e171.
37. Garcia, K.C., Tallquist, M.D., et al. 1997. Alphabeta T cell receptor interactions with syngeneic and allogeneic ligands: affinity measurements and crystallization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 13838-13843.
38. (+) T cells without an organized immunological synapse. Eur. J. Immunol. 30, 3266-3270.
39. Gonzalez, P.A., Carreno, L.J., et al. 2005. T cell receptor binding kinetics required for T cell activation depend on the density of cognate ligand on the antigen-presenting cell. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4824-4829.
40. Grakoui, A., Bromley, S.K., et al. 1999. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 285, 221-227.
41. Gronski, M.A., Boulter, J.M., et al. 2004. TCR affinity and negative regulation limit autoimmunity. Nat. Med. 10, 1234-1239.
42. Harding, C.V. 1996. Class I MHC presentation of exogenous antigens. J. Clin. Immunol. 16, 90-96.
43. Hlavacek, W.S., Redondo, A., et al. 2002. Kinetic proofreading in receptor-mediated transduction of cellular signals: receptor aggregation, partially activated receptors, and cytosolic messengers. Bull. Math. Biol. 64, 887-911.
44. + CTL clones is determined by the frequency of serial TCR engagement. J. Immunol. 161, 553-562.
45. Hwang, I., Huang, J.F., et al. 2000. T cells can use either T cell receptor or CD28 receptors to absorb and internalize cell surface molecules derived from antigen-presenting cells. J. Exp. Med. 191, 1137-1148.
46. Irvine, D.J., Purbhoo, M.A., et al. 2002. Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells. Nature 419, 845-849.
47. Itoh, Y., Hemmer, B., et al. 1999. Serial TCR engagement and down-modulation by peptide:MHC molecule ligands: relationship to the quality of individual TCR signaling events. J. Immunol. 162, 2073-2080.
48. Kalergis, A.M., Boucheron, N., et al. 2001. Efficient T cell activation requires an optimal dwell-time of interaction between the TCR and the pMHC complex. Nat. Immunol. 2, 229-234.
49. Kerry, S.E., Buslepp, J., et al. 2003. Interplay between TCR affinity and necessity of coreceptor ligation: high-affinity peptide-MHC/TCR interaction overcomes lack of CD8 engagement. J. Immunol. 171, 4493-4503.
50. Kersh, G.J., Miley, M.J., et al. 2001. Structural and functional consequences of altering a peptide MHC anchor residue. J. Immunol. 166, 3345-3354.
51. Kim, H.J., Guo, D., et al. 2005. Coevolution of TCR-MHC interactions: conserved MHC tertiary structure is not sufficient for interactions with the TCR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7263-7267.
52. Korb, L.C., Mirshahidi, S., et al. 1999. Induction of T cell anergy by low numbers of agonist ligands. J. Immunol. 162, 6401-6409.
53. Krummel, M., Wulfing, C., et al. 2000. Thirty-six views of T-cell recognition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 355, 1071-1076.
54. Kuiper, H.M., de Jong, R., et al. 1994. Influence of CD28 co-stimulation on cytokine production is mainly regulated via interleukin-2. Immunology 83, 38-44.
55. Kumar, V., and Sercarz, E. 2001. An integrative model of regulation centered on recognition of TCR peptide/MHC complexes. Immunol. Rev. 182, 113-121.
56. Labrecque, N., Whitfield, L.S., et al. 2001. How much TCR does a T cell need? Immunity 15, 71-82.
57. Langenkamp, A., Messi, M., et al. 2000. Kinetics of dendritic cell activation: impact on priming of TH1, TH2 and nonpolarized T cells. Nat. Immunol. 1, 311-316.
58. Lanzavecchia, A., Lezzi, G., et al. 1999. From TCR engagement to T cell activation: a kinetic view of T cell behavior. Cell 96, 1-4.
59. Ledbetter, J.A., Imboden, J.B., et al. 1990. CD28 ligation in T-cell activation: evidence for two signal transduction pathways. Blood 75, 1531-1539.
60. Lee, K.H., Holdorf, A.D., et al. 2002a. T cell receptor signaling precedes immunological synapse formation. Science 295, 1539-1542.
61. Lee, S.J., Hori, Y., et al. 2003. Low T cell receptor expression and thermal fluctuations contribute to formation of dynamic multifocal synapses in thymocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4383-4388.
62. Lee, S.J., Hori, Y., et al. 2002b. Correlation of a dynamic model for immunological synapse formation with effector functions: two pathways to synapse formation. Trends Immunol. 23, 492-499.
63. Leon, K., Perez, R., et al. 2001. Three-cell interactions in T cell-mediated suppression? A mathematical analysis of its quantitative implications. J. Immunol. 166, 5356-5365.
64. Linsley, P.S., Greene, J.L., et al. 1994. Human B7-1 (CD80) and B7-2 (CD86) bind with similar avidities but distinct kinetics to CD28 and CTLA-4 receptors. Immunity 1, 793-801.
65. Liu, H., Rhodes, M., et al. 2000. On the dynamics of TCR:CD3 complex cell surface expression and downmodulation. Immunity 13, 665-675.
66. Lord, G.M., Lechler, R.I., et al. 1999. A kinetic differentiation model for the action of altered TCR ligands. Immunol. Today 20, 33-39.
67. Luescher, I.F., Vivier, E., et al. 1995. CD8 modulation of T-cell antigen receptor-ligand interactions on living cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Nature 373, 353-356.
68. Lyons, G.E., Moore, T., et al. 2006. Influence of human CD8 on antigen recognition by T-cell receptor-transduced cells. Cancer Res. 66, 11455-11461.
69. Madrenas, J. 1999. Differential signalling by variant ligands of the T cell receptor and the kinetic model of T cell activation. Life Sci. 64, 717-731.
70. Manning, T.C., and Kranz, D.M. 1999. Binding energetics of T-cell receptors: correlation with immunological consequences. Immunol. Today 20, 417-422.
71. Mardiney, M., 3rd, Brown, M.R., et al. 1996. Measurement of T-cell CD69 expression: a rapid and efficient means to assess mitogen- or antigen-induced proliferative capacity in normals. Cytometry 26, 305-310.
72. Margulies, D.H. 1997. Interactions of TCRs with MHC-peptide complexes: a quantitative basis for mechanistic models. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9, 390-395.
73. Marquez, M.E., Ellmeier, W., et al. 2005. CD8 T cell sensory adaptation dependent on TCR avidity for self-antigens. J. Immunol. 175, 7388-7397.
74. Marzio, R., Mauel, J., et al. 1999. CD69 and regulation of the immune function. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 21, 565-582.
75. Matsui, K., Boniface, J.J., et al. 1991. Low affinity interaction of peptide-MHC complexes with T cell receptors. Science 254, 1788-1791.
76. McKeithan, T.W. 1995. Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 5042-5046.
77. McNeil, L.K., and Evavold, B.D. 2003. TCR reserve: a novel principle of CD4 T cell activation by weak ligands. J. Immunol. 170, 1224-1230.
78. + T cell activation by dendritic cells in lymph nodes. J. Exp. Med. 200, 847-856.
79. Moldovan, M.C., Yachou, A., et al. 2002. CD4 dimers constitute the functional component required for T cell activation. J. Immunol. 169, 6261-6268.
80. Purbhoo, M.A., Boulter, J.M., et al. 2001. The human CD8 coreceptor effects cytotoxic T cell activation and antigen sensitivity primarily by mediating complete phosphorylation of the T cell receptor zeta chain. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 32786-32792.
81. Qi, S.Y., Groves, J.T., et al. 2001. Synaptic pattern formation during cellular recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 6548-6553.
82. Rabinowitz, J.D., Beeson, C., et al. 1996. Kinetic discrimination in T-cell activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 1401-1405.
83. Rachmilewitz, J., and Lanzavecchia, A. 2002. A temporal and spatial summation model for T-cell activation: signal integration and antigen decoding. Trends Immunol. 23, 592-595.
84. Renard, V., Romero, P., et al. 1996. CD8 beta increases CD8 coreceptor function and participation in TCR-ligand binding. J. Exp. Med. 184, 2439-2444.
85. Rognan, D., Stryhn, A., et al. 2000. Modeling the interactions of a peptide-major histocompatibility class I ligand with its receptors. I. Recognition by two alpha beta T cell receptors. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 14, 53-69.
86. Rosette, C., Werlen, G., et al. 2001. The impact of duration versus extent of TCR occupancy on T cell activation: a revision of the kinetic proofreading model. Immunity 15, 59-70.
87. Salzmann, M., and Bachmann, M. F. 1998. Estimation of maximal affinities between T-cell receptors and MHC/peptide complexes. Mol. Immunol. 35, 65-71.
88. Sarkar, A., and Franza, B.R. 2004. A logical analysis of the process of T cell activation: different consequences depending on the state of CD28 engagement. J. Theor. Biol. 226, 455-466.
89. Savage, P.A., Boniface, J.J., et al. 1999. A kinetic basis for T cell receptor repertoire selection during an immune response. Immunity 10, 485-492.
90. (+) T cells is amplified by prolonged T cell antigen receptor triggering. J. Exp. Med. 196, 793-803.
91. Shaw, A.S. 2005. T-cell activation and immunologic synapse. Immunol. Res. 32, 247-252.
92. Sidorov, I.A., and Romanyukha, A.A. 1993. Mathematical modeling of T-cell proliferation. Math Biosci. 115, 187-232.
93. Smith, K.A. 1989. The interleukin 2 receptor. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 5, 397-425.
94. Sousa, J., and Carneiro, J. 2000. A mathematical analysis of TCR serial triggering and down-regulation. Eur. J. Immunol. 30, 3219-3227.
95. + T cells in vivo: multiple thresholds in response to a constant level of antigen presentation. J. Immunol. 167, 2030-2039.
96. Uhlin, M., Masucci, M., et al. 2006. Is the activity of partially agonistic MHC:peptide ligands dependent on the quality of immunological help? Scand. J. Immunol. 64, 581-587.
97. Valitutti, S., Muller, S., et al. 1995. Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide-MHC complexes. Nature 375, 148-151.
98. van der Merwe, P.A. 2002. Do T cell receptors do it alone? Nat. Immunol. 3, 1122-1123.
99. van der Merwe, P.A., Bodian, D.L., et al. 1997. CD80 (B7-1) binds both CD28 and CTLA-4 with a low affinity and very fast kinetics. J. Exp. Med. 185, 393-403.
100. van der Merwe, P.A., and Davis, S.J. 2003. Molecular interactions mediating T cell antigen recognition. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21, 659-684.
101. Vignali, D.A. 1994. The interaction between CD4 and MHC class II molecules and its effect on T cell function. Behring Inst. Mitt. 94, 133-147.
102. + memory T cells display broad heterogeneity in their activation threshold for cytokine synthesis. J. Immunol. 161, 5284-5295.
103. Wang, B., Sharma, A., et al. 2002. Peptidic termini play a significant role in TCR recognition. J. Immunol. 169, 3137-3145.
104. Wedagedera, J.R., and Burroughs, N.J. 2006. T-cell activation: a queuing theory analysis at low agonist density. Biophys. J. 91, 1604-1618.
105. (2+) signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8471-8476.
106. Wigginton, J.E., and Kirschner, D. 2001. A model to predict cell-mediated immune regulatory mechanisms during human infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Immunol. 166, 1951-1967.
107. Williams, C.B., Engle, D.L., et al. 1999. A kinetic threshold between negative and positive selection based on the longevity of the T cell receptor-ligand complex. J. Exp. Med. 189, 1531-1544.
108. Wofsy, C., Coombs, D., et al. 2001. Calculations show substantial serial engagement of T cell receptors. Biophys. J. 80, 606-612.
109. Wu, Z., Johnson, K.W., et al. 1995. Ligand binding analysis of soluble interleukin-2 receptor complexes by surface plasmon resonance. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 16045-16051.
110. Xu, Z., and Weiss, A. 2002. Negative regulation of CD45 by differential homodimerization of the alternatively spliced isoforms. Nat. Immunol. 3, 764-771.
111. (+) T cells by skin grafts via direct antigen presentation. J. Immunol. 169, 1270-1276.