Ubiquitination-mediated protein degradation and modification: An emerging theme in plant-microbe interactions

Cell Research

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 413-426

  Zeng, Li Rong ^a   Vega Sánchez, Miguel E ^a   Zhu, Tong ^b   Wang, Guo Liang ^a,c  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SYNGENTA BIOTECHNOLOGY INC   (United States)

^c HUNAN AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Defense response; Plant microbe interactions; Spl11; U box protein; Ubiquitination

Indexed keywords

ATP DEPENDENT 26S PROTEASE; PROTEASOME; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; CONFERENCE PAPER; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PLANT; PROTEIN PROCESSING;

MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANTS; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES;

EUKARYOTA;

EID: 33745618707     PISSN: 10010602     EISSN: 17487838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.cr.7310053     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (127)

1. Thordal-Christensen H. Fresh insights into processes of nonhost resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2003; 6:351-357.
2. Dangl JL, Jones DGJ. Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature 2001; 411:826-833.
3. Nürnberger T, Brunner F, Kemmerling B, Piater L. Innate immunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obvious differences. Immunol Rev 2004; 198:249-266.
4. Bonas U, Lahaye T. Plant disease resistance triggered by pathogen-derived molecules: refined models of specific recognition. Curr Opin Microbiol 2002; 5:44-50.
5. Flor HH. Current status of the gene-for-gene concept. Annu Rev Phytopathol 1971; 9:275-296.
6. Heath MC. Hypersensitive response-related death. Plant Mol Biol 2000; 44:321-334.
7. Durrant WE, Dong X. Systemic acquired resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2004; 42:185-209.
8. Van der Hoorn RA, De Wit PJ, Joosten MH. Balancing selection favors guarding resistance proteins. Trends Plant Sci 2002; 7:67-71.
9. Mackey D, Belkhadir Y, Alonso JM, Ecker JR, Dangl JL. Arabidopsis RIN4 is a target of the type III virulence effector AvrRpt2 and modulates RPS2-mediated resistance. Cell 2003; 112:379-389.
10. Schulze-Lefert P, Bieri S. Plant sciences. Recognition at a distance. Science 2005; 308:506-508.
11. Parker JE, Holub EB, Frost LN, et al. Characterization of eds1, a mutation in Arabidopsis suppressing resistance to Peronospora parasitica specified by several different RPP genes. Plant Cell 1996; 8:2033-2046.
12. Shirasu K, Lahaye T, Tan MW, et al. A novel class of eukaryotic zinc-binding proteins is required for disease resistance signaling in barley and development in C. elegans. Cell 1999; 99:355-366.
13. Nimchuk Z, Eulgem T, Holt BF, 3rd, Dangl JL. Recognition and response in the plant immune system. Annu Rev Genet 2003; 37:579-609.
14. Marx J. Ubiquitin lives up to its name. Science 2002; 297:1792-1794.
15. Smalle J, Vierstra RD. The ubiquitin 26s proteasome proteolytic pathway. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2004; 55:555-590.
16. Voges D, Zwickl P, Baumeister W. The 26S proteasome: a molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis. Annu Rev Biochem 1999; 68:1015-1068.
17. Glickman MH, Rubin DM, Fried VA, Finley D. The regulatory particle of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteasome. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18:3149-3162.
18. Ferrell K, Wilkinson CR, Dubiel W, Gordon C. Regulatory subunit interactions of the 26S proteasome, a complex problem. Trends Biochem Sci 2000; 25:83-88.
19. Glickman MH, Raveh D. Proteasome plasticity. FEBS Lett 2005; 579:3214-3223.
20. Hartmann-Petersen R, Seeger M, Gordon C. Transferring substrates to the 26S proteasome. Trends Biochem Sci 2003; 28:26-31.
21. Kraft E, Stone SL, Ma L, et al. Genome Analysis and Functional Characterization of the E2 and RING-Type E3 Ligase Ubiquitination Enzymes of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2005; 139:1597-1611.
22. Vierstra RD. The ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway, the complex last chapter in the life of many plant proteins. Trends Plant Sci 2003; 8:135-142.
23. Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway: on protein death and cell life. EMBO J 1998; 17:7151-7160.
24. Huibregtse JM, Schaffner M, Beaudenon S, Howley PM. A family of proteins structurally and functionally related to the E6-AP ubiquitin-protein ligase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92:2563-2567.
25. Scheffner M, Huibregtse JM, Vierstra RD, Howley PM. The HPV-16 E6 and E6-AP complex functions as a ubiquitin-protein ligase in the ubiquitination of p53. Cell 1993; 75:495-505.
26. Zheng N, Schulman BA, Song L, et al. Structure of the Cul1-Rbx1-Skp1-F boxSkp2 SCF ubiquitin ligase complex. Nature 2002; 416:703-709.
27. Stebbins CE, Kaelin WG, Jr., Pavletich NP. Structure of the VHL-ElonginC-ElonginB complex: implications for VHL tumor suppressor function. Science 1999; 284:455-461.
28. Kurz T, Pintard L, Willis JH, et al. Cytoskeletal regulation by the Nedd8 ubiquitin-like protein modification pathway. Science 2002; 295:1294-1298.
29. Pintard L, Willems A, Peter M. Cullin-based ubiquitin ligases: Cul3-BTB complexes join the family. EMBO J 2004; 23:1681-1687.
30. Gagne JM, Downes BP, Shiu S-H, Durski AM, Vierstra RD. The F-box subunit of the SCF E3 complex is encoded by a diverse superfamily of genes in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:11519-11524.
31. Shen WH, Parmentier Y, Hellmann H, et al. Null mutation of AtCUL1 causes arrest in early embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Mol Biol Cell 2002; 13:1916-1928.
32. Downes BP, Stupar RM, Gingerich DJ, Vierstra RD. The HECT ubiquitin-protein ligase (UPL) family in Arabidopsis: UPL3 has a specific role in trichome development. Plant J 2003; 35:729-742.
33. Stone SL, Hauksdóttir H, Troy A, et al. Functional analysis of the RING-type ubiquitin ligase family of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2005; 137:13-30.
34. Joazeiro CA, Weissman AM. RING finger proteins: mediators of ubiquitin ligase activity. Cell 2000; 102:549-552.
35. Koegl M, Hoppe T, Schlenker S, et al. A novel ubiquitination factor, E4, is involved in multiubiquitin chain assembly. Cell 1999; 96:635-644.
36. Aravind L, Koonin EV. The U box is a modified RING finger - a common domain in ubiquitination. Curr Biol 2000; 10: R132-R134.
37. Ohi MD, Vander Kooi CW, Rosenberg JA, Chazin WJ, Gould KL. Structural insights into the U-box, a domain associated with multi-ubiquitination. Nat Struct Biol 2003; 10:250-255.
38. Boyes DC, Nam J, Dangl JL. The Arabidopsis thaliana RPM1 disease resistance gene product is a peripheral plasma membrane protein that is degraded coincident with the hypersensitive response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:15849-15854.
39. Salinas-Mondragon RE, Garciduenas-Pina C, Guzman P. Early elicitor induction in members of a novel multigene family coding for highly related RING-H2 proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol 1999; 40:579-590.
40. Serrano M, Guzman P. Isolation and gene expression analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana mutants with constitutive expression of ATL2, an early elicitor-response RING-H2 zinc-finger gene. Genetics 2004; 167:919-929.
41. Molnar G, Bancos S, Nagy F, Szekeres M. Characterisation of BRH1, a brassinosteroid-responsive RING-H2 gene from Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 2002; 215:127-133.
42. Takai R, Matsuda N, Nakano A, et al. EL5, a rice N- acetylchitooligosaccharide elicitor-responsive RING-H2 finger protein, is a ubiquitin ligase which functions in vitro in co-operation with an elicitor-responsive ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, OsUBC5b. Plant J 2002; 30:447-455.
43. Takizawa M, Goto A, Watanabe Y. The tobacco ubiquitin-activating enzymes NtE1A and NtE1B are induced by tobacco mosaic virus, wounding and stress hormones. Mol Cells 2005; 19:228-231.
44. Ramonell K, Berrocal-Lobo M, Koh S, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in chitin responsive genes show increased susceptibility to the powdery mildew pathogen Erysiphe cichoracearum. Plant Physiol 2005; 138:1027-1036.
45. Rowland O, Ludwig AA, Merrick CJ, et al. Functional analysis of Avr9/Cf-9 rapidly elicited genes identifies a protein kinase, ACIK1, that is essential for full Cf-9-dependent disease resistance in tomato. Plant Cell 2005; 17:295-310.
46. Sullivan JA, Shirasu K, Deng XW. The diverse roles of ubiquitin and the 26S proteasome in the life of plants. Nat Rev Genet 2003; 4:948-958.
47. Xie DX, Feys BF, James S, Nieto-Rostro M, Turner JG. COI1: an Arabidopsis gene required for jasmonate-regulated defense and fertility. Science 1998; 280:1091-1094.
48. Devoto A, Ellis C, Magusin A, et al. Expression profiling reveals COI1 to be a key regulator of genes involved in wound- and methyl jasmonate-induced secondary metabolism, defence, and hormone interactions. Plant Mol Biol 2005; 58:497-513.
49. Turner JG, Ellis C, Devoto A. The jasmonate signal pathway. Plant Cell 2002; 14 Suppl:S153-S164.
50. McConn M, Creelman RA, Bell E, Mullet JE, Browse J. Jasmonate is essential for insect defense in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94:5473-5477.
51. Thomma B, Eggermont K, Penninckx I, et al. Separate jasmonate-dependent and salicylate-dependent defense-response pathways in Arabidopsis are essential for resistance to distinct microbial pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:15107-15111.
52. Li L, Zhao Y, McCaig BC, et al. The tomato homolog of CORONATINE-INSENSITIVE1 is required for the maternal control of seed maturation, jasmonate-signaled defense responses, and glandular trichome development. Plant Cell 2004; 16:126-143.
53. Ren C, Pan J, Peng W, et al. Point mutations in Arabidopsis Cullinl reveal its essential role in jasmonate response. Plant J 2005; 42:514-524.
54. COI1 ubiquitin-ligase complexes are required for jasmonate response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2002; 14:1919-1935.
55. Devoto A, Nieto-Rostro M, Xie D, et al. COI1 links jasmonate signalling and fertility to the SCF ubiquitin-ligase complex in Arabidopsis. Plant J 2002; 32:457-466.
56. Xiao S, Dai L, Liu F, et al. COS1: an Arabidopsis coronatine insensitive1 suppressor essential for regulation of jasmonate-mediated plant defense and senescence. Plant Cell 2004; 16:1132-1142.
57. Carrozza MJ, Utley RT, Workman JL, Cote J. The diverse functions of histone acetyltransferase complexes. Trends Genet 2003; 19:321-329.
58. Kim HS, Delaney TP. Arabidopsis SON1 is an F-box protein that regulates a novel induced defense response independent of both salicylic acid and systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 2002; 14:1469-1482.
59. Ryals J, Weymann K, Lawton K, et al. The Arabidopsis NIM1 protein shows homology to the mammalian transcription factor inhibitor I kappa B. Plant Cell 1997; 9:425-439.
60. Cao H, Glazebrook J, Clarke JD, Volko S, Dong X. The Arabidopsis NPR1 gene that controls systemic acquired resistance encodes a novel protein containing ankyrin repeats. Cell 1997; 88:57-63.
61. Liu Y, Schiff M, Serino G, Deng XW, Dinesh-Kumar SP. Role of SCF ubiquitin-ligase and the COP9 signalosome in the N gene-mediated resistance response to Tobacco mosaic virus. Plant Cell 2002; 14:1483-1496.
62. Meacham GC, Patterson C, Zhang W, Younger JM, Cyr DM. The Hsc70 co-chaperone CHIP targets immature CFTR for proteasomal degradation. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3:100-105.
63. Stone SL, Anderson EM, Mullen RT, Goring DR. ARC1 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase and promotes the ubiquitination of proteins during the rejection of self-incompatible Brassica pollen. Plant Cell 2003; 15:885-898.
64. Patterson C. A new gun in town: the U box is a ubiquitin ligase domain. Sci STKE 2002:PE4.
65. Azevedo C, Santos-Rosa MJ, Shirasu K. The U-box protein family in plants. Trends Plant Sci 2001; 6:354-358.
66. Kirsch C, Logemann E, Lippok B, Schmelzer E, Hahlbrock K. A highly specific pathogen-responsive promoter element from the immediate-early activated CMPG1 gene in Petroselinum crispum. Plant J 2001; 26:217-227.
67. Heise A, Lippok B, Kirsch C, Hahlbrock K. Two immediate-early pathogen-responsive members of the AtCMPG gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana and the W-box-containing elicitor-response element of AtCMPG1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:9049-9054.
68. Ballinger CA, Connell P, Wu Y, et al. Identification of CHIP, a novel tetratricopeptide repeat-containing protein that interacts with heat shock proteins and negatively regulates chaperone functions. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:4535-4545.
69. Murata S, Minami Y, Minami M, Chiba T, Tanaka K. CHIP is a chaperone-dependent E3 ligase that ubiquitylates unfolded protein. EMBO Rep 2001; 2:1133-1138.
70. Jiang J, Ballinger CA, Wu Y, et al. CHIP is a U-box-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase: identification of Hsc70 as a target for ubiquitylation. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:42938-43944.
71. Li L, Xin H, Xu X, et al. CHIP mediates degradation of Smad proteins and potentially regulates Smad-induced transcription. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:856-864.
72. Huang Z, Nie L, Xu M, Sun X-H. Notch-induced E2A degradation requires CHIP and Hsc70 as novel facilitators of ubiquitination. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:8951-8962.
73. Jiang J, Cyr D, Babbitt RW, Sessa WC, Patterson C. Chaperone-dependent regulation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase intracellular trafficking by the co-chaperone/ubiquitin ligase CHIP. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:49332-49341.
74. Peng HM, Morishima Y, Jenkins GJ, et al. Ubiquitylation of neuronal nitric-oxide synthase by CHIP, a chaperone-dependent E3 ligase. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:52970-52977.
75. Zhang M, Windheim M, Roe SM, et al. Chaperoned ubiquitylation - crystal structures of the CHIP U box E3 ubiquitin ligase and a CHIP-Ubc13-Uev1a complex. Mol Cell 2005; 20:525-538.
76. Yan J, Wang J, Li Q, et al. AtCHIP, a U-box-containing E3 ubiquitin ligase, plays a critical role in temperature stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2003; 132:861-869.
77. Hoisington DA, Neuffer MG, Walbot V. Disease lesion mimics in maize. I. Effect of genetic background, temperature, developmental age, and wounding on necrotic spot formation with Les1. Dev Biol 1982; 93:381-388.
78. Dangl JL, Dietrich RA, Richberg MH. Death don't have no mercy: cell death programs in plant-microbe interactions. Plant Cell 1996; 8:1793-1807.
79. Singh K, Multani DS, Khush GS. A new spotted leaf mutant in rice. Rice Genet Newslet 1995; 12:192-193.
80. Yin Z, Chen J, Zeng L, et al. Characterizing rice lesion mimic mutants and identifying a mutant with broad-spectrum resistance to rice blast and bacterial blight. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2000; 13:869-876.
81. Zhu T, Budworth P, Chen W, et al. Transcriptional control of nutrient partitioning during rice grain filling. Plant Biotech J 2003; 1:59-70.
82. Zeng L, Yin Z, Chen J, Leung H, Wang GL. Fine genetic mapping and physical delimitation of the lesion mimic gene Spl11 to a 160-kb DNA segment of the rice genome. Mol Genet Genomics 2002; 268:253-261.
83. Zeng LR, Qu S, Bordeos A, et al. Spotted leaf11, a negative regulator of plant cell death and defense, encodes a U-box/armadillo repeat protein endowed with E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. Plant Cell 2004; 16:2795-2808.
84. Muratani M, Tansey WP. How the ubiquitin-proteasome system controls transcription. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003; 4:192-201.
85. Gray WM, Hellmann H, Dharmasiri S, Estelle M. Role of the Arabidopsis RING-H2 protein RBX1 in RUB modification and SCF function. Plant Cell 2002; 14:2137-2144.
86. Lyapina S, Cope G, Shevchenko A, et al. Promotion of NEDD-CUL1 conjugate cleavage by COP9 signalosome. Science 2001; 292:1382-1385.
87. Larsen PB, Cancel JD. A recessive mutation in the RUB1-conjugating enzyme, RCE1, reveals a requirement for RUB modification for control of ethylene biosynthesis and proper induction of basic chitinase and PDF1.2 in Arabidopsis. Plant J 2004; 38:626-638.
88. Dharmasiri S, Dharmasiri N, Hellmann H, Estelle M. The RUB/Nedd8 conjugation pathway is required for early development in Arabidopsis. EMBO J 2003; 22:1762-1770.
89. Kepinski S, Leyser O. The Arabidopsis F-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature 2005; 435:446-451.
90. Dharmasiri N, Dharmasiri S, Estelle M. The F-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature 2005; 435:441-445.
91. Ruegger M, Dewey E, Gray WM, et al. The TIR1 protein of Arabidopsis functions in auxin response and is related to human SKP2 and yeast grrlp. Genes Dev 1998; 12:198-207.
92. Austin MJ, Muskett P, Kahn K, et al. Regulatory role of SGT1 in early R gene-mediated plant defenses. Science 2002; 295:2077-2080.
93. Azevedo C, Sadanandom A, Kitagawa K, et al. The RAR1 interactor SGT1, an essential component of R gene-triggered disease resistance. Science 2002; 295:2073-2076.
94. Peart JR, Lu R, Sadanandom A, et al. Ubiquitin ligase-associated protein SGT1 is required for host and nonhost disease resistance in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:10865-10869.
95. Tor M, Gordon P, Cuzick A, et al. Arabidopsis SGT1b is required for defense signaling conferred by several downy mildew resistance genes. Plant Cell 2002; 14:993-1003.
96. Kitagawa K, Skowyra D, Elledge SJ, Harper JW, Hieter P. SGT1 encodes an essential component of the yeast kinetochore assembly pathway and a novel subunit of the SCF ubiquitin ligase complex. Mol Cell 1999; 4:21-33.
97. TIR1-mediated auxin response. Plant Cell 2003; 15:1310-1319.
98. Takahashi A, Casais C, Ichimura K, Shirasu K. HSP90 interacts with RAR1 and SGT1 and is essential for RPS2-mediated disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100:11777-11782.
99. Young JC, Agashe VR, Siegers K, Hartl FU. Pathways of chaperone-mediated protein folding in the cytosol. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004; 5:781-791.
100. Tsan MF, Gao B. Heat shock protein and innate immunity. Cell Mol Immunol 2004; 1:274-279.
101. Pratt WB, Toft DO. Regulation of signaling protein function and trafficking by the hsp90/hsp70-based chaperone machinery. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2003; 228:111-133.
102. Garcia-Ranea JA, Mirey G, Camonis J, Valencia A. p23 and HSP20/alpha-crystallin proteins define a conserved sequence domain present in other eukaryotic protein families. FEBS Lett 2002; 529:162-167.
103. Holt BF, 3rd, Belkhadir Y, Dangl JL. Antagonistic control of disease resistance protein stability in the plant immune system. Science 2005; 309:929-932.
104. Serino G, Deng XW. The COP9 signalosome: regulating plant development through the control of proteolysis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2003; 54:165-182.
105. Wei N, Tsuge T, Serino G, et al. The COP9 complex is conserved between plants and mammals and is related to the 26S proteasome regulatory complex. Curr Biol 1998; 8:919-922.
106. Cope GA, Suh GS, Aravind L, et al. Role of predicted metalloprotease motif of Jab1/Csn5 in cleavage of Nedd8 from Cull. Science 2002; 298:608-611.
107. Zhou C, Wee S, Rhee E, et al. Fission yeast COP9/signalosome suppresses cullin activity through recruitment of the deubiquitylating enzyme Ubp12p. Mol Cell 2003; 11:927-938.
108. Coscoy L, Sanchez DJ, Ganem D. A novel class of herpesvirus-encoded membrane-bound E3 ubiquitin ligases regulates endocytosis of proteins involved in immune recognition. J Cell Biol 2001; 155:1265-1273.
109. Cadwell K, Coscoy L. Ubiquitination on nonlysine residues by a viral E3 ubiquitin ligase. Science 2005; 309:127-130.
110. Imai N, Matsuda N, Tanaka K, et al. Ubiquitin ligase activities of Bombyx mori nucleopolyhedrovirus RING finger proteins. J Virol 2003; 77:923-930.
111. Huang J, Huang Q, Zhou X, et al. The poxvirus p28 virulence factor is an E3 ubiquitin ligase. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:54110-54116.
112. Galan JE, Collmer A. Type III secretion machines: bacterial devices for protein delivery into host cells. Science 1999; 284:1322-1328.
113. Gelvin SB. Agrobacterium and plant genes involved in T-DNA transfer and integration. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 2000; 51:223-256.
114. Ziemienowicz A, Merkle T, Schoumacher F, Hohn B, Rossi L. Import of Agrobacterium T-DNA into plant nuclei: two distinct functions of VirD2 and VirE2 proteins. Plant Cell 2001; 13:369-383.
115. Tzfira T, Vaidya M, Citovsky V. VIP1, an Arabidopsis protein that interacts with Agrobacterium VirE2, is involved in VirE2 nuclear import and Agrobacterium infectivity. EMBO J 2001; 20:3596-3607.
116. Tzfira T, Vaidya M, Citovsky V. Involvement of targeted proteolysis in plant genetic transformation by Agrobacterium. Nature 2004; 431:87-92.
117. Janjusevic R, Abramovitch RB, Martin GB, Stebbins CE. A bacterial inhibitor of host programmed cell death defenses is an E3 ubiquitin ligase. Science 2006; 311:222-226.
118. Lee JC, Peter ME. Regulation of apoptosis by ubiquitination. Immunol Rev 2003; 193:39-47.
119. Schnell JD, Hicke L. Non-traditional functions of ubiquitin and ubiquitin-binding proteins. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:35857-35860.
120. Durrant WE, Rowland O, Piedras P, Hammond-Kosack KE, Jones JDG. cDNA-AFLP reveals a striking overlap in race-specific resistance and wound response gene expression profiles. Plant Cell 2000; 12:963-977.
121. Vijayan P, Shockey J, Levesque CA, Cook RJ, Browse J. A role for jasmonate in pathogen defense of arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95:7209-7214.
122. Banzai T, Hershkovits G, Katcoff DJ, et al. Identification and characterization of mRNA transcripts differentially expressed in response to high salinity by means of differential display in the mangrove, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza. Plant Sci 2002; 162:499-505.
123. Gidekel M, Destefano-Beltran L, Garcia P, et al. Identification and characterization of three novel cold acclimation-responsive genes from the extremophile hair grass Deschampsia antarctica Desv. Extremophiles 2003; 7:459-469.
124. Lee H, Xiong L, Gong Z, et al. The Arabidopsis HOS1 gene negatively regulates cold signal transduction and encodes a RING finger protein that displays cold-regulated nucleo - cytoplasmic partitioning. Genes Dev 2001; 15:912-924.
125. Feussner K, Feussner I, Leopold I, Wasternack C. Isolation of a cDNA coding for an ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBC1 of tomato - the first stress-induced UBC of higher plants. FEBS Lett 1997; 409:211-215.
126. Woo HR, Kim JH, Nam HG, Lim PO. The delayed leaf senescence mutants of Arabidopsis, ore1, ore3, and ore9 are tolerant to oxidative stress. Plant Cell Physiol 2004; 45:923-932.
127. Tang D, Christiansen KM, Innes RW. Regulation of plant disease resistance, stress responses, cell death, and ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis by the EDR1 protein kinase. Plant Physiol 2005; 138:1018-1026.