Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays

Dental Materials

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 463-469

  Rosentritt, Martin ^a   Behr, Michael ^a   Lang, Reinhold ^a   Handel, Gerhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cement; Marginal integrity; MiCroleakage

Indexed keywords

BONDING; BONE CEMENT; CERAMIC PRODUCTS; CURING; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATES; RESINS; THERMAL CYCLING;

MARGINAL INTEGRITY; MICROLEAKAGE;

DENTAL MATERIALS;

COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; VITREMER;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 1842682444     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Diaz Arnold A.M., Vargas M.A., Haselton D.R. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 81:1999;135-141.
2. Ruse N.D. What is a compomer? J Can Dent Assoc. 65:1999;500-504.
3. Silverstone L. The acid etch technique: In vitro studies with special reference to the enamel surface and enamel-resin interface. Proc Int Symp Acid Etch Tech. 1975;North Central Publishing, St Paul, Minn., USA.
4. Perdigao J., Lopes M. Dentin bonding-State of the art 1999. Compendium. 20:1999;1151-1162.
5. Inoue S., Van Meerbeek B., Vargas M., Yoshig'da Y., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. Advanced Adhesive Dentistry-3rd International Kurara Symposium. 1st ed Adhesion mechanism of self-etching adhesives. 2000;Como, Italy.
6. Roulet J.F., Reich T., Blunck U., Noack M. Quantitative margin analysis in the scanning electron microscopy. Scanning Microsc. 3:1989;147-159.
7. Griffiths B.M., Watson T.F., Sherriff M. The influence of dentine bonding systems and their handling characteristics on the morphology and micropermeability of the dentine adhesive interface. J Dent. 27:1999;63-71.
8. Technical Data Sheet Espertise. 3M Espe; 2002.
9. Rosentritt M., Leibrock A., Lang R., Scharnagl M., Behr M., Handel G. Regensburger masticator. Mater Test. 3:(39):1997;77-80.
10. Krejci I., Lutz F. In-vitro test results of the evaluation of dental restoration systems. Correlation with in-vivo results. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 100:1990;1445-1449.
11. Brosius G., Brosius F. SPSS Base System und Professional Statistics. 1st edn :1995;International Thomson Publishing, Bonn.
12. Leinfelder K.F. Current status of dentine adhesive systems. Alpha Omegan. 91:1998;17-22.
13. van Dijken J.W.V., Örmin A., Olofsson A.L. Clinical performance of pressed ceramic inlays luted with resin-modified glass-ionomer and autopolymerizing resin composite cement. J Prosthet Dent. 8:1999;529-535.
14. Phrukkanon S., Burrow M.F., Tyas M.J. The effect of dentine location and tubule orientation on the bond strengths between resin and dentine. J Dent. 27:1999;265-274.
15. Mitchell C.A., Douglas W.H. Comparison of the porosity of handmixed and capsulated glass-ionomer luting cements. Biomaterials. 18:1997;921-929.
16. Kiyomura M. Bonding strength to bovine dentin with 4-Meta/Mma-TBB resin. Long-term stability and influence of water. J Jpn Dent Mater. 6:1987;860-872.
17. Koibuchi H., Yasuda N., Nakabayashi N. Bonding to dentin with a self-etching primer: the effect of smear layers. Dent Mater. 17:2001;122-126.
18. Irie M., Suzuki K., Windmüller B. Effect of one-day storage on marginal gap of composite inlays. J Dent Res. 81:(A-415):2002;3365.