Marginal integrity after fatigue loading of ceramic inlay restorations luted with three different cements

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 77-80

  Abdalla, Ali I ^a   Davidson, Carel L ^b  

^a Tanta University   (Egypt)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DYE; DYRACT CEM; DYRACT-CEM; GLASS IONOMER; KETAC CEM; KETAC-CEM; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TOOTH CEMENT; VARIOLINK; ZINC OXIDE;

ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; THERMODYNAMICS; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DYES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMAN; INLAYS; MAGNESIUM OXIDE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; THERMODYNAMICS; ZINC OXIDE;

EID: 0034173024     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Binns D. The chemical and physical properties of porcelain. In: McLean JW. Dental ceramics: Proceding of the first international symposium on ceramics. Chicago: Quintessence, 1983;41-82.
2. Dietschi D, Maeder M, Meyer J-M, et al. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain bonded to tooth. Quint Int 1990;21;823-831.
3. Jensen ME, Redford AD, Wilson BT, et al. Posterior etched porcelain restorations. An in vitro study. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1987;8:615-621.
4. De Long R, Douglas WH. Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restorative resin. J Am Dent Assoc 1983;85;101-108.
5. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays. J Dent 1993;21:39-64.
6. Dijken van JW, Horstedt P. Marginal breakdown of fired porcelain inlays cemented with glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement or resin composite. J Dent 1994;22:265-272.
7. Fritz UB, Finger WJ, Uno S. Resin modified glass ionomer cements: bonding to enamel and dentin. Dent Mat 1996;12:161-166.
8. Nakajima IT, Watkins JM, Arita K, et al. Mechanical properties of glass ionomer under static and dynamic loading. Dent Mater 1996;21:30-37.
9. Braem MJA, Davidson CL, Lambrechts P, et al. In vitro flexural fatigue limits of dental composite. J Biomed Mater Res 1994;23:1397-1402.
10. Braem MJA, Lambrechts P, Gladys S, et al. In vitro fatigue behavior of restorative composites and glass ionomers. Dent Mater 1995;11:137-141.
11. Peutzfeldt A. Compomers and glass ionomers: Bond strength to dentin and mechanical properties. Am J Dent 1996;9:259-263.
12. Davidson CL, Van Zeghbroeck L, Feilzer AJ. Destructive stresses in adhesive luting cements. J Dent Res 1991;70:880-882.
13. Barkmeier WW, Cavel WT, Kelsey WP. Clinical evaluation of Dicor light activated cements. J Dent Res 1987;66:132 (Abstr 205).
14. Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1987:66:1460-1465.
15. Dietschi D, Maeder M. Holz J. In vitro evaluation of marginal fit and morphology of fired ceramic inlays. Quint Int 1992;23:271-278.
16. Derand T. Stress analysis of cemented or resin bonded porcelain inlays. Dent Mater 1991;7:21-24.
17. Davidson CL, Abdalla AI. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of Class II resin composite restorations. Am J Dent 1993;6:39-42.
18. Burke FJT. Tooth fracture in vivo and in vitro: A review. J Dent 1992;20: 131-139.