Adhesive luting of indirect restorations

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 13, Issue 5 SPEC. ISS., 2000, Pages

  Krämer, Norbert ^a   Lohbauer, Ulrich ^a   Frankenberger, Roland ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENTS; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILICON DIOXIDE;

CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; FLOW KINETICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ULTRASOUND; ULTRASTRUCTURE; VISCOSITY;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ALUMINUM SILICATES; CERAMICS; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTIN; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMAN; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); RESIN CEMENTS; RHEOLOGY; SILICON DIOXIDE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; ULTRASONICS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0034331342     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (188)

1. Krejci I, Lutz F, Krejci D. Zahnfarbene Seitenzahnrestaurationen. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1991; 101:1163-1168.
2. Burke FJT, Qualtrough AJ. Tooth colored inlays: State of the art. J Ir Dent Assoc 1992; 38:2-6.
3. Christensen GJ. Current use of tooth-colored inlays, onlays, and direct-placement resins. J Esthet Dent 1998; 10:290-295.
4. Hickel R. Modern filling materials (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1997; 52:572-585.
5. Roulet JF. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam. J Dent 1997; 25:459-473.
6. Inokoshi S, Willems G, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Dual cure luting composites -Part I: Filler particle distribution. J Oral Rehabil 1993; 20:133-146.
7. Habernicht G. Kleben - Grundlagen, Technologie, Anwendungen. 2. Auflage. 2. Auflage ed. Berlin: Springer. 1990.
8. Janda R. Kleben und Klebertechniken (Teil I). Dental Labor 1992; 40:409-415.
9. Ruyter IE. The chemistry of adhesive agents. Oper Dent 1992; 5:32-43.
10. Eppenberger J, Marinello CP, Scherle W, et al. Komposit als Befestigungszement? Erste klinischen Erfahrungen in der Kronen- und Brückenprothetik. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1987; 97:1237-1250.
11. Schäffer H, Dumfahrt H, Gauch K. Oberflächenstruktur und Substanzverlust beim Ätzen keramischer Materialien. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1989; 99:530-543.
12. Janda R. Zahnärztliche Befestigungsmaterialien. Dental Echo 1996; 66:36-38.
13. Salz U. Adhäsive Befestigung von Vollkeramik-Restaurationen. Vivadent Report 1994; 10:9-20.
14. Schmalz G, Federlin M, Geurtsen W. Are ceramic inlays and veneers scientifically established? (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1994; 49:197-208.
15. Lutz F, Philips RW, Roulet J-F, et al. Komposits-Klassifikation und Wertung. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1983; 93:914-929.
16. Christensen GJ. A promising new category of dental cements. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126:781-782.
17. Aboush YE, Torabzadeh H. Fluoride release from tooth-colored restorative materials: A 12-month report. J Can Dent Assoc 1998; 64:561-4, 568.
18. Sindel J, Frankenberger R, Krämer N, et al. Crack formation of all-ceramic crowns dependent on different core build-up and luting materials. J Dent 1999; 27:175-181.
19. Lambrechts P, Inokoshi S, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Classification and potential of composite luting materials. In: Mörmann WH, ed. International Symposium on Computer Restorations. The State of the Art of Cerec Method. Proceedings. Berlin: Quintessence. 1991: 61-90.
20. Wu JC, Wilson PR. Resin luting cements for full coverage restorations. Aust Prosthod J 1994; 8:55-64.
21. Hasegawa EA, Boyer DB, Chan DCN. Hardening of dual-cured cements under composite resin inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66:187-192.
22. El-Badrawy WA, El-Mowafy OM. Chemical versus dual curing of resin inlay cements. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73:515-524.
23. Al-Mouzayn MS, El-Mowafy OM, El-Badrawy WA. Knoop microhardness of dual-cure resin cements. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 539 (Abstr 3165).
24. El-Mowafy OM, Rubo MH, El-Badrawy WA. Hardening of new resin cements cured through a ceramic inlay. Oper Dent 1999; 24:38-44.
25. Noack MJ. A new method to lute tooth colored inlays with highly filled composite resins. J Dent Res 1991; 70:457 (Abstr 1528).
26. Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R, Petschelt A. Die Ultraschalleinsetztechnik am Beispiel des Pertac-Hybridinlay-Systems. Zahnärztl Welt 1992; 101:764-768.
27. Noack MJ, Locke LJS, Roulet JF. Margin quality of porcelain inlays inserted adhesively and by ultrasonic insertion (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1993; 48:720-723.
28. Blackman R, Barghi N, Duke E. Influence of ceramic thickness on the polymerization of light-cured resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63:295-300.
29. Hickel R, Heid M, Kunzelmann K-H, et al. Curing depth of light curing composites under ceramic material (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1992; 47:182-185.
30. Hickel R, Kunzelmann K-H. Neuer Stand der zahnfarbenen Seitenzahnrestaurationen. Zahnärztl Mit 1992; 82:74-84.
31. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Davidson CL, et al. Dual Cure luting composites - Part II. J Oral Rehabil 1994; 21:57-66.
32. International Organization for Standardization. Dental water-based cements, ISO 9917. 1991 Geneva.
33. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 4049 Dentistry -Polymer-based filling, restorative and luting materials. International Organization for Standardization, editor. 2000. Geneva.
34. Sindel J, Schuh H, Krämer N. Film thickness of dental resin based luting materials using ultrasonic energy. J Dent Res 1995; 74:939 (Abstr 229).
35. Krämer N. Die Klebefuge bei zahnfarbenen Inlays - Ein locus minoris resistentiae? Erlangen: Lengenfelder. 1999. PhD Thesis.
36. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, et al. A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater 1992; 8:310-319.
37. Schiffner U. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Speicheldiagnostik innerhalb der Individualprophylaxe. Oralprophylaxe 1997; 19:33-39.
38. Schiffner U, Knop B. Ultrasound-activated compomers of fissure sealing? (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996; 51:687-689.
39. Hickel R, Kremers L, Haffner C. Kompomere. Quintessenz 1996; 47:1581-1589.
40. Thonemann B, Federlin M, Schmalz G, et al. Resin-modified glass-ionomers for luting posterior ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 1995; 11:161-168.
41. Krämer N, Sindel J, Petschelt A. Effects of the filler content of hybrid composites of film thickness (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996; 51: 166-168.
42. Peutzfeld A. Effect of the ultrasonic insertion technique on the seating of composite inlays. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52:51-54.
43. Krämer N, Pelka M, Petschelt A. Comparison of luting composites using the high viscosity cementation technique. J Dent Res 1995; 74:537 (Abstr 1096).
44. Øilo G, Evje DM. Film thickness of dental luting cements. Dent Mater 1986; 2:85-89.
45. Krämer N, Schoch M, Frankenberger R, et al. Luting composite resin behavior in vivo - Four year results. J Dent Res 1998; 77:1257 (Abstr 402).
46. Bodenheim G, Frankenberger R, Schoch M, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new ceramic luting system - Six months follow-up. J Dent Res 1999; 78:308 (Abstr 1622).
47. Noack MJ. The radiopacity of tooth-colored inlay materials and luting composites . J Dent Res 1993; 72:178 (Abstr 598).
48. Krejci I, Lutz F. Tulux-Zement. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1989; 99:455-459.
49. Buchalla W, Trett A, Attin T, et al. Farbstabilität fotochromer Befestigungskomposite. Presentation at the AFG. 2000. Mainz.
50. Edelhoff D, Marx R. Bond strength of composite resins to all-ceramic materials after various surface treatment methods (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1995; 50:112-117.
51. Sindel J, Kunzelmann KH. Comparison of the etching characteristics of leucite glass ceramics (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1993; 48:478-480.
52. Kupiec KA, Wuertz KM, Barkmeier WW, et al. Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for composite-to-porcelain repair. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76:119-124.
53. Diaz-Amold AM, Aquilino SA. An evaluation of the bond strengths of four organosilane materials in response to thermal stress. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62:257-260.
54. Stokes AN, Hood JA. Thermocycling, silane priming, and resin/porcelain interfaces - An electrical leakage study. Dent Mater 1989; 5:369-370.
55. Bailey LF, Bennett RJ. Dicor surface treatments for enhanced bonding. J Dent Res 1988; 67:925-931.
56. Hayakawa T, Horie K, Aida M, et al. The influence of surface conditions and silane agents on the bond of resin to dental porcelain. Dent Mater 1992; 8:238-240.
57. Nicholls JI. Tensile bond of resin cements to porcelain veneers. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 60:443-447.
58. Thurmond JW, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72:355-359.
59. Wirz J, Müller W, Schmidli F. Neue Verfahren für den Kunststoff-Metall-Verbund. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1992; 102:1-19.
60. Kern M, Thompson VP. The adhesive bond between alumina ceramics and dental enamel after prolonged storage in water (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996; 51:169-172.
61. Bodenheim G, Sindel J, Frankenberger R, et al. Bond strengths of luting composites to IPS Empress after silica coating. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 678 (Abstr 369).
62. Lohbauer U, Raithel P, Frankenberger R, et al. Scherfestigkeit von Befestigungskompositen auf unterschiedlich konditionierten Keramikoberflächen. In: Hetzer G, Krämer N, Hellwig E, ed. Autoreferate-Band. Quintessenz 2000; Berlin: 54-55.
63. Thonemann B, Federlin M, Schmalz G, et al. Clinical evaluation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic inlays in vivo: 2-year results. Clin Oral Invest 1997; 1:27-34.
64. Christgau M, Friedl KH, Schmalz G, et al. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to dentin in vitro. Oper Dent 1999; 24:137-146.
65. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, et al. In-vivo evaluation of a feldspathic ceramic system: 2-year results. J Dent 1996; 24:25-31.
66. Krämer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M, et al. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years - A clinical study. J Dent 1999; 27:325-331.
67. Sindel J, Petschelt A. Effect of the incremental technique on the biaxial flexure strength (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996; 51:273-275.
68. Boyer DB, Chan KC, Reinhardt JW. Build-up and repair of light-cured composites: Bond strength. J Dent Res 1984; 63:1241-1244.
69. Krejci I. Zahnfarbene adhäsive Inlays. In: Krejci I, ed. Zahnfarbene Restaurationen. München Wien: Carl Hanser Verlag. 1992: 2-54.
70. Latta MA, Barkmeier WW. Bond strength of a resin cement to a cured composite inlay material. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72:189-193.
71. Swift EJ Jr, Brodeur C, Cvitko E, et al. Treatment of composite surfaces for indirect bonding. Dent Mater 1992; 8:193-196.
72. Kunzelmann K-H, Buschhorn S, Mehl A, et al. Bond strength of conventional and ultrasonically Activated bonding composite resins. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 182-182.
73. DeSchepper EJ, Tate WH, Powers JM. Bond strength of resin cements to microfilled composites. Am J Dent 1993; 6:235-238.
74. Tate WH, DeSchepper EJ, Powers JM. Bond strength of resin cements to a hybrid composite. Am J Dent 1993; 6:195-198.
75. Krämer N, Popp S, Sindel J, et al. Effects of surface pretreatment on bond strength of composite inlays (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996; 51:598-601.
76. Frankenberger R, Schmidt G, Radakovic T, et al. Fatigue bond strength of a luting composite to composite inlays. J Dent Res 2000; 79:454 (Abstr 2483).
77. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34:849-853.
78. Gilpatrick RO, Kaplan I, Roach D. Microleakage of composite resin restorations with various etching times. Quintessence Int 1994; 25:573-576.
79. Janda R. Kleben und Klebertechniken (Teil II). Dental Labor 1992; 15:615-628.
80. Barkmeier WW, Shaffer SE, Gwinnett AJ. Effects of 15 vs 60 second enamel acid conditioning on adhesion and morphology. Oper Dent 1986; 11:111-116.
81. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Krämer N, et al. Do dentin bonding agents and their applicator system affect the bond to enamel? (German, Abstr in English) Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1997; 52:202-205.
82. Munechika T, Suzuki K, Nishiyama M, et al. Comparison of the tensile bond strength of composite resins to longitudinal and transverse sections of enamel prisms in human teeth. J Dent Res 1984; 63:1079-1079.
83. Dietschi D, Scampa U, Campanile G, et al. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect class II composite resin restorations: An in vitro evaluation. Quintessence Int 1995; 26:127-138.
84. Lutz F, Krejci I, Schüpbach P. Adhäsivsysteme für zahnfarbene Restaurationen. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1993; 103:537-549.
85. Perdigao J, Lopes M. Dentin bonding-questions for the new millennium. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1:191-209.
86. Eick JD, Gwinnett AJ, Pashley DH. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996; 8:306-335.
87. Perdigao J. An ultramorphological study of human dentin exposed to adhesive systems. PhD thesis, ed. Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium: 1995.
88. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1992; 16:265-273.
89. Nakabayashi N, Ashizawa M, Nakamura M. Identification of a resindentin hybrid layer in vital human dentin created in vivo: Durable bonding to vital dentin. Quintessence Int 1992; 23:135-141.
90. Eick JD, Cobb CM, Chappel P, et al. The dentinal surface: Its influence on dentinal adhesion. Part I. Quintessence Int 1991; 22:967-977.
91. Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, et al. Ultramorphological interactions between tooth structure and modern dentn adhesive systems. Transaction of the Academy of Dental Materials 1996; 9: 130.
92. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, et al. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998; 26:1-20.
93. Walshaw PR, McComb D. Clinical considerations for optimal dentinal bonding. Quintessence Int 1996; 27:616-625.
94. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Krämer N, et al. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 1999; 24:147-155.
95. Bertschinger C, Paul S, Lüthy H. Dual application of dentin bonding agents: Effects on bond strength. Am J Dent 1996; 9:115-119.
96. Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years. Part I: Clinical behavior. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 459-465.
97. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Krämer N, et al. Push-out dentin bond strength of ceramic inlays using different luting modes. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 815 (Abstr 1469).
98. Hickel R. The problem of tooth hypersensitivity following the placement of acid-etch retained inlays (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1990; 45:740-742.
99. Krämer N, Kunzelmann K-H, Pelka M, et al. Long-term results with a microfilled composite inlay system (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996; 51: 342-344.
100. Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH, Obermeier T. Die Kompositfüllung im Seitenzahnbereich - Teil 1. Zahnärztl Welt 1994; 103:610-618.
101. Dietschi D, Moor L. Evaluation of the marginal and internal adaptation of different ceramic and composite inlay systems after an in vitro fatigue test. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1:41-56.
102. Scheibenbogen FA, Manhart J, Kremers L, et al. Two-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82:391-397.
103. Christensen GJ. Pulp capping 1998. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129:1297-1299.
104. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, et al. Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-coloured inlay systems at 3 years. J Dent 1995; 23:329-338.
105. Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, et al. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127:1171-1181.
106. Hoglund Äberg C, van Dijken JWV, Olofsson AL. Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass-ionomer cement. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52:140-149.
107. Isidor F, Brondum K. A clinical evaluation of porcelain inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74:140-144.
108. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted Bindslev P. A 3-year study of inlays milled from machinabel ceramic blocks representing 2 different inlay systems. Quintessence Int 1999; 30:829-836.
109. Jensen ME. A two-year clinical study of posterior etched-porcelain resin-bonded restorations. Am J Dent 1988; 1:27-27.
110. Krejci I, Füllemann J, Lutz F. Klinische und rasterelektronenmikroskopische Langzeituntersuchung von Kompositinlays. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1994; 104:1351-1356.
111. Molin M, Karlsson S. A 3-year clinical follow-up study of ceramic (Optec) inlay system. Acta Odontol Scand 1996; 54:145-149.
112. Qualtrough AJE, Wilson N. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a porcelain inlay system. J Dent 1996; 24:317-323.
113. Rehkugler J, Hofmann N, Klaiber B. Occlusal margin quality of posterior composite inlays after four years of clinical service. J Dent Res 1996; 75:397 (Abstr 3034).
114. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JWV, et al. Ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with either a dual-cured or a chemically cured composite resin luting agent. A 2-year clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 1995; 53:325-330.
115. Wassel RW, Walls AWG, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: Three-year clinical results. Br Dent J 1995; 179:343-349.
116. Jäger K, Wirz J, Schmidli F. Porzellaninlays als Amalgamersatz? Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990; 100:1345-1352.
117. O'Neil SJ, Miracle RL, Leinfelder KF. Evaluating interfacial gaps for esthetic inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124:48-54.
118. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M, et al. Wear of ceramic inlays, their enamel antagonists, and luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69:425-430.
119. Krejci I. Zahnfarbene Seitenzahnrestaurationen. Qualität. Potential und Indikation. München: Hanser. 1992.
120. Frazier KB, Sarrett DC. Wear resistance of dual-cured resin luting agents. Am J Dent 1995; 8:161-164.
121. Kawai K, Isenberg BP, Leinfelder KF. Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear. Quintessence Int 1994; 25:53-58.
122. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: Resto-rations, opposing cusps, and luting cements. Quintessence Int 1994; 25:207-207.
123. Krejci I, Lutz F, Gautschi L. Wear and marginal adaptation of composite resin inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72:233-244.
124. Kunzelmann K-H, Deigner M, Hickel R. Three-body wear of composite luting materials at different gap sizes and shrinkage conditions. J Dent Res 1992; 71:113 (Abstr 60).
125. Noack MJ, DeGee AJ, Roulet JF, et al. Interfacial wear of luting composites of ceramic inlays in vitro. J Dent Res 1992; 71:113 (Abstr 58).
126. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, et al. Effect of gap dimension on wear resistance of luting agents. Am J Dent 1995; 8:149-151.
127. Krämer N, Sindel J, Frankenberger R, et al. Toothbrush wear behavior of different luting composites. J Dent Res 1998, 77: 1257 (Abstr 404).
128. Krejci I, Lutz F. In-Vito-Testverfahren zur Evaluation dentaler Restaurationsysteme - 3. Korrelation mit In-vivo-Resultaten. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990; 100:1445-1449.
129. DeGee AJ, Pallav P, Davidson CL. Effect of abrasion medium on wear of stress-bearing composites and amalgam in vitro. J Dent Res 1986; 65:654-658.
130. Kunzelmann K-H. Verschleißanalyse und -quantifizierung von Füllungsmaterialien in vivo und in vitro. Aachen: Shaker. 1998. PhD Thesis.
131. Krämer N, Sindel J, Pelka M, et al. Three-body wear behavior of different viscous luting composites. J Dent Res 1996; 75:74 (Abstr 456).
132. Roulet J-F. Degradation of dental polymers. Basel: Karger. 1987.
133. Krämer N, Frankenberger R, Sindel J, et al. In vitro behavior of different luting composites. Transactions of the Academy of Dental Materials 1997; 10:169.
134. Mehl A, Godescha P, Kunzelmann KH, et al. The marginal integrity of composite and ceramic inlays in extensive cavities (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996; 51:701-704.
135. Manhart J, Schmidt M, Chen HY, et al. Marginal quality of a new resin cement after artificial aging. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 269 (Abstr 1006).
136. Reiss B, Walther W. Clinical Long-term results and 10-year Kaplan-Meier analysis of Cerec restorations. Int J Computerized Dent 2000; 3: 9-23.
137. Isenberg BP, Essig ME, Leinfelder KF. Three-year clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM restorations. J Esthet Dent 1992; 4:173-176.
138. Kreulen CM, Amerogen van WE, Akerboom HBM, et al. A clinical study on direct and indirect class II posterior composite resin restorations: Design of the investigation. J Dent Child 1991; 58:281-288.
139. Lang H, Schwan R, Burwinkel M, et al. Optoelectronic measuring of the wear of restorative materials (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1994; 49: 276-278.
140. Lamprecht C, Frankenberger R, Krämer N, et al. A new software to evaluate luting gaps of tooth-coloured inlays. Transaction of the Academy of Dental Materials 1996; 9: 240.
141. Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann KH, et al. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res 1997; 76:1799-1807.
142. Roulet J-F, Bartsch T, Hickel R, et al. Luting composite wear of glass ceramic inlays after 9 years. J Dent Res 1997; 76:163 (Abstr 1197).
143. Noack MJ. Tooth-colored inlays (in German). University of Berlin: Berlin. 1994. PhD Thesis.
144. Pelka M, Krämer N, Kunzelmann K-H. Surface alterations of different materials due to mechanical profilometry (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1993; 48:488-491.
145. Krämer N, Frankenberger R. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years. Part II: Wear of luting composites. Oper Dent 2000; 25, In press.
146. Noack MJ, Roulet J-F, Bergmann P. A new method to lute tooth colored inlays with highly filled composite resins. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 457 (Abstr 1528).
147. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Hahn C, et al. Evaluation of luting film abrasion in vivo (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996; 51:591-594.
148. Essig ME, Isenberg BP, Leinfelder KF, et al. An in vitro evaluation of duo-cured cements with CAD/CAM ceramics inlays. J Dent Res 1991; 70:296 (Abstr 246).
149. Bessing C, Lundqvist P. 1-year clinical examination of indirect composite resin inlays: A preliminary report. Quintessence Int 1991; 22:153-157.
150. Bishop BM. A heat and pressure cured composite inlay system: A clinical evaluation. Aust Prosthodont J 1989; 3:35-41.
151. Holan G, Fuks AB. The diagnostic value of coronal dark-gray discoloration in primary teeth following traumatic injuries. Pediatr Dent 1996; 18:224-227.
152. Gray WA, Suzuki M, Jordan RE, et al. Clinical evaluation of indirect composite resin restoration - Three-year results. J Dent Res 1991; 70:345 (Abstr 633).
153. Hannig M. Five-year clinical evaluation of heat- and pressure-cured composite resin inlay system. J Dent Res 1996; 75:256 (Abstr 1908).
154. Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of crown and bridge composite resin veneering materials. J Dent Res 1986; 65: 166 (Abstr 31).
155. Ebert J, Kunzelmann K-H, Krämer N, et al. Failure analysis in adhesive restorations. An example: Visio-Gem®. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1994; 49:932-936.
156. Krämer N, Kunzelmann KH. Clinical study on the use of a crown and bridge vennering material for composite inlays (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1993; 48:427-430.
157. Van Dijken JW, Hörstedt P. Marginal breakdown of 5-year-old direct composite inlays. J Dent 1996; 24:389-394.
158. Eder A, Wickens J. Surface treatment of gold alloys for resin adhesion. Quintessence Int 1996; 27:35-40.
159. Hansson O. Clinical results with resin-bonded prostheses and an adhesive cement. Quintessence Int 1994; 25:125-132.
160. Hannig M, Schmeiser R. Esthetic posteriorrestorations utilizing the double-inlay technique: A novel approach in esthetic dentistry. Quintessence Int 1997; 28:79-83.
161. Berekally TL, Smales RJ. A retrospective clinical evaluation of resin-bonded bridges inserted at the Adelaide Dental Hospital. Aust Dent J 1993; 38:85-96.
162. De Kanter RJ, Creugers NH, Verzijden CW, et al. A five-year multi-practice clinical study on posterior resin-bonded bridges. J Dent Res 1998; 77:609-614.
163. Tjan AHL, Dunn JR, Grant BE. Marginal leakage of cast gold crowns luted with an adhesive resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67:11-15.
164. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry: Historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75:18-32.
165. Delong R, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. The wear of enamel opposing shaded ceramic restorative materials: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68:42-48.
166. Hudson JD, Goldstein GR, Georgescu M. Enamel wear caused by three different restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74:647-654.
167. Pelka M, Reinelt C, Krämer N, et al. In-vivo-abrasion of IPS Empress -inlays (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1995; 50:917-919.
168. Haas M, Arnetzl G, Wegschneider W, et al. Clinical results and material behavior of composite, ceramic and gold inlays (German, Abstr in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1992; 47:18-22.
169. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted Bindslev P. A one-year clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays. Scand J Dent Res 1994; 102:186-192.
170. Bessing C. An in vivo study of glass ceramic (Dicor) inlays. Acta Odontol Scand 1990; 48:351-357.
171. Stenberg R, Matsson Lars. Clinical evaluation of glass ceramic inlays (Dicor). Acta Odontol Scand 1993; 51:91-97.
172. Krejci I, Krejci D, Lutz F. Clinical evaluation of a new pressed glass ceramic inlay material over 1.5 years. Quintessence Int 1992; 23:181-186.
173. Lehner C, Studer S, Brodbeck U, et al. Six-year clinical results of leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays. Acta Med Dent Helv 1998; 3:137-146.
174. Mörmann WH, Krejci I. Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in situ: Clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation. Quintessence Int 1992; 23:109-115.
175. Pallesen U. Clinical performance of Cerec-restorations: Restorative procedure and preliminary results. In: Mörmann WH, ed. International Symposium on computer restorations. The state of the art of the Cerec Method. Proceedings. Quintessence 1991; Berlin:285-300.
176. Shearer AC, Thordrup M, Hörsted Bindslev P, et al. Clinical study of a milled ceramic inlay/onlay system. A clinical study of a milled ceramic inlay/onlay system. J Dent Res 1996; 75:285 (Abstr 2140).
177. Sjogren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 1998; 56:263-267.
178. Wilder AD. Clinical considerations of Cerec restorations. In: Mörmann WH, ed. International Symposium on computer restorations. The state of the art of the Cerec Method. Proceedings. Quintessence 1991; Berlin: 141-149.
179. Banks RG. Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63:619-626.
180. Fischer H, Marx R. Mechanische Eigenschaften von Empress II. Acta Med Dent Helv 1999; 4:141-145.
181. Pospiech P, Kistler S, Frasch C, et al. Clinical evaluation of Empress 2 bridges: First results after two years. J Dent Res 2000;79:334 (Abstr 2140).
182. Jäger K. Laminate-Technik in der Praxis. Zahnärztl Welt 1995; 104:108-113.
183. Christensen GJ. Ceramic veneers: State of the art, 1999. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130:1121-1123.
184. Peumans M, Meerbeek BV, Lambrechts P, et al. Porcelain veneers: A review of the literature. J Dent 2000; 28:163-177.
185. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, et al. Five-year clinical performance of porcelain veneers. Quintessence Int 1998; 29:211-221.
186. Dumfahrt H, Schäffer H. Porcelain Laminate Veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II - clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13:9-18.
187. Fradeani M. Six-year follow-up with Empress veneers. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1998; 18:216-225.
188. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J. Recent trends in esthetic restorations for posterior teeth. Quintessence Int 1994; 25:659-677.