A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays

Quintessence International

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 199-205

  Thordrup, Marianne ^a   Isidor, Flemming ^a   Hörsted Bindslev, Preben ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AARHUS   (Denmark)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; Ceramic inlays; Clinical trials; Resin composite inlays

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; BRILLIANT DIRECT INLAY RESIN; BRILLIANT DIRECT-INLAY RESIN; CEREC; ESTILUX GLAZE; RESIN; TOOTH CEMENT; VITADUR N;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENDODONTICS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LIFE TABLE; METHODOLOGY; RECURRENT DISEASE; RETREATMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INLAYS; LIFE TABLES; LINEAR MODELS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); RECURRENCE; RETREATMENT; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0035279915     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE. Selection of restorative materials, reasons for replacement, and longevity of restorations in Florida. J Am Coll Dent 1998;65:27-33.
2. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Accomplishments and expectations with posterior composite resins. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC (eds). International Symposium on Posterior Composite Resin Dental Restorative Materials, ed 3. St. Paul: Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing, 1985:521-540.
3. Letzel H. Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial. J Dent 1989;17:S10-S17.
4. Mjör IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:58-63.
5. Craig RG. Ceramics. Restorative Dental Materials, ed 8. St. Louis: Mosby, 1989:481-498.
6. Roulet JF, Herder S. Keramik als Füllungsmaterial für Seitenzahnkavitäten. Zahnärztl Mitt 1989;79:908-913.
7. Hannig M, Albers HK. Kompositinlays aus SR-Isosit im klinischen kurzzeittest. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1990;45: 236-239.
8. Wendt SL Jr, Leinfelder KF. The clinical evaluation of heat-treated composite resin inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 120: 177-181.
9. Haas M, Arnetzl G, Wegscheider WA, König K, Bratschko RO. Klinische und Werkstoffkundliche Erfahrungen mit Komposit-, Keramik- und Goldinlays. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1992;47:18-22.
10. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, Noack MJ, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Roulet J-F, Vanherle G. Marginal adaptation of four tooth-colored inlay systems in vivo. J Dent 1992;20:18-26.
11. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. A one-year clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays. Scand J Dent Res 1994;102:186-192.
12. Tidehag P, Gunne J. A 2-year Clinical Follow-up Study of IPS Empress Ceramic Inlays. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8: 456-460.
13. Friedl K-H, Schmalz G, Hiller K-A, Sailer A. In-vivo evaluation of a feldspathic ceramic system: 2-year results. J Dent 1996;24:25-31.
14. Qualthrough AJE, Wilson NHF. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a porcelain inlay system. J Dent 1996;24:317-323.
15. Shearer AC, Thordrup M, Hörsted-Bindslev P, Wilson NHF. A milled ceramic inlay-onlay system: A report from a series of cases. British Dent J 1998;185:283-286.
16. Roulet J-F. Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam-results up to 6 years. Clin Oral Invest 1997;1:40-46.
17. Berg NG, Derand T. A 5-year evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec). Swed Dent J 1997;21:121-127.
18. Hayashi M, Tsuchitani Y, Miura M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. 6-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 1998;23:318-326.
19. Sjögren G, Molin M, Van Dijken JWV. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 1998;56:263-267.
20. Van Dijken JV, Ahberg CH, Olofsson AL. Fired ceramic inlays: A 6-year follow up. J Dent 1998;26:219-225.
21. Mörmann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F, Barbakow F. Chairside computer-aided direct ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int 1989;20:329-339.
22. Ryge G. The California Dental Association Quality Evaluation System: A standard for self-assessment. In: Anusavice KJ (ed). Quality Evaluation of Dental Restorations. Quintessence Publishing, 1989:273-290.
23. Jokstad A, Mjor IA, Qvist V. The age of restorations in situ. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52:234-242.
24. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjor IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;48:305-311.
25. Van Dijken JWV, Kieri C, Carlén M. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res 1999;78:1319-1325.
26. Rowe AHR. A five year study of the clinical performance of a posterior composite resin restorative material. J Dent 1989;17:S6-S9.
27. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP, Holston AM, Gingell JC. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int 1991;22:143-151.
28. Rasmusson CG, Lundin SA. Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: Five year results. Swed Dent J 1995;19:173-182.
29. Raskin A, Michotte-Theal B, Vreven J, Wilson NHF. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite 10-year report. J Dent 1999;27:13-19.
30. Van Dijken JW, Hörstedt P. Effect of the use of rubber dam on marginal adaptation of composite fillings placed with the acid etch technique. Acta Odontol Scand 1987;45:303-308.
31. Fuzzi M, Rappelli G. Survival rate of ceramic inlays. J Dent 1998;26:623-626.
32. Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD, Roberson TM. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays. A four-year study. JADA 1996; 127:1171-1181.
33. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. A 3-year study of inlays milled from machinable ceramic blocks representing 2 different inlay systems. Quintessence Int 1999;12: 829-836.
34. Wilder AD, May KN, Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Leinfelder KF. Seventeen-year clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite class I and II restorations. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11:135-143.
35. Jorgensen KD. Restorative resins: Abrasion vs. mechanical properties. Scand J Dent Res 1980;88:557-568.
36. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF. Localized wear and marginal integrity of posterior resin composites. Am J Dent 1993;6: 199-203.