In Vitro Evaluation of Fit of Adhesively Luted Ceramic Inlays

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 342-347

  Audenino, Guido ^a   Bresciano, Mario E ^a   Bassi, Francesco ^a   Carossa, Stefano ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; CELAY; COLORLOGIC PORCELAIN; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; RESIN CEMENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MOLAR; RESIN CEMENTS;

EID: 0033154610     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Bernal G, Jones RM, Brown DT, Munoz CA, Goodacre CJ. The effect of the finish line form and luting agent on the breaking strength of Dicor crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:108-113.
2. Christensen GJ. The rise of resin for cementing restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;24:104-105.
3. Brodsky LJ. Porcelain inlays simplified. Dent Cosmos 1933;75:1,024-1,028.
4. Barcroft DT. Baking porcelain inlays directly in the investment without the use of a platinum matrix. J Am Dent Assoc 1941;28:97-99.
5. Brinker HA. Simplified porcelain inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:44-49.
6. McLean J. Ceramics in clinical dentistry. Br Dent J 1988;164:187-194.
7. Adair P, Bell B, Pameijer C. Casting technique of machinable glass ceramics [abstract 833]. J Dent Res 1980;59:475.
8. Grossmann D. Processing a dental glass ceramic by casting methods. Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings. Am Ceram Soc 1985;68:19.
9. Wohlwend A. Swiss patent 1986 (CH-Pat.Anmeldung), patent 668699-1986.
10. Wohlwend A. Verfahren und Ofen zur Herstellung von Zahnersatzteilen. European patent 1987 (EU-Pat. Anmeldung), patent 0 231 773 A1, 1987.
11. Wohlwend A, Schärer P. The Empress technique: A new technique for the fabrication of full ceramic crowns, inlays, and veneers [in German]. Quintessenz Zahntech 1990;16:966-978.
12. Beham G. IPS-Empress: A new ceramic technology. Ivoclar-Vivadent Report 1990;6:1-13.
13. Dong JK, Luthy H, Wohlwend A, Schärer P. Heat-pressed ceramics: Technology and strength. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:9-16.
14. Brandestini M, Mörmann WH, Lutz F, et al. Computer machined ceramic inlays: In vitro marginal adaptation [abstract 305]. J Dent Res 1985;64:208.
15. Duret F, Blouin J-L, Duret B. CAD-CAM in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;117:715-720.
16. Mörmann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F, Barbakow F. Chairside computer-aided direct inlays. Quintessence Int 1989;20:329-339.
17. Eidenbenz S, Lehner CR, Schärer P. Copy milling ceramic inlays from resin analogs: A practicable approach with the Celay system. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:134-142.
18. Jörgensen KD, Esbensen AL. The relationship between the film thickness of zinc phosphate cement and the retention of veneer crowns. Acta Odontol Scand 1968;26:169-174.
19. Fransson B, Øilo G, Gjeitanger R. The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater 1985;1:197-199.
20. Johnston JF, Phillips RW, Swartz BS. A laboratory and clinical investigation of certain restorative and cementing materials. J Prosthet Dent 1955;5:705-710.
21. Christensen GJ. Marginal fit of gold inlay castings. J Prosthet Dent 1966;16:297-305.
22. Demond HW. Ability to evaluate nonvisible margins with an explorer. Oper Dent 1985;10:6-11.
23. Löfstrom LH, Barakat MM. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of clinically cemented cast gold restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:664-669.
24. van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, Noack MJ, Braem M, Lambrechts P, et al. Marginal adaptation of four tooth-coloured inlay systems in vivo. J Dent 1992;20:18-26.
25. Noack MJ, De Gee AJ, Roulet JF, Davidson CL. Interfacial wear of luting composite of ceramic inlays in vitro [abstract 58]. J Dent Res 1992,71:113.
26. Kunzelmann KH, Deigner M, Hickel R. Three-body wear of composite luting materials at different gap sizes and shrinkage conditions [abstract 59]. J Dent Res 1992;71:113.
27. Isenberg BI, Kawai K, Leinfelder KF. Effect of gap dimension on composite cement wear [abstract 1,402]. J Dent Res 1992;71:691.
28. Kawai K, Isenberg BP, Leinfelder KF. Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear. Quintessence Int 1994;25:53-58.
29. O'Neal SJ, Miracle RL, Leinfelder KF. Evaluating interfacial gaps for esthetic inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:48-54.
30. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M, Heinzmann JL. Wear of ceramic inlays, their antagonists, and luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:425-430.
31. Guzman AF, Moore BK, Andres CJ. Wear resistance of four luting agents as a function of marginal gap distance, cement type, and restorative material. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:415-425.
32. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res 1989;68:48-50.
33. Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. Stresses generated by luting resins during cementation of composite and ceramic inlays. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:115-122.
34. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J. An in vitro study of parameters related to marginal and internal seal of bonded restorations. Quintessence Int 1993;24:281-291.
35. Schmalz G, Federlin M, Reich E. Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a Class II ceramic inlay. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:392-399.
36. Molin MK, Karlsson SL, Kristiansen MS. Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dent Mater 1996;12:245-249.
37. Derand T. Stress analysis of cemented resin bonded loaded porcelain inlays. Dent Mater 1991;7:21-24.
38. Molin MK, Karlsson SL. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:201-206.
39. Bronwasser PJ, Mörmann WH, Krejci I, Lutz F. Marginal adaptation of adhesive Cerec Dicor inlays. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1991;101:162-169.
40. Sturdevant JR, Heyman HO, Wilder AD, Robertson TM, Bayne SC. Composite cement thickness of Cerec CAD/CAM ceramic inlays [abstract 245]. J Dent Res 1991;70:296.
41. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hørsted-Bindslev P. Cerec or laboratory-fabricated inlays? In: Mörmann WH (ed). Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Restorations. State of the Art of the Cerec Method. Chicago: Quintessence, 1991:91-101.
42. Inokoshi S, Van Meerbeek B, Willes G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM inlays made with the original and the updated software. J Dent 1992;20:171-177.
43. Dietschi D, Maeder M, Holz J. In vitro evaluation of marginal fit and morphology of fired ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int 1992;23:271-278.
44. Krejci F, Lutz F, Reimer M. Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays. J Dent 1993;21:39-46.
45. Hofmann N, Haller B, Klaiber B, Munchenberg K. Randqualitat gesinterter ind gepresster Keramikilays nach Belastung im Kausimulator. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1993;48:713-716.
46. Siervo S, Bandettini B, Siervo P, Falleni A, Siervo R. The Celay system: A comparison of the fit of direct and indirect fabrication techniques. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:434-439.
47. Sorensen JA, McLaren E, Avera SP. Marginal fidelity and micro-leakage of ceramic inlay systems [abstract 140). J Dent Res 1994;73:119.
48. Noack MJ. Die Passgenauigteit von Komposit-, Glaskeramik-und Keramikinlays. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1994;49:873-878.
49. Noack MJ, van Meerbeek B, Roulet JF, Lambrechts P. Marginal behavior of 10 different tooth-colored inlay systems in vivo. J Dent Res 1995;74:165.
50. Kawai K, Hayashi M, Torii M, Tsuchitani Y. Marginal adaptability and fit of ceramic milled inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:1,414-1,419.
51. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE. Choosing a multiple-comparison technique. In: Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE (eds). Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. Boston: PWS-Kent, 1988:373-374.
52. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984;63:1,396-1,399.
53. Davidson CL, van Zeghbroeck L, Feilzer AJ. Destructive stresses in adhesive luting cements. J Dent Res 1991;70:880-882.
54. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1,636-1,639.
55. Verzijden CW, Feilzer AJ, Creugers NH, Davidson CL. The influence of polymerisation shrinkage of resin cements on bonding to metal. J Dent Res 1992;71:410-413.
56. Diaz-Arnold AM, Williams VD, Aquilino SA. The effect of film thickness on the tensile bond strength of a prosthodontic adhesive. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:614-618.
57. Ghana HS, Ibbetson RJ, Pearson GJ, Eder A. The influence of cement thickness on the tensile strength of two resin cements. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:340-344.
58. Wu JC, Wilson PR. Optimal cement space for resin luting cement. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:209-215.
59. Ariyaratnam M, Wilson MA, Wilson NH, Watts DC. Variation in thickness of the composite lute with an indirect composite inlay system. Restorative Dent 1990;6:16-18.