Protein structure classification

Reviews in Computational Chemistry

Volumn 22, Issue , 2006, Pages 1-55

  Koehl, Patrice ^a  

^a University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749988567     PISSN: 10693599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1002/0471780367.ch1     Document Type: Review

References (181)

1. J. Monod, Le Hasard Et La Nécessité, Seuil, Paris, France, 1973.
2. A. Bernal, U. Ear, and N. Kyrpides, Nucl. Acids Res., 29, 126 (2001). Genomes Online Database (Gold): A Monitor of Genome Projects World-Wide.
3. F. C. Bernstein, T. F. Koetzle, G. William, D. J. Meyer, M. D. Brice, and J. R. Rodgers J. Mol. Biol., 112, 535 (1977). The Protein Databank: A Computer-Based Archival File for Macromolecular Structures.
4. H. M. Berman, J. Westbrook, Z. Feng, G. Gilliland, T. N. Bhat, and H. Weissig, Nucl. Acids Res., 28, 235 (2000). The Protein Data Bank.
5. W. Gilbert, Nature (London), 349, 99 (1991). Towards a Paradigm Shift in Biology.
6. A. G. Murzin, S. E. Brenner, T. Hubbard, and C. Chothia, J. Mol. Biol., 247, 536 (1995). SCOP: A Structural Classification of Proteins Database for the Investigation of Sequences and Structures.
7. C. A. Orengo, A. D. Michie, S. Jones, D. T. Jones, M. B. Swindells, and J. M. Thornton, Structure, 5, 1093 (1997). CATH: A Hierarchic Classification of Protein Domain Structures.
8. L. Holm and C. Sander, J. Mol. Biol., 233, 123 (1993). Protein Structure Comparison by Alignment of Distance Matrices.
9. G. E. Schulz and R. H. Schirmer, Principles of Protein Structure, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1979.
10. C. R. Cantor and P. R. Schimmel, Biophysical Chemistry: The Conformation of Biological Macromolecules, W. H. Freeman Company, New York, 1980.
11. C. Branden and J. Tooze, Introduction to Protein Structure, Garland Publishing, New York, 1991.
12. T. E. Creighton, Proteins, W. H. Freeman Sc Co., New York, 1993.
13. W. R. Taylor, A. C. W. May, N. P. Brown, and A. Aszodi, Reports Prog. Phys., 64, 517 (2001). Protein Structure: Geometry, Topology and Classification.
14. R. B. Corey and L. Pauling, Rev. Sci. Instr., 24, 621 (1953). Molecular Models of Amino Acids, Peptides and Proteins.
15. W. L. Koltun, Biopolymers, 3, 665 (1965). Precision Space-Filling Atomic Models.
16. J. Kendrew, R. Dickerson, B. Strandberg, R. Hart, D. Davies, and D. Philips, Nature (London), 185, 422 (1960). Structure of Myoglobin: A Three Dimensional Fourier Synthesis at 2 Angstrom Resolution.
17. P. J. Kraulis, J. Appl. Cryst., 24, 946 (1991). Molscript: A Program to Produce Both Detailed and Schematic Plots of Protein Structures.
18. W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, and K. Schulten, J. Molec. Graphics, 14, 33 (1996). VMD - Visual Molecular Dynamics.
19. K. C. Timberlake, General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry: Structures of Life, Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco, CA, 2004.
20. G. M. Crippen, J. Mol. Biol., 126, 315 (1978). Tree Structural Organization of Proteins.
21. A. V. Efimov, FEBS Lett., 224, 372 (1987). Pseudo-Homology of Protein Standard Structures Formed by 2 Consecutive Beta-Strands.
22. A. V. Efimov, FEBS Lett., 284, 288 (1991). Structure of Coiled Beta-Beta Hairpins and Beta-Beta-Corners.
23. A. V. Efimov, Protein Eng., 4, 245 (1991). Structure of Alpha-Alpha Hairpins with Short Connections.
24. A. V. Efimov, Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 60, 201 (1993). Standard Structures in Proteins.
25. C. Brooks, M. Karplus, and M. Pettitt, Adv. Chem. Phys., 71, 1 (1988). Proteins: A Theoretical Perspective of Dynamics, Structure and Thermodynamics.
26. C. B. Anfinsen, Science, 181, 223 (1973). Principles That Govern Protein Folding.
27. P. Koehl and M. Levitt, Nature Struct. Biol., 6, 108 (1999). A Brighter Future for Protein Structure Prediction.
28. D. Baker and A. Šali, Science, 294, 93 (2001). Protein Structure Prediction and Structural Genomics.
29. J.-E. Shea, M. R. Friedel, and A. Baumketner in Rev. Comput. Chem., K. B. Lipkowitz, T. R. Cundari, and V. Gillet, Eds., Wiley, New York, 2006, Vol. 22, pp. 169-228. Predicting Protein Folding.
30. M. Perutz, M. Rossman, A. Cullis, G. Muirhead, G. Will, and A. North, Nature (London), 185, 416 (1960). Structure of Haemoglobin: A Three-Dimensional Fourier Synthesis at 5.5 Angstrom Resolution, Obtained by X-Ray Analysis.
31. M. Levitt and C. Chothia, Nature (London), 261, 552 (1976). Structural Patterns in Globular Proteins.
32. A. M. Lesk and C. Chothia, J. Mol. Biol., 136, 225 (1980). How Different Amino-Acid Sequences Determine Similar Protein Structures: The Structure and Evolutionary Dynamics of the Globins.
33. C. Chothia and J. Janin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 78, 4146 (1981). Relative Orientation of Close Packed Beta Pleated Sheets in Proteins.
34. F. E. Cohen, M. J. E. Sternberg, and W. R. Taylor, J. Mol. Biol., 148, 253 (1981). Analysis of the Tertiary Structure of Protein Beta Sheet Sandwiches.
35. C. Chothia and J. Janin, Biochemistry, 21, 3955 (1982). Orthogonal Packing of Beta Pleated Sheets in Proteins.
36. F. E. Cohen, M. J. E. Sternberg, and W. R. Taylor, J. Mol. Biol., 156, 821 (1982). Analysis and Prediction of the Packing of Alpha Helices against a Beta Sheet in the Tertiary Structure of Globular Proteins.
37. K. C. Chou, Proteins: Struct. Func. Genet., 21, 319 (1995). A Novel Approach to Predicting Protein Structural Classes in a (20-1)-D Amino Acid Composition Space.
38. K. C. Chou and C. T. Zhang, Critical Rev. Biochem. Molec. Biol., 30, 275 (1995). Prediction of Protein Structural Classes.
39. I. Bahar, A. R. Atilgan, R. L. Jernigan, and B. Erman, Proteins: Struct. Func. Genet., 29, 172 (1997). Understanding the Recognition of Protein Structural Classes by Amino Acid Composition.
40. W. M. Liu and K. C. Chou, J. Protein Chem., 17, 209 (1998). Prediction of Protein Structural Classes by Modified Mahalanobis Discriminant Algorithm.
41. K. C. Chou, W. M. Liu, G. M. Maggiora, and C. T. Zhang, Proteins: Struct. Func. Genet., 31, 97 (1998). Prediction and Classification of Domain Structural Classes.
42. Y. D. Cai, Y. X. Li, and K. C. Chou, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1476, 1 (2000). Using Neural Networks for Prediction of Domain Structural Classes.
43. G. P. Zhou and N. Assa-Munt, Proteins: Struct. Func. Genet., 44, 57 (2001). Some Insights into Protein Structural Class Prediction.
44. R. Y. Luo, Z. P. Feng, and J. K. Liu, Eur. J. Biochem., 269, 4219 (2002). Prediction of Protein Structural Class by Amino Acid and Polypeptide Composition.
45. E. G. Hutchinson and J. M. Thornton, Protein Eng., 6, 233 (1993). The Greek Key Motif: Extraction, Classification and Analysis.
46. J. S. Richardson, Nature (London), 268, 495 (1977). β-Sheet Topology and the Relatedness of Proteins.
47. D. W. Banner, A. C. Bloomer, G. A. Petsko, D. C. Phillips, C. I. Pogson, I. A. Wilson, P. H. Corran, A. J. Furth, J. D. Milman, R. E. Offord, J. D. Priddle, and S. G. Waley, Nature (London), 255, 609 (1975). Structure of Chicken Muscle Triose Phosphate Isomerase Determined Crystallographically at 2.5 Å Resolution Using Amino-Acid Sequence Data.
48. A. G. Murzin, A. M. Lesk, and C. Chothia, J. Mol. Biol., 236, 1369 (1994). Principles Determining the Structure of Beta-Sheet Barrels in Proteins. 1. A Theoretical-Analysis.
49. A. G. Murzin, A. M. Lesk, and C. Chothia, J. Mol. Biol., 236, 1382 (1994). Principles Determining the Structure of Beta-Sheet Barrels in Proteins. 2. The Observed Structures.
50. G. Pujadas and J. Palau, Biologin (Bratislava), 54, 231 (1999). Tim Barrel Fold: Structural, Functional and Evolutionary Characteristics in Natural and Designed Molecules.
51. R. K. Wierenga, FEBS Lett., 492, 193 (2001). The Tim-Barrel Fold: A Versatile Framework for Efficient Enzymes.
52. N. Nagano, C. A. Orengo, and J. M. Thornton, J. Mol. Biol., 321, 741 (2002). One Fold with Many Functions: The Evolutionary Relationships between Tim Barrel Families Based on Their Sequences, Structures and Functions.
53. M. C. Vega, E. Lorentzen, A. Linden, and M. Wilmanns, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 7, 694 (2003). Evolutionary Markers in the (Beta/Alpha)8-Barrel Fold.
54. J. A. Gerlt and F. M. Raushel, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 7, 252 (2003). Evolution of Function in (Beta/Alpha)8-Barrel Enzymes.
55. E. L. Wise and I. Rayment, Acc. Chem. Res., 37, 149 (2004). Understanding the Importance of Protein Structure to Nature's Routes for Divergent Evolution in Tim Barrel Enzymes.
56. G. D. Rose, J. Mol. Biol., 134, 447 (1979). Hierarchic Organization of Domains in Globular Proteins.
57. J. S. Richardson, Adv. Protein Chem., 34, 167 (1981). The Anatomy and Taxonomy of Protein Structure.
58. J. Janin and C. Chothia, Meth. Enzymol., 115, 420 (1985). Domains in Proteins - Definitions, Location, and Structural Principles.
59. C. P. Ponting and R. B. Russell, in Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., R. M. Stroud, W. K. Olson, and M. P. Sheetz, Eds., Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CA, 2002, Vol. 31, pp. 45-71. The Natural History of Protein Domains.
60. S. Veretnik, P. E. Bourne, N. N. Alexandrov, and I. N. Shindyalov, J. Mol. Biol., 339, 647 (2004). Toward Consistent Assignment of Structural Domains in Proteins.
61. R. A. Laskowski, E. G. Hutchinson, A. D. Michie, A. C. Wallace, M. L. Jones, and J. M. Thornton, Trends Biochem. Sci., 22, 488 (1997). PDBSum: A Web-Based Database of Summaries and Analyses of All PDB Structures.
62. R. A. Laskowski, Nucl. Acids Res., 29, 221 (2001). PDBSum: Summaries and Analyses of PDB Structures.
63. W. Kabsch and C. Sander, Biopolymers, 22, 2577 (1983). Dictionary of Protein Secondary Structure: Pattern Recognition of Hydrogen Bonded and Geometrical Features.
64. G. Wang and R. L. Dunbrack, Bioinformatics (Oxford), 19, 1589 (2003). Pisces: A Protein Sequence Culling Server.
65. S. E. Brenner, P. Koehl, and M. Levitt, Nucl. Acids Res., 28, 254 (2000). The Astral Compendium for Protein Structure and Sequence Analysis.
66. J. M. Chandonia, N. S. Walker, L. Lo Conte, P. Koehl, M. Levitt, and S. E. Brenner, Nucl. Acids Res., 30, 260 (2002). Astral Compendium Enhancements.
67. J. M. Chandonia, G. Hon, N. S. Walker, L. Lo Conte, P. Koehl, M. Levitt, and S. E. Brenner, Nucl. Acids Res., 32, D189 (2004). The Astral Compendium in 2004.
68. M. G. Rossman and A. Liljas, J. Mol. Biol., 85, 177 (1974). Recognition of Structural Domains in Globular Proteins.
69. M. H. Zehfus and G. D. Rose, Biochemistry, 25, 5759 (1986). Compact Units in Proteins.
70. S. A. Islam, J. C. Luo, and M. J. E. Sternberg, Protein Eng., 8, 513 (1995). Identification and Analysis of Domains in Proteins.
71. A. S. Siddiqui and G. J. Barton, Protein Sci., 4, 872 (1995). Continuous and Discontinuous Domains: An Algorithm for the Automatic Generation of Reliable Protein Domain Definitions.
72. N. Alexandrov and I. Shindyalov, Bioinformatics (Oxford), 19, 429 (2003). PDB: Protein Domain Parser.
73. S. J. Wodak and J. Janin, Biochemistry, 20, 6544 (1981). Location of Structural Domains in Proteins.
74. A. A. Rashin, Nature (London), 291, 85 (1981). Location of Domains in Globular Proteins.
75. N. Go, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 80, 1964 (1983). Modular Structural Units, Exon and Function in Chicken Lysozyme.
76. M. H. Zehfus, Protein Eng., 7, 335 (1994). Binary Discontinuous Compact Protein Domains.
77. L. Holm and C. Sander, Proteins: Struct. Func. Genet., 19, 256 (1994). Parser for Protein Folding Units.
78. Y. Xu, D. Xu, and H. N. Gambow, Bioinformatics (Oxford), 16, 1091 (2000). Protein Domain Decomposition Using a Graph-Theoretic Approach.
79. J. T. Guo, D. Xu, D. Kim, and Y. Xu, Nucl. Acids Res., 31, 944 (2003). Improving the Performance of Domainparser for Structural Domain Partition Using Neural Network.
80. W. R. Taylor, Protein Eng., 12, 203 (1999). Protein Structural Domain Identification.
81. M. B. Swindells, Protein Sci., 4, 93 (1995). A Procedure for the Automatic Determination of Hydrophobic Cores in Protein Structures.
82. M. B. Swindells, Protein Sci., 4, 103 (1995). A Procedure for Detecting Structural Domains in Proteins.
83. A. S. Siddiqui and G. J. Barton, Protein Sci., 4, 872 (1995). Continuous and Discontinuous Domains: An Algorithm for the Automatic-Generation of Reliable Protein Domain Definitions.
84. C. Guerra and S. Istrail, Mathematical Methods for Protein Structure Analysis and Design, Advanced Lectures, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2003.
85. C. Chen and Q. Li, Acta Cryst. A, A60, 201 (2004). A Strict Solution for the Optimal Superposition of Protein Structures.
86. B. Sabata and J. K. Aggarwal, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Proc: Image Understanding, 54, 309 (1991). Estimation of Motion from a Pair of Range Images: A Review.
87. C. Ferrari and C. Guerra, in Mathematical Methods for Protein Structure Analysis and Design, C. Guerra and S. Istrail, Eds., Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2003, pp. 57-82. Geometric Methods for Protein Structure Comparison.
88. D. W. Eggert, A. Lorusso, and R. B. Fisher, Mach. Vis. and Applic., 9, 272 (1997). Estimating 3D Rigid Body Transformations: A Comparison of Four Major Algorithms.
89. G. H. Golub and C. F. V. Loan, Matrix Computation, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1996.
90. W. Kabsch, Acta Cryst. A, 32, 922 (1976). Solution for Best Rotation to Relate 2 Sets of Vectors.
91. W. Kabsch, Acta Cryst. A, 34, 827 (1978). Discussion of Solution for Best Rotation to Relate 2 Sets of Vectors.
92. A. D. McLachlan, J. Mol. Biol., 128, 49 (1979). Gene Duplications in the Structural Evolution of Chymotrypsin.
93. K. S. Arun, T. S. Huang, and S. D. Blostein, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. & Machine Intel., 9, 698 (1987). Least-Sqaure Fitting of Two 3D Point Sets.
94. P. H. Schonemann, Psychometrica, 31, 1 (1966). A Generalized Solution of the Orthogonal Procrustes Problem.
95. B. Horn, H. Hilden, and S. Negahdaripour, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 5, 1127 (1988). Closed-Form Solution of Absolute Orientation Using Orthonormal Matrices.
96. B. Horn, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 4, 629 (1987). Closed-Form Solution of Absolute Orientation Using Unit Quaternions.
97. M. W. Walker, L. Shao, and R. A. Voltz, CVGIP: Image Understanding, 54, 358 (1991). Estimating 3D Location Parameters Using Dual Number Quaternions.
98. E. A. Coutsias, C. Seok, and K. A. Dill, J. Comput. Chem, 25, 1849 (2004). Using Quaternions to Calculate RMSD.
99. S. Umeyama, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. & Machine Intel., 13, 376 (1991). Least-Squares Estimation of Transformation Parameters between 2-Point Patterns.
100. P. Koehl, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 11, 348 (2001). Protein Structure Similarities.
101. W. R. Taylor and C. A. Orengo, J. Mol. Biol., 208, 1 (1989). Protein Structure Alignment.
102. W. R. Taylor, Protein Sci., 8, 654 (1999). Protein Structure Comparison Using Iterated Double Dynamic Programming.
103. K. Nishikawa and T. Ooi, J. Theor. Biol., 43, 351 (1974). Comparison of Homologous Tertiary Structures of Proteins.
104. L. Holm, C. Ouzounis, C. Sander, G. Tuparev, and G. Vriend, Protein Sci., 1, 1691 (1992). A Database of Protein Structure Families with Common Folding Motifs.
105. L. Holm and C. Sander, Nature (London), 361, 309 (1993). Globin Fold in a Bacterial Toxin.
106. G. Vriend and C. Sander, Proteins: Struct. Func. Genet., 11, 52 (1991). Detection of Common 3-Dimensional Substructures in Proteins.
107. N. N. Alexandrov, K. Takahashi, and N. Go, J. Mol. Biol., 225, 5 (1992). Common Spatial Arrangements of Backbone Fragments in Homologous and Nonhomologous Proteins.
108. R. Nussinov and H. J. Wolfson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 88, 10495 (1991). Efficient Detection of 3-Dimensional Structural Motifs in Biological Macromolecules by Computer Vision Techniques.
109. R. Nussinov, D. Fischer, and H. Wolfson, FASEB J., 6, A349 (1992). A Computer Vision Based 3-Dimensional Approach for the Comparison of Protein Structures.
110. D. Fischer, O. Bachar, R. Nussinov, and H. Wolfson, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 9, 769 (1992). An Efficient Automated Computer Vision Based Technique for Detection of 3-Dimensional Structural Motifs in Proteins.
111. D. Fischer, H. Wolfson, and R. Nussinov, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn., 11, 367 (1993). Spatial, Sequence-Order-Independent Structural Comparison of Alpha/Beta Proteins: Evolutionary Implications.
112. D. Fischer, H. Wolfson, S. L. Lin, and R. Nussinov, Protein Sci., 3, 769 (1994). 3-Dimensional, Sequence Order-Independent Structural Comparison of a Serine-Protease against the Crystallographic Database Reveals Active-Site Similarities - Potential Implications to Evolution and to Protein-Folding.
113. H. J. Wolfson and I. Rigoutsos, IEEE Comput. Sci. & Eng., 4, 10 (1997). Geometric Hashing: An Overview.
114. P. J. Artymiuk, A. R. Poirrette, H. M. Grindley, D. W. Rice, and P. Willett, J. Mol. Biol., 243, 327 (1994). A Graph-Theoretic Approach to the Identification of 3-Dimensional Patterns of Amino-Acid Side-Chains in Protein Structures.
115. P. J. Artymiuk, A. R. Poirrette, D. W. Rice, and P. Willett, Topics Curr. Chem., 174, 73 (1995). The Use of Graph-Theoretical Methods for the Comparison of the Structures of Biological Macromolecules.
116. E. J. Gardiner, P. J. Artymiuk, and P. Willett, J. Mol. Graph. & Modelling, 15, 245 (1997). Clique-Detection Algorithms for Matching Three-Dimensional Molecular Structures.
117. T. D. Wu, S. C. Schmidler, T. Hastie, and D. L. Brutlag, J. Comput. Biol., 5, 585 (1998). Regression Analysis of Multiple Protein Structures.
118. S. Subbiah, D. V. Laurents, and M. Levitt, Curr. Biol., 3, 141 (1993). Structural Similarity of DNA-Binding Domains of Bacteriophage Repressors and the Globin Core.
119. M. Gerstein and M. Levitt, Protein Sci., 7, 445 (1998). Comprehensive Assessment of Automatic Structural Alignment against a Manual Standard; the SCOP Classification of Proteins.
120. A. S. Yang and B. Honig, J. Mol. Biol., 301, 665 (2000). An Integrated Approach to the Analysis and Modeling of Protein Sequences and Structures. I. Protein Structural Alignment and a Quantitative Measure for Protein Structural Distance.
121. J. D. Szustakowski and Z. P. Weng, Proteins: Struct. Func. Genet., 38, 428 (2000). Protein Structure Alignment Using a Genetic Algorithm.
122. I. N. Shindyalov and P. E. Bourne, Protein Eng., 11, 739 (1998). Protein Structure Alignment by Incremental Combinatorial Extension (CE) of the Optimal Path.
123. M. E. Ochagavia and S. J. Wodak, Proteins: Struct. Func. Bioinfo., 55, 436 (2004). Progressive Combinatorial Algorithm for Multiple Structural Alignments: Application to Distantly Related Proteins.
124. R. Blankenbecler, M. Ohlson, C. Peterson, and M. Ringler, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 100, 11936 (2003). Matching Protein Structures with Fuzzy Alignments.
125. L. Chen, T. Zhou, and Y. Tang, Bioinformatics (Oxford), 21, 51 (2005). Protein Structure Alignment by Deterministic Annealing.
126. B. W. Matthews and M. G. Rossman, Meth. Enzymol., 115, 397 (1985). Comparison of Protein Structures.
127. M. L. Sierk and W. R. Pearson, Protein Sci., 13, 773 (2004). Sensitivity and Selectivity in Protein Structure Comparison.
128. M. Novotny, D. Madsen, and G. J. Kleywegt, Proteins: Struct. Func. Genet., 54, 260 (2004). Evaluation of Protein Fold Comparison Servers.
129. R. Kolodny, P. Koehl, and M. Levitt, J. Mol. Biol., 346, 1173 (2005). Comprehensive Evaluation of Structural Alignment Method: Scoring by Geometric Match Measures.
130. L. Holm and C. Sander, Trends Biochem. Sci., 20, 478 (1995). DALI - a Network Tool for Protein-Structure Comparison.
131. M. G. Rossmann and P. Argos, J. Mol. Biol., 105, 75 (1976). Exploring Structural Homology of Proteins.
132. R. B. Russell and G. J. Barton, Proteins: Struct. Func. Genet., 14, 309 (1992). Multiple Protein Sequence Alignment from Tertiary Structure Comparison Assignment of Global and Residue Confidence Levels.
133. M. Suyama, Y. Matsuo, and K. Nishikawa, J. Mol. Evol., 44, S163 (1997). Comparison of Protein Structures Using 3D Profile Alignment.
134. J. U. Bowie, R. Lüthy, and D. Eisenberg, Science, 253, 164 (1991). A Method to Identify Protein Sequences That Fold into a Known Three-Dimensional Structure.
135. J. Jung and B. Lee, Protein Eng., 13, 535 (2000). Protein Structure Alignment Using Environmental Profiles.
136. T. Kawabata and K. Nishikawa, Proteins: Struct. Func. Genet., 41, 108 (2000). Protein Structure Comparison Using the Markov Transition Model of Evolution.
137. I. D. Kuntz, G. M. Grippen, P. A. Kollman, and D. Kimelman, J. Mol. Biol., 106, 983 (1976). Calculation of Protein Tertiary Structure.
138. G. M. Crippen and T. F. Havel, Distance Geometry and Molecular Conformation, Research Studies, Somerset, United Kingdom, 1988.
139. R. Kolodny and N. Linial, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 101, 12201 (2004). Approximate Protein Structural Alignment in Polynomial Time.
140. K. Kaindl and B. Steipe, Acta Cryst. A, 53, 809 (1997). Metric Properties of the Root-Mean-Square Deviation of Vector Sets.
141. K. Mizuguchi and N. Go, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 5, 377 (1995). Seeking Significance in 3-Dimensional Protein-Structure Comparisons.
142. A. M. Lesk, Proteins: Struct. Func. Genet., 33, 320 (1998). Extraction of Geometrically Similar Substructures: Least-Squares and Chebyshev Fitting and the Difference Distance Matrix.
143. A. C. W. May, Proteins: Struct. Func. Genet., 37, 20 (1999). Toward More Meaningful Hierarchical Classification of Protein Three-Dimensional Structures.
144. C. A. Orengo, M. B. Swindells, A. D. Michie, M. J. Zvelebil, P. C. Driscoll, M. D. Waterfield, and J. M. Thornton, Protein Sci., 4, 1977 (1995). Structure Similarity between the Pleckstrin Homology Domain and Verotoxin: The Problem of Measuring and Evaluating Structural Similarity.
145. Z. K. Feng and M. J. Sippl, Folding & Design, 1, 123 (1996). Optimum Superimposition of Protein Structures: Ambiguities and Implications.
146. A. Godzik, Protein Sci., 5, 1325 (1996). The Structural Alignment between Two Proteins: Is There a Unique Answer?
147. T. J. P. Hubbard, Proteins: Struct. Func. Genet., Suppl 3, 15 (1999). RMS/Coverage Graphs: A Qualitative Method for Comparing Three-Dimensional Protein Structure Predictions.
148. G. A. Arteca, in Rev. Comput. Chem., K. B. Lipkowitz and D. B. Boyd, Eds., VCH Publishers, New York, 1996, Vol. 9, pp. 191-254. Molecular Shape Descriptors.
149. P. Rogen and H. Bohr, Math. Biosci., 182, 167 (2003). A New Family of Global Protein Shape Descriptors.
150. D. Barnatan, Topology, 34, 423 (1995). On the Vassiliev Knot Invariants.
151. A. Stasiak and J. H. Maddocks, Nature (London), 406, 251 (2000). Mathematics - Best Packing in Proteins and DNA.
152. K. A. Hoffman, R. S. Manning, and J. H. Maddocks, Biopolymers, 70, 145 (2003). Link, Twist, Energy, and the Stability of DNA Minicircles.
153. M. Levitt, J. Mol. Biol., 170, 723 (1983). Protein Folding by Restrained Energy Minimization and Molecular Dynamics.
154. G. A. Arteca, Biopolymers, 33, 1829 (1993). Overcrossing Spectra of Protein Backbones - Characterization of 3-Dimensional Molecular Shape and Global Structural Homologies.
155. G. A. Arteca, Phys. Rev. E, 49, 2417 (1994). Scaling Behavior of Some Molecular Shape Descriptors of Polymer Chains and Protein Backbones.
156. G. A. Arteca, Phys. Rev. E, 51, 2600 (1995). Scaling Regimes Self-Entanglements in Very Compact Proteins.
157. G. A. Arteca and O. Tapia, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 39, 642 (1999). Characterization of Fold Diversity among Proteins with the Same Number of Amino Acid Residues.
158. C. T. Reimann, G. A. Arteca, and O. Tapia, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 4, 4058 (2002). Proteins in Vacuo. A Connection between Mean Overcrossing Number and Orientationally-Averaged Collision Cross Section.
159. P. Rogen and B. Fain, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 100, 119 (2003). Automatic Classification of Protein Structure by Using Gauss Integrals.
160. J. H. White, Am. J. Math., 91, 693 (1969). Self-Linking and Gauss-Integral in Higher Dimensions.
161. O. Gonzalez and J. H. Maddocks, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 96, 4769 (1999). Global Curvature, Thickness, and the Ideal Shapes of Knots.
162. A. Maritan, C. Micheletti, A. Trovato, and J. R. Banavar, Nature (London), 406, 287 (2000). Optimal Shapes of Compact Strings.
163. J. R. Banavar, A. Maritan, C. Micheletti, and A. Trovato, Proteins: Struct. Func. Genet., 47, 315 (2002). Geometry and Physics of Proteins.
164. J. R. Banavar, A. Maritan, and F. Seno, Proteins: Struct. Func. Genet., 49, 246 (2002). Anisotropic Effective Interactions in a Coarse-Grained Tube Picture of Proteins.
165. J. R. Banavar and A. Maritan, Rev. Modern Phys., 75, 23 (2003). Colloquium: Geometrical Approach to Protein Folding: A Tube Picture.
166. J. R. Banavar, A. Flammini, D. Marenduzzo, A. Maritan, and A. Trovato, J. Phys: Cond. Matter, 15, S1787 (2003). Tubes near the Edge of Compactness and Folded Protein Structures.
167. T. X. Hoang, A. Trovato, F. Seno, J. R. Banavar, and A. Maritan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 101, 7960 (2004). Geometry and Symmetry Presculpt the Free-Energy Landscape of Proteins.
168. C. A. Ouzounis, R. M. R. Coulson, A. J. Enright, V. Kunin, and J. B. Pereira-Leal, Nature Rev. Genet., 4, 508 (2003). Classification Schemes for Protein Structure and Function.
169. A. D. Michie, C. A. Orengo, and J. M. Thornton, J. Mol. Biol., 262, 168 (1996). Analysis of Domain Structural Class Using an Automated Class Assignment Protocol.
170. S. Jones, M. Stewart, A. Michie, M. B. Swindells, C. Orengo, and J. M. Thornton, Protein Sci., 7, 233 (1998). Domain Assignment for Protein Structures Using a Consensus Approach: Characterization and Analysis.
171. L. Holm and C. Sander, Science, 273, 595 (1996). Mapping the Protein Universe.
172. S. Dietmann and L. Holm, Nature Struct. Biol., 8, 953 (2001). Identification of Homology in Protein Structure Classification.
173. L. Holm and C. Sander, Nucl. Acids Res., 26, 316 (1998). Touring Protein Fold Space with DALI/FSSP.
174. L. Holm and C. Sander, Nucl. Acids Res., 22, 3600 (1994). The FSSP Database of Structurally Aligned Protein Fold Families.
175. C. Hadley and D. T. Jones, Structure, 7, 1099 (1999). A Systematic Comparison of Protein Structure Classifications: SCOP, CATH and FSSP.
176. R. Day, D. A. C. Beck, R. S. Armen, and V. Daggett, Protein Sci., 12, 2150 (2003). A Consensus View of Fold Space: Combining SCOP, CATH, and the DALI Domain Dictionary.
177. A. Harrison, F. Pearl, R. Mott, J. Thornton, and C. Orengo, J. Mol. Biol., 323, 909 (2002). Quantifying the Similarities within Fold Space.
178. G. Apic, J. Gough, and S. Teichmann, J. Mol. Biol., 310, 311 (2001). Domain Combinations in Archaeal, Eubacterial and Eukaryotic Proteomes.
179. S. Teichmann, A. G. Murzin, and C. Chothia, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 11, 354 (2001). Determination of Protein Function, Evolution and Interactions by Structural Genomics.
180. B. Rost, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 12, 409 (2002). Did Evolution Leap to Create the Protein Universe?
181. G. M. Downs and J. M. Barnard, in Rev. Comput. Chem., K. B. Lipkowitz, R. Larter, and T. Cundari, Eds., Wiley-VCH, New York, 2002, Vol. 18, pp. 1-40. Clustering Methods and Their Uses in Computational Chemistry.