A retrospective study of mirage ceramic inlays over up to 9 years

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 510-514

  Schulz, Peter ^a,c   Johansson, Anders ^a   Arvidson, Kristina ^b  

^a POSTGRADUATE DENTAL EDUCATION CENTER   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^c NONE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTISTRY; DENTURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; BICUSPID; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INLAYS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; RETREATMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; SEX FACTORS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0141993782     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Hensten-Pettersen A, Jacobsen N, Gjerdet R. Adverse reactions to dental materials. In: Karlsson S, Nilner K, Dahl BL (eds). A Textbook of Fixed Prosthodontics. The Scandinavian Approach. Stockholm: Gothia, 2000:131-144.
2. Qualtrough AJE, Wilson NHF, Smith GA. The porcelain inlay: A historical view. Oper Dent 1990;15:61-70.
3. McLean JW. Evolution of dental ceramics in the twentieth century. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:61-66.
4. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-853.
5. Bowen RL, Marjenhoff WA. Development of an adhesive bonding system. Oper Dent 1992;(suppl 5):75-80.
6. Tseng EY, Cooley RL, Evans JG. Porcelain to dentine bond strength with a dentine adhesive. J Esthet Dent 1992;4:131-133.
7. Burke FJT. The effect in bonding procedure on fracture resistance of dentin-bonded all-ceramic crowns. Quintessence Int 1995;26:293-300.
8. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:135-141.
9. Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restoration. Am J Dent 2000;13:60-76.
10. Roulet JF, Janda R. Future ceramic systems. Oper Dent 2001;(suppl 6):211-228.
11. Hondrum SO. A review of the strength properties of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:859-865.
12. McLean JW. The Science and Art of Dental Ceramics. Volumes I and II: The Nature of Dental Ceramics and Their Clinical Use. Chicago: Quintessence, 1979.
13. Molin MK, Karlsson SL. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:194-200.
14. Manhart J, Chen HY, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R. Three-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays. Am J Dent 2001;14:95-99.
15. Höglund-Åberg C, Van Dijken J, Olofsson AL. Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer cement. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52:140-149.
16. Tidehag P, Gunne J. A 2-year clinical follow-up study of IPS Empress ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:456-460.
17. Fradeani M, Aquilano A, Bassein L. Longitudinal study of pressed glass-ceramic inlays for four and a half years. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:346-353.
18. Hayashi M, Tsuchitani Y, Miura M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. 6-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 1998;23:318-326.
19. Pallesen U, van Dijken JWV. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system. Eur J Oral Sci 2000;108:239-246.
20. van Dijken J, Höglund-Åberg C, Olofsson AL. Fired ceramic inlays: A 6-year follow up. J Dent 1998;26:219-225.
21. Molin M, Karlsson S. A clinical evaluation of the Optec inlay system. Acta Odontol Scand 1992;50:227-233.
22. Fuzzi M, Rappelli G. Survival rate of ceramic inlays. J Dent 1998;26:623-626.
23. Isidor F, Brondum K. A clinical evaluation of porcelain inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:140-144.
24. Gemalmaz D, Ozcan M, Alkumru HN. A clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays bonded with different luting agents. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:273-283.
25. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW. A five-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 1998;56:263-267.
26. Hayashi M, Tsuchitani Y, Kawamura Y, Miura M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 2000;25:473-481.
27. Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Kramer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays after six years: Clinical behaviour. Oper Dent 2000;25:459-465.
28. Otto T, De Nisco S. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: A 10-year prospective clinial study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:122-128.
29. California Dental Association. Quality Evaluation for Dental Care: Guidelines for the Assessment of Clinical Quality and Professional Performance. Los Angeles: CDA, 1977.
30. Rykke M. Dental materials for posterior restorations. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992;8:139-148.
31. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:45-64.
32. Milleding P, Örtengren U, Karlsson S. Ceramic inlay systems: Some clinical aspects. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:571-580.
33. Helkimo E, Carlsson GE, Helkimo M. Bite force and state of dentition. Acta Odontol Scand 1977;35:297-303.
34. Eikenberg S, Shurtleff J. Effect of hydration on bond strength of a silane-bonded composite to porcelain after seven months. Gen Dent 1996;44:58-61.
35. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petscheldt A. Fatigue behaviour of different dentin adhesives. Clin Oral Investig 1999;3:11-17.
36. Milleding P, Wennerberg A, Alaeddin S, Karlsson S, Simon E. Surface corrosion of dental materials in vitro. Biomaterials 1999;20:384-392.
37. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 year. J Dent Res 2000;79:1385-1391.