Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite class II inlay restorations: A 3D-FEA study

Dental Materials

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 862-872

  Ausiello, Pietro ^a   Rengo, Sandro ^a   Davidson, Carel L ^b   Watts, David C ^c  

^a School of Dentistry   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D finite elements; Analysis; Class II MOD inlay restorations; Dental materials; Occlusal loading; Resin cements; Stress distribution simulation

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; CERAMIC MATERIALS; ELASTIC MODULI; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; LOADS (FORCES); MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RESINS; STRESS CONCENTRATION;

CAVITIES; CERAMIC-INLAY MODELS; STRESS DISSIPATION; VERTICAL LOADING;

COMPOSITE MATERIALS;

RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MASTICATION; METHODOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; VALIDATION STUDY;

BICUSPID; BITE FORCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTICITY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INLAYS; RESIN CEMENTS;

EID: 4644338380     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Adhesive metal-free restorations: current concepts for the esthetic treatment of posterior teeth. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc; 1997p. 60-77.
2. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Mechanical properties of heat treated restorative resins for use in the inlay/onlay technique. Scand J Dent Res 1990;98(6):564-7.
3. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of UEDMA BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater 1998;14(1):51-6.
4. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:4-64.
5. Sorensen JA, Munksgaard EC. Relative gap formation adjacent to ceramic inlays with combinations of resin cements and dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76(5):472-6.
6. Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13(Spec No): 60D-76D. November, Review.
7. Burke FJ, Fleming GJ, Nathanson D, Marquis PM. Are adhesive technologies needed to support ceramics? An assessment of the current evidence. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4(1):7-22.
8. Manhart J, Chen HY, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R. Three-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays. Am J Dent 2001;14(2): 95-9.
9. Davidson CL. Resisting the curing contraction with adhesive composites. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55(4):446-7.
10. Dietschi D, Moor L. Evaluation of the marginal and internal adaptation of different ceramic and composite inlay systems after an in vitro fatigue test. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1(1):41-56.
11. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990;69:1250-3.
12. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal Integrity related to bond strength and elasticity of the composite resin restorative system. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:258-64.
13. Davidson CL. Lining and elasticity. In: Dondi dall'Orologio G, Prati C, editors. Factors influencing the quality of composite restorations, theory and practice. Carimate, Italy: AriesdueS.r.L.; 1997. ISBN, 88-900175-0-3.
14. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Comparison of the marginal integrity of in vivo and in vitro Class II composite restorations J Dent 1993;21(3):158-62.
15. Watts DC, Marouf AS, Al-Hindi AM. Photo-polymerization shrinkage-stress kinetics in resin-composites: methods development. Dent Mater 2003;19(1):1-11.
16. Torii Y, Itou K, Itota T, Hama K, Konishi N, Nagamine M, Inoue K. Influence of filler content and gap dimension on wear resistance of resin composite luting cements around a CAD/CAM ceramic inlay restoration. Dent Mater J 1999; 18(4):453-61.
17. Ausiello P, Rengo S, Apicella A, Davidson CL. 3D-finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upper premolar, restored with resin-based composites. J Biomech 2001;34(10):1269-77.
18. Ausiello P, Apicella A, Davidson CL. Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress-distribution in composite restorationsa 3D finite element analysis. Dent Mat 2002;18(4):295-303.
19. Darendeliler SY, Alacam T, Yaman Y. Analysis of stress-distribution in a maxillary central incisor subjected to various post and core application. J Endodont 1998;24: 107-11.
20. Verluis A. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses?. J Dent Res 1996;75(3): 871-8.
21. Dietschi D. Evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of adhesive Class II restorations. In vitro fatigue test. PhD Thesis, Amsterdam; 2003
22. Tortopidis D, Lyons MF, Baxendale RH, Gilmour WH. The variability of bite force measurement between sessions, in different positions within the dental arch. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25(9):681-6.
23. Bakke M, Michler L, Moller E. Occlusal control of mandibular elevator muscles. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100(5):284-91.
24. Ausiello P, De Gee AJ, Rengo S, Davidson CL. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars adhesively restored. Am J Dent 1997;10(5):237-41.
25. de Freitas CR, Miranda MI, de Andrade MF, Flores VH, Vaz LG, Guimaraes C. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of Class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer. Quintessence Int 2002;33(8):589-94.
26. Abu-Hassan MI, Abu-Hammad OA, Harrison A. Stress-distribution associated with loaded ceramic onlay restorations with different designs of marginal preparation. An FEA study. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27(4):294-8.
27. Gemalmaz D, Ozcan M, Alkumru HN. A clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays bonded with different luting agents. J Adhes Dent 2001;3(3):273-8.