Chromatin dynamics and the preservation of genetic information

Nature

Volumn 447, Issue 7147, 2007, Pages 951-958

  Downs, Jessica A ^a   Nussenzweig, Michel C ^b   Nussenzweig, André ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA;

CANCER; CYTOLOGY; DNA; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENOME; NUCLEIC ACID; PROTEIN; RECOGNITION; SIGNALING;

AGING; CANCER GENETICS; CARCINOGENESIS; CHROMATIN; DNA DAMAGE; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; GENOME; HUMAN; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MEDICAL GENETICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 34250820438     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature05980     Document Type: Review

References (98)

1. Jenuwein, T. & Allis, C. D. Translating the histone code. Science 293, 1074-1080 (2001).
2. Turner, B. M. Histone acetylation and an epigenetic code. Bioessays 22, 836-845 (2000).
3. Shogren-Knaak, M. et al. Histone H4-K16 acetylation controls chromatin structure and protein interactions. Science 311, 844-847 (2006).
4. 60Co γ-rays. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. Relat. Stud. Phys. Chem. Med. 48, 389-395 (1985).
5. Shim, E. Y. et al. RSC mobilizes nucleosomes to improve accessibility of repair machinery to the damaged chromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 1602-1613 (2007).
6. Kruhlak, M. J. et al. Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 172, 823-834 (2006).
7. Tsukuda, T., Fleming, A. B., Nickoloff, J. A. & Osley, M. A. Chromatin remodelling at a DNA double-strand break site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 438, 379-383 (2005).
8. Huyen, Y. et al. Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 432, 406-411 (2004).
9. Rogakou, E. P., Boon, C., Redon C. & Bonner, W. M. DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J. Cell Biol. 146, 905-916 (1999).
10. Rouse, J. & Jackson, S. P. Interfaces between the detection, signaling, and repair of DNA damage. Science 297, 547-551 (2002).
11. Zhou, B. B. & Elledge, S. J. The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 408, 433-439 (2000).
12. Bakkenist, C. J. & Kastan, M. B. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature 421, 499-506 (2003).
13. Lee, J. H. & Paull, T. T. ATM activation by DNA double-strand breaks through the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Science 308, 551-554 (2005).
14. Dupre, A. Boyer-Chatenet, L. & Gautier, J. Two-step activation of ATM by DNA and the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 451-457 (2006).
15. You, Z., Chahwan, C., Bailis, J., Hunter, T. & Russell, P. ATM activation and its recruitment to damaged DNA require binding to the C terminus of Nbs1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 5363-5379 (2005).
16. Pellegrini, M. et al. Autophosphorylation at serine 1987 is dispensable for murine ATM activation in vivo. Nature 443, 222-225 (2006).
17. Meek, K., Gupta, S., Ramsden D. A. & Lees-Miller, S. P. The DNA-dependent protein kinase: the director at the end. Immunol. Rev. 200, 132-141 (2004).
18. Zou, L. & Elledge, S. J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300, 1542-1548 (2003).
19. Kumagai, A., Lee, J., Yoo H. Y. & Dunphy, W. G. TopBP1 activates the ATR-ATRIP complex. Cell 124, 943-955 (2006).
20. Fernandez-Capetillo, O., Celeste, A. & Nussenzweig, A. Focusing on foci: H2AX and the recruitment of DNA-damage response factors. Cell Cycle 2, 426-427 (2003).
21. Bekker-Jensen S. et al. Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 173, 195-206 (2006).
22. Celeste, A. et al. Histone H2AX phosphorylation is dispensable for the initial recognition of DNA breaks. Nature Cell Biol. 5, 675-679 (2003).
23. Petersen, S. et al. AID is required to initiate Nbs1/γ-H2AX focus formation and mutations at sites of class switching. Nature 414, 660-665 (2001).
24. Reina-San-Martin, B. et al. H2AX is required for recombination between immunoglobulin switch regions but not for intra-switch region recombination or somatic hypermutation. J. Exp. Med. 197, 1767-1778 (2003).
25. Kruhlak, M. J., Celeste, A. & Nussenzweig, A. Spatio-temporal dynamics of chromatin containing DNA breaks. Cell Cycle 5, 1910-1912 (2006).
26. Ziv, Y. et al. Chromatin relaxation in response to DNA double-strand breaks is modulated by a novel ATM- and KAP-1 dependent pathway. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 870-876 (2006).
27. Flaus, A., Martin, D. M., Barton G. J. & Owen-Hughes, T. Identification of multiple distinct Snf2 subfamilies with conserved structural motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 2887-2905 (2006).
28. Angus-Hill, M. L. et al. A Rsc3/Rsc30 zinc cluster dimer reveals novel roles for the chromatin remodeler RSC in gene expression and cell cycle control. Mol. Cell 7, 741-751 (2001).
29. Cairns, B. R. et al. Two functionally distinct forms of the RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex, containing essential AT hook, BAH, and bromodomains. Mol. Cell 4, 715-723 (1999).
30. Bennett, C. B. et al. Genes required for ionizing radiation resistance in yeast. Nature Genet. 29, 426-434 (2001).
31. Shim, E. Y., Ma, J. L., Oum, J. H., Yanez, Y. & Lee, S. E. The yeast chromatin remodeler RSC complex facilitates end joining repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 3934-3944 (2005).
32. Chai, B., Huang, J., Cairns, B. R. & Laurent, B. C. Distinct roles for the RSC and Swi/Snf ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers in DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev. 19, 1656-1661 (2005).
33. Downs, J. A., Kosmidou, E., Morgan, A. & Jackson, S. P. Suppression of homologous recombination by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae linker histone. Mol. Cell 11, 1685-1692 (2003).
34. Hill, D. A. & Imbalzano, A. N. Human SWI/SNF nucleosome remodeling activity is partially inhibited by linker histone H1. Biochemistry 39, 11649-11656 (2000).
35. Park, J. H. et al. Mammalian SWI/SNF complexes facilitate DNA double-strand break repair by promoting γ-H2AX induction. EMBO J. 25, 3986-3997 (2006).
36. van Attikum, H., Fritsch, O., Hohn, B. & Gasser, S. M. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA doublestrand break repair. Cell 119, 777-788 (2004).
37. Shen, X., Mizuguchi, G., Hamich A. & Wu, C. A chromatin remodelling complex involved in transcription and DNA processing. Nature 406, 541-544 (2000).
38. Downs, J. A. et al. Binding of chromatin-modifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites. Mol. Cell 16, 979-990 (2004).
39. Morrison, A. J. et al. INO80 and γ-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 119, 767-775 (2004).
40. Papamichos-Chronakis, M., Krebs, J. E. & Peterson, C. L. Interplay between Ino80 and Swr1 chromatin remodeling enzymes regulates cell cycle checkpoint adaptation in response to DNA damage. Genes Dev. 20, 2437-2449 (2006).
41. Mizuguchi, G. et al. ATP-driven exchange of histone H2AZ variant catalyzed by SWR1 chromatin remodeling complex. Science 303, 343-348 (2004).
42. Kusch, T. et al. Acetylation by Tip60 is required for selective histone variant exchange at DNA lesions. Science 306, 2084-2087 (2004).
43. Toh, G. W. et al. Histone H2A phosphorylation and H3 methylation are required for a novel Rad9 DSB repair function following checkpoint activation. DNA Repair (Amst.) 5, 693-703 (2006).
44. Nakamura, T. M., Du, L.-L., Redon, C. & Russell, P. Histone H2A phosphorylation controls Crb2 recruitment at DNA breaks, maintains checkpoint arrest, and influences DNA repair in fission yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 6215-6230 (2004).
45. Javaheri, A. et al. Yeast G1 DNA damage checkpoint regulation by H2A phosphorylation is independent of chromatin remodeling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13771-13776 (2006).
46. Downs, J. A., Lowndes, N. F. & Jackson, S. P. A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A in DNA repair. Nature 408, 1001-1004 (2000).
47. Unal, E. et al. DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol. Cell 16, 991-1002 (2004).
48. Strom, L., Lindroos, H. B., Shirahige, K. & Sjogren, C. Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. Mol. Cell 16, 1003-1015 (2004).
49. Xie, A. et al. Control of sister chromatid recombination by histone H2AX. Mol. Cell 16, 1017-1025 (2004).
50. Bird, A. W. et al. Acetylation of histone H4 by Esa1 is required for DNA double-strand break repair. Nature 419, 411-415 (2002).
51. Harvey, A. C., Jackson, S. P. & Downs, J. A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A Ser122 facilitates DNA repair. Genetics 170, 543-553 (2005).
52. Wyatt, H. R., Liaw, H., Green, G. R. & Lustig, A. J. Multiple roles for Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A in telomere position effect, Spt phenotypes and double-strand-break repair. Genetics 164, 47-64 (2003).
53. Ahn, S. H. et al. Sterile 20 kinase phosphorylates histone H2B at serine 10 during hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis in S. cerevisiae. Cell 120, 25-36 (2005).
54. Fernandez-Capetillo, O., Allis, C. D. & Nussenzweig, A. Phosphorylation of histone H2B at DNA double-strand breaks. J. Exp. Med. 199, 1671-1677 (2004).
55. Ahn, S. H., Henderson, K. A., Keeney, S. & Allis, C. D. H2B (Ser10) phosphorylation is induced during apoptosis and meiosis in S. cerevisiae. Cell Cycle 4, 780-783 (2005).
56. Odegard, V. H., Kim, S. T., Anderson, S. M., Shlomchik, M. J. & Schatz, D. J. Histone modifications associated with somatic hypermutation. Immunity 23, 101-110 (2005).
57. Qin, S. & Parthun, M. R. Recruitment of the type B histone acetyltransferase Hat1p to chromatin is linked to DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 3649-3658 (2006).
58. Tamburini, B. A. & Tyler, J. K. Localized histone acetylation and deacetylation triggered by the homologous recombination pathway of double-strand DNA repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 4903-4913 (2005).
59. Murr, R. et al. Histone acetylation by Trrap-Tip60 modulates loading of repair proteins and repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 91-99 (2006).
60. Gupta, A. et al. Involvement of human MOF in ATM function. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 5292-5305 (2005).
61. Birger, Y. et al. Increased tumorigenicity and sensitivity to ionizing radiation upon loss of chromosomal protein HMGN1. Cancer Res. 65, 6711-6718 (2005).
62. Jazayeri, A., McAinsh, A. D. & Jackson, S. P. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sin3p facilitates DNA double-strand break repair. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 1644-1649 (2004).
63. Utley, R., Lacoste, N., Jobin-Robitaille, O., Allard, S. & Côte, J. Regulation of NuA4 histone acetyltransferase activity in transcription and DNA repair by phosphorylation of histone H4. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 8179-8190 (2005).
64. Cheung, W. L. et al. Phosphorylation of histone H4 serine 1 during DNA damage requires casein kinase II in S. cerevisiae. Curr. Biol. 15, 656-660 (2005).
65. Fernandez-Capetillo, O. et al. DNA damage-induced G2-M checkpoint activation by histone H2AX and 53BP1. Nature Cell Biol. 4, 993-997 (2002).
66. Keogh, M. C. et al. A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates γH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Nature 439, 497-501 (2006).
67. Nussenzweig, A. & Paull, T. DNA repair: tails of histones lost. Nature 439, 406-407 (2006).
68. -/- B cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 37, 235-239 (2007).
69. Manis, J. P. et al. 53BP1 links DNA damage-response pathways to immunoglobulin heavy chain class-switch recombination. Nature Immunol. 5, 481-487 (2004).
70. Ward, I. M. et al. 53BP1 is required for class switch recombination. J. Cell Biol. 165, 459-464 (2004).
71. Reina-San-Martin, B., Nussenzweig, M. C., Nussenzweig, A. & Difilippantonio, S. Genomic instability, endoreduplication, and diminished Ig class-switch recombination in B cells lacking Nbs1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 1590-1595 (2005).
72. Honjo, T., Nagaoka, H., Shinkura, R. & Muramatsu, M. AID to overcome the limitations of genomic information. Nature Immunol. 6, 655-661 (2005).
73. Franco, S. et al. H2AX prevents DNA breaks from progressing to chromosome breaks and translocations. Mol. Cell 21, 201-214 (2006).
74. Ramiro, A. R. et al. Role of genomic instability and p53 in AID-induced c-myc-Igh translocations. Nature 440, 105-109 (2006).
75. Ozdemir, A. et al. Characterization of lysine 56 of histone H3 as an acetylation site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 25949-25952 (2005).
76. Masumoto, H., Hawke, D., Kobayashi, R. & Verreault, A. A role for cell-cycle-regulated histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation in the DNA damage response. Nature 436, 294-298 (2005).
77. Dirksen, E. H. et al. Human lymphoblastoid proteome analysis reveals a role for the inhibitor of acetyltransferases complex in DNA double-strand break response. Cancer Res. 66, 1473-1480 (2006).
78. Driscoll, R., Hudson, A. & Jackson, S.P. Yeast Rtt109 promotes genome stability by acetylating histone H3 on lysine 56. Science 315, 649-652 (2007).
79. Collins, S. R. et al. Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 446, 806-810 (2007).
80. Maas, N. L., Miller, K. M., DeFazio, L. G. & Toczyski, D. P. Cell cycle and checkpoint regulation of histone H3 K56 acetylation by Hst3 and Hst4. Mol. Cell 23, 109-119 (2006).
81. Celic, I. H. et al. The sirtuins Hst3 and Hst4p preserve genome integrity by controlling histone H3 lysine 56 deacetylation. Curr. Biol. 16, 1280-1289 (2006).
82. Wysocki, R. et al. Role of Dot1-dependent histone H3 methylation in G1 and S phase DNA damage checkpoint functions of Rad9. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 8430-8443 (2005).
83. Giannattasio, M., Lazzaro, F., Plevani, P. & Muzi-Falconi, M. The DNA damage checkpoint response requires histone H2B ubiquitination by Rad6-Bre1 and H3 methylation by Dot1. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 9879-9886 (2005).
84. DiTullio, R. A. Jr et al. 53BP1 functions in an ATM-dependent checkpoint pathway that is constitutively activated in human cancer. Nature Cell Biol. 4, 998-1002 (2002).
85. Cao, R. et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing. Science 298, 1039-1043 (2002).
86. Bekker-Jensen, S., Lukas, C., Melander, F., Bartek, J. & Lukas, J. Dynamic assembly and sustained retention of 53BP1 at the sites of DNA damage are controlled by Mdc1/NFBD1. J. Cell Biol. 170, 201-211 (2005).
87. Sanders, S. L. et al. Methylation of histone H4 lysine 20 controls recruitment of Crb2 to sites of DNA damage. Cell 119, 603-614 (2004).
88. Du, L. L., Nakamura, T. M. & Russell, P. Histone modification- dependent and -independent pathways for recruitment of checkpoint protein Crb2 to double-strand breaks. Genes Dev. 20, 1583-1596 (2006).
89. Schotta, G. et al. A silencing pathway to induce H3-K9 and H4-K20 trimethylation at constitutive heterochromatin. Genes Dev. 18, 1251-1262 (2004).
90. Botuyan, M. V. et al. Structural basis for the methylation state-specific recognition of histone H4-K20 by 53BP1 and Crb2 in DNA repair. Cell 127, 1361-1373 (2006).
91. Ryan, M. P., Jones, R. & Morse, R. H. SWI-SNF complex participation in transcriptional activation at a step subsequent to activator binding. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 1774-1782 (1998).
92. Brown, C. E. et al. Recruitment of HAT complexes by direct activator interactions with the ATM-related Tra1 subunit. Science 292, 2333-2337 (2001).
93. Falzon, M., Fewell, J. W. & Kuff, E. L. EBP-80, a transcription factor closely resembling the human autoantigen Ku, recognizes single- to double-strand transitions in DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 10546-10552 (1993).
94. Stucki, M. et al. MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 123, 1213-1226 (2005).
95. Lou, Z. et al. MDC1 maintains genomic stability by participating in the amplification of ATM-dependent DNA damage signals. Mol. Cell 21, 187-200 (2006).
96. Ju, B. G. et al. A topoisomerase II?-mediated dsDNA break required for regulated transcription. Science 312, 1798-1802 (2006).
97. Wolffe, A. P. & Hayes, J. J. Chromatin disruption and modification. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 711-720 (1999).
98. Luger, K., Mäder, A. W., Richmond, R. K., Sargent, D. F. & Richmond, T. J. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature 389, 251-260 (1997).