CAFASP-1: Critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 37, Issue SUPPL. 3, 1999, Pages 209-217

  Fischer, Daniel ^a   Barret, Christian ^b   Bryson, Kevin ^c   Elofsson, Arne ^d   Godzik, Adam ^e   Jones, David ^c   Karplus, Kevin J ^b   Kelley, Lawrence A ^f   Maccallum, Robert M ^f   Pawowski, Krzysztof ^e   Rost, Burkhard ^g   Rychlewski, Leszek ^h   Sternberg, Michael ^f  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b Santa Cruz   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^d STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e BURNHAM INSTITUTE   (United States)

^f IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

^g EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

CASP; Critical assessment; Fold recognition; Fully automated structure prediction; Threading

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; RECOGNITION; RELIABILITY; ALGORITHM; CHEMISTRY; INTERNET; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE;

ALGORITHMS; INTERNET; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 0032606140     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(1999)37:3+<209::AID-PROT27>3.0.CO;2-Y     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. Scop: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 1995;247:536-540.
2. Fischer D, Elofsson A, Rice DW, Eisenberg D. Assessing the performance of inverted protein folding methods by means of an extensive benchmark. Proc 1st. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. January 1996. p 300-318. http://www.mbi.ucla.edu/people/ fischer/BENCH/benchmark1.html.
3. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJB, Meyer EF, Brice MD, Rodgers JR, Kennard O, Shimanouchi T, Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 1977;112:535-542.
4. Jones DT. Genthreader: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J Mol Biol 1999;287: 797-815.
5. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992;358:86-89.
6. Altschul SF, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389-3402.
7. Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, Thornton JM. Cath - a hierarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 1997;5:1093-1108.
8. Fischer D, Eisenberg D. Protein fold recognition using sequence-derived predictions. Prot Sci 1996;5:947-955.
9. Rost B, Sander C. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J Mol Biol 1993;232:584-599.
10. Fischer D. Modeling three-dimensional protein structures for amino acid sequences of the CASP3 experiment using sequence-derived predictions. Proteins Suppl 1999;3:61-65.
11. Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R. Hidden markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 1999;14:846-856.
12. Murzin AG, Bateman A. Distant homology recognition using structural classification of proteins. Proteins 1993;16:92-112.
13. Bryant SH, Lawrence CE. An empirical energy function for threading protein sequence through folding motif. Proteins 1993; 16:92-112.
14. Hendlich M, Lackner P, Weitckus S, Floeckner H, Froschauer R, Gottsbacher K, Casari G, Sippl MJ. Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models. The calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force. J Mol Biol 1990;216:167-180.
15. Fischer D, Eisenberg D. Assigning folds to the proteins encoded by the genome of Mycoplasma genitalium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:11929-11934.
16. Rychlewski L, Zhang B, Godzik A. Functional insights from structural predictions: analysis of the Escherichia coli genome. Protein Sci 1999;8:614-624.
17. Huynen M, Doerks T, Eisenhaber F, Orengo C, Sunyaev S, Yuan Y, Bork P. Homology-based fold predictions for Mycoplasma genitalium proteins. J Mol Biol 1998;280:323-326.
18. Fischer D, Eisenberg D. Predicting Structures for Genome Sequences. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1999;9:208-211.
19. Kelley LA, MacCallum RM, Sternberg MJE. Recognition of remote protein homologies using three-dimensional information to generate a position specific scoring matrix in the program 3D-PSSM. In: Istrail S, Pevzner P, Waterman M, editors. RECOMB 99-proceedings of the 3rd annual conference on computational biology. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 1999. p 218-225.
20. Park J, Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R, Haussler D, Hubbard T, Chothia C. Sequence comparisons using multiple sequences detect twice as many remote homologues as pairwise methods. J Mol Biol 1998;284:1201-1210.
21. Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rice DW, Le Grand S, Eisenberg D. A study of combined structure-sequence profiles. Folding Design 1996;1: 451-461.
22. Rost B. TOPITS: threading one-dimensional predictions into three-dimensional structures. Proc. Conf. Intelligent Systems in Mol Biol, ISMB-95; 1995. p 314-321.
23. Rychlewski L, Zhang B, Godzik A. Fold and function predictions for mycoplasma genitalium proteins. Folding Design 1998;3:229-238.