Quantitative Measurement of Marginal Disintegration of Ceramic Inlays

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 3-8

  Hayashi, M ^a,b   Tsubakimoto, Y ^a   Takeshige, F ^a   Ebisu, S ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NONE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; FELDSPAR; POTASSIUM DERIVATIVE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ACCURACY; ADAPTATION; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEGRADATION; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IN VIVO STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LASER; MEASUREMENT; MICROSCOPY; MORPHOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OPTICS; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPARATIVE DENTISTRY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; BICUSPID; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL PORCELAIN; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INLAYS; LASERS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); OPTICS; POTASSIUM COMPOUNDS; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 1642519917     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Van Doren V & Vanherle G (1986) In vivo evaluation of four posterior composites: Quantitative wear measurements and clinical behavior Dental Materials 2(3) 106-113.
2. Dastane A, Vaidyanathan TK, Vaidyanathan J, Mehra R & Hesby R (1996) Development and evaluation of a new 3-D digitization and computer graphic system to study the anatomic tissue and restoration surfaces Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 23(1) 25-34.
3. DeLong R, Pintado M & Douglas WH (1985) Measurement of change in surface contour by computer graphics Dental Materials 1(1) 27-30.
4. Frankenberger R, Petschelt A & Kramer N (2000) Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: Clinical behavior Operative Dentistry 25(6) 459-465.
5. Hayashi M, Tsuchitani Y, Kawamura Y, Miura M, Takeshige F & Ebisu S (2000) Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays Operative Dentistry 25(6) 473-481.
6. Hayashi M, Tsuchitani Y, Miura M, Takeshige F & Ebisu S (1998) 6-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays Operative Dentistry 23(6) 318-326.
7. Hewlett ER, Orro ME & Clark GT (1992) Accuracy testing of three-dimensional digitizing systems Dental Materials 8(1) 49-53.
8. Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Vuylsteke M & Davidson CL (1984) Quantitative evaluation of the wear resistance of posterior dental restorations: A new three-dimensional measuring technique Journal of Dentistry 12(3) 252-267.
9. Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann KH & Hickel R (1997) A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear Journal of Dental Research 76(11) 1799-1807.
10. Pallesen U & van Dijken JWV (2000) An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system European Journal of Oral Sciences 108(3) 239-246.
11. Reiss B & Walter W (2000) Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan-Meier analysis of Cerec restorations International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 3(1) 9-23.
12. Roulet JF, Bartsch T, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH & Mehl A (1997) Luting composite wear of glass ceramic inlays after 9 years Journal of Dental Research 76 Abstract #1197 p 163.
13. van Dijken JWV, Hoglund-Aberg C & Olofsson A-L (1998) Fired ceramic inlays: A 6-year follow up Journal of Dentistry 26(3) 219-225.
14. Williams DF, Cunningham J, Lalor MJ, Groves D & Atkinson JT (1983) Laser techniques for the evaluation of wear in Class II restorations Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 10(5) 407-414.