Comparative protein modeling

Reviews in Computational Chemistry

Volumn 22, Issue , 2006, Pages 57-167

  Esposito, Emilio Xavier ^a   Tobi, Dror ^b   Madura, Jeffry D ^c  

^a NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749991908     PISSN: 10693599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1002/0471780367.ch2     Document Type: Review

References (224)

1. A. R. Leach, Molecular Modeling: Principles and Applications, Second Edition, Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, United Kingdom, 2001.
2. C. Branden and J. Tooze, Introduction to Protein Structure, Second Edition, Garland Publishing, New York, 1999.
3. W. Browne, A. North, D. Phillips, K. Brew, T. C. Vanaman, and R. L. Hill, J. Mol. Biol., 42, 65 (1969). A Possible Three-Dimensional Structure of Bovine α-Lactalbumin Based on that of Hen's Egg-White Lysozyme.
4. C. C. F. Blake, G. A. Mair, A. C. T. North, D. C. Phillips, and V. R. Sarma, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 167, 365 (1967). On the Conformation of the Hen Egg-White Lysozyme Molecule.
5. M. Levitt, J. Mol. Biol., 226, 507 (1992). Accurate Modeling of Protein Conformation by Automatic Segment Matching. Available: http://www. bioinformatics.ucla.edu/~genemine/.
6. M. A. Marti-Renom, A. C. Stuart, A. Fiser, R. Sánchez, F. Melo, and A. Šali, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomolec. Struct., 29, 291 (2000). Comparative Protein Structure Modeling of Genes and Genomes. Download MODELLER from http://salilab.org/modeler/.
7. MODELLER: A Program for Protein Structure Modeling, Release 7v7, 2004, Andrej Šali, Department of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Mission Bay QB3, 1700 4th Street, Suite 503B, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-2552, email modeler_usage@salilab.org.
8. D. W. Mount, Bioinformatics: Sequence and Genome Analysis, Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 2004. Available: http://www.bioinformaticsonline.org.
9. J. D. Tisdall, Beginning Perl for Bioinformatics, O'Reilly, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2001.
10. J. D. Tisdall, Mastering Perl for Bioinformatics, O'Reilly, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2003.
11. C. Gibas and P. Jambeck, Developing Bioinformatics Computer Skills, O'Reilly, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2001.
12. T. K. Attwood and D. J. Parry-Smith, Introduction to Bioinformatics, Prentice-Hall, New York, 1999.
13. T. Lengauer, R. Mannhold, H. Kubinyi, and H. Timmerman, Bioinformatics - from Genomes to Drugs Volume I: Basic Technologies, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2002.
14. T. Lengauer, R. Mannhold, H. Kubinyi, and H. Timmerman, Bioinformatics - From Genomes to Drugs Volume II: Applications, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 2002.
15. G. A. Petsko and D. Ringe, Protein Structure and Function, New Science Press, Ltd., London, 2003.
16. T. E. Creighton, Proteins, Second Edition, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 1993.
17. D. L. Nelson, M. M. Cox, and A. L. Lehninger, Principles of Biochemistry, Fourth Edition, Worth Publishers, New York, 2004.
18. A. D. Baxevanis, D. B. Davison, R. D. M. Page, G. A. Petsko, L. D. Stein, and G. D. Stormo, Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, Vol. 1, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2003.
19. A. D. Baxevanis, D. B. Davison, R. D. M. Page, G. A. Petsko, L. D. Stein, and G. D. Stormo, Current Protocols In Bioinformatics, Vol. 2, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2005.
20. C. Hardin, T. V. Pogorelov, and Z. Luthey-Schulten, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 12, 176 (2001). Ab Initio Protein Structure Prediction.
21. R. Bonneau and D. Baker, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomolec. Struct., 30, 173 (2001). Ab Initio Protein Structure Prediction: Progress and Prospects.
22. J.-E. Shea, M. R. Friedel, and A. Baumketner, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz, T. Cundari, and V. Gillet, Eds., Wiley-VCH, New York, Vol. 22, 2006, pp. 169-228. Simulations of Protein Folding.
23. M. Y. Galperin, Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D3 (2004). The Molecular Biology Database Collection: 2004 update. Available: http://nar.oupjournals.org/cgi/ content/abstract/32/suppl_1/D3 Online database at http://www.nar.oupjournals. org/cgi/content/full/32/ suppl_1/D3/GKH143TB1.
24. W. Dynan, H. J. Gross, R. I. Gumport, R. B. Hallick, S. M. Linn, A. Maxwell, E. Westhof, J. A. Wise, K. R. Fox, A. R. Kimmel, and A. Bateman, Nucleic Acids Res., 33, (2005). The 2005 Database Collection. Available: http://www.nar.oupjournals.org.
25. M. Y. Galperin, Nucleic Acids Res., 33, D5 (2005). The Molecular Biology Database Collection: 2005 update. Available: http://nar.oupjournals.org/cgi/ content/abstract/33/suppl_1/D5 Online database at http://nar.oupjournals.org/ cgi/content-nw/full/33/suppl_1/D5/TBL1.
26. P. Koehl, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, K. B. Lipkowitz, T. Cundari, and V. Gillet Editors, Wiley-VCH, New York, Vol. 22, 2006, pp. 1-55. Protein Structure Classification.
27. E. Gasteiger, A. Gattiker, C. Hoogland, I. Ivanyi, R. D. Appel, and A. Bairoch, Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 3784 (2003). ExPASy: The Proteomics Server for In-depth Protein Knowledge and Analysis. The ExPASy website www.expasy.org.
28. B. Boeckmann, A. Bairoch, R. Apweiler, M.-C. Blatter, A. Estreicher, E. Gasteiger, M. J. Martin, K. Michoud, C. O'Donovan, I. Phan, S. Pilbout, and M. Schneider, Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 365 (2003). The SWISS-PROT Protein Knowledgebase and its Supplement TrEMBL in 2003.
29. A. Bairoch, R. Apweiler, C. H. Wu, W. C. Barker, B. Boeckmann, S. Ferro, E. Gasteiger, H. Huang, R. Lopez, M. Magrane, M. J. Martin, D. A. Natale, C. O'Donovan, N. Redaschi, and L.-S. L. Yeh, Nucleic Acids Res., 33, D154 (2005). The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). The UniProt website http://www.uniprot.org.
30. N. Hulo, C. J. A. Sigrist, V. L. Saux, P. S. Langendijk-Genevaux, L. Bordoli, A. Gattiker, E. D. Castro, P. Buchner, and A. Bairoch, Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D134 (2004). Recent Improvements to the PROSITE Database. The PROSITE website http://us.expasy.org/prosite/.
31. Enzyme Nomenclature: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology on the Nomenclature and Classification of Enzyme-Catalysed Reactions. International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (NC-IUBMB). Available: http://www.chem.qmul. ac.uk/iubmb/enzyme/.
32. J. Kopp and T. Schwede, Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D230 (2004). The SWISS-MODEL Repository of Annotated Three-Dimensional Protein Structure Homology Models. The SWISS-MODEL repository http://swissmodel.expasy.org/repository/.
33. K. Mizuguchi, C. M. Deane, T. L. Blundell, and J. P. Overington, Protein Sci., 7, 2469 (1998). HOMSTRAD: A Database of Protein Structure Alignments for Homologous Families. The HOMSTRAD database http://www-cryst.bioc.cam.ac.uk/ ~homstrad/.
34. L. A. Stebbings and K. Mizuguchi, Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D203 (2004). HOMSTRAD: Recent Developments of the Homologous Protein Structure Alignment Database.
35. A. Bateman, L. Coin, R. Durbin, R. D. Finn, V. Hollich, S. Griffiths-Jones, A. Khanna, M. Marshall, S. Moxon, E. L. L. Sonnhammer, D. J. Studholme, C. Yeats, and S. R. Eddy, Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D138 (2004). The Pfam Protein Families Database.
36. H. M. Berman, J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T. N. Bhat, H. Weissig, I. N. Shindyalov, and P. E. Bourne, Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 235 (2000). The Protein Data Bank. The RCSB/PDB website http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/.
37. S. F. Altschul, W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman, J. Mol. Biol., 215, 403 (1990). Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. The NCBI BLAST server http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/.
38. S. F. Altschul, T. L. Madden, A. A. Schäffer, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Miller, and D. J. Lipman, Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 3389 (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A New Generation of Protein Database Search Programs.
39. F. Melo and E. Feytmans, J. Mol. Biol., 277, 1141 (1998). Assessing Protein Structures with a Non-local Atomic Interaction Energy.
40. Biomolecular Simulations: The GROMOS96 Manual and User Guide, 1996, BIOMOS, b.v., Zürich, Switzerland, 1996 Available: http://www.igc.ethz.ch/ gromos/.
41. N. Guex and M. C. Peitsch, Electrophoresis, 18, 2714 (1997). SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PDB Viewer: An Environment for Comparative Protein Modeling. Download the Swiss-PDB Viewer from http://swissmodel.expasy.org/spdbv/mainpage. htm.
42. T. Schwede, J. Kopp, N. Guex, and M. C. Peitsch, Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 3381 (2003). SWISS-MODEL: An Automated Protein Homology-modeling Server. The SWISS-MODEL website http://swissmodel.expasy.org/.
43. C. Chothia, A. M. Lesk, M. Levitt, A. G. Amit, R. A. Mariuzza, S. E. V. Phillips, and R. J. Poljak, Science, 233, 755 (1986). The Predicted Structure of Immunoglobulin D1.3 and its Comparison with the Crystal Structure.
44. T. L. Blundell, B. L. Sibanda, M. J. E. Sternberg, and J. M. Thornton, Nature, 326, 347 (1987). Knowledge-Based Prediction of Protein Structures and the Design of Novel Molecules.
45. T. J. Hubbard and T. L. Blundell, Protein Engineer., 1, 159 (1987). Comparison of Solvent-inaccessible Cores of Homologous Proteins: Definitions Useful for Protein Modeling.
46. J. Greer, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 7, 317 (1990). Comparative Modeling Methods: Application to the Family of the Mammalian Serine Proteases.
47. M. S. Johnson, N. Srinivasan, R. Sowdhamini, and T. L. Blundell, Crit. Rev. Biochem. Molec. Biol., 29, 1 (1994). Knowledge-based Protein Modeling.
48. P. A. Bates and M. J. E. Sternberg, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics Supplement, 37, 47 (1999). Model Building by Comparison at CASP3: Using Expert Knowledge and Computer Automation.
49. National Center for Biotechnology Information. National Library of Medicine & National Institutes of Health, 2005. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.
50. BLAST Server. National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine & National Institutes of Health, 2005.
51. A. Bairoch, B. Boeckmann, S. Ferro, and E. Gasteiger, Briefings in Bioinformatics, 5, 39 (2004). Swiss-Prot: Juggling between Evolution and Stability. The Swiss-Prot website http://us.expasy.org/sprot/.
52. C. H. Wu, L.-S. L. Yeh, H. Huang, L. Arminski, J. Castro-Alvear, Y. Chen, Z.-Z. Hu, R. S. Ledley, P. Kourtesis, B. E. Suzek, C. R. Vinayaka, J. Zhang, and W. C. Barker, Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 345 (2003). The Protein Information Resource. Available: http://pir.georgetown.edu/home.shtml.
53. Protein Research Foundation Database. Protein Research Foundation, 2005. Available: http://www4.prf.or.jp/en/index.html.
54. GenBank. National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine & National Institute of Health, 2005. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/index.html.
55. BLAST Program Selection Guide. BLAST-Help Group, NCBI User Service, 2005. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/producttable.shtml.
56. J. Schultz, F. Milpetz, P. Bork, and C. P. Ponting, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 95, 5857 (1998). SMART, A Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool: Identification of Signaling Domains. Available: http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/.
57. I. Letunic, R. R. Copley, S. Schmidt, F. D. Ciccarelli, T. Doerks, J. Schultz, C. P. Ponting, and P. Bork, Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D142 (2004). SMART 4.0: Towards Genomic Data Integration.
58. Protein Families Database of Alignments and HMMs. Sanger Institute, 2005. The Pfam website http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/Pfam/.
59. R. L. Tatusov, E. V. Koonin, and D. J. Lipman, Science, 278, 631 (1997). A Genomic Perspective on Protein Families. The NCBI COG website http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/.
60. R. L. Tatusov, N. D. Fedorova, J. D. Jackson, A. R. Jacobs, B. Kiryutin, E. V. Koonin, D. M. Krylov, R. Mazumder, S. L. Mekhedov, A. N. Nikolskaya, B. S. Rao, S. Smirnov, A. V. Sverdlov, S. Vasudevan, Y. I. Wolf, J. J. Yin, and D. A. Natale, BioMed Central Bioinformat., 4, 41 (2003). The COG Database: An Updated Version Includes Eukaryotes.
61. W. Gish, personal communication, St. Louis, Missouri, 1996-2004. The WU-BLAST website http://blast.wustl.edu.
62. P. E. Bourne, H. M. Berman, B. McMahon, K. D. Watenpaugh, J. Westbrook, and P. M. D. Fitzgerald, in Meth. Enzymol., C. W. Carter, Jr. and R. M. Sweet, Eds., Academic Press, San Diego, California, Vol. 277, 1997, pp. 571-590. The Macromolecular Crystallographic Information File (mmCIF). Available: http://ndbserver.rutgers.edu/mmcif/.
63. J. Westbrook and P. E. Bourne, Bioinformatics, 16, 159 (2000). STAR/mmCIF: An Extensive Ontology for Macromolecular Structure and Beyond.
64. K. Karplus, R. Karchin, C. Barrett, S. Tu, M. Cline, M. Diekhans, L. Grate, J. Casper, and R. Hughey, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics Supplement, 45, 86 (2001). What Is the Value Added by Human Intervention in Protein Structure Prediction? The SAM-T02 website is http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/ research/compbio/HMM-apps/T02-query.html.
65. K. Karplus, R. Karchin, J. Draper, J. Casper, Y. Mandel-Gutfreund, M. Diekhans, and R. Hughey, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 53, 491 (2003). Combining Local-Structure, Fold-Recognition, and New Fold Methods for Protein Structure Prediction.
66. R. Karchin, M. Cline, Y. Mandel-Gutfreund, and K. Karplus, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 51, 504 (2003). Hidden Markov Models that Use Predicted Local Structure for Fold Recognition: Alphabets of Backbone Geometry. STR information http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/SAM_T02/sam-t02-faq. html.
67. T. Jones and S. Thirup, EMBO J., 5, 819 (1986). Using Known Substructures in Protein Model Building and Crystallography.
68. A. Krogh, M. Brown, I. S. Mian, K. Sjölander, and D. Haussler, J. Mol. Biol., 235, 1501 (1994). Hidden Markov Models in Computational Biology: Applications to Protein Modeling.
69. S. R. Eddy, Curr. Opin. Structural Biol., 6, 361 (1996). Hidden Markov Models.
70. S. R. Eddy, Bioinformatics, 14, 755 (1998). Profile Hidden Markov Models.
71. A. Krogh, B. Larsson, G. von Heijne, and E. L. L. Sonnhammer, J. Molec. Biol., 305, 567 (2001). Predicting Transmembrane Protein Topology with a Hidden Markov Model: Application to Complete Genomes. Available: http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/ services/TMHMM-2.0/.
72. W. Kabsch and C. Sander, Biopolymers, 22, 2577 (1983). Dictionary of Protein Secondary Structure: Pattern Recognition of Hydrogen-Bonded and Geometrical Features. Available: http://www.cmbi.kun.nl/gv/dssp/.
73. D. Frishman and P. Argos, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 23, 566 (1995). Knowledge-Based Secondary Structure Assignment. Available: http://wolf.bi.umist.ac.uk/unix/stride.html.
74. M. Heinig and D. Frishman, Nucleic Acids Res., 32, W500 (2004). STRIDE: A Web Server for Secondary Structure Assignment from Known Atomic Coordinates of Proteins. Available http://webclu.bio.wzw.tum.de/stride/.
75. Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction, Protein Structure Prediction Center, Biosciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction 6, 2005 Available: http://predictioncenter. llnl.gov/.
76. E. L. L. Sonnhammer, G. von Heijne, and A. Krogh. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Intellegent Systems for Molecular Biology, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California (1998). A Hidden Markov Model for Predicting Transmembrane Helices in Protein Sequences.
77. S. Möller, M. D. R. Croning, and R. Apweiler, Bioinformatics, 17, 646 (2001). Evaluation of Methods for the Prediction of Membrane Spanning Regions.
78. J. H. Holland, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1975.
79. R. Rosenblatt, Psychological Rev., 65, 386 (1959). The Perceptron: A Probabilistic Model for Information Storage and Organization in the Brain.
80. R. Karchin, Hidden Markov Models and Protein Sequence Analysis. University of California at Santa Cruz Bioinformatics (Computational Biology), 2002. Available: http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/research/compbio/ismb99.handouts/ KK185FP.html.
81. J. Hargbo and A. Elofsson, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 36, 68 (1999). Hidden Markov Models That Use Predicted Secondary Structures for Fold Recognition.
82. D. T. Jones, W. R. Taylor, and J. M. Thornton, Nature, 358, 86 (1992). A New Approach to Protein Fold Recognition. Available: http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/ threader/threader.html.
83. D. T. Jones, R. T. Miller, and J. M. Thornton, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 23, 387 (1995). Successful Protein Fold Recognition by Optimal Sequence Threading Validated by Rigourous Blind Testing.
84. D. T. Jones, in Computational Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 32, S. Salzberg, D. Searls, and S. Kasif, Eds., Elsevier Science, New York, 1998, pp. 285-311. THREADER: Protein Sequence Threading by Double Dynamic Programming.
85. D. Tobi and R. Elber, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 41, 40 (2000). Distance-Dependent, Pair Potential for Protein Folding: Results From Linear Optimization. Available: http://cbsu.tc.cornell.edu/software/loopp/index. htm and http://ser-loopp.tc.cornell.edu/cbsu/loopp.htm.
86. J. Meller and R. Elber, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 45, 241 (2001). Linear Programming Optimization and a Double Statistical Filter for Protein Threading Protocols.
87. O. Teodorescu, T. Galor, J. Pillardy, and R. Elber, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 54, 41 (2004). Enriching the Sequence Substitution Matrix by Structural Information.
88. M. J. Sippl, J. Mol. Biol., 213, 859 (1990). Calculation of Conformational Ensembles from Potentials of Mean Force. An Approach to the Knowledge-Based Prediction of Local Structures in Globular Proteins.
89. A. Godzik, A. Kolinski, and J. Skolnick, Protein Sci., 4, 2107 (1995). Are Proteins Ideal Mixtures of Amino Acids? Analysis of Energy Parameter Sets.
90. K. Harata, Y. Abe, and M. Muraki, J. Molec. Biol., 287, 347 (1999). Crystallographic Evaluation of Internal Motion of Human Small, α-Lactalbumin Refined by Full-matrix Least-squares Method.
91. A. C. Pike, K. Brew, and K. R. Acharya, Structure, 4, 691 (1996). Crystal Structures of Guinea-pig, Goat and Bovine α-Lactalbumin Highlight the Enhanced Conformational Flexibility of Regions that are Significant for its Action in Lactose Synthase.
92. T. C. Mueser, P. H. Rogers, and A. Arnone, Biochemistry, 39, 15353 (2000). Interface Sliding As Illustrated by the Multiple Quaternary Structures of Liganded Hemoglobin.
93. D. T. Jones, J. Molec. Biol., 292, 195 (1999). Protein Secondary Structure Prediction Based on Position-specific Scoring Matrices. Available: http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/psipred/.
94. L. J. McGuffin, K. Bryson, and D. T. Jones, Bioinformatics, 16, 404 (2000). The PSIPRED Protein Structure Prediction Server.
95. THREADER 3 User Guide: Protein Fold Recognition by Threading, Version 3 Manual, David T. Jones, Department of Computer Science, Bioinformatics Unit, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom, email dtj@cs.ucl.ac.uk, 2003.
96. M. A. Walsh, A. McCarthy, P. A. O'Farrell, P. McArdle, P. D. Cunningham, S. G. Mayhew, and T. M. Higgins, Eur. J. Biochem., 258, 362 (1998). X-ray Crystal Structure of the Desulfovibrio vulgaris (Hildenborough) Apoflavodoxin-riboflavin Complex.
97. M. A. Walsh, T. Schneider, L. C. Sieker, Z. Daunter, V. Lamzin, and K. S. Wilson, Acta Crystallographica, Section D, Biological Crystallography, 54, 522 (1998). Refinement of Triclinic Hen Egg-white Lysozyme at Atomic Resolution.
98. J. Thompson, D. Higgins, and T. Gibson, Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 4673 (1994). CLUSTAL W: Improving the Sensitivity of Progressive Multiple Sequence Alignment Through Sequence Weighting, Position-specific Gap Penalties and Weight Matrix Choice. Clustal W and Clustal X website: http://bess.u-strasbg.fr/ BioInfo/ClustalX/Top.html.
99. E. F. Pettersen, T. D. Goddard, C. C. Huang, G. S. Couch, D. M. Greenblatt, E. C. Meng, and T. E. Ferrin, J. Comput. Chem., 25, 1605 (2004). UCSF Chimera - A Visualization System for Exploratory Research and Analysis. Available: http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera.
100. J. Vojtechovský, K. Chu, J. Berendzen, R. M. Sweet, and I. Schlichting, Biophysical J., 77, 2153 (1999). Crystal Structures of Myoglobin-Ligand Complexes at Near-Atomic Resolution.
101. M. O. Dayhoff and R. V. Eck, in Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, Vol. 3, M. O. Dayhoff, Ed., National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, D.C., 1968, pp. 33-41. A Model of Evolutionary Change in Proteins.
102. M. O. Dayhoff, R. M. Schwartz, and B. C. Orcutt, in Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, Vol. 5, Suppl. 3, M. O. Dayhoff, Ed., National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, D.C., 1978, pp. 345-358. A Model of Evolutionary Change in Proteins.
103. M. O. Dayhoff, W. C. Barker, and L. T. Hunt, in Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 91, C. H. W. Hirs and S. N. Timasheff, Eds., Academic Press, New York, 1983, pp. 524-545. Establishing Homologies in Protein Sequences.
104. S. Henikoff and J. G. Henikoff, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 89, 10915 (1992). Amino Acid Substitution Matrices from Protein Blocks.
105. J. Stoye, Gene, 211, GC45 (1998). Multiple Sequence Alignment with the Divide-and-Conquer Method.
106. S2C: A database correlating sequence and atomic coordinate numbering in the Protein Data Bank, Guoli Wang, Jonathan W. Arthur, and Roland L. Dunbrack, Jr., 2002. Available: http://dunbrack.fccc.edu/Guoli/s2c/.
107. G. H. Stout and L. H. Jensen, X-Ray Structure Determination: A Practical Guide, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1989.
108. M. A. S. Saqi, R. B. Russell, and M. J. E. Sternberg, Protein Engineer., 11, 627 (1998). Misleading Local Sequence Alignments: Implications for Comparative Protein Modeling.
109. M. Bajaj and T. L. Blundell, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioengineer., 13, 453 (1984). Evolution and the Tertiary Structure of Proteins.
110. A. J. Jennings, C. M. Edge, and M. J. E. Sternberg, Protein Engineering Design and Selection, 14, 227 (2001). An Approach to Improving Multiple Alignments of Protein Sequences Using Predicted Secondary Structure.
111. G. H. Gonnet, Handbook of Algorithms and Data Structures: In Pascal and C, Second Edition, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Wokingham, United Kingdom, 1991.
112. G. H. Gonnet, M. A. Cohen, and S. A. Benner, Science, 256, 1443 (1992). Exhaustive Matching of the Entire Protein Sequence Database.
113. S. Henikoff and J. G. Henikoff, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 17, 49 (1993). Performance Evaluation of Amino Acid Substitution Matrices.
114. S. B. Needleman and C. D. Wunsch, J. Mol. Biol., 48, 443 (1970). A General Method Applicable to the Search for Similarities in the Amino Acid Sequences of Two Proteins.
115. J. Thompson, T. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin, and D. Higgins, Nucleic Acids Res., 25, 4876 (1997). The CLUSTAL_X Windows Interface: Flexible Strategies for Multiple Sequence Alignment Aided by Quality Analysis Tools.
116. F. Jeanmougin, J. D. Thompson, M. Gouy, D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson, Trends Biochem. Sci., 23, 403 (1998). Multiple Sequence Alignment with Clustal X.
117. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package), 3.6, Distributed by Joseph Felenstein. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, 2004. Available: http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html.
118. C. Notredame, D. G. Higgins, and J. Heringa, J. Mol. Biol., 302, 205 (2000). T-Coffee: A Novel Method for Fast and Accurate Multiple Sequence Alignment. Available: http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/TCoffee.html.
119. X. Huang and W. Miller, Adv. Appl. Math., 12, 337 (1991). A Time-Efficient, Linear-Space Local Similarity Algorithm. Available: http://fasta.bioch.virginia.edu/fasta_www/lalign.htm.
120. W. R. Pearson and D. J. Lipman, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 85, 2444 (1988). Improved Tools for Biological Sequence Comparison. Available: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/fasta33/.
121. W. R. Pearson, in Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 183, R. F. Doolittle, Ed., Academic Press, San Diego, California, 1990, pp. 63-98. Rapid and Sensitive Sequence Comparison with FASTP and FASTA.
122. U. Tönges, S. W. Perrey, J. Stoye, and A. W. M. Dress, Gene, 172, GC33 (1996). A General Method for Fast Multiple Sequence Alignment.
123. J. Stoye, Divide-and-Conquer Multiple Sequence Alignment, Ph.D. dissertation, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany, 1997.
124. D. J. Lipman, S. F. Altschul, and J. D. Kececioglu, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 86, 4412 (1989). A Tool for Multiple Sequence Alignment.
125. S. K. Gupta, J. D. Kececioglu, and A. A. Schäffer, J. Comput. Biol., 2, 459 (1995). Improving the Practical Space and Time Efficiency of the Shortest-Paths Approach to Sum-of-Pairs Multiple Sequence Alignments.
126. M. J. Zvelebil, G. J. Barton, W. R. Taylor, and M. J. E. Sternberg, J. Molec. Biol., 195, 957 (1987). Prediction of Protein Secondary Structure and Active Sites Using the Alignment of Homologous Sequences.
127. M. Clamp, J. Cuff, S. M. Searle, and G. J. Barton, Bioinformatics, 20, 426 (2004). The Jalview Java Alignment Editor. Available: http://www.jalview. org/.
128. G. J. Barton, Protein Engineering, 6, 37 (1993). ALSCRIPT - A Tool to Format Multiple Sequence Alignments. Request ALSCRIPT from http://www.compbio. dundee.ac.uk/Software/Alscript/alscript.html.
129. J. Pontius, J. Richelle, and S. J. Wodak, J. Mol. Biol., 264, 121 (1996). Deviations from Standard Atomic Volumes as a Quality Measure for Protein Crystal Structures. Request PROVE from http://www.ucmb.ulb.ac.be/SCMBB/PROVE/.
130. K. B. Nicholas, H. B. Nicholas, Jr., and D. W. Deerfield, II, EMBNEW.NEWS, 4, 14 (1997). GeneDoc: Analysis and Visualization of Genetic Variation. Available: http://www.psc.edu/biomed/dissem/genedoc/index.html.
131. B. Rost, J. Struct. Biol., 134, 204 (2001). Review: Protein Secondary Structure Prediction Continues to Rise.
132. G. D. Rose, Nature, 272, 586 (1978). Prediction of Chain Turns in Globular Proteins on a Hydrophobic Basis.
133. G. D. Rose and S. Roy, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 77, 4643 (1980). Hydrophobic Basis of Packing in Globular Proteins.
134. C. Chothia, J. Mol. Biol., 105, 1 (1976). The Nature of the Accessible and Buried Surfaces in Proteins.
135. J. Kyte and R. F. Doolittle, J. Mol. Biol., 157, 105 (1982). A Simple Method for Displaying the Hydropathic Character of a Protein.
136. B. Rost and C. Sander, J. Mol. Biol., 232, 584 (1993). Prediction of Protein Secondary Structure at Better than 70% Accuracy.
137. D. Frishman and P. Argos, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 27, 329 (1997). Seventy-Five Percent Accuracy in Protein Secondary Structure Predicition.
138. D. T. Jones, J. Mol. Biol., 287, 797 (1999). GenTHREADER: An Efficient and Reliable Protein Fold Recognition Method for Genomic Sequences.
139. D. Frishman and P. Argos, Protein Engineer., 9, 133 (1996). Incorporation of Long-Distance Interactions into a Secondary Structure Prediction Algorithm.
140. M. Ouali and R. D. King, Protein Sci., 9, 1162 (2000). Cascaded Multiple Classifiers for Secondary Structure Prediction. Available: http://www.aber.ac. uk/~phiwww/prof/.
141. D. T. Jones, W. R. Taylor, and J. M. Thornton, Biochemistry, 33, 3038 (1994). A Model Recognition Approach to the Prediction of All-Helical Membrane Protein Structure and Topology. Available: http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/psipred/.
142. D. T. Jones, FEBS Lett., 423, 281 (1998). Do Transmembrane Protein Superfolds Exist?
143. B. Rost, in Methods in Enzymology: Computer Methods for Macromolecular Sequence Analysis, Vol. 266, R. F. Doolittle, Ed., Academic Press, San Diego, California, 1996, pp. 525-539. PHD: Predicting One-Dimensional Protein Structure by Profile-Based Neural Networks. Available: http://cubic.bioc.columbia.edu/ predictprotein/.
144. M. S. Johnson, M. J. Sutcliffe, and T. L. Blundell, J. Mol. Evolution, 30, 43 (1990). Molecular Anatomy: Phyletic Relationships Derived from Three-Dimensional Structures of Proteins.
145. J. Felenstein, Annu. Rev. Genet., 22, 521 (1988). Phylogenies from Molecular Sequences: Inference and Reliability.
146. M. F. Perutz, J. Mol. Biol., 13, 646 (1965). Structure and Function of Haemoglobin. I. A Tentative Atomic Model of Horse Oxyhaemoglobin.
147. M. F. Perutz, J. C. Kendrew, and H. C. Watson, J. Mol. Biol., 13, 669 (1965). Structure and Function of Haemoglobin. II. Some Relations between Polypeptide Chain Configuration and Amino Acid Seqeunce.
148. M. F. Perutz, H. Muirhead, J. M. Cox, and L. C. G. Goaman, Nature, 219, 131 (1968). Three-Dimensional Fourier Synthesis of Horse Oxyhaemoglobin at 2.8 Å Resolution: The Atomic Model.
149. T. F. Havel and M. E. Snow, J. Mol. Biol., 217, 1 (1991). A New Method for Building Protein Conformations from Sequence Alignments with Homologues of Known Structure.
150. N. Srinivasan and T. L. Blundell, Protein Engineer., 6, 501 (1993). An Evaluation of the Performance of an Automated Procedure for Comparative Modeling of Protein Tertiary Structure.
151. S. M. Brocklehurst and R. N. Perham, Protein Sci., 2, 626 (1993). Prediction of the Three-dimensional Structures of the Biotinylated Domain from Yeast Pyruvate Carboxylase and of the Lipoylated H-protein from the Pea Leaf Glycine Cleavage System: A New Automated Method for the Prediction of Protein Tertiary Structure.
152. A. Šali and T. L. Blundell, J. Mol. Biol., 234, 779 (1993). Comparative Protein Modeling by Satisfaction of Spatial Restraints.
153. L. A. Kelley, S. P. Gardner, and M. J. Sutcliffe, Protein Engineer., 9, 1063 (1996). An Automated Approach for Clustering an Ensemble of NMR-Derived Protein Structures into Conformationally-Related Subfamilies. Available: http://neon.ce.umist.ac.uk/nmrclust/protocol.html.
154. A. Fiser, R. K. Do, and A. Šali, Protein Sci., 9, 1753 (2000). Modeling of Loops in Protein Structures.
155. MODELLER: A Program for Protein Structure Modeling, Release 8v0, 2005, Andrej Šali, Department of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Mission Bay QB3, 1700 4th Street, Suite 503B, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-2552, email modeler_usage@salilab.org.
156. Molecular Operating Environment, 2004.03, Chemical Computing Group Inc., 1010 Sherbrooke Street West, #910, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2R7, 2004. Available: http://www.chemcomp.com.
157. P. A. Bates, L. A. Kelley, R. M. MacCallum, and M. J. E. Sternberg, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics Supplement, 45, 39 (2001). Enhancement of Protein Modeling by Human Intervention in Applying the Automatic Programs 3D-JIGSAW and 3D-PSSM. The 3D-JIGSAW server http://www.bmm.icnet.uk/ servers/3djigsaw/. The 3D-PSSM server http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/~3dpssm/ index2.html.
158. B. Contreras-Moreira and P. A. Bates, Bioinformatics, 18, 1141 (2002). Domain Fishing: A First Step in Protein Comparative Modeling.
159. L. A. Kelley, R. M. MacCallum, and M. J. E. Sternberg, J. Mol. Biol., 299, 499 (2000). Enhanced Genome Annotation using Structural Profiles in the Program 3D-PSSM.
160. D. Fischer, C. Barret, K. Bryson, A. Elofsson, A. Godzik, D. Jones, K. J. Karplus, L. A. Kelley, R. M. MacCallum, K. Pawowski, B. Rost, L. Rychlewski, and M. J. E. Sternberg, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics Supplement, 37, 209 (1999). CAFASP-1: Critical Assessment of Fully Automated Structure Prediction Methods.
161. L. A. Kelley, R. M. MacCallum, and M. J. E. Sternberg. Third Annual Conference on Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB 99), 1999, The Association for Computing Machinery, New York. Recognition of Remote Protein Homologies Using Three-Dimensional Information to Generate a Position Specific Scoring Matrix in the Program 3D-PSSM.
162. P. A. Bates, R. M. Jackson, and M. J. E. Sternberg, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics Supplement, 29, 59 (1997). Model Building by Comparison: A Combination of Expert Knowledge and Computer Automation.
163. R. Sanchez and A. Šali, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 7, 206 (1997). Advances in Comparative Protein-Structure Modeling.
164. S. Srinivasan, C. March, and S. Sudarsanam, Protein Sci., 2, 277 (1993). An Automated Method for Modeling Proteins on Known Templates Using Distance Geometry.
165. A. Šali, J. P. Overington, M. S. Johnson, and T. L. Blundell, Trends Biochem. Sci., 15, 235 (1990). From Comparisons of Protein Sequences and Structures to Protein Modeling and Design.
166. J. M. Thornton, J. Mol. Biol., 151, 261 (1981). Disulphide Bridges in Globular Proteins.
167. W. Braun and N. Gō, J. Mol. Biol., 186, 611 (1985). Calculation of Protein Conformations by Proton-Proton Distance Constraints. A New Efficient Algorithm.
168. A. D. MacKerell, Jr., D. Bashford, M. Bellott, R. L. Dunbrack, Jr., J. D. Evanseck, M. J. Field, S. Fischer, J. Gao, H. Guo, S. Ha, D. Joseph-McCarthy, L. Kuchnir, K. Kuczera, F. T. K. Lau, C. Mattos, S. Michnick, T. Ngo, D. T. Nguyen, B. Prodhom, I. W. E. Reiher, B. Roux, M. Schlenkrich, J. C. Smith, R. Stote, J. Straub, M. Watanabe, J. Wiórkiewicz-Kuczera, D. Yin, and M. Karplus, J. Phys. Chem. B, 102, 3586 (1998). All-Atom Empirical Potential for Molecular Modeling and Dynamics Studies of Proteins.
169. M. J. Sutcliffe, I. Haneef, D. Carney, and T. L. Blundell, Protein Engineer., 1, 377 (1987). Knowledge Based Modeling of Homologous Proteins, Part I: Three-dimensional Frameworks Derived from the Simultaneous Superposition of Multiple Structures.
170. C. M. Topham, A. McLeod, F. Eisenmenger, J. P. Overington, M. S. Johnson, and T. L. Blundell, J. Mol. Biol., 229, 194 (1993). Fragment Ranking in Modeling of Protein Structure: Conformationally Constrained Environmental Amino Acid Substitution Tables.
171. M. J. Sutcliffe, F. R. Hayes, and T. L. Blundell, Protein Engineer., 1, 385 (1987). Knowledge Based Modeling of Homologous Proteins, Part II: Rules for the Conformations of Substituted Sidechains.
172. Comparative Modeling Perl Scripts, Troy Wymore, Biomedical Initiative Group, Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center, Carnegie Mellon University, 4400 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, 2005. Available: http://www.psc.edu/biomed/ research/biostr/perl.htm.
173. D. A. Pearlman, D. A. Case, J. W. Caldwell, W. S. Ross, T. E. Cheatham, III, S. DeBolt, D. Ferguson, G. Seibel, and P. A. Kollman, Comput. Phys. Commun., 91, 1 (1995). AMBER: A Package of Computer Programs for Applying Molecular Mechanics, Normal Mode Analysis, Molecular Dynamics and Free Energy Calculations to Simulate the Structural and Energetic Properties of Molecules.
174. AMBER, Version 8, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Box 2280, University of California-San Francisco, 600 16th Street, San Francisco, California 94143-2280, 2004. Available: http://amber.scripps.edu.
175. B. R. Brooks, R. E. Bruccoleri, B. D. Olafson, D. J. States, S. Swaminathan, and M. Karplus, J. Comput. Chem., 4, 187 (1983). CHARMM: A Program for Macromolecular Energy, Minimization, and Dynamics Calculations.
176. A. D. MacKerell, Jr., B. R. Brooks, C. L. Brooks, III, L. Nilsson, B. Roux, Y. Won, and M. Karplus, in Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry, Vol 1, P. v. R. Schleyer, Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chichester, United Kingdom, 1998, pp. 271-277. CHARMM: The Energy Function and Its Parameterization with an Overview of the Program.
177. Tinker, 4.2, Jay William Ponder, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, 2004. Available: http://dasher.wustl.edu/tinker/.
178. L. Kalé, R. Skell, M. Bhandarkar, R. Brunner, A. Gursoy, N. Krawetz, J. Phillips, A. Shinozaki, K. Varadarajan, and K. Schulten, J. Comput. Phys., 151, 283 (1999). NAMD2: Greater Scalability for Parallel Molecular Dynamics. Download NAMD from http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/.
179. M. J. Sippl, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 17, 355 (1993). Recognition of Errors in Three-Dimensional Structures of Proteins. Download ProSa from http://www.came.sbg.ac.at/Services/prosa.html.
180. J. U. Bowie, R. Lüthy, and D. Eisenberg, Science, 253, 164 (1991). A Method to Identify Protein Sequences That Fold into a Known Three-Dimensional Structure. The Verify3D server http://www.doe-mbi.ucla.edu/Services/Verify_3D/.
181. R. Lüthy, J. U. Bowie, and D. Eisenberg, Nature, 356, 83 (1992). Assessment of Protein Models with Three-Dimensional Profiles.
182. A. A. Canutescu, A. A. Shelenkov, and R. L. Dunbrack, Jr., Protein Sci., 12, 2001 (2003). A Graph-Theory Algorithm for Rapid Protein Side-Chain Prediction. Download SCWRL from http://dunbrack.fccc.edu/SCWRL3.php.
183. J. Janin, S. J. Wodak, M. Levitt, and B. Maigret, J. Mol. Biol., 125, 357 (1978). Conformation of Amino Acid Side-Chains in Proteins.
184. M. N. G. James and A. R. Sielecki, J. Mol. Biol., 163, 299 (1983). Structure and Refinement of Penicillopepsin at 1.8Å Resolution.
185. M. J. McGregor, S. A. Islam, and M. J. E. Sternberg, J. Mol. Biol., 198, 295 (1987). Analysis of the Relationship Between Side-Chain Conformation and Secondary Structure in Globular Proteins.
186. J. W. Ponder and F. M. Richards, J. Mol. Biol., 193, 775 (1987). Tertiary Templates for Proteins: Use of Packing Criteria in the Enumeration of Allowed Sequences for Different Structural Classes.
187. P. Koehl and M. Delarue, J. Mol. Biol., 239, 249 (1994). Application of a Self-consistent Mean Field Theory to Predict Protein Side-chains Conformation and Estimate Their Conformational Entropy.
188. S. C. Lovell, J. M. Word, J. S. Richardson, and D. C. Richardson, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 40, 389 (2000). The Penultimate Rotamer Library. Available: http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu/databases/rotamer. html.
189. Z. Xiang and B. H. Honig, J. Mol. Biol., 311, 421 (2001). Extending the Accuracy Limits of Prediction for Sidechain Conformation. Available: http://trantor.bioc.columbia.edu/programs/sidechain/index.html.
190. M. P. Jacobson, R. A. Friesner, Z. Xiang, and B. H. Honig, J. Mol. Biol., 320, 597 (2002). On the Role of the Crystal Environment in Determining Protein Side-chain Conformations.
191. st Century. Available: http://dunbrack.fccc.edu/ bbdep/.
192. R. L. Dunbrack, Jr. and M. Karplus, J. Mol. Biol., 230, 543 (1993). Backbone-Dependent Rotamer Library for Proteins: Application to Side-Chain Predictions.
193. R. L. Dunbrack, Jr. and M. Karplus, Nature Structural Biol., 1, 334 (1994). Conformational Analysis of the Backbone-Dependent Rotamer Preferences of Protein Sidechains.
194. R. L. Dunbrack, Jr. and F. E. Cohen, Protein Sci., 6, 1661 (1997). Bayesian Statistical Analysis of Protein Side-Chain Rotamer Preferences.
195. R. F. Goldstein, Biophys. J., 66, 1335 (1994). Efficient Rotamer Elimination Applied to Protein Side-Chains and Related Spin Glasses.
196. L. L. Looger and H. W. Hellinga, J. Mol. Biol., 307, 429 (2001). Generalized Dead-End Elimination Algorithms Make Large-Scale Protein Side-Chain Structure Prediction Tractable: Implications for Protein Design and Structural Genomics.
197. J. Desmet, M. De Maeyer, B. Hazes, and I. Lasters, Nature, 356, 539 (1992). The Dead-End Elimination Theorem and Its Use in Protein Side-Chain Positioning.
198. D. B. Gordon and S. L. Mayo, J. Comput. Chem., 19, 1505 (1998). Radical Performance Enhancements for Combinatorial Optimization Algorithms Based on the Dead-End Elimination Theorem.
199. D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications, Second Edition, Academic Press, New York, 2001. Available: http://molsim.chem.uva.nl/frenkel_smit/.
200. M. J. Field, A Practical Introduction to the Simulation of Molecular Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1999.
201. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulations of Liquids, Oxford University Press, New York, 1989.
202. W. F. van Gunsteren and A. E. Mark, J. Chem. Phys., 108, 6109 (1998). Validation of Molecular Dynamics Simulation.
203. R. A. Laskowski, M. W. MacArthur, D. S. Moss, and J. M. Thornton, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 26, 283 (1993). PROCHECK: A Program to Check the Stereochemical Quality of Protein Structures. Download PROCHECK from http://www.biochem.ucl.ac.uk/~roman/procheck/procheck.html.
204. H. J. C. Berendsen, J. R. Grigera, and T. P. Straatsma, J. Phys. Chem., 91, 6269 (1987). The Missing Term in Effective Pair Potentials.
205. W. L. Jorgensen, J. Chandrasekhar, J. D. Madura, and M. L. Klein, J. Chem. Phys., 79, 926 (1983). Comparison of Simple Potential Functions for Simulating Liquid Water.
206. W. L. Jorgensen and J. D. Madura, Mol. Phys., 56, 1381 (1985). Temperature and Size Dependences for Monte Carlo Simulations of TIP4P Water.
207. H. W. Horn, W. C. Swope, J. W. Pitera, J. D. Madura, T. J. Dick, G. L. Hura, and T. Head-Gordon, J. Chem. Phys., 120, 9665 (2004). Development of an Improved Four-Site Water Model for Biomolecular Simulations: TIP4P-Ew.
208. R. W. Pastor, B. R. Brooks, and A. Szabo, Mol. Phys., 65, 1409 (1988). An Analysis of the Accuracy of Langevin and Molecular Dynamics Algorithms.
209. H. J. C. Berendsen, J. P. M. Postma, W. F. van Gunsteren, A. D. Nola, and J. R. Haak, J. Chem. Phys., 81, 3684 (1984). Molecular Dynamics with Coupling to an External Bath.
210. S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi, Science, 220, 671 (1983). Optimization by Simulated Annealing.
211. M. Levitt, J. Mol. Biol., 104, 59 (1976). A Simplified Representation of Protein Conformations for Rapid Simulation of Protein Folding.
212. G. N. Ramachandran and V. Sasisekharan, in Advances in Protein Chemistry, Vol. 23, C. B. Anfinsen, Jr., M. L. Anson, J. T. Edsall, and F. M. Richards, Eds., Academic Press, New York, 1968, pp. 283-438. Conformation of Polypeptides and Proteins.
213. A. L. Morris, M. W. MacArthur, E. G. Hutchinson, and J. M. Thornton, PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 12, 345 (1992). Stereochemical Quality of Protein Structure Coordinates.
214. C. Colovos and T. O. Yeates, Protein Sci., 2, 1511 (1993). Verification of Protein Structures: Patterns of Nonbonded Atomic Interactions. Download ERRAT from http://www.doe-mbi.ucla.edu/Services/ERRATv2/ and for more information visit http://www.doe-mbi.ucla.edu/People/Yeates/Gallery/Errat.html.
215. W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, and K. Schulten, J. Mol. Graph. Model., 14, 33 (1996). VMD-Visual Molecular Dynamics. Download VMD from http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/ Research/vmd/.
216. L. A. Kelley and M. J. Sutcliffe, Protein Sci., 6, 2628 (1997). OLDERADO: On-Line Database of Ensemble Representatives and Domains. The OLDERADO server http://neon.ce.umist.le.ac.uk/olderado/index.html.
217. R. A. Engh and R. Huber, Acta Crystallographica, Section A, A47, 392 (1991). Accurate Bond and Angle Parameters for X-Ray Protein Structure Refinement.
218. The Cambridge Structural Database, 2003, Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2003. Available: http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/prods/csd/csd.html.
219. M. W. MacArthur, R. A. Laskowski, and J. M. Thornton, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 4, 731 (1994). Knowledge-based Validation of Protein Structure Coordinates Derived by X-Ray Crystallography and NMR Spectroscopy.
220. M. J. Sippl, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 5, 229 (1995). Knowledge-Based Potentials for Proteins.
221. M. Wiederstein and M. J. Sippl, J. Mol. Biol., 345, 1199 (2005). Protein Sequence Randomization: Efficient Estimation of Protein Stability Using Knowledge-Based Potentials.
222. G. F. Voronoi, J. für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 134, 198 (1908). Nouvelles Applications des Paramètres Continus à la Théorie des Formes Quadratiques.
223. P. Alard, Calculs de Surface et d'Énergie dans le Domain des Macromolécules, Service de Conformation des Macromolécules Biologiques et de Bioinformatique, Service de Conformation des Macromolécules Biologiques et de Bioinformatique, B-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium, 1991.
224. L. A. Kelley, S. P. Gardner, and M. J. Sutcliffe, Protein Engineer., 10, 737 (1997). An Automated Approach for Defining Core Atoms and Domains in an Ensemble of NMR-Derived Protein Structures. Available: http://neon.ce.umist.le. ac.uk/nmrcore/coreprot.html.