Correlation of a dynamic model for immunological synapse formation with effector functions: Two pathways to synapse formation

Trends in Immunology

Volumn 23, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 492-499

  Lee, Sung Joo E ^a,b   Hori, Yuko ^a,b   Groves, Jay T ^a,b   Dustin, Michael L ^c   Chakraborty, Arup K ^a,b  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOKINE; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN; T LYMPHOCYTE RECEPTOR;

ANTIGEN RECOGNITION; BINDING KINETICS; CELL JUNCTION; CELL MEDIATED LYMPHOLYSIS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CYTOKINE PRODUCTION; CYTOTOXIC T LYMPHOCYTE; HUMAN; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; SYNAPSE; T LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION;

ANIMALS; CYTOKINES; CYTOTOXICITY, IMMUNOLOGIC; HUMANS; INTERCELLULAR JUNCTIONS; LYMPHOCYTE ACTIVATION; MODELS, IMMUNOLOGICAL; RECEPTORS, ANTIGEN, T-CELL; T-LYMPHOCYTES;

EID: 0036776238     PISSN: 14714906     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1471-4906(02)02285-8     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Harding C.V., Unanue E.R. Quantitation of antigen-presenting cell MHC class II/peptide complexes necessary for T-cell stimulation. Nature. 346:1990;574-576.
2. Demotz S., et al. The minimal number of class II MHC-antigen complexes needed for T cell activation. Science. 249:1990;1028-1030.
3. Rudensky A.Y., et al. Sequence analysis of peptides bound to MHC class II molecules. Nature. 353:1991;622-627.
4. Hunt D.F., et al. Peptides presented to the immune system by the murine class II major histocompatability complex molecule I-Ad. Science. 256:1992;1817-1820.
5. Monks C.R., et al. Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells. Nature. 395:1998;82-86.
6. Grakoui A., et al. The immunological synapse: A molecular machine controlling T-cell activation. Science. 285:1999;221-227.
7. Lee K.-H., et al. Tyrosine kinase signaling precedes formation of the immunological synapse. Science. 295:2002;1539-1542.
8. Stinchcombe J.C., et al. The immunological synapse of CTL contains a secretory domain and membrane bridges. Immunity. 15:2001;751-761.
9. van der Merwe P., et al. Cytoskeletal polarization and redistribution of cell-surface molecules during T-cell antigen recognition. Semin. Immunol. 12:2000;5-21.
10. Wülfing C., et al. Costimulation and endogenous MHC ligands contribute to T-cell recognition. Nat. Immunol. 3:2002;42-47.
11. Qi S.Y., et al. Synaptic pattern formation during cellular recognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98:2001;6548-6553.
12. Dustin M.L., et al. Antigen receptor engagement delivers a stop signal to migrating T lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94:1997;3909-3913.
13. Chakraborty A.K. How and why does the immunological synapse form? Physical chemistry meets cell biology. Sci STKE. PE10:2002.
14. Springer T.A. Adhesion receptors of the immune system. Nature. 346:1990;425-433.
15. Staunton D.E., et al. The arrangement of the immunoglobulin-like domains of ICAM-1 and the binding sites for LFA-1 and rhinovirus. Cell. 61:1990;243-254.
16. Xiong J.P., et al. Crystal structure of the extracellular segment of integrin αVβ3. Science. 294:2001;339-345.
17. Garboczi D.N., et al. Structure of the complex between human T-cell receptor, viral peptide and HLA-A2. Nature. 384:1996;134-141.
18. Garcia K.C., et al. An αβ T-cell receptor structure at 2.5Å resolution and its orientation in the TCR-MHC complex. Science. 274:1996;209-219.
19. Shaw A.S., Dustin M.L. Making the T-cell receptor go the distance: a topological view of T-cell activation. Immunity. 6:1997;361-369.
20. Safran S. Statistical Thermodynamics of Surfaces, Interfaces, and Membranes. 1994;Addison-Wesley.
21. Moy V.T., et al. Intermolecular forces and energies between ligands and receptors. Science. 266:1994;257-259.
22. Wülfing C., Davis M.M. A receptor/cytoskeletal movement triggered by costimulation during T-cell activation. Science. 282:1998;2266-2269.
23. Delon J., et al. Exclusion of CD43 from the immunological synapse is mediated by phosphorylation-regulated relocation of the cytoskeletal adaptor moesin. Immunity. 15:2001;691-701.
24. Allenspach E.J., et al. ERM-dependent movement of CD43 defines a novel protein complex distal to the immunological synapse. Immunity. 15:2001;739-750.
25. Valitutti S., et al. Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide-MHC complexes. Nature. 375:1995;148-151.
26. Itoh Y., et al. Serial TCR engagement and down modulation by peptide: MHC molecule ligands: Relationship to the quality of individual TCR signaling events. J. Immunol. 162:1999;2073-2080.
27. Wofsy C., et al. Calculations show substantial serial engagement of T-cell receptors. Biophys. J. 80:2001;606-612.
28. Van Kampen N.G. Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. 1987;Elsevier.
29. Hohenberg P.C., Halperin B.I. Theory of dynamic critical phenomena. Rev. Mod. Phys. 49:1977;435-479.
30. Davis M.M., et al. Ligand recognition by αβ T-cell receptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16:1998;523-544.
31. Carlin L.M., et al. Intercellular transfer and supramolecular organization of human leukocyte antigen C at inhibitory natural killer cell immune synapses. J. Exp. Med. 194:2001;1507-1517.
32. Micheletti F., Canella A. Supra-agonist peptides enhance the reactivation of memory CTL responses. J. Immunol. 165:2000;4264-4271.
33. Manning T.C., et al. Alanine scanning mutagenesis of an αβ T-cell receptor: mapping the energy of antigen recognition. Immunity. 8:1998;413-425.
34. Janeway C.A. Jr, et al. T-cell development, survival, and signalling: a new concept of the role of self-peptide: self-MHC complexes. The Immunologist. 6:1998;5-12.
35. Williams C.B., et al. A kinetic threshold between negative and positive selection based on the longevity of the T-cell receptor-ligand complex. J. Exp. Med. 189:1999;1531-1544.
36. Sloan-Lancaster J., Allen P.M. Altered peptide ligand-induced partial T-cell activation: molecular mechanisms and role in T-cell biology. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14:1996;1-27.
37. Germain R.N., Stefanova I. The dynamics of T-cell receptor signaling: complex orchestration and the key roles of tempo and cooperation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17:1999;467-522.
38. Evavold B.D., et al. Complete dissection of the Hb(64-76) determinant using T helper 1, T helper 2 clones, and T-cell hybridomas. J. Immunol. 148:1992;347-353.
39. Racioppi L., et al. Peptide major histocompaitibility complex class II complexes with mixed agonist/antagonist properties provide evidence for ligand-related differences in T-cell receptor-dependent intracellular signaling. J. Exp. Med. 177:1993;1047-1060.
40. Reay P.A., et al. Use of global amino acid replacements to define the requirements for MHC binding and T-cell recognition of moth cytochrome c (93-103). J. Immunol. 152:1994;3946-3957.
41. Kalergis A.M., et al. Efficient T-cell activation requires an optimal dwell-time of interaction between the TCR and the pMHC complex. Nat. Immunol. 2:2001;229-234.
42. Matsui K., et al. Kinetics of T-cell receptor binding to peptide/I-Ek complexes: correlation of the dissociation rate with T-cell responsiveness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91:1994;12862-12866.
43. Corr M., et al. T-cell receptor-MHC class I peptide interactions: affinity, kinetics and specificity. Science. 265:1994;946-949.
44. Alam S.C., et al. T-cell-receptor affinity and thymocyte positive selection. Nature. 381:1996;616-620.
45. Lyons D.S., et al. A TCR binds to antagonist ligands with lower affinities and faster dissociation rates than to agonists. Immunity. 5:1996;53-61.
46. + CTL clones is determined by the frequency of serial TCR engagement. J. Immunol. 161:1998;553-562.
47. Kersh G.J., et al. High- and low-potency ligands with similar affinities for the TCR: the importance of kinetics in TCR signaling. Immunity. 9:1998;817-826.
48. Sykulev Y., et al. Peptide antagonism and T-cell receptor interactions with peptide-MHC complexes. Immunity. 9:1998;475-483.
49. Ding Y.H., et al. Four A6-TCR/peptide/HLA-A2 structures that generate very different T-cell signals are nearly identical. Immunity. 11:1999;45-56.
50. Rosette C., et al. The impact of duration versus extent of TCR occupancy on T-cell activation: a revision of the kinetic proofreading model. Immunity. 15:2001;59-70.
51. McKeithan T.W. Kinetic proofreading in T-cell receptor signal transduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92:1995;5042-5046.
52. Rabinowitz J.D., et al. Kinetic discrimination in T-cell activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93:1996;1401-1405.
53. Reich Z., et al. Ligand-specific oligomerization of T-cell receptor molecules. Nature. 387:1997;617-620.
54. Germain R.N. T-cell signaling: the importance of receptor clustering. Curr. Biol. 7:1997;R640-644.
55. Martz E., et al. The role of calcium in the lethal hit of T lymphocyte-mediated cytolysis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 146:1982;121-143.
56. Spits H., et al. Alloantigen recognition is preceded by nonspecific adhesion of cytotoxic T cells and target cells. Science. 232:1986;403-405.
57. Shaw S., et al. Two antigen-independent adhesion pathways used by human cytotoxic T-cell clones. Nature. 323:1986;262-264.
58. van Der Merwe P.A., Davis S.J. Immunology. The immunological synapse - a multitasking system. Science. 295:2002;1479-1480.
59. Alam S.M., et al. T-cell-receptor affinity and thymocyte positive selection. Nature. 381:1996;616-620.
60. Hogquist K.A., et al. T-cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. Cell. 76:1994;17-27.
61. + T cells. Immunity. 3:1995;79-86.
62. Sykulev Y., et al. Kinetics and affinity of reactions between an antigen-specific T-cell receptor and peptide-MHC complexes. Immunity. 1:1994;15-22.