Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 275-281

  Ozturk, Nilgün ^a   Aykent, Filiz ^a  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; DENTIN; EVALUATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZATION; ROOM TEMPERATURE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STEREOMICROSCOPY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH EXTRACTION; ADHESION; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIME; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ALUMINUM SILICATE; CERAMCO; CLEARFIL LINER BOND 2; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PANAVIA FLUORO; PANAVIA-FLUORO; RESIN CEMENT;

ADHESIVENESS; ALUMINUM SILICATES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0037629990     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2003.37     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Dietschi D, Maeder M, Meyer JM, Holz J. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth. Quintessence Int 1990;21:823-31.
2. Fradeani M, Aquilano A, Bassein L. Longitudinal study of pressed glass ceramic inlays for four and a half years. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:346-53.
3. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M, Heinzmann JL. Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:425-30.
4. Abel MG. In-office inlays with today's new materials. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42:657-64.
5. Gemalmaz D, Ozcan M, Yoruç AB, Alkumru HN. Marginal adaptation of a sintered ceramic inlay system before and after cementation. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:646-51.
6. Mitchem JC. The use and abuse of aesthetic materials in posterior teeth. Int Dent J 1988;8:119-25.
7. Qualtrough AJ, Wilson NH, Smith GA. Porcelain inlay: a historical view. Oper Dent 1990;15:61-70.
8. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:1-20.
9. Inokoshi S, Willems G, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Dual-cure luting composites: Part I: Filler particle distribution. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:133-46.
10. Sjogren G, Molin M, Van Dijken J, Bergman M. Ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with either a dual-cured or a chemically cured composite resin luting agent. A 2-year clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:325-30.
11. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-53.
12. Eliades G. Clinical relevance of the formulation and testing of dentine bonding systems. J Dent 1994;22:73-81.
13. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivitiy of dentin bonding: Effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2000;25:324-30.
14. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 1995;11:117-25.
15. El-Mowafy OM, Benmergui C. Radiopacity of resin-based inlay luting cements. Oper Dent 1994;19:11-5.
16. Oram DA, Pearson GJ. A survey of current practice into the use of aesthetic inlays. Br Dent J 1994;176:457-62.
17. Milleding P, Ortengren U, Karlsson S. Ceramic inlay systems: some clinical aspects. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:571-80.
18. Paul SJ, Scharer P. The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:536-45.
19. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:111-21.
20. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 1998;14:212-21.
21. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2000;16:180-7.
22. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, et al. The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:299-309.