Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: Marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements

Dental Materials

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 185-191

  Frankenberger, Roland ^a   Lohbauer, Ulrich ^a   Schaible, Rainer B ^a   Nikolaenko, Sergej A ^b   Naumann, Michael ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b KRASNOYARSK STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^c HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dentine bonding; Etch and rinse; Glass ceramic; Resin composites; Self etch

Indexed keywords

CEMENTS; CHEMICAL BONDS; ETCHING; GLASS CERAMICS; THERMOMECHANICAL TREATMENT;

CEMENTOENAMEL JUNCTION; DENTINE BONDING; ETCH-AND-RINSE; RESIN COMPOSITES; SELF-ETCHING;

ADHESIVES;

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; ADHESE CEMENT; ALUMINUM SILICATE; CALIBRA; DCR CEMENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; ED PRIMER II; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; MAXCEM; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; MULTILINK ADHESIVE SYSTEM; PANAVIA FLUORO; PANAVIA-FLUORO; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND NT; RELY X UNICEM; RESIN CEMENT; SELF CURE ADHESIVE; SYNTAC DENTINE ADHESIVE; TOOTH CEMENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VARIOLINK;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ACRYLIC RESINS; ALUMINUM SILICATES; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 37349062045     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Schulz P., Johansson A., and Arvidson K. A retrospective study of Mirage ceramic inlays over up to 9 years. Int J Prosthodont 16 (2003) 510-514
2. Hayashi M., Tsuchitani Y., Kawamura Y., Miura M., Takeshige F., and Ebisu S. Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 25 (2000) 473-481
3. Molin M.K., and Karlsson S.L. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Int J Prosthodont 13 (2000) 194-200
4. Bergman M.A. The clinical performance of ceramic inlays: a review. Aust Dent J 44 (1999) 157-168
5. Hayashi M., Tsuchitani Y., Miura M., Takeshige F., and Ebisu S. 6-Year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 23 (1998) 318-326
6. Kramer N., Ebert J., Petschelt A., and Frankenberger R. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years. Dent Mater 22 (2006) 13-21
7. Kramer N., and Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 262-271
8. Sjogren G., Molin M., and van Dijken J.W. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite. Int J Prosthodont 17 (2004) 241-246
9. Posselt A., and Kerschbaum T. Longevity of 2328 chairside Cerec inlays and onlays. Int J Comput Dent 6 (2003) 231-248
10. Hayashi M., Wilson N.H., Yeung C.A., and Worthington H.V. Systematic review of ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig 7 (2003) 8-19
11. Thordrup M., Isidor F., and Horsted-Bindslev P. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int 32 (2001) 199-205
12. Kramer N., Lohbauer U., and Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 13 (2000) 60D-76D
13. Frankenberger R., Petschelt A., and Kramer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior. Oper Dent 25 (2000) 459-465
14. Manhart J., Chen H., Hamm G., and Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 29 (2004) 481-508
15. Hayashi M., Tsubakimoto Y., Takeshige F., and Ebisu S. Quantitative measurement of marginal disintegration of ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 29 (2004) 3-8
16. Kramer N., and Frankenberger R. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays after six years: wear of luting composites. Oper Dent 25 (2000) 466-472
17. Hayashi M., Tsubakimoto Y., Takeshige F., and Ebisu S. Analysis of longitudinal marginal deterioration of ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 29 (2004) 386-391
18. Hikita K., Van Meerbeek B., De Munck J., Ikeda T., Van L.K., Maida T., Lambrechts P., and Peumans M. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentine. Dent Mater 22 (2006) [Epub ahead of print]
19. Bott B., and Hannig M. Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of Class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro. Dent Mater 19 (2003) 264-269
20. Ferrari M., Dagostin A., and Fabianelli A. Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a self-curing resin system. Dent Mater 19 (2003) 270-276
21. Frankenberger R., Sindel J., Kramer N., and Petschelt A. Dentine bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 24 (1999) 147-155
22. Frankenberger R., and Tay F.R. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 397-412
23. Frankenberger R., Kramer N., and Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentine bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 25 (2000) 324-330
24. Frankenberger R., Strobel W.O., Kramer N., Lohbauer U., Winterscheidt J., Winterscheidt B., and Petschelt A. Evaluation of the fatigue behavior of the resin-dentine bond with the use of different methods. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 67 (2003) 712-721
25. Frankenberger R., Strobel W.O., Lohbauer U., Kramer N., and Petschelt A. The effect of six years of water storage on resin composite bonding to human dentine. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 69 (2004) 25-32
26. Thordrup M., Isidor F., and Horsted-Bindslev P. A prospective clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays: ten-year results. Quintessence Int 37 (2006) 139-144
27. Abdalla A.I., and Davidson C.L. Marginal integrity after fatigue loading of ceramic inlay restorations luted with three different cements. Am J Dent 13 (2000) 77-80
28. Ausiello P., Rengo S., Davidson C.L., and Watts D.C. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study. Dent Mater 20 (2004) 862-872
29. Hofmann N., Just N., Haller B., Hugo B., and Klaiber B. The effect of glass ionomer cement or composite resin bases on restoration of cuspal stiffness of endodontically treated premolars in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 2 (1998) 77-83
30. Manhart J., Schmidt M., Chen H.Y., Kunzelmann K.H., and Hickel R. Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in Class II cavities after artificial aging. Oper Dent 26 (2001) 357-366
31. Rosentritt M., Behr M., Lang R., and Handel G. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays. Dent Mater 20 (2004) 463-469
32. Chieffi N., Chersoni S., Papacchini F., Vano M., Goracci C., Davidson C.L., Tay F.R., and Ferrari M. The effect of application sustained seating pressure on adhesive luting procedure. Dent Mater 21 (2006) [Epub ahead of print]
33. Audenino G., Bresciano M.E., Bassi F., and Carossa S. In vitro evaluation of fit of adhesively luted ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 12 (1999) 342-347
34. Dietschi D., and Moor L. Evaluation of the marginal and internal adaptation of different ceramic and composite inlay systems after an in vitro fatigue test. J Adhes Dent 1 (1999) 41-56
35. De Munck J., Van Landuyt K., Coutinho E., Poitevin A., Peumans M., Lambrechts P., and Van Meerbeek B. Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to Class-I cavity-bottom dentine after thermo-cycling. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 999-1007
36. el-Mowafy O.M., Rubo M.H., and el-Badrawy W.A. Hardening of new resin cements cured through a ceramic inlay. Oper Dent 24 (1999) 38-44
37. Ozturk A.N., and Usumez A. Influence of different light sources on microtensile bond strength and gap formation of resin cement under porcelain inlay restorations. J Oral Rehabil 31 (2004) 905-910
38. Ozturk N., and Aykent F. Dentine bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. J Prosthet Dent 89 (2003) 275-281
39. Rees J.S., and Jacobsen P.H. Stresses generated by luting resins during cementation of composite and ceramic inlays. J Oral Rehabil 19 (1992) 115-122
40. Van Meerbeek B., Van Landuyt K., De Munck J., Hashimoto M., Peumans M., Lambrechts P., Yoshida Y., Inoue S., and Suzuki K. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J 24 (2005) 1-13
41. Frankenberger R., Perdigao J., Rosa B.T., and Lopes M. No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentine adhesives-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 17 (2001) 373-380
42. Frankenberger R., Garcia-Godoy F., Lohbauer U., Petschelt A., and Kramer N. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part I. In vitro investigations. Am J Dent 18 (2005) 23-27
43. Carvalho R.M., Chersoni S., Frankenberger R., Pashley D.H., Prati C., and Tay F.R. A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials 26 (2005) 1035-1042
44. Itthagarun A., Tay F.R., Pashley D.H., Wefel J.S., Garcia-Godoy F., and Wei S.H. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerisation. Part III. Evidence from fluid conductance and artificial caries inhibition. Am J Dent 17 (2004) 394-400
45. Tay F.R., Pashley D.H., Garcia-Godoy F., and Yiu C.K. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerisation. Part II. Silver tracer penetration evidence. Am J Dent 17 (2004) 315-322
46. Tay F.R., Frankenberger R., Krejci I., Bouillaguet S., Pashley D.H., Carvalho R.M., and Lai C.N. Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerisation. I. In vivo evidence. J Dent 32 (2004) 611-621
47. Tay F.R., Pashley D.H., Suh B.I., Hiraishi N., and Yiu C.K. Water treeing in simplified dentine adhesives-deja vu?. Oper Dent 30 (2005) 561-579
48. Haller B., Hassner K., and Moll K. Marginal adaptation of dentine bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites. Oper Dent 28 (2003) 574-584
49. Hahn P., Schaller H., Hafner P., and Hellwig E. Effect of different luting procedures on the seating of ceramic inlays. J Oral Rehabil 27 (2000) 1-8
50. Romao Jr. W., Miranda Jr. W.G., Cesar P.F., and Braga R.R. Correlation between microleakage and cement thickness in three Class II inlay ceramic systems. Oper Dent 29 (2004) 212-218