Seventy-five percent accuracy in protein secondary structure prediction

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 329-335

  Frishman, Dmitrij ^a,b   Argos, Patrick ^a  

^a EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

Author keywords

hydrogen bonds; protein sequence analysis; protein structure; sequence alignment

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENOME; HYDROGEN BOND; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CARRIER PROTEINS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; INTEGRATION HOST FACTORS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

EID: 0030931336     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(199703)27:3<329::AID-PROT1>3.0.CO;2-8     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Sonnhammer, E.L.L., Kahn, D. The modular arrangement of proteins as inferred from analysis of homology. Protein Sci. 3:482-492, 1994.
2. Argos, P. Prediction of the secondary structure of mouse nerve growth factor and its comparison with insulin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 3:805-11, 1976.
3. Zvelebil, M.J., Barton, G.J., Taylor, W.R., Sternberg, M.J. Prediction of protein secondary structure and active sites using the alignment of homologous sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 195:957-961, 1987.
4. Crawford, I.P., Niermann, T., Kirschner, K. Prediction of secondary structure by evolutionary comparison: Application to the alpha subunit of thryptophan synthase. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 2:118-129, 1987.
5. Benner, S.A. Patterns of divergence in homologous proteins as indicators of tertiary and quaternary structure. Adv. Enzyme Regul. 28:219-236, 1989.
6. Rost, B., Sander, C. Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J. Mol. Biol. 232:584-599, 1993.
7. Salamov, A.A., Solovyev, V.V. Prediction of protein secondary structure by combining nearest-meighbour akgorithms amd multiple sequence alignments. J. Mol. Biol. 247:11-15, 1995.
8. Mehta, P.K., Heringa, J., Argos, P. A simple and fast approach to prediction of protein secondary structure from multiply aligned sequences with accuracy above 70%. Protein Sci. 4:2517-2525, 1995.
9. Geourjon, C., Deléage, G. SOPMA: Significant improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by consensus prediction from multiple sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 11:681-684, 1995.
10. Barton, G.J. Protein secondary structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5:372-376, 1995.
11. Benner, S.A., Gerloff, D.L., Jenny, T.F. Predicting protein crystal structures. Science 265:1642-1644, 1994.
12. Lupas, A., Koster, A.J., Walz, J., Baumeister, W. Predicted secondary structure of the 20 S proteasome and model structure of the putative peptide channel. FEBS Lett. 354:45-49, 1994.
13. Barton, G.J., Cohen, P.T.W., Barford, D. Conservation analysis and structure prediction of the protein serine/ threonine phosphatases. Eur. J. Biochem. 220:225-237, 1994.
14. Bork, P., Holm, L., Koonin, E.V., Sander, C. The cytidyltransferase superfamily: Identification of the nucleotide-binding site and fold prediction. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 22:259-266, 1995.
15. Levin, J., Pascarella, S., Argos, P., Garnier, J. Quantification of secondary structure prediction improvement using multiple alignments. Protein Eng. 6:849-854, 1993.
16. Di Francesco, V., Gamier, J., Munson, P.J. Improving protein secondary structure prediction with aligned homologous sequences. Protein Sci. 5:106-113, 1996.
17. Spouge, J.L. Speeding up dynamic programming algorithms for finding optimal lattice model. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 49:1552-1556, 1989.
18. Altschul, S.F., Carroll, R.J., Lipman, D.J. Weights for data related by a tree. J. Mol. Biol. 207:647-653, 1989.
19. Carrillo, H., Lipman, D.J. The multiple sequence alignment problem. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 48:1073-1082, 1988.
20. Gotoh, O. Optimal alignment between groups of sequences and its application to multiple sequence alignment. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 9:361-370, 1993.
21. Hogeweg, P., Hesper, B. The alignment of sets of sequences and the construction of phyletic trees: An integrated method. J. Mol. Evol. 20:175-186, 1984.
22. Johnson, M.S., Doolittle, R.F. A method for the simultaneous alignment of three of more amino acid sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 23:267-278, 1986.
23. Feng, D.-F., Doolittle, R.F. Progressive sequence alignment as a prerequisite to correct phylogenetic trees. J. Mol. Evol. 25:351-360, 1987.
24. Barton, G.J., Sternberg, M.J.E. A strategy for the rapid multiple alignment of protein sequences: Confidence levels from tertiary structure comparisons. J. Mol. Biol. 198:327-337, 1987.
25. Higgins, D.G., Sharp, P.M. CLUSTAL: A package for prerforming multiple sequence alignment on a microcomputer. Gene 73:237-244, 1988.
26. Vingron, M., Argos, P. A fast and sensitive multiple sequence alignment algorithm. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 5:115-121, 1989.
27. Hirosawa, M., Totoki, Y., Hoshida M., Ishikawa M. Comprehensive study on iterative algorithms of multiple sequence alignment. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 11:13-18, 1995.
28. Benner, S.A. Predicting the conformation of proteins from sequences: Progress and future progress. J. Mol. Recogn. 8:9-28, 1995.
29. Gerloff, D.L., Jenny, T.F., Knecht, L.J., Gonnet, G.H., Benner, S.A. The nitrogenase MoFe protein: A secondary structure prediction. FEBS Lett. 318:118-124, 1993.
30. Bernstein, F.C., Koetzle, T.F., Williams, G.J., Meyer, E.F., Brice, M.D., Rodgers, J.R., Kennard, O., Shimanouchi, T., Tasumi, M. The protein data bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112:535-542, 1977.
31. Heringa, J., Sommerfeldt, H., Higgins, D., Argos, P. OBSTRUCT: A program to obtain largest cliques from a protein sequence set according to structural resolution and sequence similarity. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8:599-600, 1992.
32. Bairoch, A., Apweiler, R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its new supplement TREMBL. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:21-25, 1996.
33. Rice, C.M., Fuchs, R., Higgins, D.G., Stoehr, P.J., Cameron, G.N. The EMBL data library. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:2967-2971, 1993.
34. Pearson, W.R., Lipman, D.J. Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:2444-2448, 1988.
35. Altschul, S.F., Boguski, M.S., Gish, W., Wootton, J.C. Issues in searching molecular sequence databases. Nat. Genet. 6:119-129, 1994.
36. Frishman, D., Argos, P. Incorporation of non-local interactions in protein secondary structure prediction from the amino acid sequence. Protein Eng. 9:133-142, 1996.
37. Zhang, X., Mesirov, J.P., Waltz, D.L. Hybrid system for protein secondary structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 225: 1049-1063, 1992.
38. Hutchinson, E.G., Thornton, J.M. Arevised set of poteitials for beta-turn formation in proteins. Protein Sci. 3:2207-2216, 1994.
39. Huang, X., Miller, W. A time-efficient, linear-space local similarity algorithm. Adv. Appl. Math. 12:337-357, 1991.
40. Sander, C., Schneider, R. Database of homology derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 9:56-68, 1991.
41. Nash, J.C. 'Compact Numerical Methods for Computers: Linear Algebra and Function Minimization.' New York: John Wiley, 1979.
42. Kabsch, W., Sander, C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22:2577-2637, 1983.
43. Frishman, D., Argos, P. Knowledge-base protein secondary structure assignment. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 23: 566-579, 1995.
44. Geourjon, C., Deléage, G. SOPM: A self-optimized method for protein secondary structure prediction. Protein Eng. 7:157-164, 1994.
45. Sibbald, P.R., Argos, P. Weighting aligned protein or nucleic acid sequences to correct for unequal representation. J. Mol. Biol. 216:813-818, 1990.
46. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G., Gibson, T.J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680, 1994.
47. Henikoff, S., Henikoff, J.G. Position-based sequence weights. J. Mol. Biol. 243:574-578, 1994.
48. Vogt, G., Etzold, T., Argos, P. An assessment of amino acid exchange matrices in aligning protein sequences: The twilight zone revisited. J. Mol. Biol. 249:816-831, 1995.
49. Russell, R.B., Barton, G.J. The limits of protein secondary structure prediction accuracy from multiple sequence alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 234:951-957, 1993.
50. Pascarella, S., Argos, P. A data bank merging related protein structures and sequences. Protein Eng. 5:121-137, 1992.
51. Niermann, T., Kirschner, K. Use of homologous sequence to improve protein secondary structure prediction. Methods Enzymol. 202:54-59, 1991.
52. Suzuki, M., Yagi, N., Gernstein, M. DNA recognition and superstructure formation by helix-turn-helix proteins. Protein Eng. 8:329-338, 1995.
53. Yuan, H.S., Finkel, S.E., Feng, J.-A., Johnson, R.S., Dickerson, R.E. The molecular structure of wild-type and a mutant FIS protein: Relationship between mutational changes and recombinational enhancer function or DNA binding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:9558-9562, 1991.
54. Matthews, B. Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 405:422-451, 1975.