Evaluation of the Fatigue Behavior of the Resin-Dentin Bond with the Use of Different Methods

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 712-721

  Frankenberger, Roland ^a   Strobel, Wolfgang O ^a   Krämer, Norbert ^a   Lohbauer, Ulrich ^a   Winterscheidt, Jens ^b   Winterscheidt, Britta ^b   Petschelt, Anselm ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Bond strength; Dentin bonding; Fatigue; Internal adaptation; Margin analysis; Resin composites

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVES; DENTAL AMALGAMS; FATIGUE OF MATERIALS; RESINS; THERMOMECHANICAL TREATMENT; TOOTH ENAMEL;

DYNAMIC DENTIN BOND STRENGTHS;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

RESIN; TISSUE ADHESIVE;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; DENTIN; DENTISTRY; FATIGUE; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SHEAR STRESS; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH EXTRACTION;

EID: 0346874513     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.10052     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:1-20.
2. Eick JD, Cobb CM, Chappel P, Spencer P, Robinson SJ. The dentinal surface: Its influence on dentinal adhesion. Part I. Quintessence Int 1991;22:967-977.
3. Eick JD, Robinson SJ, Chappell P, Cobb CM, Spencer P. The dentinal surface: Its influence on dentinal adhesion. Part III. Quintessence Int 1993;24:571-582.
4. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-1640.
5. Haller B, Trojanski A. Effect of multi step dentin bonding systems and resin modified glass ionomer cement liner on marginal quality of dentin bonded resin composite class II restorations. Clin Oral Invest 1998;2:130-136.
6. Perdigao J., Lopes M. Dentin bonding - Questions for the new millennium. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:199-209.
7. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34:849-854.
8. Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:1033-1042.
9. Hickel R, Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13 (Special Issue):41D-54D.
10. Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years - Clinical behavior. Oper Dent 2000;25:459-465.
11. McCabe JF, Rusby S. Dentine bonding - The effect of precuring the bonding resin. Br Dent J 1994;176:333-336.
12. Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Yildiz E, Yucel T, Vanherle G. The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent 1996;9:167-173.
13. Miyazaki M, Mikitake S, Onose H, Moore K. Influence of thermal cycling on dentin bond strength of two step bonding systems. Am J Dent 1998;11:118-122.
14. Finger WJ, Fritz U. Laboratory evaluation of one component enamel/dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 1996;9:206-210.
15. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Fatigue behaviour of different dentin adhesives. Clin Oral Invest 1999;3:11-17.
16. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. "No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives - A microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2001;17:373-380.
17. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical relevance of laboratory fatigue studies. J Dent 1994;22:97-102.
18. Sanders Tavares da Cunha Mello F, Feilzer AJ, DeGee AJ, Davidson CL. Sealing ability of eight resin bonding systems in class II restoration after mechanical fatigue. Dent Mater 1997; 13:372-376.
19. Sudsangiam S, van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose? J Adhes Dent 1999;1:57-67.
20. Drummond JL, Sakaguchi RL, Racean DC, Wozny J, Steinberg AD. Testing mode and surface treatment effects on dentin bonding. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;32:533-541.
21. Dewji HR, Drummond JL, Fadavi S, Punwani I. Bond strength of Bis GMA and glass ionomer pit and fissure sealants using cyclic fatigue. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:594-599.
22. Wakefield CW, Draughn RA, Sneed WD, Davis TN. Shear bond strengths of six bonding systems using the pushout method of in vitro testing. Oper Dent 1998;23:69-76.
23. Patierno JM, Rueggeberg FA, Anderson RW, Weller RN, Pashley DH. Push-out strength and SEM evaluation of resin composite bonded to internal cervical dentin. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996;12:227-236.
24. Roydhouse RH, Punch shear test for dental purposes. J Dent Res 1970;49:131-136.
25. Dhert WJ, Verheyen CC, Braak LH, de Wijn JR, Klein CP, de Groot K, Rozing PM. A finite element analysis of the push-out test: Influence of test conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26: 119-130.
26. Kimura N. Reduction of the bond strength obtained by the proposed push out method. J Jpn Dent Mater 1985;5:559-565.
27. Draughn RA. Compressive fatigue limits of composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1979;58:1093-1096.
28. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Pelka M, Petschelt A. Internal adaptation and overhang formation of direct Class II resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Invest 1999;3:208-215.